Assignment in Insurance Policy | Meaning | Explanation | Types
Table of Contents
- 1 What is Assignment in an Insurance Policy?
- 2 Who can make an assignment?
- 3 What happens to the ownership of the policy upon Assignment?
- 4 Can assignment be changed or cancelled?
- 5 What happens if the assignment dies?
- 6 What is the procedure to make an assignment?
- 7 Is it necessary to Inform the insurer about assignment?
- 8 Can a policy be assigned to a minor person?
- 9 Who pays premium when a policy is assigned?
- 10.1 1. Conditional Assignment
- 10.2 2. Absolute Assignment
![](http://charunivedita.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
What is Assignment in an Insurance Policy?
Assignment means a complete transfer of the ownership of the policy to some other person. Usually assignment is done for the purpose of raising a loan from a bank or a financial institution .
![assignment in insurance section Assignment in Insurance Policy - Meaning, Explanation, Types](https://accountlearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Assignment-in-Insurance-Policy-Meaning-Explanation-Types.jpg)
Assignment is governed by Section 38 of the Insurance Act 1938 in India. Assignment can also be done in favour of a close relative when the policyholder wishes to give a gift to that relative. Such an assignment is done for “natural love and affection”. An example, a policyholder may assign his policy to his sister who is handicapped.
Who can make an assignment?
A policyholder who has policy on his own life can assign the policy to another person. However, a person to whom a policy has been assigned can reassign the policy to the policyholder or assign it to any other person. A nominee cannot make an assignment of the policy. Similarly, an assignee cannot make a nomination on the policy which is assigned to him.
What happens to the ownership of the policy upon Assignment?
When a policyholder assign a policy, he loses all control on the policy. It is no longer his property. It is now the assignee’s property whether the policyholder is alive or dead, the assignee alone will get the policy money from the insurance company.
If the assignee dies, then his (assignee’s) legal heirs will be entitled to the policy money.
Can assignment be changed or cancelled?
An assignment cannot be changed or cancelled. The assignee can of course, reassign the policy to the policyholder who assigned it to him. He can also assign the policy to any other person because it is now his property. We can think of a bank reassigning the policy to the policyholder when their loan is repaid.
What happens if the assignment dies?
If the assignee dies, the assignment does not get cancelled. The legal heirs of the assignee become entitled to the policy money. Assignment is a legal transfer of all the interests the policyholder has in the policy to the assignee.
What is the procedure to make an assignment?
Assignment can be made only after issue of the policy bond. The policyholder can either write out the wording on the policy bond (endorsement) or write it on a separate paper and get it stamped. (Stamp value is the same, as the stamp required for the policy — Twenty paise per one thousand sum assured). When assignment is made by an endorsement on the policy bond, there is no need for stamp because the policy is already stamped.
Is it necessary to Inform the insurer about assignment?
Yes, it is necessary to give information about assignment to the insurance company. The insurer will register the assignment in its records and from then on recognize the assignee as the owner of the policy. If someone has made more than one assignment, then the date of the notice will decide which assignment has priority. In the case of reassignment also, notice is necessary.
Can a policy be assigned to a minor person?
Assignment can be made in favour of a minor person. But it would be advisable to appoint a guardian to receive the policy money if it becomes due during the minority of the assignee.
Who pays premium when a policy is assigned?
When a policy is assigned normally, the assignee should pay the premium, because the policy is now his property. In practice, however, premium is paid by the assignor (policyholder) himself. When a bank gives a loan and takes the assignment of a policy a security, it will ask the assignor himself to pay the premium and keep it in force. In the case of an assignment as a gift, the assignor would like to pay the premium because he has gifted the policy.
Types of assignment
Assignment may take two forms:
- Conditional Assignment.
- Absolute Assignment.
1. Conditional Assignment
It would be useful where the policyholder desires the benefit of the policy to go to a near relative in the event of his earlier death. It is usually effected for consideration of natural love and affection. It generally provides for the right to revert the policyholder in the event of the assignee predeceasing the policyholder or the policyholder surviving to the date of maturity.
2. Absolute Assignment
This assignment is generally made for valuable consideration. It has the effect of passing the title in the policy absolutely to the assignee and the policyholder in no way retains any interest in the policy. The absolute assignee can deal with the policy in any manner he likes and may assign or transfer his interest to another person.
Related Posts
![assignment in insurance section Characteristic features of an insurance contract](https://accountlearning.com/wp-content/themes/point/images/smallthumb.png)
Can a policy be assigned during the minority of the life assured?
Can a general insurance policy(say fire/motor) under agreed bank clause should be assigned as the stock/motor is hypo/mortgaged to a bank
![assignment in insurance section Accountlearning | Contents for Management Studies |](https://accountlearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/cropped-AccountlearningMain.png)
- Privacy Policy
- MyNewMarkets.com
- Claims Journal
- Insurance Journal TV
- Academy of Insurance
- Carrier Management
![assignment in insurance section Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News](https://www.insurancejournal.com/img/insurance-journal-logo-680.png)
Featured Stories
- Uber Hit by Record $324M Fine for Data Transfers
- Root, Goosehead Partner on Tech Integration
Current Magazine
![assignment in insurance section current magazine](https://d6zxf491dr98g.cloudfront.net/img/magazines/120/ije_20240819.png)
- Read Online
Post-Loss Assignments of Claims Under Insurance Policies
In the settlement of lawsuits involving insured claims, it is not uncommon that one condition of the settlement is that the defendant assign his or her claims under all applicable insurance policies to the party that filed suit.
Indeed, it is frequently the case that the defendant, particularly when the defendant is an individual, has a limited ability to pay a judgment and insurance coverage offers the best opportunity for a recovery by the suing party. Usually, such settlements are made without any serious thought being given to whether the defendant’s claim against its insurer is assignable; the assumption being that it is assignable.
However, insurance policies generally have anti-assignment clauses which prohibit the assignment of the policy, or an interest in the policy, without the insurer’s consent. These clauses come into play in determining the validity or enforceability of the assignment of a claim under an insurance policy and should be considered when such an assignment is part of a settlement.
When considering the enforceability of anti-assignment clauses in insurance policies, the courts generally draw a distinction between an assignment made prior to the occurrence of a covered loss (a “pre-loss” assignment) and an assignment made after the occurrence of a covered loss (a “post-loss” assignment).
In analyzing pre-loss assignments, the courts recognize that requiring an insurer to provide coverage to an assignee of its policy prior to the occurrence of a covered loss would place the insurer in the position of covering a party with whom it had not contracted nor been allowed to properly underwrite to assess the risks posed by that potential insured, and, accordingly, determine the appropriate premium to charge for the risks being undertaken or choose to decline coverage.
Post-loss assignments, on the other hand, take place after the insurer’s obligations under its policy have become fixed by the occurrence of a covered loss, thus the risk factors applicable to the assignee are irrelevant with regard to the covered loss in question. For these reasons, the majority of the courts enforce anti-assignment clauses to prohibit or restrict pre-loss assignments, but refuse to enforce anti-assignment clauses to prohibit or restrict post-loss assignments.
Katrina Cases
The Louisiana Supreme Court, which had not previously addressed the enforceability of anti-assignment clauses for post-loss assignments, was recently confronted with this issue in the In re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, litigation involving consolidated cases arising out of Hurricane Katrina. The issue arose as a result of a lawsuit brought by the State of Louisiana as the assignee of claims under numerous insurance policies as part of the “Road Home” Program. The Road Home Program was set up following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita to distribute federal funds to homeowners suffering damage from the hurricanes. In return for receiving a grant of up to $150,000, homeowners were required to execute a Limited Subrogation/Assignment agreement, which provided in pertinent part:
Pursuant to these Limited Subrogation/Assignments, the State of Louisiana brought suit against more than 200 insurance companies to recover funds dispensed under the Road Home Program. The suit was removed to Federal Court under the Class Action Fairness Act and the insurers filed motions to dismiss, arguing that the assignments to the State of Louisiana were invalid under the anti-assignment clauses in the homeowner policies at issue.
On appeal, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals certified the following question to the Louisiana Supreme Court: “Does an anti-assignment clause in a homeowner’s insurance policy, which by its plain terms purports to bar any assignment of the policy or an interest therein without the insurer’s consent, bar an insured’s post-loss assignment of the insured’s claims under the policy when such an assignment transfers contractual obligations, not just the right to money due?”
In answering this question, the Louisiana Supreme Court began by noting that, as a general matter, contractual rights are assignable unless the law, the contract terms or the nature of the contract preclude assignment. Specific to the certified question, Louisiana Civil Code article 2653 provides that a right “cannot be assigned when the contract from which it arises prohibits the assignment of that right.” The Louisiana Supreme Court observed that the language of article 2653 is broad and, on its face, applies to all assignments, including post-loss assignments of insurance claims. The Court, therefore, construed the issue confronting it as whether Louisiana public policy would enforce an anti-assignment clause to preclude post-loss assignments of claims under insurance policies.
In addressing the public policy question, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized the distinction between pre-loss assignments and post-loss assignments discussed by courts from other states and noted that the prevailing view was that anti-assignment clauses were invalid and/or unenforceable when applied to post-loss assignments. Notwithstanding this weight of authority, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated:
“[W]hile the Louisiana legislature has clearly indicated an intent to allow parties freedom to assign contractual rights, by enacting La. C.C. art. 2653, it has also clearly indicated an intent to allow parties freedom to contractually prohibit assignment of rights. We recognize the vast amount of national jurisprudence distinguishing between pre-loss and post-loss assignments and rejecting restrictions on post-loss assignments, however we find no public policy in Louisiana favoring assignability of claims over freedom of contract.”
Thus, Court refused to invalidate the enforceability of the anti-assignment clauses to the post-loss assignments before it based on public policy, adding that public policy determinations are better suited to the legislature.
Nonetheless, after having recognized the general enforceability of anti-assignment clauses to post-loss assignments, the Court immediately placed limits on when those clauses would be applicable, stating that to be applicable, they “must clearly and unambiguously express that the non-assignment clause applies to post-loss assignments.” The Court refused “to formulate a test consisting of specific terms or words,” which would satisfy this condition and remanded the case to the federal courts to determine whether the individual anti-assignment clauses in the various policies were sufficiently clear and explicit to be enforced with respect to post-loss assignments at issue.
A Broad Application
It should be noted that the Court’s opinion appears to apply broadly to all post-loss assignments irrespective of what specific rights are being assigned, despite the fact that the certified question was narrower and asked only about the applicability of a post-loss assignment where the assignment “transfers contractual obligations, not just the right to money due.”
In a footnote at the beginning of its opinion, the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that in certifying the question to it, the Fifth Circuit “disclaimed any intent” that the Court “confine its reply to the precise form or scope of the legal questions certified.” The footnote indicates that the Court’s opinion was not intended to be limited to only those post-loss assignments involving the assignment of contractual obligations.
Louisiana has departed from the majority view in holding that as a matter of general law, anti-assignment clauses are not inherently void with regard to post-loss assignments. However, it may be that in practical application, the results of individual cases may well be consistent with the majority rule of not enforcing anti-assignment clauses with regard to post-loss assignments because Louisiana courts may be reluctant to find that the anti-assignment clauses are sufficiently “clear and explicit” unless they specifically state that they apply to post-loss assignments, notwithstanding the Louisiana Supreme Court’s unwillingness to “formulate a test consisting of specific terms or words.”
Topics Lawsuits Carriers Profit Loss Claims Louisiana Hurricane Homeowners
Was this article valuable?
Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.
Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
![assignment in insurance section](https://www.insurancejournal.com/app/uploads/2024/08/car-shopping-Bloomberg-150x150.jpg)
Written By Robert Redfearn, Jr.
From this issue.
![assignment in insurance section Insurance Journal Magazine July 18, 2011](https://d6zxf491dr98g.cloudfront.net/img/magazines/135/ijc_20110718.jpg)
Excess, Surplus & Specialty Markets Directory Vol. II – The Industry’s Leading Coverage Placement Directory
Interested in carriers .
Get automatic alerts for this topic.
- Categories: Legal Beat
- Have a hot lead? Email us at [email protected]
Insurance Jobs
- Pension Outsourcing Senior Associate - Dallas, TX
- Attorney Sr. Consultant II (Remote- ORLANDO) - Florida, FL
- Vendor Placement Associate – Provider Network Specialist - Chicago, IL
- L&R-Client Legal Svc Attorney-Exp - Michigan, MI
- Sales Lead, Risk Software - New York, NY
![assignment in insurance section MyNewMarkets](https://www.insurancejournal.com/img/blocks/mynewmarkets-logo-220x38.png)
- Condos: A Difficult Market to Navigate
- Inflation, the Economy and Workers’ Comp: A Positive Outlook
- Umbrella Liability: The Triple Upsell Possibility for Personal Lines Clients
- Where the AI Risks Are: Swiss Re's Top 10 Ranking by Industry
- How to Succeed in the Entertainment Insurance Business: Get creative producing with a small cast of underwriters and limited capacity.
![assignment in insurance section Claims Journal](https://www.insurancejournal.com/img/blocks/claimsjournal-logo-220x38.png)
- The Murdaugh Drama Continues: Store That Sold Beer Now Suing its Insurers
- U.S. P/C Insurance Industry Posts First H1 Underwriting Profit Since 2021
- Southern California Edison Seeks to Recover $1.6B of Wildfire-Related Losses
- Typhoon Shanshan Churns Over Japan, Dumping Heavy Rain
- Game Theory and Worker's Comp: Understanding Stakeholder Frictional Maps
![assignment in insurance section Academy of Insurance education](https://www.insurancejournal.com/img/blocks/ijacademy-logo-220x38.png)
- August 22 HO-14: More Than a Mature HO-4
![assignment in insurance section](https://oneclaimsolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/1041689-300x300.png)
Assignment of Benefits vs Direction to Pay vs Assignment of Policy
![assignment in insurance section direction to pay](https://www.oneclaimsolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/istockphoto-1134367625-612x612-1.jpg)
Assignment of Benefits vs. Assignment of Policy
Assignment of Benefits forms, also known as AOBs, play a crucial role in the restoration industry’s contractor-client dynamics. These legal documents empower policyholders to transfer their insurance policy benefits to a third party, effectively connecting their restoration contractor directly to their insurance company. By doing so, policyholders can bypass many of the complications and anxieties typically associated with a restoration project, streamlining the process.
According to Josh Ehmke, Co-owner and General Consult at One Claim Solution , there’s a common misunderstanding between assignment of benefits and assignment of policy. An assignment of policy refers to the transfer of the benefits and rights of an insurance policy from one party (the policyholder) to another party (the assignee).
“An assignment of policy is never going to be valid. In fact, I haven’t come across a state that allows an assignment of an insurance policy without the insurance company’s prior written consent,” Josh said. “The reason it’s not allowed is because it’s against public policy. It increases the insurance risk substantially.”
For example, a policyholder might have a history of filing numerous claims against their insurance provider, suggesting a pattern that they might be well-versed in exploiting certain loopholes and taking advantage of insurance companies. Additionally, there are concerns that they may not adequately maintain or safeguard their property, leading to an increased risk for the insurance company.
“That is absolutely different from an assignment of benefits, which grants the rights the policyholder had to the payment under the policy to be transferred to the assignee,” Josh said. ”The only prerequisite for an assignment of benefits other than having a covered claim, is that the loss has already occurred. If you get an assignment of benefits before the loss occurs, that’s essentially a transfer of a policy.”
OCS recently encountered a case where the question arose regarding the scope of an assignment of benefits. Specifically, the issue was whether only the rights of the policyholder are transferred, or if the policyholder’s obligations are also transferred alongside the benefits under the assignment.
“By taking the assignment, the contractor doesn’t assume the policyholder’s obligations under that policy,” Josh said. “It’s very important to word your assignment of benefits appropriately to clearly state that you’re not agreeing to assume any of those policy obligations, and to specify which rights you want.”
Direction to Pay vs. Assignment of Benefits
Direction to pay (DTP) is a financial arrangement where the policyholder, who is entitled to receive an insurance claim payment, instructs the insurance company to pay the claim proceeds directly to a third party. This third party could be a vendor, contractor, service provider, or any other entity to whom the policyholder owes a debt or has entered into an agreement.
“The issue with direction to pay is that the carrier doesn’t have to honor it because it’s not enforceable,” Josh said. “It’s very limited in what it can do, whereas an assignment of benefits is much more powerful because it obligates the insurance company legally to pay you.”
According to Josh, DTP’s are rarely used, except in states like Texas and Florida where AOBs are detrimental to contractors or illegal.
“A DTP is better than nothing and allows you to at least show the carrier that the homeowner granted approval to request payment,” Josh said. “But outside of those situations, the direction to pay in my mind is worthless. When you can have an assignment of benefits, there’s no reason to have a direction to pay at all.”
A Final Word
Understanding the differences between an AOB, Assignment of Policy, and DTP is crucial because each term represents distinct legal and financial arrangements that can significantly impact insurance claims and policyholder rights. To learn more about the value of assignment of benefits in helping you navigate the restoration process, be sure to subscribe to our newsletter .
![assignment in insurance section](https://www.oneclaimsolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/ocs-logo-white.png)
(602) 491-2588
335 E Germann Rd #340 Gilbert, AZ 85297
WHO WE SERVE
Partner With Us
PRIVACY POLICY
All rights reserved. Copyright © 2024.
Connor Trahan
Account executive.
Hi there! I’m Connor, the Account Executive for One Claim. My goal is to guide our contractors through the sales process, ensuring you’re equipped with all the information you need to make your decision and hit the ground running once aboard. We view ourselves as an extension of your business and I strive to make the process an enlightening and consultative one. My career has primarily been focused in software sales over a few different industries but the last few years were spent helping general contractors solve similar problems to what we’re doing here at OCS! Outside of work, I love spending time with my family, cooking and boating during the summer months.
Nicole Liesenfelt
Director, human resources.
Hello! I’m Nicole, and I’m here to champion for our employees, recruit for new talent, and impact culture at One Claim Solution. I find satisfaction in supporting a memorable employee experience and bring innovation, problem solving, and strategic view to the process. Nothing is more important than our people, and a healthy culture is my top priority! I have had the pleasure of building my career in various sectors, specializing in small to medium size firms focused on high-growth. My experience is centered around driving and implementing change, leading high-performing teams, and driving process improvements. I am excited to make an impact at One Claim. Outside of work, my family and I enjoy getting outdoors as much as possible to explore beautiful Colorado!
Elizabeth McGlone
Demand generation manager.
Great to meet you! I’m Elizabeth, and I’m the one behind all the emails and advertisements you’ve been seeing. As the Demand Generation Manager at One Claim Solution, my mission is to connect with contractors like you who need our services. I’m passionate about having an impact on others and I bring a wealth of experience in demand generation and marketing strategy to create moments of delight, curiosity, and education for you.
Prior to One Claim Solution, I had the privilege of building marketing departments from the ground up at companies in a variety of industries, including IT consulting, first protection, and healthcare. Personally, I love being outdoors, playing Dungeons and Dragons and board games, singing, and traveling.
Alisha Yartzoff
Director of contractor success.
Welcome! I’m Alisha, and I’m here to champion your success as the Director of Contractor Success at One Claim. With a passion for helping contractors thrive, I bring a wealth of experience in onboarding, customer service, and account management to ensure your journey with us is nothing short of exceptional.
Prior to joining One Claim, I had the privilege of scaling SMB and Enterprise Customer Success teams at fast-growing SaaS startups. With over six years of experience at companies like Mavenlink, Teamwork, and ServiceTitan, I honed my expertise in building high-performing teams and fostering proactive, consultative relationships. This background has equipped me with a deep understanding of the challenges faced by businesses like yours, and I’m dedicated to helping you overcome them.
Hi there, my name is Eric! I am the Chief Technology Officer here at OCS, spearheading our technical strategy. I have a background in computer science, graduating cum laude from BYU-Idaho with a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Information Technology.
Before coming to One Claim, I served as the Director of Engineering at Slingshot Technology, Inc., a company later acquired by WorkWave in 2021. My professional journey has spanned both emerging startups and established corporations, with a steadfast focus on cultivating high-trust, low bureaucracy teams and innovating technology using agile methodologies.
In my free time, you can find me flying drones, enjoying the outdoors, and spending time with my family.
Hello, my name is Cam, I’m the COO of One Claim Solution! I come from a management consulting background (Bain & Company) and hold an MBA from the University of Michigan. I have worked at a wide variety of organizations, from Fortune 500 to small-cap, in an equally wide variety of industries. I have over 15 years of experience in operations and strategic growth, and I have spent much of my career focused on developing high-performing tech-enabled service organizations through early stage and high growth phases.
Outside of work, my wife Brittny and I have four kids, ages 13 to 6. As residents of Mesa, Arizona, we love to ski and explore the national parks of the southwest!
Hello, my name is Dan, and I am the CEO of One Claim Solution. I am super excited by everything we are doing at OCS to be the market leading insurance billing specialist that advocates on behalf of our restoration contractors.
My professional experiences are predominantly corporate in nature. My career started at General Electric in finance and accounting. Immediately prior to joining OCS, I spent time as an investor at Bondcliff Partners and management consultant with Bain & Company. I also hold an MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University and got my BS in finance and accounting from Northeastern University.
Outside of the office, I enjoy spending time with my wife, two young children, and our family dog, Whiskey. We live in Charleston, SC and take advantage of the beautiful weather by spending as much time as possible outside at the beach or adventuring around town
Co-Founder and General Counsel
Hi, I’m Josh! In 2016, I co-founded One Claim Solution with my partner Jeremy Traasdahl, and I serve as General Counsel of One Claim Solution. Working in the restoration industry, Jeremy and I saw contractors struggling to get paid quickly and fairly and we knew there was a need for change. We founded One Claim Solution to be this change and it’s been my privilege to see our company grow and to advocate for our clients as general counsel.
Outside of my passion for helping the restoration industry, I enjoy spending time outdoors, fly-fishing, hunting, skiing, and coaching my kids’ baseball teams. I’ve been married to my amazing wife for 20 years and we have a beautiful family of 5 children.
Jeremy Traasdahl
Hey, I’m Jeremy! In 2016, I co-founded One Claim Solution with my partner Josh Ehmke. Working in the restoration industry, Josh and I saw contractors struggling to get paid quickly and fairly and we knew there was a need for change. We founded One Claim Solution to be this change and it’s been my privilege to lead our amazing team.
Prior to One Claim Solution, I started my career as an inside sales rep for Avnet, then moved to Pepsico as a district sales manager. Outside of work, I love spending time with my wife and four children, two boys and two girls!
![assignment in insurance section Academike](https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cropped-Artboard-4-copy@2x-8-1-1.png)
Assignment under Insurance Policies
By J Mandakini, NUALS
Editor’s Note: This paper attempts to explore the concept of assignment under Indian law especially Contract Act, Insurance Act and Transfer of Property Act. It seeks to appreciate why the assignment is made use of for securities of a facility sanctioned by ICICI Bank. Also, it explains how ICICI Bank faces certain problems in executing the same.
INTRODUCTION
For any facility sanctioned by a lender, collateral is always deposited to secure the same. Such mere deposition will not suffice, the borrower has to explicitly permit the lender to recover from the borrower, such securities in case of his default.
This is done by the concept of assignment, dealt with adequately in Indian law. Assignment of obligations is always a tricky matter and needs to be dealt with carefully. The Bank should not fall short of any legally permitted lengths to ensure the same. This is why ambiguity in its security documents have to be rectified.
This paper attempts to explore the concept of assignment in contract law. It seeks to appreciate why the assignment is made use of for securities of a facility sanctioned by ICICI Bank. The next section will deal with how ICICI Bank faces certain problems in executing the same. The following sections will talk about possible risks involved, as well as defenses and solutions to the same.
WHAT IS ASSIGNMENT?
Assignment refers to the transfer of certain or all (depending on the agreement) rights to another party. The party which transfers its rights is called an assignor, and the party to whom such rights are transferred is called an assignee. Assignment only takes place after the original contract has been made. As a general rule, assignment of rights and benefits under a contract may be done freely, but the assignment of liabilities and obligations may not be done without the consent of the original contracting party.
The liability on a contract cannot be transferred so as to discharge the person or estate of the original contractor unless the creditor agrees to accept the liability of another person instead of the first. [i]
Illustration
P agrees to sell his car to Q for Rs. 100. P assigns the right to receive the Rs. 100 to S. This may be done without the consent of Q. This is because Q is receiving his car, and it does not particularly matter to him, to whom the Rs. 100 is being handed as long as he is being absolved of his liability under the contract. However, notice may still be required to be given. Without such notice, Q would pay P, in spite of the fact that such right has been assigned to S. S would be a sufferer in such case.
In this case, that condition is being fulfilled since P has assigned his right to S. However, P may not assign S to be the seller. P cannot just transfer his duties under the contract to another. This is because Q has no guarantee as to the condition of S’s car. P entered into the contract with Q on the basis of the merits of P’s car, or any other personal qualifications of P. Such assignment may be done with the consent of all three parties – P, Q, S, and by doing this, P is absolved of his liabilities under the contract.
1.1. Effect of Assignment
Immediately on the execution of an assignment of an insurance policy, the assignor forgoes all his rights, title and interest in the policy to the assignee. The premium or loan interest notices etc. in such cases will be sent to the assignee. [ii] However, the existence of obligations must not be assumed, when it comes to the assignment. It must be accompanied by evidence of the same. The party asserting such a personal obligation must prove the existence of an express assumption by clear and unequivocal proof. [iii]
![assignment in insurance section assignment in insurance section](https://www.lawctopus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/crack-the-clat-pg-exam-side-banner-mobile-2023-09-v2.webp)
Assignment of a contract to a third party destroys the privity of contract between the initial contracting parties. New privity is created between the assignee and the original contracting party. In the illustration mentioned above, the original contracting parties were P and Q. After the assignment, the new contracting parties are Q and S.
1.2. Revocation of Assignment
Assignment, once validly executed, can neither be revoked nor canceled at the option of the assignor. To do so, the insurance policy will have to be reassigned to the original assignor (the insured).
1.3. Exceptions to Assignment
There are some instances where the contract cannot be assigned to another.
- Express provisions in the contract as to its non-assignability – Some contracts may include a specific clause prohibiting assignment. If that is so, then such a contract cannot be assigned. Assignability is the rule and the contrary is an exception. [iv]
Pensions, PFs, military benefits etc. Illustration
1.4. enforcing a contract of assignment.
From the day on which notice is given to the insurer, the assignee becomes the beneficiary of the policy even though the assignment is not registered immediately. It does not wait until the giving of notice of the transfer to the insurer. [vi] However, no claims may lie against the insurer until and unless notice of such assignment is delivered to the insurer.
If notice of assignment is not provided to the obligor, he is discharged if he pays to the assignor. Assignee would have to recover from the assignor. However, if the obligor pays the assignor in spite of the notice provided to him, he would still be liable to the assignee.
The following two illustrations make the point amply clear:
Illustrations
1. Seller A assigns its right to payment from buyer X to bank B. Neither A nor B gives notice to X. When payment is due, X pays A. This payment is fully valid and X is discharged. It will be up to B to recover it from A
2. Seller A assigns to bank B its right to payment from buyer X. B immediately gives notice of the assignment to X. When payment is due, X still pays A. X is not discharged and B is entitled to oblige X to pay a second time.
An assignee doesn’t stand in better shoes than those of his assignor. Thus, if there is any breach of contract by the obligor to the assignee, the latter can recover from the former only the same amount as restricted by counter claims, set offs or liens of the assignor to the obligor.
The acknowledgment of notice of assignment is conclusive proof of, and evidence enough to entertain a suit against an assignor and the insurer respectively who haven’t honoured the contract of assignment.
1.5. Assignment under various laws in India
There is no separate law in India which deals with the concept of assignment. Instead, several laws have codified it under different laws. Some of them have been discussed as follows:
1.5.1. Under the Indian Contract Act
There is no express provision for the assignment of contracts under the Indian Contract Act. Section 37 of the Act provides for the duty of parties of a contract to honour such contract (unless the need for the same has been done away with). This is how the Act attempts to introduce the concept of assignment into Indian commercial law. It lays down a general responsibility on the “representatives” of any parties to a contract that may have expired before the completion of the contract. (Illustrations to Section 37 in the Act).
An exception to this may be found from the contract, e.g. contracts of a personal nature. Representatives of a deceased party to a contract cannot claim privity to that contract while refusing to honour such contract. Under this Section, “representatives” would also include within its ambit, transferees and assignees. [vii]
Section 41 of the Indian Contract Act applies to cases where a contract is performed by a third party and not the original parties to the contract. It applies to cases of assignment. [viii] A promisee accepting performance of the promise from a third person cannot afterwards enforce it against the promisor. [ix] He cannot attain double satisfaction of its claim, i.e., from the promisor as well as the third party which performed the contract. An essential condition for the invocation of this Section is that there must be actual performance of the contract and not of a substituted promise.
1.5.2. Under the Insurance Act
The creation of assignment of life insurance policies is provided for, under Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938.
- When the insurer receives the endorsement or notice, the fact of assignment shall be recorded with all details (date of receipt of notice – also used to prioritise simultaneous claims, the name of assignee etc). Upon request, and for a fee of an amount not exceeding Re. 1, the insurer shall grant a written acknowledgment of the receipt of such assignment, thereby conclusively proving the fact of his receipt of the notice or endorsement. Now, the insurer shall recognize only the assignee as the legally valid party entitled to the insurance policy.
1.5.3. Under the Transfer of Property Act
Indian law as to assignment of life policies before the Insurance Act, 1938 was governed by Sections 130, 131, 132 and 135 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 under Chapter VIII of the Act – Of Transfers of Actionable Claims. Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act states that nothing contained in that Section is to affect Section 38 of the Insurance Act.
I) Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act
An actionable claim may be transferred only by fulfilling the following steps:
- Signed by a transferor (or his authorized agent)
The transfer will be complete and effectual as soon as such an instrument is executed. No particular form or language has been prescribed for the transfer. It does not depend on giving notice to the debtor.
The proviso in the section protects a debtor (or other person), who, without knowledge of the transfer pays his creditor instead of the assignee. As long as such payment was without knowledge of the transfer, such payment will be a valid discharge against the transferee. When the transfer of any actionable claim is validly complete, all rights and remedies of transferor would vest now in the transferee. Existence of an instrument in writing is a sine qua non of a valid transfer of an actionable claim. [x]
II) Section 131 of the Transfer Of Property Act
This Section requires the notice of transfer of actionable claim, as sent to the debtor, to be signed by the transferor (or by his authorized agent), and if he refuses to sign it, a signature by the transferee (or by his authorized agent). Such notice must state both the name and address of the transferee. This Section is intended to protect the transferee, to receive from the debtor. The transfer does not bind a debtor unless the transferor (or transferee, if transferor refuses) sends him an express notice, in accordance with the provisions of this Section.
III) Section 132 of the Transfer Of Property Act
This Section addresses the issue as to who should undertake the obligations under the transfer, i.e., who will discharge the liabilities of the transferor when the transfer has been made complete – would it be the transferor himself or the transferee, to whom the rest of the surviving contract, so to speak, has been transferred.
This Section stipulates, that the transferee himself would fulfill such obligations. However, where an actionable claim is transferred with the stipulation in the contract that transferor himself should discharge the liability, then such a provision in the contract will supersede Ss 130 and 132 of this Act. Where the insured hypothecates his life insurance policies and stipulates that he himself would pay the premiums, the transferee is not bound to pay the premiums. [xi]
FACILITIES SECURED BY INSURANCE POLICIES – HOW ASSIGNMENT COMES INTO THE PICTURE
Many banks require the borrower to take out or deposit an insurance policy as security when they request a personal loan or a business loan from that institution. The policy is used as a way of securing the loan, ensuring that the bank will have the facility repaid in the event of either the borrower’s death or his deviations from the terms of the facility agreement.
Along with the deposit of the insurance policy, the policyholder will also have to assign the benefits of the policy to the financial institution from which he proposes to avail a facility. The mere deposit, without writing, or passing of any document of title to such a claim, does not create any equitable charge. [xii]
ETHICS OF ASSIGNING LIFE INSURANCE POLICY TO LENDERS
The purpose of taking out a life insurance policy on oneself, is that in the event of an untimely death, near and dear ones of the deceased are not left high and dry, and that they would have something to fall back on during such traumatic times. Depositing and assigning the rights under such policy document to another, would mean that there is a high chance that benefits of life insurance would vest in such other, in the event of unfortunate death and the family members are prioritized only second. These are not desirable circumstances where the family would be forced to cope with the death of their loved one coupled with the financial crisis.
Thus, there is a need to examine the ethics of:
- The bank accepting such assignment
The customer should be cautious before assigning his rights under life insurance policies. By “cautious”, it is only meant that he and his dependents and/or legal heirs should be aware of the repercussions of the act of assigning his life insurance policy. It is conceded that no law prohibits the assignment of life insurance policies.
In fact, Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 , provides for such assignments. Judicial cases have held life insurance policies as property more than a social welfare measure. [xiii] Further, the bank has no personal relationship with any customer and thus has no moral obligation to not accept such assignments of life insurance.
However, the writer is of the opinion that, in dealing with the assignment of life insurance policies, utmost care and caution must be taken by the insured when assigning his life insurance policy to anyone else.
CURRENT STAND OF ICICI REGARDING FACILITIES SECURED BY INSURANCE POLICY, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO ASSIGNMENT OF OBLIGATIONS
This Section seeks to address and highlight the manner in which ICICI Bank drafts its security documents with regard to the assignment of obligations. The texts placed in quotes in the subsequent paragraphs are verbatim extracts from the security document as mentioned.
Composite Document for Corporate and Realty Funding
“ 8 . CHARGING CLAUSE
The Mortgagor doth hereby:
iii) Assign and transfer unto the Mortgagee all the Bank Accounts and all rights, title, interest, benefits, claims and demands whatsoever of the Mortgagor in, to, under and in respect of the Bank Accounts and all monies including all cash flows and receivables and all proceeds arising from Projects and Other Projects_______________, insurance proceeds, which have been deposited / credited / lying in the Bank Accounts, all records, investments, assets, instruments and securities which represent all amounts in the Bank Accounts, both present and future (the “Account Assets”, which expression shall, as the context may permit or require, mean any or each of such Account Assets) to have and hold the same unto and to the use of the Mortgagee absolutely and subject to the powers and provisions herein contained and subject also to the proviso for redemption hereinafter mentioned;
(v) Assign and transfer unto the Mortgagee all right, title, interest, benefit, claims and demands whatsoever of the Mortgagors, in, to, under and/or in respect of the Project Documents (including insurance policies) including, without limitation, the right to compel performance thereunder, and to substitute, or to be substituted for, the Mortgagor thereunder, and to commence and conduct either in the name of the Mortgagor or in their own names or otherwise any proceedings against any persons in respect of any breach of, the Project Documents and, including without limitation, rights and benefits to all amounts owing to, or received by, the Mortgagor and all claims thereunder and all other claims of the Mortgagor under or in any proceedings against all or any such persons and together with the right to further assign any of the Project Documents, both present and future, to have and to hold all and singular the aforesaid assets, rights, properties, etc. unto and to the use of the Mortgagee absolutely and subject to the powers and provisions contained herein and subject also to the proviso for redemption hereinafter mentioned.”
ICICI Bank’s Standard Terms and Conditions Governing Consumer Durable Loans
“ insurance.
The Borrower further agrees that upon any monies becoming due under the policy, the same shall be paid by the Insurance Company to ICICI Bank without any reference / notice to the Borrower, but not exceeding the principal amount outstanding under the Insurance Policy. The Borrower specifically acknowledges that in all cases of claim, the Insurance Company will be solely liable for settlement of the claim, and he/she will not hold ICICI Bank responsible in any manner whether for compensation, recovery of compensation, processing of claims or for any reason whatsoever.
Reference has been made only to assignment of assets, rights, benefits, interests, properties etc. No specific reference has been made to the assignment of obligations of the assignor under such insurance contract.
THE ISSUE FACED BY ICICI BANK
Where ICICI Bank accepts insurance policy documents of customers as security for a loan, in the light of the fact that the documents are silent about the question of assignment of obligations, are they assigned to ICICI Bank? Where there is hypothecation of a life insurance policy, with a stipulation that the mortgagor (assignor) should pay the premiums, and that the mortgagee (assignee) is not bound to pay the same, Sections 130 and 132 do not apply to such cases. [xiv] With rectification of this issue, ICICI Bank can concretize its hold over the securities with no reservations about its legality.
RISKS INVOLVED
This section of the paper attempts to explore the many risks that ICICI Bank is exposed to, or other factors which worsen the situation, due to the omission of a clause detailing the assignment of obligations by ICICI Bank.
Practices of Other Companies
The practices of other companies could be a risk factor for ICICI Bank in the light of the fact that some of them expressly exclude assignment of obligations in their security documents.
There are some companies whose notice of assignment forms contain an exclusive clause dealing with the assignment of obligations. It states that while rights and benefits accruing out of the insurance policy are to be assigned to the bank, obligations which arise out of such policy documents will not be liable to be performed by the bank. Thus, they explicitly provide for the only assignment of rights and benefits and never the assignment of obligations.
Possible Obligation to Insurance Companies
By not clearing up this issue, ICICI Bank could be held to be obligated to the insurance company from whom the assignor took the policy, for example, with respect to insurance premiums which were required to be paid by the assignor. This is not a desirable scenario for ICICI Bank. In case of default by the assignor in the terms of the contract, the right of ICICI Bank over the security deposited (insurance policy in question) could be fraught in the legal dispute.
Possible litigation
Numerous suits may be instituted against ICICI Bank alleging a violation of the Indian Contract Act. Some examples include allegations of concealment of fact, fraud etc. These could be enough to render the existing contract of assignment voidable or even void.
Contra Proferentem
This doctrine applies in a situation when a provision in the contract can be interpreted in more than one way, thereby creating ambiguities. It attempts to provide a solution to interpreting vague terms by laying down, that a party which drafts and imposes an ambiguous term should not benefit from that ambiguity. Where there is any doubt or ambiguity in the words of an exclusion clause, the words are construed more forcibly against the party putting forth the document, and in favour of the other party. [xv]
The doctrine of contra proferentem attempts to protect the layman from the legally knowledgeable companies which draft standard forms of contracts, in which the former stands on a much weaker footing with regard to bargaining power with the latter. This doctrine has been used in interpreting insurance contracts in India. [xvi]
If litigation ensues as a result of this uncertainty, there are high chances that the Courts will tend to favour the assignor and not the drafter of the documents.
POSSIBLE DEFENSES AGAINST DISPUTES FOR THE SECURITY DOCUMENTS AS THEY ARE NOW
This section of the paper attempts to give defences which the Bank may raise in case of any disputes arising out of silence on the matter of assignability of obligations.
Interpretation of the Security Documents
UNIDROIT principles expressly provide a method for interpretation of contracts. [xvii] The method consists of utilizing the following factors:
This defence relates to the concept of estoppel embodied in Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. According to the Section, when one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representatives, to deny the truth of that thing.
If a man either by words or by conduct has intimated that he consents to an act which has been done and that he will not offer any opposition to it, and he thereby induces others to do that which they otherwise might have abstained from, he cannot question legality of the act he had sanctioned to the prejudice of those who have so given faith to his words or to the fair inference to be drawn from his conduct. [xviii] Subsequent conduct may be relevant to show that the contract exists, or to show variation in the terms of the contract, or waiver, or estoppel. [xix]
Where the meaning of the instrument is ambiguous, a statement subsequently interpreting such instrument is admissible. [xx] In the present case, where the borrower has never raised any claims with regard to non assignability of obligations on him, and has consented to the present conditions and relations with ICICI Bank, he cannot he cannot be allowed to raise any claims with respect to the same.
Internationally, the doctrine of post contractual conduct is invoked for such disputes. It refers to the acts of parties to a contract after the commencement of the contract. It stipulates that where a party has behaved in a particular manner, so as to induce the other party to discharge its obligations, even if there has been a variation from the terms of the contract, the first party cannot cite such variation as a reason for its breach of the contract.
Where the parties to a contract are both under a common mistake as to the meaning or effect of it, and therefore embark on a course of dealing on the footing of that mistake, thereby replacing the original terms of the contract by a conventional basis on which they both conduct their affairs, then the original contract is replaced by the conventional basis. The parties are bound by the conventional basis. Either party can sue or be sued upon it just as if it had been expressly agreed between them. [xxi]
The importance of consensus ad idem has been concretized by various case laws in India. Further, if the stipulations and terms are uncertain and the parties are not ad idem there can be no specific performance, for there was no contract at all. [xxii]
In the present case, the minds of the assignor and assignee can be said to have not met while entering into the assignment. The assignee never had any intention of undertaking any obligations of the assignor. In Hartog v Colin & Shields, [xxiii] the defendants made an offer to the plaintiffs to sell hare skins, offering to a pay a price per pound instead of per piece.
AVOIDING THESE RISKS
To concretize ICICI Bank’s stand on the assignment of obligations in the matter of loans secured by insurance policies, the relevant security documents could be amended to include such a clause.
For instances where loans are secured by life insurance policies, a standard set by the American Banker’s Association (ABA) has been followed by many Indian commercial institutions as well. [xxvi] The ABA is a trade association in the USA representing banks ranging from the smallest community bank to the largest bank holding companies. ABA’s principal activities include lobbying, professional development for member institutions, maintenance of best practices and industry standards, consumer education, and distribution of products and services. [xxvii]
There are several ICICI security documents which have included clauses denying any assignment of obligations to it. An extract of the deed of hypothecation for vehicle loan has been reproduced below:
“ 3. In further pursuance of the Loan Terms and for the consideration aforesaid, the Hypothecator hereby further agrees, confirms, declares and undertakes with the Bank as follows:
(i)(a) The Hypothecator shall at its expenses keep the Assets in good and marketable condition and, if stipulated by the Bank under the Loan Terms, insure such of the Assets which are of insurable nature, in the joint names of the Hypothecator and the Bank against any loss or damage by theft, fire, lightning, earthquake, explosion, riot, strike, civil commotion, storm, tempest, flood, erection risk, war risk and such other risks as may be determined by the Bank and including wherever applicable, all marine, transit and other hazards incidental to the acquisition, transportation and delivery of the relevant Assets to the place of use or installation. The Hypothecator shall deliver to the Bank the relevant policies of insurance and maintain such insurance throughout the continuance of the security of these presents and deliver to the Bank the renewal receipts / endorsements / renewed policies therefore and till such insurance policies / renewal policies / endorsements are delivered to the Bank, the same shall be held by the Hypothecator in trust for the Bank. The Hypothecator shall duly and punctually pay all premia and shall not do or suffer to be done or omit to do or be done any act, which may invalidate or avoid such insurance. In default, the Bank may (but shall not be bound to) keep in good condition and render marketable the relevant Assets and take out / renew such insurance. Any premium paid by the Bank and any costs, charges and expenses incurred by the Bank shall forthwith on receipt of a notice of demand from the Bank be reimbursed by the Hypothecator and/or Borrower to the Bank together with interest thereon at the rate for further interest as specified under the Loan Terms, from the date of payment till reimbursement thereof and until such reimbursement, the same shall be a charge on the Assets…”
The inclusion of such a clause in all security documents of the Bank can avoid the problem of assignability of obligations in insurance policies used as security for any facility sanctioned by it.
An assignment of securities is of utmost importance to any lender to secure the facility, without which the lender will not be entitled to any interest in the securities so deposited.
In this paper, one has seen the need for assignment of securities of a facility. Risks involved in not having a separate clause dealing with non assignability of obligations have been discussed. Certain defences which ICICI Bank may raise in case of the dispute have also been enumerated along with solutions to the same.
Formatted by March 2nd, 2019.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[i] J.H. Tod v. Lakhmidas , 16 Bom 441, 449
[ii] http://www.licindia.in/policy_conditions.htm#12, last visited 30 th June, 2014
[iii] Headwaters Construction Co. Ltd. v National City Mortgage Co. Ltd., 720 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (D. Idaho 2010)
[iv] Indian Contract Act and Specific Relief Act, Mulla, Vol. I, 13 th Edn., Reprint 2010, p 968
[v] Khardah Co. Ltd. v. Raymond & Co ., AIR 1962 SC 1810: (1963) 3 SCR 183
[vi] Principles of Insurance Law, M.N. Srinivasan, 8 th Edn., 2006, p. 857
[vii] Ram Baran v Ram Mohit , AIR 1967 SC 744: (1967) 1 SCR 293
[viii] Sri Sarada Mills Ltd. v Union of India, AIR 1973 SC 281
[ix] Lala Kapurchand Godha v Mir Nawah Himayatali Khan, [1963] 2 SCR 168
[x] Velayudhan v Pillaiyar, 9 Mad LT 102 (Mad)
[xi] Hindustan Ideal Insurance Co. Ltd. v Satteya, AIR 1961 AP 183
[xii] Mulraj Khatau v Vishwanath, 40 IA 24 – Respondent based his claim on a mere deposit of the policy and not under a written transfer and claimed that a charge had thus been created on the policy.
[xiii] Insure Policy Plus Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. v The Life Insurance Corporation of India, 2007(109)BOMLR559
[xiv] Transfer of Property Act, Sanjiva Row, 7 th Edn., 2011, Vol II, Universal Law Publishing Company, New Delhi
[xv] Ghaziabad Development Authority v Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 2003
[xvi] United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v M/s. Pushpalaya Printers, [2004] 3 SCR 631, General Assurance Society Ltd. v Chandumull Jain & Anr., [1966 (3) SCR 500]
[xvii] UNIDROIT Principles, Art 4.3
[xviii] B.L.Sreedhar & Ors. v K.M. Munireddy & Ors., 2002 (9) SCALE 183
[xix] James Miller & Partners Ltd. v Whitworth Street Estates (Manchester) Ltd., [1970] 1 All ER 796 (HL)
[xx] Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v State of Gujarat, AIR 1975 SC 32
[xxi] Amalgamated Investment & Property Co. Ltd. v Texas Commerce International Bank Ltd., [1981] 1 All ER 923
[xxii] Smt. Mayawanti v Smt. Kaushalya Devi, 1990 SCR (2) 350
[xxiii] [1939] 3 All ER 566
[xxiv] Terrell v Alexandria Auto Co., 12 La.App. 625
[xxv] http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/CISG25/Pamboukis.pdf, last visited on 30 th June, 2014
[xxvi] https://www.phoenixwm.phl.com/shared/eforms/getdoc.jsp?DocId=525.pdf, last visited on 30 th June, 2014
[xxvii] http://www.aba.com/About/Pages/default.aspx, last visited on 30 th June, 2014
![assignment in insurance section assignment in insurance section](https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/WhatsApp_news.png)
Related Posts:
![Animal Cruelty vs Religious Sacrifice: Anatomy of the Conflict Between Legislation & Religion animal sacrifice](https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Academike-ALL-Images-5.jpg)
![](http://charunivedita.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
![assignment in insurance section Crack the CLAT PG Exam](https://www.lawctopus.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/crack-the-clat-pg-exam-popup-desktop-2023-09.webp)
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime :)
Thanks, I’m not interested
- Practical Law
Assignment of insurance policies and claims
Practical law uk practice note w-031-6021 (approx. 19 pages), get full access to this document with a free trial.
Try free and see for yourself how Practical Law resources can improve productivity, efficiency and response times.
About Practical Law
This document is from Thomson Reuters Practical Law, the legal know-how that goes beyond primary law and traditional legal research to give lawyers a better starting point. We provide standard documents, checklists, legal updates, how-to guides, and more.
650+ full-time experienced lawyer editors globally create and maintain timely, reliable and accurate resources across all major practice areas.
83% of customers are highly satisfied with Practical Law and would recommend to a colleague.
81% of customers agree that Practical Law saves them time.
- Construction and engineering
- Construction insurance
- Credit, terrorism and political risks
- Cyber insurance
- Directors and officers
- Disputes, investigations and enforcement
- Insurance in commercial transactions
- Insurance intermediaries
- Legal expenses
- Making and dealing with claims
- Reinsurance
- Security, risk management and business continuity
![assignment in insurance section Livewell](https://livewell.com/wp-content/themes/livewell/images/livewell_large.png)
Financial Tips, Guides & Know-Hows
Home > Finance > How Is A Collateral Assignment Used In A Life Insurance Contract?
![assignment in insurance section How Is A Collateral Assignment Used In A Life Insurance Contract?](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/how-is-a-collateral-assignment-used-in-a-life-insurance-contract-1697118432.jpeg)
How Is A Collateral Assignment Used In A Life Insurance Contract?
Published: October 14, 2023
Discover how collateral assignments are utilized in life insurance contracts, providing financial security and peace of mind. Learn about the benefits and considerations involved in this strategic financial tool.
(Many of the links in this article redirect to a specific reviewed product. Your purchase of these products through affiliate links helps to generate commission for LiveWell, at no extra cost. Learn more )
Table of Contents
Introduction, what is a collateral assignment, understanding life insurance contracts, how a collateral assignment works, benefits and uses of collateral assignments, risks and considerations, limitations and restrictions, how to set up a collateral assignment.
When it comes to financial matters, having a solid understanding of various concepts and strategies is crucial. One such concept is a collateral assignment, which plays a significant role in the world of life insurance contracts. Understanding how a collateral assignment works can provide you with valuable insights into how to manage and leverage your life insurance policy to meet your financial needs.
A collateral assignment involves using your life insurance policy as collateral for a loan or other financial transaction. It allows you to borrow against the cash value of your policy without surrendering the policy itself. This strategy can be particularly useful if you need access to funds for a specific purpose, such as starting a business, financing education expenses, or facing unexpected medical bills.
In order to grasp the significance of collateral assignments, it’s important to have a solid understanding of life insurance contracts. Life insurance is a contractual agreement between a policyholder and an insurance company. The policyholder pays regular premium payments, and in return, the insurance company provides a death benefit to the policy’s beneficiaries upon the policyholder’s death. Additionally, certain types of life insurance policies, such as whole life or universal life insurance, accumulate a cash value over time.
The cash value in a life insurance policy can be used in various ways. One option is to surrender the policy and receive the accumulated cash value. However, this may result in the termination of the policy and the loss of its associated benefits. Another option is to take a policy loan against the cash value. This allows the policyholder to access funds while keeping the policy intact.
This is where a collateral assignment becomes relevant. Instead of taking a policy loan, a policyholder can use a collateral assignment to borrow money from a lender by assigning a portion of the life insurance policy’s death benefit as collateral. In this arrangement, the lender becomes the assignee of the policy and is entitled to receive a portion of the death benefit if the policyholder passes away before the loan is repaid. This arrangement provides security to the lender and allows the policyholder to access funds without surrendering the policy.
In the following sections, we will delve deeper into how a collateral assignment works, its benefits and uses, as well as the considerations, limitations, and steps involved in setting it up.
A collateral assignment is a legal agreement that allows a policyholder to assign a portion of the death benefit from a life insurance policy as collateral for a loan or other financial obligation. It serves as a way to secure the loan by providing the lender with a potential source of repayment in the event of the policyholder’s death. This arrangement allows the policyholder to access funds without surrendering the policy or disrupting its financial benefits.
With a collateral assignment, the policyholder remains the owner of the life insurance policy and retains control over other aspects of the policy, such as changing beneficiaries or making withdrawals from the cash value. The assigned portion of the death benefit serves as collateral for the loan or debt, and if the policyholder passes away before the loan is repaid, the lender has the right to receive the assigned portion of the death benefit to satisfy the outstanding debt.
It’s important to note that a collateral assignment does not transfer ownership of the policy to the lender. Instead, it grants the lender a limited interest in the policy specifically for the purpose of securing the loan. Once the loan is repaid, the collateral assignment is released, and the policy returns to the full control of the policyholder.
A collateral assignment can be used for various financial purposes, including personal loans, business financing, or even as a form of security for a surety bond. The flexibility of this arrangement allows policyholders to leverage the accumulated cash value and death benefit of their life insurance policy to meet their financial needs without sacrificing the long-term benefits of the policy.
It’s worth noting that the availability and terms of collateral assignment can vary depending on the insurance company and the specific policy. Some policies may have limitations on the amount that can be assigned or require approval from the insurance company before the assignment can be made. It’s important to review the policy terms and consult with the insurance provider or a financial advisor to understand the specific guidelines and implications of a collateral assignment.
In the next section, we will explore how a collateral assignment works within the context of a life insurance contract.
Before delving deeper into how a collateral assignment works, it’s essential to have a solid understanding of life insurance contracts. A life insurance contract is a legal agreement between a policyholder and an insurance company, wherein the policyholder pays regular premium payments in exchange for financial protection for their loved ones in the event of their death.
Life insurance contracts come in various forms, but the two main types are term life insurance and permanent life insurance. Term life insurance provides coverage for a specific period, typically 10, 20, or 30 years. If the policyholder passes away during the term, the insurance company pays out a death benefit to the beneficiaries named in the policy. Permanent life insurance, on the other hand, provides lifelong coverage and includes a cash value component that accumulates over time.
The cash value in a permanent life insurance policy, such as whole life or universal life insurance, grows gradually over the years through premium payments and potential investment gains. This cash value can be accessed by the policyholder through withdrawals or policy loans, providing a source of liquidity that can be utilized for various financial needs.
One of the key advantages of permanent life insurance policies is their ability to accumulate cash value on a tax-deferred basis. This means that any growth in the cash value is not subject to immediate taxation, allowing the policyholder to potentially build a substantial cash reserve over time.
Furthermore, permanent life insurance policies often provide additional benefits such as the ability to participate in the insurance company’s profits through dividends, the option to increase or decrease the death benefit, and even the flexibility to adjust premium payments.
Given the unique features and advantages offered by permanent life insurance policies, they are often the type of policy chosen for a collateral assignment. The combination of death benefit protection and cash value growth make permanent life insurance policies an ideal asset to use as collateral for loans or other financial obligations.
Now that we have a basic understanding of life insurance contracts and their various components, let’s explore how a collateral assignment works in conjunction with a life insurance policy in the next section.
Now that we understand the basics of life insurance contracts, let’s dive into how a collateral assignment works within the context of these policies. A collateral assignment involves assigning a portion of the death benefit from a life insurance policy as collateral for a loan or other financial obligation.
Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of how a collateral assignment typically works:
- The policyholder identifies a need for funds and seeks a loan or financing.
- The policyholder and the lender determine the amount of the loan and agree on the terms and conditions.
- A collateral assignment agreement is drafted, which outlines the terms of the assignment, including the assigned portion of the death benefit, the loan amount, and the repayment terms.
- The collateral assignment agreement is signed by the policyholder, the lender, and the insurance company, acknowledging the assignment and providing consent for the assignee to receive a portion of the death benefit in the event of the policyholder’s death.
- Upon the policyholder’s passing, the lender files a claim with the insurance company, providing necessary documentation to establish the validity of the claim.
- The insurance company verifies the claim and disburses the assigned portion of the death benefit to the lender to satisfy the outstanding debt.
- If there are remaining funds from the death benefit after repaying the loan, they are distributed to the designated beneficiaries of the policy.
It’s important to note that the policyholder remains the owner of the life insurance policy and retains control over other aspects of the policy, such as changing beneficiaries or making withdrawals from the cash value. The assigned portion of the death benefit is solely used as collateral for the loan, and the lender only has a claim to that specific portion.
It’s crucial for both the policyholder and the lender to understand the terms and conditions of the collateral assignment, including any limitations or restrictions set by the insurance company. Some common restrictions may include a maximum assignment amount, a requirement to maintain the policy in-force, or a provision for the policyholder to replace the collateral assignment with another form of security if requested by the insurance company.
By using a collateral assignment, the policyholder can access funds while keeping the life insurance policy intact. This can be particularly advantageous in situations where surrendering the policy would result in the loss of the accumulated cash value and other benefits.
In the next section, we will explore the various benefits and uses of collateral assignments within the realm of financial planning.
Collateral assignments offer several benefits and serve various uses within the realm of financial planning. Let’s explore some of the key advantages and common uses of collateral assignments:
1. Access to Funds
One of the primary benefits of a collateral assignment is the ability to access funds without surrendering the life insurance policy. By using the death benefit as collateral, the policyholder can secure a loan or obtain financing for personal or business purposes. This allows individuals to meet immediate financial needs without disrupting their long-term insurance coverage.
2. Retention of Policy Benefits
Unlike policy loans, which require repayment with interest, collateral assignments allow policyholders to retain the full benefits of their life insurance policies. These benefits can include the death benefit for beneficiaries, potential cash value growth, and the ability to participate in policy dividends. By using a collateral assignment, policyholders do not have to forfeit these valuable features.
3. Lower Interest Rates
When compared to other types of loans, collateral assignments often offer lower interest rates. This is because the loan is backed by the assigned portion of the life insurance policy’s death benefit, providing additional security for the lender. Lower interest rates can result in significant cost savings for the policyholder over the life of the loan.
4. Flexible Repayment Terms
Collateral assignments provide flexibility in terms of loan repayment. Policyholders and lenders can negotiate repayment terms that align with the borrower’s financial capacity, allowing for customized repayment schedules. This flexibility can help borrowers manage their cash flow effectively and repay the loan on terms that suit their specific needs.
5. Diverse Financial Uses
Collateral assignments can be used for a wide range of financial purposes. Common uses include funding education expenses, starting or expanding a business, purchasing or renovating a property, financing a major purchase, or covering unexpected medical expenses. The versatility of collateral assignments allows policyholders to leverage their life insurance policies to meet various financial goals.
6. Potential Tax Advantages
Collateral assignments may offer potential tax advantages depending on the specific circumstances. For example, if the loan proceeds are used for investment purposes or to generate income, the interest paid on the loan may be tax-deductible. It’s crucial to consult with a tax advisor or financial expert to understand the tax implications of a collateral assignment in your specific situation.
By leveraging the benefits and uses of collateral assignments, policyholders can maximize the value of their life insurance policies and utilize them as a valuable financial asset. However, it’s essential to consider the potential risks and limitations associated with collateral assignments, which we will explore in the next section.
While collateral assignments offer several advantages, it’s important to fully understand the potential risks and considerations before entering into such an arrangement. Here are some key factors to keep in mind:
1. Impact on Death Benefit
Assigning a portion of the death benefit as collateral can reduce the overall amount payable to beneficiaries upon the policyholder’s death. It’s crucial to assess the impact of this reduction on the intended financial protection for loved ones and ensure that the remaining portion of the death benefit is still sufficient to address their needs.
2. Default Risk
If the policyholder fails to repay the loan, the lender may have the right to claim the assigned portion of the death benefit, potentially leaving beneficiaries with a reduced payout. It’s important to have a robust repayment plan in place and make timely payments to avoid default and the potential loss of policy benefits.
3. Policy Lapse
If the policy lapses due to missed premium payments or other reasons, the collateral assignment may become void, and the lender loses their security interest in the life insurance policy. Policyholders should ensure they have a sufficient plan in place to maintain premiums and keep the policy in force to protect the collateral assignment.
4. Limited Flexibility
Once a collateral assignment is in place, it restricts the policyholder’s ability to make changes to the policy, such as increasing or decreasing coverage, accessing the cash value, or changing beneficiaries. It’s important to evaluate whether the potential benefits of a collateral assignment outweigh the loss of flexibility in managing the life insurance policy.
5. Complex Documentation
Collateral assignments involve drafting and signing complex legal documents, including the collateral assignment agreement. It’s crucial to fully understand the terms and conditions of the agreement and consider seeking professional advice to ensure that all parties involved are clear on their rights and obligations.
6. Insurance Company Regulations
Each insurance company may have specific regulations and requirements regarding collateral assignments. It’s important to review the policy terms and consult with the insurance provider to understand any restrictions, limitations, or approval processes associated with collateral assignments.
Considering these risks and considerations is essential to make informed decisions when considering a collateral assignment. Seeking guidance from a financial advisor or insurance professional can help assess the suitability of a collateral assignment and its potential impact on your overall financial plan.
In the next section, we will explore any limitations and restrictions that may apply to collateral assignments.
While collateral assignments can be valuable tools, there are certain limitations and restrictions that policyholders should be aware of. These limitations can vary depending on the insurance company and the specific policy. Here are some common limitations and restrictions to consider:
1. Assignment Limits
Insurance companies often impose limits on the amount that can be assigned from a life insurance policy. This limit is typically a percentage of the policy’s death benefit. It’s essential to review the policy terms to understand the maximum allowable assignment amount.
2. Policy Approval
In some cases, insurance companies require policyholder approval before a collateral assignment can be implemented. This approval process may involve submitting an application, providing financial information, or meeting certain criteria determined by the insurance company.
3. Maintaining Policy In-Force
To retain the collateral assignment, policyholders must keep the life insurance policy in force, which includes paying premiums on time. If the policy lapses or is terminated, the collateral assignment may become void, and the policyholder may lose the associated benefits.
4. Replacement of Collateral
In certain situations, insurance companies may require the policyholder to replace the collateral assignment with another form of security if requested. This requirement ensures that the insurance company is adequately protected against potential losses.
5. Removing the Collateral Assignment
If the policyholder wishes to remove the collateral assignment, they will need to follow the specified procedure outlined by the insurance company. This often involves submitting a formal request, providing necessary documentation, and obtaining the insurance company’s approval.
6. Financial Institution Requirements
Financial institutions, such as banks or lenders, may have their own specific requirements for collateral assignments. These requirements may include minimum loan amounts, credit checks, or additional documentation. It’s important to familiarize yourself with the lender’s guidelines to ensure a smooth collateral assignment process.
7. Legal and Financial Advice
Due to the complex nature of collateral assignments, it’s wise to seek advice from legal and financial professionals. They can provide guidance on the legal implications, tax considerations, and overall suitability of a collateral assignment based on your specific circumstances.
Understanding these limitations and restrictions is crucial when considering a collateral assignment. It’s important to review the policy documents, consult with the insurance company and relevant professionals, and ensure compliance with all applicable regulations to navigate the process successfully.
In the next section, we will outline the general steps involved in setting up a collateral assignment.
Setting up a collateral assignment requires careful consideration and following specific steps. While the exact process may vary depending on the insurance company and the lender, here are some general guidelines to help you navigate the setup process:
1. Assess Your Financial Needs
Determine the amount of funds you need and the purpose for which you require the loan or financing. Assess your financial situation and ensure that a collateral assignment aligns with your overall financial goals and needs.
2. Identify the Lender
Research potential lenders that offer collateral assignments and select one that best meets your requirements. Consider factors such as interest rates, loan terms, and reputation when making your decision.
3. Consult with professionals
Seek the advice of financial and legal professionals who specialize in life insurance policies and collateral assignments. They can guide you through the process, provide expert recommendations, and ensure that you fully understand the implications and obligations associated with a collateral assignment.
4. Review Policy Terms
Review the terms of your life insurance policy, paying particular attention to any provisions related to collateral assignments. Understand the limitations, restrictions, and requirements set by your insurance company.
5. Draft the Collateral Assignment Agreement
Work with legal professionals to draft a collateral assignment agreement that outlines the terms and conditions of the assignment. This agreement should clearly specify the assigned portion of the death benefit, the loan amount, the repayment terms, and any other relevant provisions.
6. Obtain Signatures and Consent
Ensure that all parties involved, including yourself, the lender, and the insurance company, sign the collateral assignment agreement. The insurance company’s consent is crucial to acknowledge and approve the assignment.
7. Submit Documentation
Provide the necessary documentation to the insurance company and the lender to establish the collateral assignment. This may include copies of the collateral assignment agreement, policy documents, and any other requested information.
8. Stay Informed and Compliant
Keep track of your loan repayments and stay informed about any updates or changes related to the collateral assignment. Comply with the terms and conditions stated in the collateral assignment agreement, including making timely payments to the lender and maintaining the life insurance policy in force.
Remember that these steps are general guidelines, and the specific process may vary based on your unique situation and the requirements set by the insurance company and the lender. Consulting with professionals experienced in collateral assignments will ensure a smooth and successful setup process.
In the final section, we will conclude our discussion on collateral assignments and summarize the key points to remember.
Collateral assignments serve as a valuable tool in leveraging the benefits of a life insurance policy while accessing funds for various financial needs. By assigning a portion of the death benefit as collateral, policyholders can secure loans or financing without surrendering their policies or disrupting the benefits associated with them.
We began by understanding the basics of collateral assignments and the concept of life insurance contracts. We then explored how a collateral assignment works within the context of a life insurance policy, outlining the steps involved in setting one up.
Collateral assignments offer several benefits, including access to funds, retention of policy benefits, lower interest rates, flexible repayment terms, and diverse financial uses. However, it’s important to consider the potential risks and limitations associated with collateral assignments, such as the impact on the death benefit, default risk, limited flexibility, and complex documentation.
It’s essential to carefully evaluate your financial needs, consult with professionals, review policy terms, and draft a well-structured collateral assignment agreement. By following these steps and staying compliant with the agreement, you can navigate the collateral assignment process successfully.
To ensure a smooth and efficient setup process, it’s advisable to seek guidance from financial advisors, insurance professionals, and legal experts who can provide personalized advice based on your specific circumstances.
In summary, a collateral assignment can be a powerful strategy to utilize the accumulated cash value and death benefit of a life insurance policy while addressing immediate financial needs. However, it’s crucial to conduct thorough research, seek professional advice, and fully understand the implications and obligations associated with collateral assignments.
By carefully weighing the benefits, risks, and considerations, you can make informed decisions and effectively use collateral assignments to enhance your financial plan and achieve your goals.
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/how-is-a-collateral-assignment-used-in-a-life-insurance-contract-1699065548.jpg)
How Is Collateral Assignment Used In A Life Insurance Contract?
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/rupixen-com-Q59HmzK38eQ-unsplash-min-600x400.jpeg)
Our Review on The Credit One Credit Card
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/photo-1518183214770-9cffbec72538-600x400.jpeg)
20 Quick Tips To Saving Your Way To A Million Dollars
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/how-to-remove-an-authorized-user-from-a-credit-card-1699598967.jpg)
How To Remove An Authorized User From A Credit Card
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Macroprudential-Analysis-Definition.jpg)
Macroprudential Analysis Definition
Latest articles.
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/The-Importance-of-Emergency-Funds-and-How-to-Build-Yours-600x400.jpg)
The Importance of Emergency Funds and How to Build Yours
Written By:
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/A-Beginners-Guide-to-Effective-WhatsApp-Marketing-in-2024-600x400.jpg)
A Beginner’s Guide to Effective WhatsApp Marketing in 2024
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Navigating-Crypto-Frontiers-Understanding-Market-Capitalization-as-the-North-Star-600x400.jpg)
Navigating Crypto Frontiers: Understanding Market Capitalization as the North Star
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Financial-Literacy-Matters-Heres-How-to-Boost-Yours-600x400.jpg)
Financial Literacy Matters: Here’s How to Boost Yours
![assignment in insurance section img](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/How-In-Person-Tutoring-Can-Help-Your-Child-Thrive-600x400.jpg)
Unlocking Potential: How In-Person Tutoring Can Help Your Child Thrive
Related post.
![assignment in insurance section What Is Collateral Assignment Of Life Insurance](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/what-is-collateral-assignment-of-life-insurance-1700100032.jpg)
By: • Finance
![assignment in insurance section Collateral Value: Definition, How It’s Used, And LTV Ratios](https://livewell.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Collateral-Value-Definition-How-Its-Used-and-LTV-Ratios.jpg)
Please accept our Privacy Policy.
We uses cookies to improve your experience and to show you personalized ads. Please review our privacy policy by clicking here .
- https://livewell.com/finance/how-is-a-collateral-assignment-used-in-a-life-insurance-contract/
- 1800 102 2355
- Download the APP
- 1800 102 2355 [9:30AM-6:30PM]
- Branch Locator
- Customer Portal Login
- Advisor Portal Login
![assignment in insurance section Future Generali Total Insurance Solutions](https://life.futuregenerali.in/content/images/logo.png)
What is Assignment and Nomination in Life Insurance?
‘Assignment’ and ‘Nomination’ are two most common terms used in a life insurance policy document. Let us understand the importance of these two terms in-detail.
![assignment in insurance section Future Generali](https://life.futuregenerali.in/media/2b3ha2cl/future-generali.png)
By Future Generali. Updated On Oct 06, 2022
![assignment in insurance section What is Assignment and Nomination in Life Insurance?](https://life.futuregenerali.in/media/fsfhpsqo/nominee.webp)
Your life insurance policy is a contract between you (insured) and the insurance company (insurer). The contract is filled with jargon. To the extent possible, we must understand all the terms mentioned in the policy bond (certificate). ‘Assignment’ and ‘Nomination’ are two most common terms used in the insurance world.
For instance, in the event that you plan to apply for a home loan, your home loan provider will surely use these terms. Hence, it is best to be sure and understand exactly what the terms mean before you make a decision to buy the policy.
What is assignment in life insurance?
A life insurance policy can be assigned when rights of one person are transferred to another. The rights to your insurance policy can be transferred to someone else for various reasons. The process is known as assignment.
An “assignor” (policyholder) is the person who assigns the insurance policy. An “assignee” is the person to whom the policy rights have been transferred, i.e. the person to whom the policy has been assigned.
In the event rights are transferred from an Assignor to an Assignee, the rights of the policyholder are canceled, and the Assignee becomes the owner of the insurance policy.
People often assign their life insurance policies to banks. A bank becomes the policy owner in this case, while the original policyholder continues to be the life assured whose death may be claimed by either the bank or the policy owner.
Types of Assignment
There are two ways to assign an insurance policy. They are as follows:
1. Absolute Assignment
During this process, the rights of the assignor (policyholder) will be completely transferred to the assignee (person to whom the policy rights have been transferred). It is not subject to any conditions.
As an example, Mr. Rajiv Tripathi owns a Rs 1 Crore life insurance policy. Mr. Tripathi wants to gift his wife this policy. Specifically, he wants to make “absolute assignment” of the policy in his wife's name, so that the death benefit (or maturity proceeds) can be paid directly to her. After the absolute assignment has been made, Mrs. Tripathi will own this policy, and she will be able to transfer it to someone else again.
2. Conditional Assignment
As part of this type of assignment, certain conditions must be met before the transfer of rights occurs from the Assignor to the Assignee. The Policy will only be transferred to the Assignee if all conditions are met.
For instance, a term insurance policy of Rs 50 Lakh is owned by Mr. Dinesh Pujari. Mr. Pujari is applying for a home loan of Rs 50 Lakh. For the loan, the banker asked him to assign the term policy in their name. To acquire a home loan, Mr. Pujari can assign the insurance policy to the home loan company. In the event of Mr. Pujari’s death (during the loan tenure), the bank can collect the death benefit and get their money back from the insurance company.
Mr. Pujari can get back his term insurance policy if he repays the entire amount of his home loan. As soon as the loan is repaid, the policy will be transferred to Mr. Pujari.
In the event that the insurer receives a death benefit that exceeds the outstanding loan balance, the bank will be paid from the difference between the death benefit and the loan and the balance will be paid directly to the nominee. In the above example, the remaining amount (if any) will be paid to Mr. Pujari’s beneficiaries (legal heirs/nominee).
Key Points to know Note About Assignment
In regards to the assignment, the following points should be noted:
- A policy assignment transfers/changes only the ownership, not the risk associated with it. The person assured thus becomes the insured.
- The assignment may lead to cancellation of the nomination in the policy only when it is done in favour of the insurance company due to a policy loan.
- Assignment for all insurance plans except for the pension plan and the Married Women's Property Act (MWP), can be done.
- A policy contract endorsement is required to effect the assignment.
What is nomination in life insurance?
Upon the death of the life assured, the nominee/ beneficiary (generally a close relative) receives the benefits. Policyholders appoint nominees to receive benefits. Under the Insurance Act, 1938, Section 39 governs the nomination process.
Types of Nominees
In a life insurance policy, the policyholder names someone who will receive the benefits in the event of the life assured's death. Here are a few types of nominees:
1. Beneficial Nominees
In accordance with the law, the beneficiary of the claimed benefits will be any immediate family member nominated by the policyholder (like a spouse, children, or parents). Beneficiary nominees are limited to immediate family members of the beneficiary.
2. Minor Nominees
It is common for individuals to name their children as beneficiaries of their life insurance policies. Minor nominees (under the age of 18) are not allowed to handle claim amounts. Hence, the policyholder needs to designate a custodian or appointee. Payments are made to the appointee until the minor reaches the age of 18.
3. Non-family Nominees
Nominees can include distant relatives or even friends as beneficiaries of a life insurance policy.
4. Changing Nominees
It is okay for policyholders to change their nominees as often as they wish, but the latest nominee should take priority over all previous ones.
Key Points to Note About Nomination
In regards to the nomination, the following points should be noted:
- In order to nominate, the policyholder and life assured must be the same.
- In the case of a different policyholder and life assured, the claim benefits will be paid to the policyholder.
- Nominations cannot be changed or modified.
- The policy can have more than one nominee.
- As part of successive nominations, if the life assured appoints person “A” as the first person to receive benefits. Now, in the event of the life assured’s death after person “A” dies, the claim benefits will be given to person “B”. The benefits will be available to Nominee “C” if Nominee “A” and Nominee “B” have passed away.
What is the difference between nomination and assignment?
Let's talk about the differences between assignment and nomination.
Defining parameters | Assignment | Nomination |
---|---|---|
| The endorsement is made on the contract policy. | The nominees' names are mentioned. |
| It involves transferring rights/ownership from the assignor (policyholder) to the assignee (person/entity). | Policy ownership does not change under nomination, it continues with the policyholder. |
| The life assured will transfer all his/her right/ownership of the policy to another person/institution. | It offers the nominee to avail claim benefits in case of death of the life assured. |
| The assignment might/might not support consideration. | Nomination does not support consideration. |
| Without a witness, the assignment will be considered invalid. | It is not required in the nomination. |
| Assignee has the right to sue the assignor of the policy. | The nominee cannot sue the policyholder of the policy. |
| Assignee is entitled to receive the policy money. | The nominee is entitled to avail the claim benefits in case of death of the life assured |
Nomination and Assignment serve different purposes. The nomination protects the interests of the insured as well as an insurer in offering claim benefits under the life insurance policy. On the other hand, assignment protects the interests of an assignee in availing the monetary benefits under the policy. The policyholder should be aware of both of them before buying life insurance.
Connect with our trusted financial advisors right away!
Fill in below details to get a call back
One of our associate will connect with you soon.
Latest Articles
![assignment in insurance section What is Investment? A Complete guide to start your investment journey.](https://life.futuregenerali.in/media/rrngyqwa/what-is-investment.webp)
Life Insurance 4 min What is Investment? A Complete guide to start your investment journey.
By Future Generali. Dec 06, 2023
![assignment in insurance section Endowment Policy: Returns, Benefits & Requirement](https://life.futuregenerali.in/media/kh2l43kh/endowment-policy.webp)
Life Insurance 5 min Endowment Policy: Returns, Benefits & Requirement
By Future Generali. Sep 06, 2023
![assignment in insurance section Understanding Sum Assured: Significance & Calculation](https://life.futuregenerali.in/media/bozdjxr2/sum-assured.webp)
Life Insurance 4 min Understanding Sum Assured: Significance & Calculation
By Future Generali. Jul 28, 2023
Couldn't find what you are looking for? TRY SEARCH
ARN No.: Comp-April-2022_534.
![assignment in insurance section](https://life.futuregenerali.in/media/0cbncx2m/updated_server_banner.jpg)
![](http://charunivedita.online/777/templates/cheerup2/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
What is Assignment in an Insurance Policy? Assignment means a complete transfer of the ownership of the policy to some other person. Usually assignment is done for the purpose of raising a loan from a bank or a financial institution.
When considering the enforceability of anti-assignment clauses in insurance policies, the courts generally draw a distinction between an assignment made prior to the occurrence of a covered...
Assignment of policy and assignment of benefits are quite distinct. Whereas in the former all the rights and obligations are transferred, in the latter only benefits (i. money due under the policy etc) are. transferred. In insurance the assignment means assignment of rights. under the contract.
Understanding the differences between an AOB, Assignment of Policy, and DTP is crucial because each term represents distinct legal and financial arrangements that can significantly impact insurance claims and policyholder rights.
Assignment only takes place after the original contract has been made. As a general rule, assignment of rights and benefits under a contract may be done freely, but the assignment of liabilities and obligations may not be done without the consent of the original contracting party.
An overview of the legal principles that apply when assigning an insurance policy or the right to receive the insurance monies due under the policy to a third party. It considers the requirements that must be met for the assignment to be valid and explains the difference between assignment, co-insurance, noting of interest and loss payee clauses.
A collateral assignment involves using your life insurance policy as collateral for a loan or other financial transaction. It allows you to borrow against the cash value of your policy without surrendering the policy itself.
‘Assignment’ and ‘Nomination’ are two most common terms used in a life insurance policy document. Let us understand the importance of these two terms in-detail.
Maryland law recognizes the validity of anti-assignment clauses in insurance policies. Maryland has not adopted Section 322 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, which distinguishes between pre- and post-loss assignments of benefits. When an insurance policy contains a valid anti-assignment clause, the clause prohibits assignments regardle...
Assignment of benefits, widely referred to as AOB, is a contractual agreement signed by a policyholder, which enables a third party to file an insurance claim, make repair decisions, and...