- Utility Menu
de5f0c5840276572324fc6e2ece1a882
- How to Use This Site
- Core Competencies
Research Presentation Rubric
The format of research presentations can vary across and within disciplines. Use this rubric (PDF) to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. This resource focuses on research presentations but may be useful beyond.
Oral Presentation Rubric
About this printout
This rubric is designed to be used for any oral presentation. Students are scored in three categories—delivery, content, and audience awareness.
Teaching with this printout
More ideas to try, related resources.
Oral presentation and speaking are important skills for students to master, especially in the intermediate grades. This oral presentation rubric is designed to fit any topic or subject area. The rubric allows teachers to assess students in several key areas of oral presentation. Students are scored on a scale of 1–4 in three major areas. The first area is Delivery, which includes eye contact, and voice inflection. The second area, Content/Organization, scores students based on their knowledge and understanding of the topic being presented and the overall organization of their presentation. The third area, Enthusiasm/Audience Awareness, assesses students based on their enthusiasm toward the topic and how well they came across to their intended audience. Give students the oral presentation rubric ahead of time so that they know and understand what they will be scored on. Discuss each of the major areas and how they relate to oral presentation.
- After students have completed their oral presentations, ask them to do a self-assessment with the same rubric and hold a conference with them to compare their self-assessment with your own assessment.
- Provide students with several examples of oral presentations before they plan and execute their own presentation. Ask students to evaluate and assess the exemplar presentations using the same rubric.
- Students can do a peer evaluation of oral presentations using this rubric. Students meet in partners or small groups to give each other feedback and explain their scoring.
- Lesson Plans
- Student Interactives
Students research engineering careers and create poetry to understand the vocabulary of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics).
Useful for a wide variety of reading and writing activities, this outlining tool allows students to organize up to five levels of information.
- Print this resource
Explore Resources by Grade
- Kindergarten K
To read this content please select one of the options below:
Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, assessing oral presentation performance: designing a rubric and testing its validity with an expert group.
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
ISSN : 2050-7003
Article publication date: 3 July 2017
The purpose of this paper is to design a rubric instrument for assessing oral presentation performance in higher education and to test its validity with an expert group.
Design/methodology/approach
This study, using mixed methods, focusses on: designing a rubric by identifying assessment instruments in previous presentation research and implementing essential design characteristics in a preliminary developed rubric; and testing the validity of the constructed instrument with an expert group of higher educational professionals ( n =38).
The result of this study is a validated rubric instrument consisting of 11 presentation criteria, their related levels in performance, and a five-point scoring scale. These adopted criteria correspond to the widely accepted main criteria for presentations, in both literature and educational practice, regarding aspects as content of the presentation, structure of the presentation, interaction with the audience and presentation delivery.
Practical implications
Implications for the use of the rubric instrument in educational practice refer to the extent to which the identified criteria should be adapted to the requirements of presenting in a certain domain and whether the amount and complexity of the information in the rubric, as criteria, levels and scales, can be used in an adequate manner within formative assessment processes.
Originality/value
This instrument offers the opportunity to formatively assess students’ oral presentation performance, since rubrics explicate criteria and expectations. Furthermore, such an instrument also facilitates feedback and self-assessment processes. Finally, the rubric, resulting from this study, could be used in future quasi-experimental studies to measure students’ development in presentation performance in a pre-and post-test situation.
- Higher education
- Oral presentation competence
Van Ginkel, S. , Laurentzen, R. , Mulder, M. , Mononen, A. , Kyttä, J. and Kortelainen, M.J. (2017), "Assessing oral presentation performance: Designing a rubric and testing its validity with an expert group", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education , Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 474-486. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2016-0012
Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited
Related articles
All feedback is valuable.
Please share your general feedback
Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questions
Contact Customer Support
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Rubric for Standard Research Talks This rubric is designed to help you evaluate the organization, design, and delivery of standard research talks and other oral presentations. Here are some ways to use it: Distribute the rubric to colleagues before a dress rehearsal of your talk. Use the rubric to collect feedback and improve your presentation ...
The goal of this rubric is to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. • Self-assessment: Record yourself presenting your talk using your computer's pre-downloaded recording software or by using the coach in Microsoft PowerPoint. Then review your recording, fill in the rubric ...
Oral Presentation Rubric 4—Excellent 3—Good 2—Fair 1—Needs Improvement Delivery • Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes • Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points • Consistent use of direct eye contact with ...
Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Presenter mumbles, talks very fast, and speaks too quietly for a majority of students to hear & understand. Timing 4 - Exceptional 3 - Admirable 2 - Acceptable 1 - Poor. Length of Presentation Within two minutes of allotted time +/-. Within four minutes of allotted time +/-.
Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric, Formal Setting . PRESENTER: Non-verbal skills (Poise) 5 4 3 2 1 Comfort Relaxed, easy presentation with minimal hesitation Generally comfortable appearance, occasional hesitation Somewhat comfortable appearance, some hesitation Generally uncomfortable, difficulty with flow of presentation Completely
2. The presentation explains how steps in the research process led to the development of the student's personal conclusion(s). 3. 4 Engage Audience. The design, delivery or performance techniques (e.g., eye contact, vocal variety, emphatic gestures, movement) hampers effective communication AND/OR severely limit the presentation's impact. 2.
Oral Presentation: Scoring Guide. 4 points - Clear organization, reinforced by media. Stays focused throughout. 3 points - Mostly organized, but loses focus once or twice. 2 points - Somewhat organized, but loses focus 3 or more times. 1 point - No clear organization to the presentation. 3 points - Incorporates several course concepts ...
rts.5Fielding Questions - 15 %1. All team members are willing to address the topic of the questions and show knowledg. re. s related to their chosen topic.52. ts. appear eager to answer questions. 5. Questions are answered correctly.5**Each team has 20 minute. to state their case or tell their story. If a team can adequately present the.
Oral Presentation Rubric OBJECTIVES Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Overall Content Sophisticated use of evidence and research, including scholarly and primary sources where appropriate Above average use of evidence and research, including scholarly and primary sources where appropriate Adequate use of evidence and research,
Oral Presentations Scoring Rubric. Oral presentations are expected to completely address the topic and requirements set forth in the assignment, and are appropriate for the intended audience. Oral presentations are expected to provide an appropriate level of analysis, discussion and evaluation as required by the assignment.
Superficial understanding of their research. Research proposal has a few major flaws that interfere with completion of the project. Variables need clarification, were not the most significant variables to investigate. Needs to improve scientific accuracy of the information presented. Proposal meets all requirements with minimum effectiveness.
Short Research Presentation Rubric Presenter Name: _____ Level: UG/G Evaluation Criteria Category Below Expectations (0 - 3) Adequate (3 - 5) Good (6 - 8) Exemplary (9 - 10) Total Content and Knowledge pertinent information, Information not presented clearly, concisely, nor logically. Ideas unsupported. Inappropriate.
overly text-heavy, distracting, unconnected to claim, or otherwise claim, or otherwise presentation. ineffective. connected to claim, and effectively help support. Speech and manner (eye contact, volume, clarity, pacing) Speech and manner One or more are not effective: pacing may be too fast or slow; eye contact may not be present; voice may be ...
The format of research presentations can vary across and within disciplines. Use this rubric (PDF) to identify and assess elements of research presentations, including delivery strategies and slide design. This resource focuses on research presentations but may be useful beyond.
Scoring Rubric for Oral Scientific Presentations. Level of Achievement. Excellent 16-20 points. Good 11-15 points. Marginal 6-10 points. Inadequate 0-5 points. Organization. Well thought out with logical progression. Use of proper language.
Research Oral Presentation Rubric. Presentation follows scientific method (use research paper outline as your guide) in the proper sequential order. Student does not seem to understand their research project and is not able to interpret results. Student creates a good presentation but could improve on displaying data and has a few errors in ...
Beginning Developing Proficient Mastery. 2 3 4. A. Content. Topic lacks relevance or focus; presentation contains multiple fact errors. Topic would benefit from more focus; presentation contains some fact errors or omissions. Topic is adequately focused and relevant; major facts are accurate and generally complete.
Rubric: Research Proposal Oral Presentation Category Elements of a strong presentation Knowledge and explanation of subject matter: • relates proposal to topics covered in 20.109 when appropriate • sufficiently explains concepts/ methods/etc. not covered in 20.109 Idea • the what, why, and how (are you going to do it) of
Oral Presentation Rubric. Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes. Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes. Displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes. No eye contact with audience, as entire report is read from notes.
AP®RESEARCH 2017 SCORING GUIDELINES Performance Task Rubric: Presentation and Oral Defense. generalized or oversimplified conclusion. the choice is superficial or illogical. (Reflection Throughout. is assigned to a single row of the rubric when the presentation displays a below. Content Area Performance Levels 1 Research Design The ...
The rubric allows teachers to assess students in several key areas of oral presentation. Students are scored on a scale of 1-4 in three major areas. The first area is Delivery, which includes eye contact, and voice inflection. The second area, Content/Organization, scores students based on their knowledge and understanding of the topic being ...
The purpose of this paper is to design a rubric instrument for assessing oral presentation performance in higher education and to test its validity with an expert group.,This study, using mixed methods, focusses on: designing a rubric by identifying assessment instruments in previous presentation research and implementing essential design ...