design and problem solving in technology pdf

Toward a design theory of problem solving

• Development
• Published: December 2000
• Volume 48 , pages 63–85, ( 2000 )

Cite this article

• David H. Jonassen 1  

17k Accesses

890 Citations

11 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Problem solving is generally regarded as the most important cognitive activity in everyday and professional contexts. Most people are required to and rewarded for solving problems. However, learning to solve problems is too seldom required in formal educational settings, in part, because our understanding of its processes is limited. Instructional-design research and theory has devoted too little attention to the study of problem-solving processes. In this article, I describe differences among problems in terms of their structuredness, domain specificity (abstractness), and complexity. Then, I briefly describe a variety of individual differences (factors internal to the problem solver) that affect problem solving. Finally, I articulate a typology of problems, each type of which engages different cognitive, affective, and conative processes and therefore necessitates different instructional support. The purpose of this paper is to propose a metatheory of problem solving in order to initiate dialogue and research rather than offering a definitive answer regarding its processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Developing real life problem-solving skills through situational design: a pilot study

Problem Solving from a Behavioral Perspective: Implications for Behavior Analysts and Educators

Designing Problem-Solving for Meaningful Learning: A Discussion of Asia-Pacific Research

Anderson, J.R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications . New York: Freeman.

Google Scholar  

Barrows, H.S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the pre-clinical years . New York: Springer.

Barrows, H.S., & Tamblyn, R.M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education . New York: Springer.

Bransford, J., & Stein, B.S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver: A guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity . New York: W.H. Freeman. Bryson, M., Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., & Joram, E. (1991). Going beyond the problem as given: Problem solving in expert and novice writers. In R.J. Sternberg & P.A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Davidson, J.E., & Sternberg, R.J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Davis, J.K., & Haueisen, W.C. (1976). Field independence and hypothesis testing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43 , 763–769.

Dörner, D., & Wearing, A.J. (1995). Complex problem solving: Toward a theory. In P.A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 65–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dunkle, M.E., Schraw, G., & Bendixen, L.D. (1995, April). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Durso, F.T., & Gronlund, S.D. (1999). Situation awareness. In F.T. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 283–314). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

English, L.D. (1998). Children's reasoning in solving relational problems of deduction. Thinking & Reasoning, 4 (3), 249–281.

Article   Google Scholar  

Fishbein, D.D., Eckart, T., Lauver, E., van Leeuwen, R., & Langemeyer, D. (1990). Learners' questions and comprehension in a tutoring system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 , 163–170.

Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and comprehension monitoring: A new era of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 , 906–911.

Forgas, J.P. (1982). Reactions to life dilemmas: Risk taking, success and responsibility attribution. Australian Journal of Psychology, 34 , 25–35.

Funke, J. (1991). Solving complex problems: Exploration and control of complex systems. In R.J. Sternberg & P.A. Frensch (eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 185–222). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gagné, R.M. (1980). The conditions of learning . New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th Ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.

Gagné, R.M., & Merrill, M.D. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 38 (1), 23–30 1990.

Gick, M.L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21 (1&2), 99–120.

Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12 , 306–355.

Gick, M.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15 , 1–38.

Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1989). Motivating the notion of generic design within information processing theory: The design problem space. AI Magazine, 10 (1), 19–36.

Gordon, S.E., & Gill, R.T. (1989). The formation and use of knowledge structures in problem solving domains . Tech. Report AFOSR-88-0063. Washington, DC: Bolling AFB.

Gourgey, A.F. (1998). Metacognition and basic skills instruction. Instructional Science, 26 , 81–96.

Greeno, J. (1978). Natures of problem-solving abilities. In W. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (pp. 239–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Greeno, J. (1991). A view of mathematical problem solving in school. In M.U. Smith (Ed.), Toward a unified theory of problem solving (pp. 69–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design process: Exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction, 5 , 305–344.

Halgren, S.L., & Cooke, N.J. (1993). Towards ecological validity in menu research. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39 (1), 51–70.

Hall, E.P., Gott, S.P., & Pokorny, R.A. (1995). A procedural guide to cognitive task analysis: The PARI methodology , Tech. Report AL/HR-TR-1995-0108. Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Human Resources Directorate.

Hannafin, M.J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open-ended learning environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology, 34 (8), 48–55.

Hayes, J.R., & Simon, H.A. (1977). Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In N.J. Castellan, D.B. Pisoni, & G.R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive theory (pp. 21–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Heil, M.C. (1999). Air traffic control specialist age and cognitive test performance . FAA Office of Aviation Medicine Report No. DOT-FAA-AM-99-23. Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration.

Heller, L.C. (1982). An exploration of the effect of structure variables on mathematical word problem-solving achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University), Dissertation Abstracts International, 44 , 416.

Hofer, B.K., & Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67 (1), 88–140.

Hong, N.S., Jonassen, D.H., & McGee, S. (in press). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching .

Jeffries, R., Turner, A.A., Polson, P.G., & Atwood, M.E. (1981). The processes involved in designing software. In J.R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 255–283). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Johnson, S.D. (1988). Cognitive analysis of expert and novice troubleshooting performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1 (3), 38–54.

Johnson, S.D., & Satchwell, S.E. (1993). The effect of functional flow diagrams on apprentice aircraft mechanics' technical system understanding. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6 (4), 73–91.

Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional design model for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development 45 (1), 65–95.

Jonassen, D.H. (2000a). Integrating problem solving into instructional design. In R.A. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Jonassen, D.H. (2000b). Activity theory revisited. In D.H Jonassen & S.L. Land, (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Jonassen, D.H. (2000c). Using technologies to model student problem spaces . Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education, Taipei, Taiwan.

Jonassen, D.H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for assessing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jonassen, D.H., & Grabowski, B.L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Jonassen, D.H., & Henning, P. (1999). Mental models: Knowledge in the head and knowledge in the world. Educational Technology, 39 (3), 37–42.

Jonassen, D.H., & Kwon, H.I. (in press). Communication patterns in computer-mediated vs. face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development .

Jonassen, D.H, & Land, S.L (Eds.). (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Jonassen, D., Prevish, T., Christy, D., Stavurlaki, E. (1999). Learning to solve problems on the Web: Aggregate planning in a business management course. Distance Education: An International Journal, 20 (1), 49–63.

Jonassen, D.H., & Tessmer, M. (1996/1997). An outcomes-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation, and research. Training Research Journal, 2 , 11–46.

Jonassen, D.H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. (1999). Handbook of task analysis procedures . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kahney, H. (1993). Problem solving: Current issues . Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Kerstholt, J.H., & Raaijmakers, J.G.W. (1997). Decision making in dynamic task environments. In R. Ranyard, W.R. Cozier, & Ola Swenson (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 205–217). London: Routledge.

Kitchner, K.S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26 , 222–232.

Kluwe, R.H. (1995). Single case studies and models of complex problem solving In P.A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 269–291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Land, S.M., & Hannafin, M.J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-inaction with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44 (3), 37–53.

Lehman, D., Lempert, R., & Nisbett, R.E. (1988). The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events. Educational Psychologist, 43 , 431–42.

Lester, F.K. (1994). Musings about mathematical problem-solving research: 1970–1994. Journal for Research in Mathematis Education, 25 , 660–675.

Lucangelli, D., Tressoldi, P.E., & Cendron, M. (1998). Cognitive and metacognitive abilities involved in the solution of mathematical word problems: Validation of a comprehensive model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23 , 257–275.

MacKay, E., & O'Neill, P. (1992). What creaes the dilemma in ethical dilemmas? Examples from psychological practice. Ethics & Behavior, 2 (4), 227–244.

Maloney, T.J. (1981). The relation between field-independence and rule-transfer (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo), Dissertation Abstracts International, 442 , 2575.

Marshall, S.P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Masui, C., & DeCorte, E. (1999). Enhancing learning and problem solving skills: Orienting and self-judging, two powerful and trainable learning skills. Learning and Instruction, 9 , 517–542.

Mayer, R.E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.

Mayer, R.E. (1998). Cognitive. Metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26 , 49–63.

Mayer, R.E., & Wittrock, M.C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D.C. Berlinert & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47–62). New York: Macmillan.

McCloskey, M., Caramaza, A., & Basili, A. (1985). Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia. Brain and Cognition, 4 , 171–196.

Meacham, J.A., Emont, N.C. (1989). The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J.D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 7–23). New York: Praeger.

Mullen, J.D., & Roth, B.M. (1991). Decision making: Its logic and practice . Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Perkins, D.N., Hancock, C., Hobbs, R., Martin, F., & Simmons, R. (1986). Conditions of learning in novice programmers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2 (1), 37–56.

Perry, W.G. (1970). The forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Pokorny, R.A., Hall, E.P., Gallaway, M.A., & Dibble, E. (1996). Analyzing components of work samples to evaluate performance. Military Psychology, 8 (3), 161–177.

Reed, S.K., Ernsyt, G.W., & Banerji, R. (1974). The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6 , 436–450.

Reigeluth, C.M. (1983). Instructional design theories and models . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Reitman, W.R. (1965). Cognition and thought . New York: Wiley.

Robertson, W.C. (1990). Detection of cognitive structure with protocol data: Predicting performance on physics transfer problems. Cognitive Science, 14 , 253–280.

Ronning, McCurdy, & Ballinger (1984, January). Individual differences: A third component in problem-solving instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21 (1), 71–82.

Salomon, G., & Perkins, D.N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24 , 113–142.

Schacter, J., Chung, G.K.W.K., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 , 840–849.

Schank, R.C., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. (1993/1994). The design of goal-based scenarios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (4), 305–345.

Schroeder, D.A. (1995). An introduction to social dilemmas. In D.A. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 1–14). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Shavelson, R.J. (1972). Some aspects of the correspondence between content structure and cognitive structure in physics instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 , 225–234.

Sherrill, J.M. (1983). Solving textbook mathematical problems. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29 , 140–152.

Simon, H.A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4 , 181–201.

Simon, D.P. (1978). Information processing theory of human problem solving. In D. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive process . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Singley, M.K., & Anderson, J.R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Smith, M.U. (1991). A view from biology. In M.U. Smith (ed.), Toward a unified theory of problem solving . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Smith, P.L., & Ragan, T.J. (1999). Instructional design 2nd ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Sternberg, R.J., & Frensch, P.A. (Eds.). (1991). Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stewin, L., & Anderson, C. (1974). Cognitive complexity as a determinant of information processing. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 20 (3), 233–243.

Suedfeld, P., de Vries, B., Bluck, S., Wallbaum, B.C. (1996). Intuitive perceptions of decision-making strategy: Naive assessors' concepts of integrative complexity. International Journal of Psychology, 31 (5), 177–190.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12 , 257–285.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 , 453–458.

van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Voss, J.F., & Post, T.A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M.T.H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M.J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Voss, J.F., Wolfe, C.R., Lawrence, J.A., & Engle, J.A. (1991). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In R.J. Sternberg & P.A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 119–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wagner, R.K. (1991). Managerial problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg & P.A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 159–184). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Williams, S. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples for legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (4), 367–427.

Wood, P.K. (1983). Inquiring systems and problem structures: Implications for cognitive development. Human Development, 26 , 249–265.

Woods, D.R., Hrymak, A.N., Marshall, R.R., Wood, P.E., Crowe, Hoffman, T.W., Wright, J.D., Taylor, P.A., Woodhouse, K.A., & Bouchard, C.G.K. (1997). Developing problem-solving skills: the McMaster problem solving program. Journal of Engineering Education, 86 (2), 75–92.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Missouri, USA

David H. Jonassen ( Distinguished Professor of Information Science and Learning Technologies )

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper represents an effort to introduce issues and concerns related to problem solving to the instructional design community. I do not presume that the community is ignorant of problem solving or its literature, only that too little effort has been expended by the field in articulating design models for problem solving. There are many reasons for that state of affairs.

The curse of any introductory paper is the lack of depth in the treatment of these issues. To explicate each of the issues raised in this paper would require a book (which is forthcoming), which makes it unpublishable in a journal. My purpose here is to introduce these issues in order to stimulate discussion, research, and development of problem-solving instruction that will help us to articulate better design models.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Jonassen, D.H. Toward a design theory of problem solving. ETR&D 48 , 63–85 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500

Download citation

Issue Date : December 2000

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Individual Difference
• Educational Technology
• Domain Specificity
• Cognitive Activity
• Problem Solver
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• DOI: 10.4324/9781315712642-12
• Corpus ID: 106812468

Design and problem-solving

• Terry Liddament
• Published 1996
• Engineering, Computer Science

8 Citations

Technological problem solving: an investigation of differences associated with levels of task success, developing a deeper understanding of design in technology education, evaluation/modification cycles in junior high students' technological problem solving, inter-creative course model proposal: teaching- learning design in secondary schools of trnc., examining problem solving ability and creativity of the students in design studio, teaching design: taking the first steps, assessing computer-aided design skills, learning about progression – informing thinking about a curriculum for wales explanatory, 8 references, is designing mysterious challenging the dual knowledge thesis, the metamorphosis of the design vocabulary, an essay concerning human understanding, the emperor's new mind, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Design, system, value: The role of problem-solving and critical thinking capabilities in technology education, as perceived by teachers

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Advertisement

Chaos and Confusion: Tech Outage Causes Disruptions Worldwide

Airlines, hospitals and people’s computers were affected after CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity company, sent out a flawed software update.

• Share full article

By Adam Satariano Paul Mozur Kate Conger and Sheera Frenkel

• July 19, 2024

Airlines grounded flights. Operators of 911 lines could not respond to emergencies. Hospitals canceled surgeries. Retailers closed for the day. And the actions all traced back to a batch of bad computer code.

A flawed software update sent out by a little-known cybersecurity company caused chaos and disruption around the world on Friday. The company, CrowdStrike , based in Austin, Texas, makes software used by multinational corporations, government agencies and scores of other organizations to protect against hackers and online intruders.

But when CrowdStrike sent its update on Thursday to its customers that run Microsoft Windows software, computers began to crash.

The fallout, which was immediate and inescapable, highlighted the brittleness of global technology infrastructure. The world has become reliant on Microsoft and a handful of cybersecurity firms like CrowdStrike. So when a single flawed piece of software is released over the internet, it can almost instantly damage countless companies and organizations that depend on the technology as part of everyday business.

“This is a very, very uncomfortable illustration of the fragility of the world’s core internet infrastructure,” said Ciaran Martin, the former chief executive of Britain’s National Cyber Security Center and a professor at the Blavatnik School of Government at Oxford University.

A cyberattack did not cause the widespread outage, but the effects on Friday showed how devastating the damage can be when a main artery of the global technology system is disrupted. It raised broader questions about CrowdStrike’s testing processes and what repercussions such software firms should face when flaws in their code cause major disruptions.

How a Software Update Crashed Computers Around the World

Here’s a visual explanation for how a faulty software update crippled machines.

How the airline cancellations rippled around the world (and across time zones)

Share of canceled flights at 25 airports on Friday

50% of flights

Ai r po r t

Bengalu r u K empeg o wda

Dhaka Shahjalal

Minneapolis-Saint P aul

Stuttga r t

Melbou r ne

Be r lin B r anden b urg

London City

Amsterdam Schiphol

Chicago O'Hare

Raleigh−Durham

B r adl e y

Cha r lotte

Reagan National

Philadelphia

1:20 a.m. ET

CrowdStrike’s stock price so far this year

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .