Rubrics For Oral Presentations
Printable rubrics for oral presentations provide a straightforward tool for evaluating the effectiveness and quality of students' speeches or presentations.
They offer clear criteria, such as organization, content understanding, delivery, and audience engagement, making it easier for you to assess performances consistently and objectively. By using these rubrics, you can give valuable feedback to your students, helping them identify their strengths and areas for improvement, which can significantly enhance their future presentation skills.
Table of Images 👆
Oral presentation grading rubric, oral presentation rubric high school.
- Oral Presentation Rubric
Oral Presentation Rubric Elementary
- Rubric For Oral Presentation High School
- Rubrics For Oral Presentations In College
- Analytic Rubrics For Oral Presentation
- Kid Friendly Oral Presentation Rubric
A high school oral presentation rubric is an essential tool that can guide you in preparing and delivering effective presentations. It outlines clear expectations regarding content, organization, delivery, and visual aids, ensuring your presentation is both engaging and informative. By following this rubric, you can enhance your public speaking skills, making a lasting impression on your audience and achieving a higher grade.
The oral presentation grading rubric serves as a fair and standardized method for teachers to assess your speaking abilities and presentation skills. It evaluates critical aspects such as clarity, coherence, pronunciation, and audience engagement. Familiarizing yourself with the grading criteria can help you identify areas for improvement, tailoring your performance to meet or exceed expectations.
An oral presentation rubric for elementary students is designed to encourage young learners to practice and develop their public speaking skills in a structured way. It focuses on basic presentation elements like articulation, confidence, and topic understanding. Using this rubric, you can gain valuable feedback on your performance, helping you become a more effective communicator from an early age.
More printable images tagged with:
Have something to tell us?
Recent Comments
Nov 22, 2022
I really appreciate the availability of these printable rubrics for oral presentations! They have been a great tool to help me evaluate and improve my presentation skills. Thank you for providing this helpful resource!
Sep 11, 2022
I love using these printable rubrics for oral presentations! They provide clear guidelines and help me evaluate my students' communication skills effectively. Thank you for making it easier for me to assess their progress!
Aug 28, 2022
Printable rubrics for oral presentations are valuable tools for both teachers and students, as they provide clear guidelines and criteria for assessing and improving presentation skills, fostering learning and professional growth.
10 By 10 Grids
Find Hidden Objects
Connect The Dots Dinosaur
Creation Activity Pages
Months Of The Names
Find free printable content.
Rubric Best Practices, Examples, and Templates
A rubric is a scoring tool that identifies the different criteria relevant to an assignment, assessment, or learning outcome and states the possible levels of achievement in a specific, clear, and objective way. Use rubrics to assess project-based student work including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations.
Rubrics can help instructors communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly, consistently and efficiently. Rubrics can provide students with informative feedback on their strengths and weaknesses so that they can reflect on their performance and work on areas that need improvement.
How to Get Started
Best practices, moodle how-to guides.
- Workshop Recording (Spring 2024)
- Workshop Registration
Step 1: Analyze the assignment
The first step in the rubric creation process is to analyze the assignment or assessment for which you are creating a rubric. To do this, consider the following questions:
- What is the purpose of the assignment and your feedback? What do you want students to demonstrate through the completion of this assignment (i.e. what are the learning objectives measured by it)? Is it a summative assessment, or will students use the feedback to create an improved product?
- Does the assignment break down into different or smaller tasks? Are these tasks equally important as the main assignment?
- What would an “excellent” assignment look like? An “acceptable” assignment? One that still needs major work?
- How detailed do you want the feedback you give students to be? Do you want/need to give them a grade?
Step 2: Decide what kind of rubric you will use
Types of rubrics: holistic, analytic/descriptive, single-point
Holistic Rubric. A holistic rubric includes all the criteria (such as clarity, organization, mechanics, etc.) to be considered together and included in a single evaluation. With a holistic rubric, the rater or grader assigns a single score based on an overall judgment of the student’s work, using descriptions of each performance level to assign the score.
Advantages of holistic rubrics:
- Can p lace an emphasis on what learners can demonstrate rather than what they cannot
- Save grader time by minimizing the number of evaluations to be made for each student
- Can be used consistently across raters, provided they have all been trained
Disadvantages of holistic rubrics:
- Provide less specific feedback than analytic/descriptive rubrics
- Can be difficult to choose a score when a student’s work is at varying levels across the criteria
- Any weighting of c riteria cannot be indicated in the rubric
Analytic/Descriptive Rubric . An analytic or descriptive rubric often takes the form of a table with the criteria listed in the left column and with levels of performance listed across the top row. Each cell contains a description of what the specified criterion looks like at a given level of performance. Each of the criteria is scored individually.
Advantages of analytic rubrics:
- Provide detailed feedback on areas of strength or weakness
- Each criterion can be weighted to reflect its relative importance
Disadvantages of analytic rubrics:
- More time-consuming to create and use than a holistic rubric
- May not be used consistently across raters unless the cells are well defined
- May result in giving less personalized feedback
Single-Point Rubric . A single-point rubric is breaks down the components of an assignment into different criteria, but instead of describing different levels of performance, only the “proficient” level is described. Feedback space is provided for instructors to give individualized comments to help students improve and/or show where they excelled beyond the proficiency descriptors.
Advantages of single-point rubrics:
- Easier to create than an analytic/descriptive rubric
- Perhaps more likely that students will read the descriptors
- Areas of concern and excellence are open-ended
- May removes a focus on the grade/points
- May increase student creativity in project-based assignments
Disadvantage of analytic rubrics: Requires more work for instructors writing feedback
Step 3 (Optional): Look for templates and examples.
You might Google, “Rubric for persuasive essay at the college level” and see if there are any publicly available examples to start from. Ask your colleagues if they have used a rubric for a similar assignment. Some examples are also available at the end of this article. These rubrics can be a great starting point for you, but consider steps 3, 4, and 5 below to ensure that the rubric matches your assignment description, learning objectives and expectations.
Step 4: Define the assignment criteria
Make a list of the knowledge and skills are you measuring with the assignment/assessment Refer to your stated learning objectives, the assignment instructions, past examples of student work, etc. for help.
Helpful strategies for defining grading criteria:
- Collaborate with co-instructors, teaching assistants, and other colleagues
- Brainstorm and discuss with students
- Can they be observed and measured?
- Are they important and essential?
- Are they distinct from other criteria?
- Are they phrased in precise, unambiguous language?
- Revise the criteria as needed
- Consider whether some are more important than others, and how you will weight them.
Step 5: Design the rating scale
Most ratings scales include between 3 and 5 levels. Consider the following questions when designing your rating scale:
- Given what students are able to demonstrate in this assignment/assessment, what are the possible levels of achievement?
- How many levels would you like to include (more levels means more detailed descriptions)
- Will you use numbers and/or descriptive labels for each level of performance? (for example 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 and/or Exceeds expectations, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing, Beginning, etc.)
- Don’t use too many columns, and recognize that some criteria can have more columns that others . The rubric needs to be comprehensible and organized. Pick the right amount of columns so that the criteria flow logically and naturally across levels.
Step 6: Write descriptions for each level of the rating scale
Artificial Intelligence tools like Chat GPT have proven to be useful tools for creating a rubric. You will want to engineer your prompt that you provide the AI assistant to ensure you get what you want. For example, you might provide the assignment description, the criteria you feel are important, and the number of levels of performance you want in your prompt. Use the results as a starting point, and adjust the descriptions as needed.
Building a rubric from scratch
For a single-point rubric , describe what would be considered “proficient,” i.e. B-level work, and provide that description. You might also include suggestions for students outside of the actual rubric about how they might surpass proficient-level work.
For analytic and holistic rubrics , c reate statements of expected performance at each level of the rubric.
- Consider what descriptor is appropriate for each criteria, e.g., presence vs absence, complete vs incomplete, many vs none, major vs minor, consistent vs inconsistent, always vs never. If you have an indicator described in one level, it will need to be described in each level.
- You might start with the top/exemplary level. What does it look like when a student has achieved excellence for each/every criterion? Then, look at the “bottom” level. What does it look like when a student has not achieved the learning goals in any way? Then, complete the in-between levels.
- For an analytic rubric , do this for each particular criterion of the rubric so that every cell in the table is filled. These descriptions help students understand your expectations and their performance in regard to those expectations.
Well-written descriptions:
- Describe observable and measurable behavior
- Use parallel language across the scale
- Indicate the degree to which the standards are met
Step 7: Create your rubric
Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle. Rubric creators: Rubistar , iRubric
Step 8: Pilot-test your rubric
Prior to implementing your rubric on a live course, obtain feedback from:
- Teacher assistants
Try out your new rubric on a sample of student work. After you pilot-test your rubric, analyze the results to consider its effectiveness and revise accordingly.
- Limit the rubric to a single page for reading and grading ease
- Use parallel language . Use similar language and syntax/wording from column to column. Make sure that the rubric can be easily read from left to right or vice versa.
- Use student-friendly language . Make sure the language is learning-level appropriate. If you use academic language or concepts, you will need to teach those concepts.
- Share and discuss the rubric with your students . Students should understand that the rubric is there to help them learn, reflect, and self-assess. If students use a rubric, they will understand the expectations and their relevance to learning.
- Consider scalability and reusability of rubrics. Create rubric templates that you can alter as needed for multiple assignments.
- Maximize the descriptiveness of your language. Avoid words like “good” and “excellent.” For example, instead of saying, “uses excellent sources,” you might describe what makes a resource excellent so that students will know. You might also consider reducing the reliance on quantity, such as a number of allowable misspelled words. Focus instead, for example, on how distracting any spelling errors are.
Example of an analytic rubric for a final paper
| Above Average (4) | Sufficient (3) | Developing (2) | Needs improvement (1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Thesis supported by relevant information and ideas | The central purpose of the student work is clear and supporting ideas always are always well-focused. Details are relevant, enrich the work. | The central purpose of the student work is clear and ideas are almost always focused in a way that supports the thesis. Relevant details illustrate the author’s ideas. | The central purpose of the student work is identified. Ideas are mostly focused in a way that supports the thesis. | The purpose of the student work is not well-defined. A number of central ideas do not support the thesis. Thoughts appear disconnected. |
| (Sequencing of elements/ ideas) | Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which flows naturally and is engaging to the audience. | Information and ideas are presented in a logical sequence which is followed by the reader with little or no difficulty. | Information and ideas are presented in an order that the audience can mostly follow. | Information and ideas are poorly sequenced. The audience has difficulty following the thread of thought. |
| (Correctness of grammar and spelling) | Minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling. | The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by spelling and/or grammatical errors. | Grammatical and/or spelling errors distract from the work. | The readability of the work is seriously hampered by spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Example of a holistic rubric for a final paper
| The audience is able to easily identify the central message of the work and is engaged by the paper’s clear focus and relevant details. Information is presented logically and naturally. There are minimal to no distracting errors in grammar and spelling. : The audience is easily able to identify the focus of the student work which is supported by relevant ideas and supporting details. Information is presented in a logical manner that is easily followed. The readability of the work is only slightly interrupted by errors. : The audience can identify the central purpose of the student work without little difficulty and supporting ideas are present and clear. The information is presented in an orderly fashion that can be followed with little difficulty. Grammatical and spelling errors distract from the work. : The audience cannot clearly or easily identify the central ideas or purpose of the student work. Information is presented in a disorganized fashion causing the audience to have difficulty following the author’s ideas. The readability of the work is seriously hampered by errors. |
Single-Point Rubric
| Advanced (evidence of exceeding standards) | Criteria described a proficient level | Concerns (things that need work) |
|---|---|---|
| Criteria #1: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
| Criteria #2: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
| Criteria #3: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
| Criteria #4: Description reflecting achievement of proficient level of performance | ||
| 90-100 points | 80-90 points | <80 points |
More examples:
- Single Point Rubric Template ( variation )
- Analytic Rubric Template make a copy to edit
- A Rubric for Rubrics
- Bank of Online Discussion Rubrics in different formats
- Mathematical Presentations Descriptive Rubric
- Math Proof Assessment Rubric
- Kansas State Sample Rubrics
- Design Single Point Rubric
Technology Tools: Rubrics in Moodle
- Moodle Docs: Rubrics
- Moodle Docs: Grading Guide (use for single-point rubrics)
Tools with rubrics (other than Moodle)
- Google Assignments
- Turnitin Assignments: Rubric or Grading Form
Other resources
- DePaul University (n.d.). Rubrics .
- Gonzalez, J. (2014). Know your terms: Holistic, Analytic, and Single-Point Rubrics . Cult of Pedagogy.
- Goodrich, H. (1996). Understanding rubrics . Teaching for Authentic Student Performance, 54 (4), 14-17. Retrieved from
- Miller, A. (2012). Tame the beast: tips for designing and using rubrics.
- Ragupathi, K., Lee, A. (2020). Beyond Fairness and Consistency in Grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education. In: Sanger, C., Gleason, N. (eds) Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
- Home div.mega__menu -->
- Guiding Principles
- Assessment Cycle
- Equity in Assessment
- FAQs About Assessment
- Learning Outcomes & Evidence
- Undergraduate Learning Goals & Outcomes
- University Assessment Reports
- Program Assessment Reports
- University Survey Reports
- Assessment in Action
- Internal Assessment Grant
- Celebrating Assessment at LMU
- Assessment Advisory Committee
- Workshops & Events
- Assessment Resources
- Recommended Websites
- Recommended Books
- Contact div.mega__menu -->
Oral Presentation Example Rubric
Oral Presentation Example Rubric Outcome: Students will graduate with the ability to give professional presentations. Work Product: Oral presentation
| Outcome/Skills | Advanced | Developing | Emerging |
| Idea development, use of language, and the organization of ideas are effectively used to achieve a purpose. | A. Ideas are clearly organized, developed, and supported to achieve a purpose; the purpose is clear. B. The introduction gets the attention of the audience. C. Main points are clear and organized effectively. D. Supporting material is original, logical, and relevant (facts, examples, etc.). E. Smooth transitions are used. F. The conclusion is satisfying. G. Language choices are vivid and precise. H. Material is developed for an oral rather than a written presentation. | A. The main idea is evident, but the organizational structure may need to be strengthened; ideas may not always flow smoothly. B. The introduction may not be well-developed. C. Main points are not always clear. D. Supporting material may lack in originality or adequate development. E. Transitions may be awkward. F. The conclusion may need additional development. G. Language is appropriate, but word choices are not particularly vivid or precise. | A. Idea “seeds” have not yet germinated; ideas may not be focused or developed; the main purpose is not clear. B. The introduction is undeveloped or irrelevant. C. Main points are difficult to identify. D. Inaccurate, generalized, or inappropriate supporting material may be used. E. Transitions may be needed. F. The conclusion is abrupt or limited. G. Language choices may be limited, peppered with slang or jargon, too complex, or too dull. |
| The nonverbal message supports and is consistent with the verbal message. | A. The delivery is natural, confident, and enhances the message — posture, eye contact, smooth gestures, facial expressions, volume, pace, etc. indicate confidence, a commitment to the topic, and a willingness to communicate. B. The vocal tone, delivery style, and clothing are consistent with the message. C. Limited filler words (“ums”) are used. D. Clear articulation and pronunciation are used. | A. The delivery generally seems effective—however, effective use of volume, eye contact, vocal control, etc. may not be consistent; some hesitancy may be observed. B. Vocal tone, facial expressions, clothing and other nonverbal expressions do not detract significantly from the message. C. Filler words are not distracting. D. Generally, articulation and pronunciation are clear.
| A. The delivery detracts from the message; eye contact may be very limited; the presenter may tend to look at the floor, mumble, speak inaudibly, fidget, or read most or all of the speech; gestures and movements may be jerky or excessive. B. The delivery may appear inconsistent with the message. C. Filler words (“ums,”) are used excessively. D. Articulation and pronunciation tend to be sloppy. |
| Idea development, use of language, and the organization of ideas for a specific audience, setting, and occasion are appropriate. | A. Language is familiar to the audience, appropriate for the setting, and free of bias; the presenter may “code-switch” (use a different language form) when appropriate. B. Topic selection and examples are interesting and relevant for the audience and occasion. C. Delivery style and clothing choices suggest an awareness of expectations and norms. | A. Language used is not disrespectful or offensive. B. Topic selection and examples are not inappropriate for the audience, occasion, or setting; some effort to make the material relevant to audience interests, the occasion, or setting is evident. C. The delivery style, tone of voice, and clothing choices do not seem out-of-place or disrespectful to the audience. | A. Language is questionable or inappropriate for a particular audience, occasion, or setting. Some biased or unclear language may be used. B. Topic selection does not relate to audience needs and interests. C. The delivery style may not match the particular audience or occasion—the presenter’s tone of voice or other mannerisms may create alienation from the audience; clothing choices may also convey disrespect for the audience. |
Rubric is a modification of one presented by: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (1998). Oral presentation rubric . Retrieved October 23, 2008 from http://www.nwrel.org/assessment/pdfRubrics/oralassess.PDF
Presentation Grading Rubric | Printable PDF
Use this FREE rubric to provide students with clear expectations for their next oral presentation or speech! Public speaking is difficult for everyone, especially students. Getting up and speaking in front of the class is the last thing many of our students want to do. Help students prepare for their speech or presentation with a clear set of guidelines.
Rubrics provide students with…
- a clear set of criteria for evaluation
- objective benchmarks for assessment
- constructive feedback for improvement
Use this grading rubric for public speaking, presentations, and speeches. Download it for FREE today!
Criteria to Include in a Presentation Rubric:
- Content & Organization
- Time & Pacing
- Eye Contact
- Clear & Audible Voice
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FREE ORAL PRESENTATION RUBRIC!
Get everything you need to teach public speaking! Click the link below to preview the bundle of engaging speaking and listening resources!
Public Speaking Curriculum Bundle
Here’s what teachers are saying about this unit:
“Our class had a great time with these tasks and I was especially appreciative of the targeted skills and activities. The learning was very clear and observable and the flow was terrific – just the right pacing.” -Rita R.
“This is a ready-to-use resource for my Public Speaking semester-long middle school elective. Great ideas and activities.” -Michelle B.
Click HERE to preview everything that’s included!
- Listening Skills
- Voice & Gestures
- Public Speaking Vocabulary
- Speech Writing
- Stage Fright
- Speech of Introduction
- Sales Speech
- Pet Peeve Speech
- Storybook Speech
- Award Speech
- Quote of the Day (200 Quotes)
Students LOVE this microphone!
This wireless Bluetooth microphone is perfect for student presentations, read alouds, speeches, and so much more! The microphone has 27 colorful LED lights that flicker in rhythm with the voice. You can also use this wireless microphone as a portable Bluetooth speaker. It’s available in a bunch of different colors, and it comes with a nice storage case.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Over 18,000 ratings on Amazon!
“The kids loved this! I think it encouraged them to try to talk more!”
This post contains affiliate links. Click here to read my affiliate policy .
Presentation Rubric | Free Download
Success! The Presentation Rubric is in your inbox! If you don't see it, check your spam/junk folder.
There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.
Rubrics for Oral Presentations
Introduction.
Many instructors require students to give oral presentations, which they evaluate and count in students’ grades. It is important that instructors clarify their goals for these presentations as well as the student learning objectives to which they are related. Embedding the assignment in course goals and learning objectives allows instructors to be clear with students about their expectations and to develop a rubric for evaluating the presentations.
A rubric is a scoring guide that articulates and assesses specific components and expectations for an assignment. Rubrics identify the various criteria relevant to an assignment and then explicitly state the possible levels of achievement along a continuum, so that an effective rubric accurately reflects the expectations of an assignment. Using a rubric to evaluate student performance has advantages for both instructors and students. Creating Rubrics
Rubrics can be either analytic or holistic. An analytic rubric comprises a set of specific criteria, with each one evaluated separately and receiving a separate score. The template resembles a grid with the criteria listed in the left column and levels of performance listed across the top row, using numbers and/or descriptors. The cells within the center of the rubric contain descriptions of what expected performance looks like for each level of performance.
A holistic rubric consists of a set of descriptors that generate a single, global score for the entire work. The single score is based on raters’ overall perception of the quality of the performance. Often, sentence- or paragraph-length descriptions of different levels of competencies are provided.
When applied to an oral presentation, rubrics should reflect the elements of the presentation that will be evaluated as well as their relative importance. Thus, the instructor must decide whether to include dimensions relevant to both form and content and, if so, which one. Additionally, the instructor must decide how to weight each of the dimensions – are they all equally important, or are some more important than others? Additionally, if the presentation represents a group project, the instructor must decide how to balance grading individual and group contributions. Evaluating Group Projects
Creating Rubrics
The steps for creating an analytic rubric include the following:
1. Clarify the purpose of the assignment. What learning objectives are associated with the assignment?
2. Look for existing rubrics that can be adopted or adapted for the specific assignment
3. Define the criteria to be evaluated
4. Choose the rating scale to measure levels of performance
5. Write descriptions for each criterion for each performance level of the rating scale
6. Test and revise the rubric
Examples of criteria that have been included in rubrics for evaluation oral presentations include:
- Knowledge of content
- Organization of content
- Presentation of ideas
- Research/sources
- Visual aids/handouts
- Language clarity
- Grammatical correctness
- Time management
- Volume of speech
- Rate/pacing of Speech
- Mannerisms/gestures
- Eye contact/audience engagement
Examples of scales/ratings that have been used to rate student performance include:
- Strong, Satisfactory, Weak
- Beginning, Intermediate, High
- Exemplary, Competent, Developing
- Excellent, Competent, Needs Work
- Exceeds Standard, Meets Standard, Approaching Standard, Below Standard
- Exemplary, Proficient, Developing, Novice
- Excellent, Good, Marginal, Unacceptable
- Advanced, Intermediate High, Intermediate, Developing
- Exceptional, Above Average, Sufficient, Minimal, Poor
- Master, Distinguished, Proficient, Intermediate, Novice
- Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Poor, Unacceptable
- Always, Often, Sometimes, Rarely, Never
- Exemplary, Accomplished, Acceptable, Minimally Acceptable, Emerging, Unacceptable
Grading and Performance Rubrics Carnegie Mellon University Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation
Creating and Using Rubrics Carnegie Mellon University Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation
Using Rubrics Cornell University Center for Teaching Innovation
Building a Rubric University of Texas/Austin Faculty Innovation Center
Building a Rubric Columbia University Center for Teaching and Learning
Creating and Using Rubrics Yale University Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning
Types of Rubrics DePaul University Teaching Commons
Creating Rubrics University of Texas/Austin Faculty Innovation Center
Examples of Oral Presentation Rubrics
Oral Presentation Rubric Pomona College Teaching and Learning Center
Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric University of Michigan
Oral Presentation Rubric Roanoke College
Oral Presentation: Scoring Guide Fresno State University Office of Institutional Effectiveness
Presentation Skills Rubric State University of New York/New Paltz School of Business
Oral Presentation Rubric Oregon State University Center for Teaching and Learning
Oral Presentation Rubric Purdue University College of Science
Group Class Presentation Sample Rubric Pepperdine University Graziadio Business School
Oral Presentation Rubric
Add to calendar, add to favourites, description.
Use this rubric when assessing your students' oral presentations. Adaptable to any oral presentation context!
Pointers covered include:
- Time Management
- Preparedness
- Speaking clearly
- Creativity.
Students are assessed on a scale of 4 points to give you a clear idea of their ability level and simplify the reporting process.
Want some help putting your oral presentation project together? Make it easy with our Oral Presentation Package!
Additional information
| Australian Curriculum Code | AC9E1LY02, AC9E1LY07, AC9E2LY02, AC9E2LY07, AC9E3LY02, AC9E3LY07, AC9EFLY02, AC9EFLY07 |
|---|---|
| File Format |
Related products
- Waste Management Sorting Bins
- Sustainable Practices Brochure
- Health Assessment Years 1 & 2: Health Messages
- Asking for Help PICK & CLICK
- Text Layout Features THUMBS UP THUMBS DOWN
- Zoo Keeper: 1-10
Australian Curriculum V9
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Lorem ipsum/ Lorem ipsum/ Lorem ipsum
Email Address
Remember Me
Out of Credits
Looks like you’re out of credits.
Create an account
Reset password, item added to your cart.
0 items in the cart ( $ 0.00 )
- English ESL Worksheets
- Speaking Practice
- Presentation, public speaking
Oral Presentation Rubric
- Rating Count
- Price (Ascending)
- Price (Descending)
- Most Recent
Free 3rd grade oral communication rubrics
Resource type.
3rd Grade Back to School Math | Bundle
3rd Grade Math Task Cards Rounding Numbers 3.NBT.A.1
3rd Grade 160 Word Problems Math Problem Solving CCSS *All Standards*
Magic Tree House Books 1-4 BUNDLE
FREEBIE Oral Presentation Rubric
How are you Feeling? Morning Meeting Anchor Chart
Presentation Rubric
Elementary Rubric for Presentations
EDITABLE Oral Communication Rubric
Peer Evaluation Form: Presenting
Show and Tell Speaking Rubric (Memento)
Lead With Lit: Complete SEL and Community Building Mini-Lesson
Paper Bag Book Report
Grade 1-3 Oral Communication - Single Point Rubric (Ontario Curriculum)
Show You Know: A Check for Understanding
Speaking and Listening Checklist for Upper Grade Discussions
Book Report/Celebration Rubric
Debate self-reflection student rubric
Poetry Party Bundle
Fluency Rubric K-5
Grab & Go Artic-Quick Speech Directions & Forms
Discussion Self - Evaluation Rubric/Checklist
SOLE (Self-Organized Learning Environment) presentation rubric
Show and Tell Activity Distance Learning and Print and Go for Speech Therapy
Oral Communication Descriptive Toy Presentation
Participation Tracker (Rubric)
PowerPoint Presentation Score Sheet
- We're hiring
- Help & FAQ
- Privacy policy
- Student privacy
- Terms of service
- Tell us what you think
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The rubric allows teachers to assess students in several key areas of oral presentation. Students are scored on a scale of 1-4 in three major areas. The first area is Delivery, which includes eye contact, and voice inflection. The second area, Content/Organization, scores students based on their knowledge and understanding of the topic being ...
Oral Presentation Rubric 4—Excellent 3—Good 2—Fair 1—Needs Improvement Delivery • Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes • Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points • Consistent use of direct eye contact with ...
Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric, Formal Setting . PRESENTER: Non-verbal skills (Poise) 5 4 3 2 1 Comfort Relaxed, easy presentation with minimal hesitation Generally comfortable appearance, occasional hesitation Somewhat comfortable appearance, some hesitation Generally uncomfortable, difficulty with flow of presentation Completely
Oral Presentation Rubric. Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes. Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes. Displayed minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes. No eye contact with audience, as entire report is read from notes.
An oral presentation rubric for elementary students is designed to encourage young learners to practice and develop their public speaking skills in a structured way. It focuses on basic presentation elements like articulation, confidence, and topic understanding. Using this rubric, you can gain valuable feedback on your performance, helping you ...
This rubric is designed to help you evaluate the organization, design, and delivery of standard research talks and other oral presentations. Here are some ways to use it: Distribute the rubric to colleagues before a dress rehearsal of your talk. Use the rubric to collect feedback and improve your presentation and delivery.
overly text-heavy, distracting, unconnected to claim, or otherwise claim, or otherwise presentation. ineffective. connected to claim, and effectively help support. Speech and manner (eye contact, volume, clarity, pacing) Speech and manner One or more are not effective: pacing may be too fast or slow; eye contact may not be present; voice may be ...
Step 7: Create your rubric. Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle.
Oral presentations are expected to provide an appropriate level of analysis, discussion and evaluation as required by the assignment. Oral presentations are expected to be well-organized in overall structure, beginning with a clear statement of the problem and ending with a clear conclusion. The presentation is well-structured; its organization ...
Oral Presentation Rubric Exemplary Proficient Developing Novice PRESENTATION CONTENT Introduction Introduced topic, established rapport and explained the purpose of presentation in creative, clear way capturing attention. Introduced presentation in clear way. Started with a self introduction or "My topic is" before capturing attention.
Oral Presentation Rubric. No movement or descriptive gestures. Very little movement or descriptive gestures. Movements or gestures enhance articulation. Movements seemed fluid and helped the audience visualize. No eye contact with audience. Minimal eye contact with audience. Consistent use of direct eye. contact with some audience.
Oral Presentation Example Rubric Outcome: Students will graduate with the ability to give professional presentations. Work Product: Oral presentation. Outcome/Skills. Advanced. Developing. Emerging. Idea development, use of language, and the organization of ideas are effectively used to achieve a purpose.
Use this FREE rubric to provide students with clear expectations for their next oral presentation or speech! Public speaking is difficult for everyone, especially students. Getting up and speaking in front of the class is the last thing many of our students want to do. Help students prepare for their speech or presentation with a clear set of ...
This Rubric can be used for all oral presentations for year 1 and 2 students, based on the ACARA and SCSA Judging standards. Rubric has marks allocated for easy data collection and tracking purposes. Also has a section for student feedback. K - 2 nd. Balanced Literacy, English Language Arts, Oral Communication.
Examples of criteria that have been included in rubrics for evaluation oral presentations include: Knowledge of content. Organization of content. Presentation of ideas. Research/sources. Visual aids/handouts. Language clarity. Grammatical correctness.
Use this rubric when assessing your students' oral presentations. Adaptable to any oral presentation context! Pointers covered include: Time Management Content Preparedness Enthusiasm Speaking clearly Creativity. Students are assessed on a scale of 4 points to give you a clear idea of their ability level and simplify the reporting process. Want some help putting your […]
Most group members are hard to understand. All group members speak clearly and are easy to understand. Most group members speak clearly and are easy to understand. Some group members speak clearly, but are difficult to understand. Only 1 or 2 group members speak and can be understood. All group members speak to the entire audience.
Created by. Anniepants927. Use this elementary level rubric to support, instruct, and assess your students as they prepare and make a presentation. This can be used for various subjects and is easy to read and understand. 3 rd - 5 th. English Language Arts, For All Subject Areas, Oral Communication.
Assessment is an important communication tool between teacher and student. Check out examples of different types of rubrics or download a template to create your own rubric.
This rubric is designed to help you evaluate oral presentations. The rating scale is presented at the top of the rubric. It is a rubric designed for the oral assessement of Intermediate-Advanced students and encompasses the areas below: Originality Structure Language Usage (grammar and syntax) Vocabulary Pronunciation + Enunciation Delivery A final mark out of 24 enables the teacher to easily ...
Set expectations and provide feedback to your students using our Presentation Rubric. Perfect for busy upper-grade teachers, this handy resource will help you assess your students' oral presentations fairly and accurately. The rubric, which focuses on four main criteria, is super versatile and can be used to grade a wide range of topics and skill levels. For more help with grading, try our ...
This oral presentation can be used with any content area for a Language Arts grade. Simple Oral Presentation Rubric. Rated 4.88 out of 5, based on 8 reviews. 4.9 ...
Ontario Teacher Pro. This is an editable (through a Google Docs link) Oral Communication Rubric appropriate for Grades 1-3. This is based on the Ontario Language Arts Curriculum and includes overall and specific expectations. 1 st - 3 rd. English Language Arts, Oral Communication, Other (ELA) FREE.