hypothesis and its role in research

The Role of Hypotheses in Research Studies: A Simple Guide

Kola Mustapha

Introduction

In the interesting world of research studies, one important thing is the hypothesis. It is like a clever guess that helps researchers understand how variables interact and are connected. This guess plays a crucial role because it guides their investigations and shapes the direction of the research. However, not all research studies need hypotheses. In this article, I will highlight the importance of hypotheses, how they are used in different types of studies, and when they might not be needed or could be a problem.

1. Understanding Hypothesis

A. definition and purpose.

Before we dive deeper, let’s define what a hypothesis is. Essentially, a hypothesis is a tentative statement that predicts the relationship between two or more variables in a research study. It is usually derived from a theoretical framework or previous empirical evidence, and it guides the design, data collection, and data analysis of the study. A hypothesis can be tested using statistical methods to determine its validity and significance.

To illustrate the significance of a hypothesis, let’s consider an example: “ If plants are exposed to longer hours of sunlight, then their growth rate will increase. ” This could be written in a proper research hypothesis format as: “ There is a positive linear relationship between hours of sunlight exposure and growth rate in plants. ” In this case, the hypothesis posits a potential cause-and-effect relationship between the duration of sunlight exposure and the growth rate of plants. To test this hypothesis, researchers would design experiments where they would subject a group of plants to longer hours of sunlight exposure while keeping another group under regular conditions. They would then measure and compare the growth rates of both groups to determine if the hypothesis holds true or needs further refinement.

It is essential to understand that a hypothesis is not a mere guess based on intuition; rather, it stems from a comprehensive understanding of existing knowledge, observations, or previous research findings. Before forming their hypotheses, researchers gather evidence and relevant information to ensure that they ground them in data and support them with existing theories or observations.

2. The Significance of Hypotheses in Research Studies

A. guiding research efforts.

Hypotheses act as valuable guides in research studies, helping researchers structure their experiments, observations, and data collection efforts. By having a clear hypothesis in mind, the study becomes more focused, enabling a systematic approach to gathering evidence and analyzing the results.

B. Enhancing Relevance and Reliability

A well-defined hypothesis enhances the relevance and reliability of research outcomes. It ensures that the study’s objectives are clear and align with the research question, thereby increasing the accuracy and significance of the findings.

3. Hypotheses in Different Study Designs

A. descriptive studies.

In descriptive research, the primary goal is to portray or describe characteristics without seeking to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables. They may use descriptive statistics, such as mean, median, mode, frequency, or percentage, to summarize the data. Descriptive studies do not need hypotheses because they do not make any predictions or comparisons. They simply seek to answer ‘what’, ‘where’, ‘when’, and ‘how’ questions but not ‘why’ questions. Examples of descriptive studies are surveys, case reports, observational studies, and narrative reviews. Here are some simple examples of descriptive research objectives:

• To describe the demographic characteristics and socioeconomic status of participants in a community health survey.
• To assess the prevalence of smartphone usage among teenagers in a particular region.
• To document the migration patterns and settlement preferences of a specific ethnic group.
• To map the distribution and abundance of a particular species of bird in a wildlife reserve.
• To identify and categorize different types of social media usage among university students.

In each of these examples, the primary focus of the descriptive research is on providing detailed descriptions of various aspects of the subject under investigation without attempting to explain or predict relationships between variables.

B. Exploratory Studies

Exploratory research aims to discover new insights, concepts, or ideas about a phenomenon that is not well understood or defined. They can answer ‘why’, ‘what, and ‘how’ questions but not ‘where’ or ‘when’ questions. They use a variety of research methods, such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and literature reviews, to collect qualitative or quantitative data on one or more variables. Exploratory studies do not need hypotheses because they do not have any preconceived assumptions or expectations but rather generate new ideas, insights, or hypotheses for further research. Examples of exploratory studies are grounded theory, ethnography, phenomenology, and action research. Here are some simple examples of exploratory research objectives:

• To examine the factors that influence employee motivation and job satisfaction in a rapidly changing work environment.
• To gain a deeper understanding of the factors contributing to the decline in sales at a particular retail store.
• To investigate the potential applications of artificial intelligence in optimizing supply chain management processes.
• To explore the experiences and coping mechanisms of individuals who have undergone a life-changing event, such as a natural disaster or a serious illness.
• To gain insights into the impact of remote work on employee productivity and work-life balance in a post-pandemic world.

In these examples, the objectives are open-ended and seek to uncover new information, generate ideas, and provide a foundation for more in-depth studies in the future. It allows researchers to venture into uncharted territories and contribute to the expansion of knowledge in a particular field or domain.

C. Explanatory Studies

Explanatory research aims to explain the causes, effects, or mechanisms of a phenomenon using logical reasoning and empirical evidence. They can answer ‘why’ and ‘how’ questions, as well as ‘what’, ‘where’, and when’ questions. They may use experimental or quasi-experimental methods, such as randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case-control studies, to manipulate or control the variables and measure the outcomes. Explanatory studies need hypotheses because they test the causal relationships between the variables using inferential statistics such as correlation, regression, t-test, ANOVA, chi-square, etc. Examples of explanatory studies are causal-comparative studies, correlational studies, and meta-analyses. Here are some simple examples of explanatory research objectives:

• To assess the impact of environmental pollution on respiratory health.
• To investigate whether a specific educational intervention leads to increased academic performance in students.
• To investigate the relationship between employee training programs and job satisfaction to determine if training leads to increased satisfaction.
• To explore whether social media usage has an impact on self-esteem and body image perception in adolescents.
• To determine if the implementation of renewable energy policies has a causal effect on reducing carbon emissions.

In each of these examples, the objectives are focused on comprehending the causal relationships between variables, and the research design frequently involves experimental or quasi-experimental methods to establish causation. The findings from explanatory research contribute to a deeper understanding of why certain outcomes occur and can inform decision-making and policy development.

4. Determining the Necessity of Hypotheses

A. study objectives.

The necessity of a hypothesis depends on the specific objectives of the research study. If the aim is to test a specific prediction or establish causality, a hypothesis is indispensable. On the other hand, if the goal is to explore, describe, or generate new ideas, hypotheses may be unnecessary or even restrictive.

B. Flexibility in Research Approach

Researchers must remain open to the idea that certain studies may not require hypotheses. Being flexible in the research approach allows for creative exploration and the potential for unexpected discoveries.

To sum up, hypotheses are very important in research studies. They help guide the research and make it organized. They are especially useful in traditional experiments and studies where specific predictions are tested. However, in some cases, like descriptive and exploratory research, hypotheses might not be needed or suitable. Knowing when to use hypotheses and when to explore freely empowers researchers to make interesting discoveries.

Written by Kola Mustapha

Data Analyst | Statistician | Research Analyst

Text to speech

What Is A Research (Scientific) Hypothesis? A plain-language explainer + examples

By:  Derek Jansen (MBA)  | Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | June 2020

If you’re new to the world of research, or it’s your first time writing a dissertation or thesis, you’re probably noticing that the words “research hypothesis” and “scientific hypothesis” are used quite a bit, and you’re wondering what they mean in a research context .

“Hypothesis” is one of those words that people use loosely, thinking they understand what it means. However, it has a very specific meaning within academic research. So, it’s important to understand the exact meaning before you start hypothesizing. 

Research Hypothesis 101

• What is a hypothesis ?
• What is a research hypothesis (scientific hypothesis)?
• Requirements for a research hypothesis
• Definition of a research hypothesis
• The null hypothesis

What is a hypothesis?

Let’s start with the general definition of a hypothesis (not a research hypothesis or scientific hypothesis), according to the Cambridge Dictionary:

Hypothesis: an idea or explanation for something that is based on known facts but has not yet been proved.

In other words, it’s a statement that provides an explanation for why or how something works, based on facts (or some reasonable assumptions), but that has not yet been specifically tested . For example, a hypothesis might look something like this:

Hypothesis: sleep impacts academic performance.

This statement predicts that academic performance will be influenced by the amount and/or quality of sleep a student engages in – sounds reasonable, right? It’s based on reasonable assumptions , underpinned by what we currently know about sleep and health (from the existing literature). So, loosely speaking, we could call it a hypothesis, at least by the dictionary definition.

But that’s not good enough…

Unfortunately, that’s not quite sophisticated enough to describe a research hypothesis (also sometimes called a scientific hypothesis), and it wouldn’t be acceptable in a dissertation, thesis or research paper . In the world of academic research, a statement needs a few more criteria to constitute a true research hypothesis .

What is a research hypothesis?

A research hypothesis (also called a scientific hypothesis) is a statement about the expected outcome of a study (for example, a dissertation or thesis). To constitute a quality hypothesis, the statement needs to have three attributes – specificity , clarity and testability .

Let’s take a look at these more closely.

Need a helping hand?

Hypothesis Essential #1: Specificity & Clarity

A good research hypothesis needs to be extremely clear and articulate about both what’ s being assessed (who or what variables are involved ) and the expected outcome (for example, a difference between groups, a relationship between variables, etc.).

Let’s stick with our sleepy students example and look at how this statement could be more specific and clear.

Hypothesis: Students who sleep at least 8 hours per night will, on average, achieve higher grades in standardised tests than students who sleep less than 8 hours a night.

As you can see, the statement is very specific as it identifies the variables involved (sleep hours and test grades), the parties involved (two groups of students), as well as the predicted relationship type (a positive relationship). There’s no ambiguity or uncertainty about who or what is involved in the statement, and the expected outcome is clear.

Contrast that to the original hypothesis we looked at – “Sleep impacts academic performance” – and you can see the difference. “Sleep” and “academic performance” are both comparatively vague , and there’s no indication of what the expected relationship direction is (more sleep or less sleep). As you can see, specificity and clarity are key.

Hypothesis Essential #2: Testability (Provability)

A statement must be testable to qualify as a research hypothesis. In other words, there needs to be a way to prove (or disprove) the statement. If it’s not testable, it’s not a hypothesis – simple as that.

For example, consider the hypothesis we mentioned earlier:

Hypothesis: Students who sleep at least 8 hours per night will, on average, achieve higher grades in standardised tests than students who sleep less than 8 hours a night.  

We could test this statement by undertaking a quantitative study involving two groups of students, one that gets 8 or more hours of sleep per night for a fixed period, and one that gets less. We could then compare the standardised test results for both groups to see if there’s a statistically significant difference. 

Again, if you compare this to the original hypothesis we looked at – “Sleep impacts academic performance” – you can see that it would be quite difficult to test that statement, primarily because it isn’t specific enough. How much sleep? By who? What type of academic performance?

So, remember the mantra – if you can’t test it, it’s not a hypothesis 🙂

Defining A Research Hypothesis

You’re still with us? Great! Let’s recap and pin down a clear definition of a hypothesis.

A research hypothesis (or scientific hypothesis) is a statement about an expected relationship between variables, or explanation of an occurrence, that is clear, specific and testable.

So, when you write up hypotheses for your dissertation or thesis, make sure that they meet all these criteria. If you do, you’ll not only have rock-solid hypotheses but you’ll also ensure a clear focus for your entire research project.

What about the null hypothesis?

You may have also heard the terms null hypothesis , alternative hypothesis, or H-zero thrown around. At a simple level, the null hypothesis is the counter-proposal to the original hypothesis.

For example, if the hypothesis predicts that there is a relationship between two variables (for example, sleep and academic performance), the null hypothesis would predict that there is no relationship between those variables.

At a more technical level, the null hypothesis proposes that no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations and that any differences are due to chance alone.

And there you have it – hypotheses in a nutshell. 

If you have any questions, be sure to leave a comment below and we’ll do our best to help you. If you need hands-on help developing and testing your hypotheses, consider our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through the research journey.

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

17 Comments

Very useful information. I benefit more from getting more information in this regard.

Very great insight,educative and informative. Please give meet deep critics on many research data of public international Law like human rights, environment, natural resources, law of the sea etc

In a book I read a distinction is made between null, research, and alternative hypothesis. As far as I understand, alternative and research hypotheses are the same. Can you please elaborate? Best Afshin

This is a self explanatory, easy going site. I will recommend this to my friends and colleagues.

Very good definition. How can I cite your definition in my thesis? Thank you. Is nul hypothesis compulsory in a research?

It’s a counter-proposal to be proven as a rejection

Please what is the difference between alternate hypothesis and research hypothesis?

It is a very good explanation. However, it limits hypotheses to statistically tasteable ideas. What about for qualitative researches or other researches that involve quantitative data that don’t need statistical tests?

In qualitative research, one typically uses propositions, not hypotheses.

could you please elaborate it more

I’ve benefited greatly from these notes, thank you.

This is very helpful

well articulated ideas are presented here, thank you for being reliable sources of information

Excellent. Thanks for being clear and sound about the research methodology and hypothesis (quantitative research)

I have only a simple question regarding the null hypothesis. – Is the null hypothesis (Ho) known as the reversible hypothesis of the alternative hypothesis (H1? – How to test it in academic research?

this is very important note help me much more

Hi” best wishes to you and your very nice blog” 

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

• What Is Research Methodology? Simple Definition (With Examples) - Grad Coach - […] Contrasted to this, a quantitative methodology is typically used when the research aims and objectives are confirmatory in nature. For example,…

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

What is a Research Hypothesis: How to Write it, Types, and Examples

Any research begins with a research question and a research hypothesis . A research question alone may not suffice to design the experiment(s) needed to answer it. A hypothesis is central to the scientific method. But what is a hypothesis ? A hypothesis is a testable statement that proposes a possible explanation to a phenomenon, and it may include a prediction. Next, you may ask what is a research hypothesis ? Simply put, a research hypothesis is a prediction or educated guess about the relationship between the variables that you want to investigate.  

It is important to be thorough when developing your research hypothesis. Shortcomings in the framing of a hypothesis can affect the study design and the results. A better understanding of the research hypothesis definition and characteristics of a good hypothesis will make it easier for you to develop your own hypothesis for your research. Let’s dive in to know more about the types of research hypothesis , how to write a research hypothesis , and some research hypothesis examples .  

Table of Contents

What is a hypothesis ?  

A hypothesis is based on the existing body of knowledge in a study area. Framed before the data are collected, a hypothesis states the tentative relationship between independent and dependent variables, along with a prediction of the outcome.  

What is a research hypothesis ?  

Young researchers starting out their journey are usually brimming with questions like “ What is a hypothesis ?” “ What is a research hypothesis ?” “How can I write a good research hypothesis ?”   

A research hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for an observable phenomenon or pattern. It guides the direction of a study and predicts the outcome of the investigation. A research hypothesis is testable, i.e., it can be supported or disproven through experimentation or observation.     

Characteristics of a good hypothesis  

Here are the characteristics of a good hypothesis :  

• Clearly formulated and free of language errors and ambiguity  
• Concise and not unnecessarily verbose  
• Has clearly defined variables  
• Testable and stated in a way that allows for it to be disproven  
• Can be tested using a research design that is feasible, ethical, and practical   
• Specific and relevant to the research problem  
• Rooted in a thorough literature search  
• Can generate new knowledge or understanding.  

How to create an effective research hypothesis  

A study begins with the formulation of a research question. A researcher then performs background research. This background information forms the basis for building a good research hypothesis . The researcher then performs experiments, collects, and analyzes the data, interprets the findings, and ultimately, determines if the findings support or negate the original hypothesis.  

Let’s look at each step for creating an effective, testable, and good research hypothesis :  

• Identify a research problem or question: Start by identifying a specific research problem.   
• Review the literature: Conduct an in-depth review of the existing literature related to the research problem to grasp the current knowledge and gaps in the field.   
• Formulate a clear and testable hypothesis : Based on the research question, use existing knowledge to form a clear and testable hypothesis . The hypothesis should state a predicted relationship between two or more variables that can be measured and manipulated. Improve the original draft till it is clear and meaningful.  
• State the null hypothesis: The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between the variables you are studying.   
• Define the population and sample: Clearly define the population you are studying and the sample you will be using for your research.  
• Select appropriate methods for testing the hypothesis: Select appropriate research methods, such as experiments, surveys, or observational studies, which will allow you to test your research hypothesis .  

Remember that creating a research hypothesis is an iterative process, i.e., you might have to revise it based on the data you collect. You may need to test and reject several hypotheses before answering the research problem.  

How to write a research hypothesis  

When you start writing a research hypothesis , you use an “if–then” statement format, which states the predicted relationship between two or more variables. Clearly identify the independent variables (the variables being changed) and the dependent variables (the variables being measured), as well as the population you are studying. Review and revise your hypothesis as needed.  

An example of a research hypothesis in this format is as follows:  

“ If [athletes] follow [cold water showers daily], then their [endurance] increases.”  

Population: athletes  

Independent variable: daily cold water showers  

Dependent variable: endurance  

You may have understood the characteristics of a good hypothesis . But note that a research hypothesis is not always confirmed; a researcher should be prepared to accept or reject the hypothesis based on the study findings.  

Research hypothesis checklist  

Following from above, here is a 10-point checklist for a good research hypothesis :  

• Testable: A research hypothesis should be able to be tested via experimentation or observation.  
• Specific: A research hypothesis should clearly state the relationship between the variables being studied.  
• Based on prior research: A research hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and previous research in the field.  
• Falsifiable: A research hypothesis should be able to be disproven through testing.  
• Clear and concise: A research hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner.  
• Logical: A research hypothesis should be logical and consistent with current understanding of the subject.  
• Relevant: A research hypothesis should be relevant to the research question and objectives.  
• Feasible: A research hypothesis should be feasible to test within the scope of the study.  
• Reflects the population: A research hypothesis should consider the population or sample being studied.  
• Uncomplicated: A good research hypothesis is written in a way that is easy for the target audience to understand.  

By following this research hypothesis checklist , you will be able to create a research hypothesis that is strong, well-constructed, and more likely to yield meaningful results.  

Types of research hypothesis  

Different types of research hypothesis are used in scientific research:  

1. Null hypothesis:

A null hypothesis states that there is no change in the dependent variable due to changes to the independent variable. This means that the results are due to chance and are not significant. A null hypothesis is denoted as H0 and is stated as the opposite of what the alternative hypothesis states.   

Example: “ The newly identified virus is not zoonotic .”  

2. Alternative hypothesis:

This states that there is a significant difference or relationship between the variables being studied. It is denoted as H1 or Ha and is usually accepted or rejected in favor of the null hypothesis.  

Example: “ The newly identified virus is zoonotic .”  

3. Directional hypothesis :

This specifies the direction of the relationship or difference between variables; therefore, it tends to use terms like increase, decrease, positive, negative, more, or less.   

Example: “ The inclusion of intervention X decreases infant mortality compared to the original treatment .”   

4. Non-directional hypothesis:

While it does not predict the exact direction or nature of the relationship between the two variables, a non-directional hypothesis states the existence of a relationship or difference between variables but not the direction, nature, or magnitude of the relationship. A non-directional hypothesis may be used when there is no underlying theory or when findings contradict previous research.  

Example, “ Cats and dogs differ in the amount of affection they express .”  

5. Simple hypothesis :

A simple hypothesis only predicts the relationship between one independent and another independent variable.  

Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging .”  

6 . Complex hypothesis :

A complex hypothesis states the relationship or difference between two or more independent and dependent variables.   

Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging, reduces sun burn, and reduces the chances of skin cancer .” (Here, the three dependent variables are slowing skin aging, reducing sun burn, and reducing the chances of skin cancer.)  

7. Associative hypothesis:  

An associative hypothesis states that a change in one variable results in the change of the other variable. The associative hypothesis defines interdependency between variables.  

Example: “ There is a positive association between physical activity levels and overall health .”  

8 . Causal hypothesis:

A causal hypothesis proposes a cause-and-effect interaction between variables.  

Example: “ Long-term alcohol use causes liver damage .”  

Note that some of the types of research hypothesis mentioned above might overlap. The types of hypothesis chosen will depend on the research question and the objective of the study.  

Research hypothesis examples  

Here are some good research hypothesis examples :  

“The use of a specific type of therapy will lead to a reduction in symptoms of depression in individuals with a history of major depressive disorder.”  

“Providing educational interventions on healthy eating habits will result in weight loss in overweight individuals.”  

“Plants that are exposed to certain types of music will grow taller than those that are not exposed to music.”  

“The use of the plant growth regulator X will lead to an increase in the number of flowers produced by plants.”  

Characteristics that make a research hypothesis weak are unclear variables, unoriginality, being too general or too vague, and being untestable. A weak hypothesis leads to weak research and improper methods.   

Some bad research hypothesis examples (and the reasons why they are “bad”) are as follows:  

“This study will show that treatment X is better than any other treatment . ” (This statement is not testable, too broad, and does not consider other treatments that may be effective.)  

“This study will prove that this type of therapy is effective for all mental disorders . ” (This statement is too broad and not testable as mental disorders are complex and different disorders may respond differently to different types of therapy.)  

“Plants can communicate with each other through telepathy . ” (This statement is not testable and lacks a scientific basis.)  

Importance of testable hypothesis  

If a research hypothesis is not testable, the results will not prove or disprove anything meaningful. The conclusions will be vague at best. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher focus on the study outcome and understand the implication of the question and the different variables involved. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher make precise predictions based on prior research.  

To be considered testable, there must be a way to prove that the hypothesis is true or false; further, the results of the hypothesis must be reproducible.  

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on research hypothesis  

1. What is the difference between research question and research hypothesis ?  

A research question defines the problem and helps outline the study objective(s). It is an open-ended statement that is exploratory or probing in nature. Therefore, it does not make predictions or assumptions. It helps a researcher identify what information to collect. A research hypothesis , however, is a specific, testable prediction about the relationship between variables. Accordingly, it guides the study design and data analysis approach.

2. When to reject null hypothesis ?

A null hypothesis should be rejected when the evidence from a statistical test shows that it is unlikely to be true. This happens when the test statistic (e.g., p -value) is less than the defined significance level (e.g., 0.05). Rejecting the null hypothesis does not necessarily mean that the alternative hypothesis is true; it simply means that the evidence found is not compatible with the null hypothesis.  

3. How can I be sure my hypothesis is testable?  

A testable hypothesis should be specific and measurable, and it should state a clear relationship between variables that can be tested with data. To ensure that your hypothesis is testable, consider the following:  

• Clearly define the key variables in your hypothesis. You should be able to measure and manipulate these variables in a way that allows you to test the hypothesis.  
• The hypothesis should predict a specific outcome or relationship between variables that can be measured or quantified.   
• You should be able to collect the necessary data within the constraints of your study.  
• It should be possible for other researchers to replicate your study, using the same methods and variables.   
• Your hypothesis should be testable by using appropriate statistical analysis techniques, so you can draw conclusions, and make inferences about the population from the sample data.  
• The hypothesis should be able to be disproven or rejected through the collection of data.  

4. How do I revise my research hypothesis if my data does not support it?  

If your data does not support your research hypothesis , you will need to revise it or develop a new one. You should examine your data carefully and identify any patterns or anomalies, re-examine your research question, and/or revisit your theory to look for any alternative explanations for your results. Based on your review of the data, literature, and theories, modify your research hypothesis to better align it with the results you obtained. Use your revised hypothesis to guide your research design and data collection. It is important to remain objective throughout the process.  

5. I am performing exploratory research. Do I need to formulate a research hypothesis?  

As opposed to “confirmatory” research, where a researcher has some idea about the relationship between the variables under investigation, exploratory research (or hypothesis-generating research) looks into a completely new topic about which limited information is available. Therefore, the researcher will not have any prior hypotheses. In such cases, a researcher will need to develop a post-hoc hypothesis. A post-hoc research hypothesis is generated after these results are known.  

6. How is a research hypothesis different from a research question?

A research question is an inquiry about a specific topic or phenomenon, typically expressed as a question. It seeks to explore and understand a particular aspect of the research subject. In contrast, a research hypothesis is a specific statement or prediction that suggests an expected relationship between variables. It is formulated based on existing knowledge or theories and guides the research design and data analysis.

7. Can a research hypothesis change during the research process?

Yes, research hypotheses can change during the research process. As researchers collect and analyze data, new insights and information may emerge that require modification or refinement of the initial hypotheses. This can be due to unexpected findings, limitations in the original hypotheses, or the need to explore additional dimensions of the research topic. Flexibility is crucial in research, allowing for adaptation and adjustment of hypotheses to align with the evolving understanding of the subject matter.

8. How many hypotheses should be included in a research study?

The number of research hypotheses in a research study varies depending on the nature and scope of the research. It is not necessary to have multiple hypotheses in every study. Some studies may have only one primary hypothesis, while others may have several related hypotheses. The number of hypotheses should be determined based on the research objectives, research questions, and the complexity of the research topic. It is important to ensure that the hypotheses are focused, testable, and directly related to the research aims.

9. Can research hypotheses be used in qualitative research?

Yes, research hypotheses can be used in qualitative research, although they are more commonly associated with quantitative research. In qualitative research, hypotheses may be formulated as tentative or exploratory statements that guide the investigation. Instead of testing hypotheses through statistical analysis, qualitative researchers may use the hypotheses to guide data collection and analysis, seeking to uncover patterns, themes, or relationships within the qualitative data. The emphasis in qualitative research is often on generating insights and understanding rather than confirming or rejecting specific research hypotheses through statistical testing.

Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.  

Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place –  Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !    

Related Posts

Back to School – Lock-in All Access Pack for a Year at the Best Price

Journal Turnaround Time: Researcher.Life and Scholarly Intelligence Join Hands to Empower Researchers with Publication Time Insights 

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer
• QuestionPro

• Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case AskWhy Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
• Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Research Hypothesis: What It Is, Types + How to Develop?

A research study starts with a question. Researchers worldwide ask questions and create research hypotheses. The effectiveness of research relies on developing a good research hypothesis. Examples of research hypotheses can guide researchers in writing effective ones.

In this blog, we’ll learn what a research hypothesis is, why it’s important in research, and the different types used in science. We’ll also guide you through creating your research hypothesis and discussing ways to test and evaluate it.

What is a Research Hypothesis?

A hypothesis is like a guess or idea that you suggest to check if it’s true. A research hypothesis is a statement that brings up a question and predicts what might happen.

It’s really important in the scientific method and is used in experiments to figure things out. Essentially, it’s an educated guess about how things are connected in the research.

A research hypothesis usually includes pointing out the independent variable (the thing they’re changing or studying) and the dependent variable (the result they’re measuring or watching). It helps plan how to gather and analyze data to see if there’s evidence to support or deny the expected connection between these variables.

Importance of Hypothesis in Research

Hypotheses are really important in research. They help design studies, allow for practical testing, and add to our scientific knowledge. Their main role is to organize research projects, making them purposeful, focused, and valuable to the scientific community. Let’s look at some key reasons why they matter:

• A research hypothesis helps test theories.

A hypothesis plays a pivotal role in the scientific method by providing a basis for testing existing theories. For example, a hypothesis might test the predictive power of a psychological theory on human behavior.

• It serves as a great platform for investigation activities.

It serves as a launching pad for investigation activities, which offers researchers a clear starting point. A research hypothesis can explore the relationship between exercise and stress reduction.

• Hypothesis guides the research work or study.

A well-formulated hypothesis guides the entire research process. It ensures that the study remains focused and purposeful. For instance, a hypothesis about the impact of social media on interpersonal relationships provides clear guidance for a study.

• Hypothesis sometimes suggests theories.

In some cases, a hypothesis can suggest new theories or modifications to existing ones. For example, a hypothesis testing the effectiveness of a new drug might prompt a reconsideration of current medical theories.

• It helps in knowing the data needs.

A hypothesis clarifies the data requirements for a study, ensuring that researchers collect the necessary information—a hypothesis guiding the collection of demographic data to analyze the influence of age on a particular phenomenon.

• The hypothesis explains social phenomena.

Hypotheses are instrumental in explaining complex social phenomena. For instance, a hypothesis might explore the relationship between economic factors and crime rates in a given community.

• Hypothesis provides a relationship between phenomena for empirical Testing.

Hypotheses establish clear relationships between phenomena, paving the way for empirical testing. An example could be a hypothesis exploring the correlation between sleep patterns and academic performance.

• It helps in knowing the most suitable analysis technique.

A hypothesis guides researchers in selecting the most appropriate analysis techniques for their data. For example, a hypothesis focusing on the effectiveness of a teaching method may lead to the choice of statistical analyses best suited for educational research.

Characteristics of a Good Research Hypothesis

A hypothesis is a specific idea that you can test in a study. It often comes from looking at past research and theories. A good hypothesis usually starts with a research question that you can explore through background research. For it to be effective, consider these key characteristics:

• Clear and Focused Language: A good hypothesis uses clear and focused language to avoid confusion and ensure everyone understands it.
• Related to the Research Topic: The hypothesis should directly relate to the research topic, acting as a bridge between the specific question and the broader study.
• Testable: An effective hypothesis can be tested, meaning its prediction can be checked with real data to support or challenge the proposed relationship.
• Potential for Exploration: A good hypothesis often comes from a research question that invites further exploration. Doing background research helps find gaps and potential areas to investigate.
• Includes Variables: The hypothesis should clearly state both the independent and dependent variables, specifying the factors being studied and the expected outcomes.
• Ethical Considerations: Check if variables can be manipulated without breaking ethical standards. It’s crucial to maintain ethical research practices.
• Predicts Outcomes: The hypothesis should predict the expected relationship and outcome, acting as a roadmap for the study and guiding data collection and analysis.
• Simple and Concise: A good hypothesis avoids unnecessary complexity and is simple and concise, expressing the essence of the proposed relationship clearly.
• Clear and Assumption-Free: The hypothesis should be clear and free from assumptions about the reader’s prior knowledge, ensuring universal understanding.
• Observable and Testable Results: A strong hypothesis implies research that produces observable and testable results, making sure the study’s outcomes can be effectively measured and analyzed.

When you use these characteristics as a checklist, it can help you create a good research hypothesis. It’ll guide improving and strengthening the hypothesis, identifying any weaknesses, and making necessary changes. Crafting a hypothesis with these features helps you conduct a thorough and insightful research study.

Types of Research Hypotheses

The research hypothesis comes in various types, each serving a specific purpose in guiding the scientific investigation. Knowing the differences will make it easier for you to create your own hypothesis. Here’s an overview of the common types:

01. Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis states that there is no connection between two considered variables or that two groups are unrelated. As discussed earlier, a hypothesis is an unproven assumption lacking sufficient supporting data. It serves as the statement researchers aim to disprove. It is testable, verifiable, and can be rejected.

For example, if you’re studying the relationship between Project A and Project B, assuming both projects are of equal standard is your null hypothesis. It needs to be specific for your study.

02. Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis is basically another option to the null hypothesis. It involves looking for a significant change or alternative that could lead you to reject the null hypothesis. It’s a different idea compared to the null hypothesis.

When you create a null hypothesis, you’re making an educated guess about whether something is true or if there’s a connection between that thing and another variable. If the null view suggests something is correct, the alternative hypothesis says it’s incorrect. 

For instance, if your null hypothesis is “I’m going to be $1000 richer,” the alternative hypothesis would be “I’m not going to get $1000 or be richer.”

03. Directional Hypothesis

The directional hypothesis predicts the direction of the relationship between independent and dependent variables. They specify whether the effect will be positive or negative.

If you increase your study hours, you will experience a positive association with your exam scores. This hypothesis suggests that as you increase the independent variable (study hours), there will also be an increase in the dependent variable (exam scores).

04. Non-directional Hypothesis

The non-directional hypothesis predicts the existence of a relationship between variables but does not specify the direction of the effect. It suggests that there will be a significant difference or relationship, but it does not predict the nature of that difference.

For example, you will find no notable difference in test scores between students who receive the educational intervention and those who do not. However, once you compare the test scores of the two groups, you will notice an important difference.

05. Simple Hypothesis

A simple hypothesis predicts a relationship between one dependent variable and one independent variable without specifying the nature of that relationship. It’s simple and usually used when we don’t know much about how the two things are connected.

For example, if you adopt effective study habits, you will achieve higher exam scores than those with poor study habits.

06. Complex Hypothesis

A complex hypothesis is an idea that specifies a relationship between multiple independent and dependent variables. It is a more detailed idea than a simple hypothesis.

While a simple view suggests a straightforward cause-and-effect relationship between two things, a complex hypothesis involves many factors and how they’re connected to each other.

For example, when you increase your study time, you tend to achieve higher exam scores. The connection between your study time and exam performance is affected by various factors, including the quality of your sleep, your motivation levels, and the effectiveness of your study techniques.

If you sleep well, stay highly motivated, and use effective study strategies, you may observe a more robust positive correlation between the time you spend studying and your exam scores, unlike those who may lack these factors.

07. Associative Hypothesis

An associative hypothesis proposes a connection between two things without saying that one causes the other. Basically, it suggests that when one thing changes, the other changes too, but it doesn’t claim that one thing is causing the change in the other.

For example, you will likely notice higher exam scores when you increase your study time. You can recognize an association between your study time and exam scores in this scenario.

Your hypothesis acknowledges a relationship between the two variables—your study time and exam scores—without asserting that increased study time directly causes higher exam scores. You need to consider that other factors, like motivation or learning style, could affect the observed association.

08. Causal Hypothesis

A causal hypothesis proposes a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. It suggests that changes in one variable directly cause changes in another variable.

For example, when you increase your study time, you experience higher exam scores. This hypothesis suggests a direct cause-and-effect relationship, indicating that the more time you spend studying, the higher your exam scores. It assumes that changes in your study time directly influence changes in your exam performance.

09. Empirical Hypothesis

An empirical hypothesis is a statement based on things we can see and measure. It comes from direct observation or experiments and can be tested with real-world evidence. If an experiment proves a theory, it supports the idea and shows it’s not just a guess. This makes the statement more reliable than a wild guess.

For example, if you increase the dosage of a certain medication, you might observe a quicker recovery time for patients. Imagine you’re in charge of a clinical trial. In this trial, patients are given varying dosages of the medication, and you measure and compare their recovery times. This allows you to directly see the effects of different dosages on how fast patients recover.

This way, you can create a research hypothesis: “Increasing the dosage of a certain medication will lead to a faster recovery time for patients.”

10. Statistical Hypothesis

A statistical hypothesis is a statement or assumption about a population parameter that is the subject of an investigation. It serves as the basis for statistical analysis and testing. It is often tested using statistical methods to draw inferences about the larger population.

In a hypothesis test, statistical evidence is collected to either reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis or fail to reject the null hypothesis due to insufficient evidence.

For example, let’s say you’re testing a new medicine. Your hypothesis could be that the medicine doesn’t really help patients get better. So, you collect data and use statistics to see if your guess is right or if the medicine actually makes a difference.

If the data strongly shows that the medicine does help, you say your guess was wrong, and the medicine does make a difference. But if the proof isn’t strong enough, you can stick with your original guess because you didn’t get enough evidence to change your mind.

How to Develop a Research Hypotheses?

Step 1: identify your research problem or topic..

Define the area of interest or the problem you want to investigate. Make sure it’s clear and well-defined.

Start by asking a question about your chosen topic. Consider the limitations of your research and create a straightforward problem related to your topic. Once you’ve done that, you can develop and test a hypothesis with evidence.

Step 2: Conduct a literature review

Review existing literature related to your research problem. This will help you understand the current state of knowledge in the field, identify gaps, and build a foundation for your hypothesis. Consider the following questions:

• What existing research has been conducted on your chosen topic?
• Are there any gaps or unanswered questions in the current literature?
• How will the existing literature contribute to the foundation of your research?

Step 3: Formulate your research question

Based on your literature review, create a specific and concise research question that addresses your identified problem. Your research question should be clear, focused, and relevant to your field of study.

Step 4: Identify variables

Determine the key variables involved in your research question. Variables are the factors or phenomena that you will study and manipulate to test your hypothesis.

• Independent Variable: The variable you manipulate or control.
• Dependent Variable: The variable you measure to observe the effect of the independent variable.

Step 5: State the Null hypothesis

The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no significant difference or effect. It serves as a baseline for comparison with the alternative hypothesis.

Step 6: Select appropriate methods for testing the hypothesis

Choose research methods that align with your study objectives, such as experiments, surveys, or observational studies. The selected methods enable you to test your research hypothesis effectively.

Creating a research hypothesis usually takes more than one try. Expect to make changes as you collect data. It’s normal to test and say no to a few hypotheses before you find the right answer to your research question.

Testing and Evaluating Hypotheses

Testing hypotheses is a really important part of research. It’s like the practical side of things. Here, real-world evidence will help you determine how different things are connected. Let’s explore the main steps in hypothesis testing:

• State your research hypothesis.

Before testing, clearly articulate your research hypothesis. This involves framing both a null hypothesis, suggesting no significant effect or relationship, and an alternative hypothesis, proposing the expected outcome.

• Collect data strategically.

Plan how you will gather information in a way that fits your study. Make sure your data collection method matches the things you’re studying.

Whether through surveys, observations, or experiments, this step demands precision and adherence to the established methodology. The quality of data collected directly influences the credibility of study outcomes.

• Perform an appropriate statistical test.

Choose a statistical test that aligns with the nature of your data and the hypotheses being tested. Whether it’s a t-test, chi-square test, ANOVA, or regression analysis, selecting the right statistical tool is paramount for accurate and reliable results.

• Decide if your idea was right or wrong.

Following the statistical analysis, evaluate the results in the context of your null hypothesis. You need to decide if you should reject your null hypothesis or not.

• Share what you found.

When discussing what you found in your research, be clear and organized. Say whether your idea was supported or not, and talk about what your results mean. Also, mention any limits to your study and suggest ideas for future research.

The Role of QuestionPro to Develop a Good Research Hypothesis

QuestionPro is a survey and research platform that provides tools for creating, distributing, and analyzing surveys. It plays a crucial role in the research process, especially when you’re in the initial stages of hypothesis development. Here’s how QuestionPro can help you to develop a good research hypothesis:

• Survey design and data collection: You can use the platform to create targeted questions that help you gather relevant data.
• Exploratory research: Through surveys and feedback mechanisms on QuestionPro, you can conduct exploratory research to understand the landscape of a particular subject.
• Literature review and background research: QuestionPro surveys can collect sample population opinions, experiences, and preferences. This data and a thorough literature evaluation can help you generate a well-grounded hypothesis by improving your research knowledge.
• Identifying variables: Using targeted survey questions, you can identify relevant variables related to their research topic.
• Testing assumptions: You can use surveys to informally test certain assumptions or hypotheses before formalizing a research hypothesis.
• Data analysis tools: QuestionPro provides tools for analyzing survey data. You can use these tools to identify the collected data’s patterns, correlations, or trends.
• Refining your hypotheses: As you collect data through QuestionPro, you can adjust your hypotheses based on the real-world responses you receive.

A research hypothesis is like a guide for researchers in science. It’s a well-thought-out idea that has been thoroughly tested. This idea is crucial as researchers can explore different fields, such as medicine, social sciences, and natural sciences. The research hypothesis links theories to real-world evidence and gives researchers a clear path to explore and make discoveries.

QuestionPro Research Suite is a helpful tool for researchers. It makes creating surveys, collecting data, and analyzing information easily. It supports all kinds of research, from exploring new ideas to forming hypotheses. With a focus on using data, it helps researchers do their best work.

Are you interested in learning more about QuestionPro Research Suite? Take advantage of QuestionPro’s free trial to get an initial look at its capabilities and realize the full potential of your research efforts.

LEARN MORE         FREE TRIAL

MORE LIKE THIS

Net Trust Score: Tool for Measuring Trust in Organization

Sep 2, 2024

Why You Should Attend XDAY 2024

Aug 30, 2024

Alchemer vs Qualtrics: Find out which one you should choose

Target Population: What It Is + Strategies for Targeting

Aug 29, 2024

Other categories

• Academic Research
• Artificial Intelligence
• Assessments
• Brand Awareness
• Case Studies
• Communities
• Consumer Insights
• Customer effort score
• Customer Engagement
• Customer Experience
• Customer Loyalty
• Customer Research
• Customer Satisfaction
• Employee Benefits
• Employee Engagement
• Employee Retention
• Friday Five
• General Data Protection Regulation
• Insights Hub
• Life@QuestionPro
• Market Research
• Mobile diaries
• Mobile Surveys
• New Features
• Online Communities
• Question Types
• Questionnaire
• QuestionPro Products
• Release Notes
• Research Tools and Apps
• Revenue at Risk
• Survey Templates
• Training Tips
• Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
• Uncategorized
• What’s Coming Up
• Workforce Intelligence

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples

How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples

Published on May 6, 2022 by Shona McCombes . Revised on November 20, 2023.

A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection .

Example: Hypothesis

Daily apple consumption leads to fewer doctor’s visits.

Table of contents

What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Variables in hypotheses

Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more types of variables .

• An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls.
• A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.

If there are any control variables , extraneous variables , or confounding variables , be sure to jot those down as you go to minimize the chances that research bias  will affect your results.

In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Step 1. ask a question.

Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.

Step 2. Do some preliminary research

Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.

At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to ensure that you’re embarking on a relevant topic . This can also help you identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalize more complex constructs.

Step 3. Formulate your hypothesis

Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.

4. Refine your hypothesis

You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:

• The relevant variables
• The specific group being studied
• The predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis

5. Phrase your hypothesis in three ways

To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in  if…then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.

In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.

If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.

6. Write a null hypothesis

If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis . The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .

• H 0 : The number of lectures attended by first-year students has no effect on their final exam scores.
• H 1 : The number of lectures attended by first-year students has a positive effect on their final exam scores.

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

A hypothesis is not just a guess — it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, November 20). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Steps & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 2, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/hypothesis/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, construct validity | definition, types, & examples, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, operationalization | a guide with examples, pros & cons, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

• Thesis Action Plan New
• Academic Project Planner

Literature Navigator

Thesis dialogue blueprint, writing wizard's template, research proposal compass.

• Why students love us
• Rebels Blog
• Why we are different
• All Products
• Coming Soon

How to Formulate a Hypothesis: Example and Explanation

A hypothesis is a smart guess about how things work. It helps scientists figure out what they think will happen in their experiments. Making a good hypothesis is important because it guides the research and helps find answers to questions. In this article, we will learn how to make a strong hypothesis, look at some examples, and understand why they matter.

Key Takeaways

• A hypothesis is an educated guess that can be tested through experiments.
• Good hypotheses are clear, precise, and can be proven wrong.
• There are different types of hypotheses, like simple, complex, null, and alternative.
• Variables play a big role in forming a hypothesis, including independent, dependent, and control variables.
• Testing and refining hypotheses are crucial steps in scientific research.

Understanding the Concept of a Hypothesis

Definition and importance.

A hypothesis is an idea you can test. It's a clear statement predicting the outcome of your study. It's not just a guess ; it should be based on what you already know. A good hypothesis helps you focus your research and guides your experiments.

Role in Scientific Research

In science, a hypothesis is very important. It gives you a starting point for your experiments. You can test it to see if it's true or false. This helps you understand more about the world. A clear, testable hypothesis is key to good research .

Common Misconceptions

Many people think a hypothesis is just a wild guess. This is not true. A hypothesis is based on existing knowledge and theories. Another common mistake is making the hypothesis too broad. A good hypothesis should be specific and testable.

Steps to Formulate a Hypothesis

Formulating a hypothesis is a critical step in the scientific method. It involves several key stages that help ensure your hypothesis is both testable and relevant to your research question. Here are the steps you should follow:

Gathering Observations

Start by collecting as many observations about your topic or problem as possible. These observations will form the foundation of your hypothesis. Good clinical research starts from a plausible hypothesis supported by contemporary scientific knowledge. Look for patterns or trends in the data that might suggest a possible explanation.

Identifying Variables

Next, identify the variables involved in your study. Variables are the elements that you will measure or manipulate in your research. There are typically three types of variables: independent, dependent, and control variables. Understanding these will help you design a more effective experiment.

Developing Possible Explanations

Once you have gathered your observations and identified your variables, the next step is to develop possible explanations for the patterns you have observed. This is where you start to formulate your hypothesis. Think of ways to confirm or disprove each possible explanation through experimentation. This process is known as falsifiability and is crucial for a robust hypothesis.

Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis

Testability and falsifiability.

A good hypothesis must be testable, meaning you can design an experiment to check if it's true or false. Testability is crucial because it allows you to gather evidence to support or refute your hypothesis. Additionally, a hypothesis should be falsifiable, which means there should be a possible outcome that can prove it wrong. This aligns with the falsification principle proposed by Karl Popper, which is fundamental in scientific research.

Clarity and Precision

Your hypothesis should be clear and precise, avoiding any vague language. This clarity helps in demystifying the concept of a thesis statement . A well-defined hypothesis makes it easier to design experiments and interpret results. For example, instead of saying "Plants grow better with more light," you could say, "If plants receive 8 hours of sunlight daily, then they will grow taller than plants that receive 4 hours of sunlight daily."

Relevance to Research Question

A good hypothesis should be directly related to your research question. It should provide a clear direction for your study and help you focus on specific variables. This relevance ensures that your hypothesis is not just a random guess but is grounded in existing knowledge and observations. Hypotheses have strong, arguably foundational, utility as a tool of science . They support the falsification principle, proposed by Karl Popper as fundamental in scientific research.

Types of Hypotheses in Research

When conducting research, it's crucial to understand the different types of hypotheses you might encounter. Each type serves a unique purpose and helps guide your study in specific ways. Knowing these types can enhance the clarity and focus of your research proposal .

Examples of Hypotheses

Simple hypothesis examples.

A simple hypothesis suggests a relationship between two variables: one independent and one dependent. For instance, "If students sleep for at least 8 hours, then their test scores will improve." This type of hypothesis is straightforward and easy to test.

Complex Hypothesis Examples

A complex hypothesis involves more than two variables. An example could be, "If students sleep for at least 8 hours and eat a healthy breakfast, then their test scores and overall well-being will improve." This type of hypothesis examines multiple factors and their combined effects.

Null and Alternative Hypothesis Examples

The null hypothesis states that there is no relationship between the variables. For example, "There is no difference in test scores between students who sleep for 8 hours and those who do not." The alternative hypothesis, on the other hand, suggests a relationship: "Students who sleep for 8 hours will have better test scores than those who do not."

Understanding these examples helps clarify how to structure your own hypotheses. Whether simple or complex, each type plays a crucial role in scientific research.

The Role of Variables in Hypothesis Formulation

When formulating a hypothesis, understanding the role of variables is crucial. Variables are the elements that you measure or manipulate in your research . They help you establish relationships and test your predictions effectively.

Testing Your Hypothesis

Designing experiments.

Designing an experiment is a crucial step in testing your hypothesis. A well-designed experiment ensures that you can accurately test your hypothesis and obtain reliable results. Start by defining your independent and dependent variables clearly. Make sure to control other factors that might influence the outcome. This is essential for maintaining the integrity of your experiment. You should also consider the ethical implications of your experiment to ensure it adheres to accepted standards.

Data Collection Methods

Once your experiment is designed, the next step is to collect data. Choose data collection methods that are appropriate for your research question and hypothesis. Common methods include surveys, observations, and experiments. Ensure that your data collection process is systematic and consistent to avoid any biases. Remember, the goal is to gather data that will either support or refute your hypothesis.

Analyzing Results

After collecting your data, the next step is to analyze the results. Use statistical methods to determine whether your data supports your hypothesis. This involves calculating the likelihood that your results are due to chance. If your data does not support your hypothesis, don't be discouraged. Unexpected findings can lead to new questions and further research. Always be open to conducting further experiments to validate and understand your findings.

Common Pitfalls in Hypothesis Formulation

When formulating a hypothesis, it's crucial to avoid common mistakes that can undermine your research. Here are some pitfalls to watch out for:

Overly Broad Hypotheses

One of the most frequent errors is creating a hypothesis that is too broad. A broad hypothesis can be difficult to test and may not provide meaningful results. Narrowing down your hypothesis to a specific aspect of your research question can make it more manageable and testable.

Lack of Testability

A hypothesis must be testable to be valid. If you can't design an experiment to test your hypothesis, it's not useful. Ensure that your hypothesis includes variables that can be measured and tested. This is essential for revolutionizing research: the secrets of effective experimental design .

Ignoring Alternative Explanations

Another common mistake is failing to consider other possible explanations for your observations. When you ignore alternative explanations, you risk missing out on important insights. Always evaluate assumptions, revise methodology, and consider alternative explanations to strengthen your hypothesis.

By being aware of these pitfalls, you can create a more robust and reliable hypothesis for your research.

Refining and Revising Hypotheses

When you conduct research, it’s common to find that your initial hypothesis may not hold true. This is a normal part of the scientific process. If your results do not support your original hypothesis, consider suggesting alternative options for future studies. This can help guide further research and improve understanding of the topic.

To ensure your hypothesis is strong, you can use a checklist to identify any weaknesses. Here are some questions to consider:

• Is the hypothesis clear and specific?
• Can it be tested through experiments?
• Does it relate to the research question?

By answering these questions, you can refine your hypothesis and make it more robust. Additionally, incorporating feedback from peers can provide new insights and help you adjust your hypothesis based on new data.

In summary, refining and revising your hypothesis is essential for advancing your research. It allows you to adapt to new findings and improve the clarity and focus of your work. Remember, the goal is to develop a hypothesis that can lead to meaningful conclusions and further exploration in your field.

In the context of educational research, a recent meta-analysis highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between psychological needs and student well-being. This shows how refining hypotheses can lead to better insights into complex issues. Similarly, a grounded theory study emphasizes the need for thorough reviews to identify key issues in research, which can also inform hypothesis revision.

Case Studies of Hypothesis Formulation

One of the most famous historical examples of hypothesis formulation is Gregor Mendel's work on pea plants. Mendel's hypothesis about inheritance patterns laid the groundwork for modern genetics. He observed the traits of pea plants and formulated hypotheses about how these traits were passed down through generations. His work is a classic example of how careful observation and hypothesis testing can lead to significant scientific breakthroughs.

In contemporary research, hypothesis formulation continues to play a crucial role. For instance, in the field of psychology, researchers often develop hypotheses to understand human behavior. A recent study on the effects of social media on mental health formulated the hypothesis that increased social media use leads to higher levels of anxiety and depression. This hypothesis was tested through surveys and data analysis, providing valuable insights into the relationship between social media and mental health.

From both historical and contemporary examples, several lessons can be learned about effective hypothesis formulation:

• Observation is key : Careful observation of phenomena is the first step in formulating a hypothesis.
• Clarity and precision : A good hypothesis should be clear and precise, making it easier to test.
• Testability: Ensure that your hypothesis can be tested through experiments or data analysis.
• Flexibility: Be prepared to revise your hypothesis based on new data or feedback.

By understanding these lessons, you can improve your own hypothesis formulation process and contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge.

In our "Case Studies of Hypothesis Formulation" section, we dive into real-world examples that show how to create strong hypotheses. These case studies are designed to help you understand the process and apply it to your own work. If you're looking for more detailed guidance, visit our website for step-by-step instructions and special offers. Don't miss out on the chance to improve your research skills!

Formulating a hypothesis is a fundamental step in the scientific method that helps guide research and experimentation. By gathering observations, evaluating potential causes, and developing testable statements, researchers can create hypotheses that are both meaningful and falsifiable. This process not only aids in understanding the problem at hand but also in predicting outcomes and drawing conclusions based on empirical evidence. Remember, a well-crafted hypothesis is clear, concise, and provides a direction for future research. With practice and careful consideration, anyone can learn to formulate effective hypotheses that contribute to scientific knowledge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a hypothesis.

A hypothesis is an educated guess about how things work. It's a statement that can be tested to see if it's true or false.

Why is a hypothesis important in scientific research?

A hypothesis helps guide your experiments and research. It gives you a clear focus and helps you understand what you're trying to find out.

What are the steps to formulate a good hypothesis?

To create a good hypothesis, start by gathering observations, look for patterns, and identify variables. Then, come up with possible explanations that you can test.

What makes a hypothesis testable?

A testable hypothesis is one that you can prove or disprove through experiments or observations. It should be clear and specific.

Can a hypothesis be proven true?

A hypothesis can be supported by evidence, but it can't be proven true beyond all doubt. New evidence might change our understanding.

What are independent and dependent variables?

Independent variables are the ones you change in an experiment. Dependent variables are the ones you measure to see if they change because of the independent variable.

What is a null hypothesis?

A null hypothesis states that there is no relationship between the variables being studied. It's often used as a starting point for testing.

How can I avoid common pitfalls in hypothesis formulation?

To avoid problems, make sure your hypothesis is specific, testable, and based on observations. Avoid making it too broad or ignoring other possible explanations.

Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics: A Fun and Informative Guide

Unlocking the Power of Data: A Review of 'Essentials of Modern Business Statistics with Microsoft Excel'

Discovering Statistics Using SAS: A Comprehensive Review

How to Deal with a Total Lack of Motivation, Stress, and Anxiety When Finishing Your Master's Thesis

Mastering the First Step: How to Start Your Thesis with Confidence

Thesis Revision Made Simple: Techniques for Perfecting Your Academic Work

Thesis Action Plan

Integrating Calm into Your Study Routine: The Power of Mindfulness in Education

How to determine the perfect research proposal length.

• Blog Articles
• Affiliate Program
• Terms and Conditions
• Payment and Shipping Terms
• Privacy Policy
• Return Policy

© 2024 Research Rebels, All rights reserved.

Your cart is currently empty.

What is Research Hypothesis: Definition, Types, and How to Develop

Read the blog to learn how a research hypothesis provides a clear and focused direction for a study and helps formulate research questions.

June 28, 2024

In this Article

A research hypothesis provides a clear, testable statement that guides the direction and focus of a study.

The benefit is that the hypothesis makes selecting appropriate research methods or statistical means possible, making the analysis more effective and achieving a result. Above all, the idea selected for the research also makes the study more focused, and the hypothesis does that best of all. Finally, when researchers propose and test a hypothesis, they can confirm, enhance, reconsider, or reject any theories.

In this blog, we'll explore the concept of a research hypothesis, its significance in research, and the various types utilized in scientific studies. Additionally, we'll provide a step-by-step guide on formulating your research hypothesis and methods for testing and evaluating it.

What is a Research Hypothesis? 

A research hypothesis is a foundational element in both qualitative and quantitative research . It is a precise, testable statement that predicts a possible relationship between two or more variables. This hypothesis is developed based on existing theories, observations, or previous research and aims to provide a direction for further investigation.

A research hypothesis starts with a question a researcher is trying to answer. It implies its effect or outcome and provides a basic ground to construct investigations, surveys, or other methods. It explains what a researcher can expect to find. Once the expectations are clearly stated, a researcher will build the methodology by choosing methods and tools for data collection and analysis.

Examples of Research Hypothesis

Here are some examples of research hypotheses across various fields:

• Hypothesis: Individuals who practice mindfulness meditation daily will report lower levels of stress compared to those who do not practice mindfulness.
• Independent Variable: Mindfulness meditation practice.
• Dependent Variable: Levels of stress.
• Hypothesis: Students who receive personalized tutoring in math will perform better on standardized tests than those who do not.
• Independent Variable: Personalized tutoring in math.
• Dependent Variable: Performance on standardized tests.
• Hypothesis: Consumers exposed to advertisements with emotional appeals will have a higher purchase intention than those with rational appeals.
• Independent Variable: Type of advertisement appeal (emotional vs. rational).
• Dependent Variable: Purchase intent .
• Hypothesis: Increasing the minimum wage will decrease employee turnover rates in the retail sector.
• Independent Variable: Minimum wage increase.
• Dependent Variable: Employee turnover rates in the retail sector.

Technology:

• Hypothesis: Users who receive personalized recommendations on a streaming platform will spend more time watching content than users who do not receive personalized recommendations.
• Independent Variable: Personalized recommendations.
• Dependent Variable: Time spent watching content.

[ Note : Here, Independent Variable is the factor manipulated or controlled in an experiment to observe its effect.

Dependent Variable is the factor that is measured or observed in an experiment to assess the impact of the independent variable.]

What is the Importance of Hypothesis in Research?

The importance of a hypothesis in research cannot be overstated, as it serves several crucial functions in the scientific inquiry process. 

Here are the key reasons why hypotheses are fundamental to research:

1. Guides the Research Process

A hypothesis gives a study a clear direction as it outlines what you intend to study and establishes the relationship you are trying to find between variables. It is precise and to the point, which helps formulate your research questions and plan your methods. Using a hypothesis helps organize the testing process from the beginning to the end of the study.

2. Defines the Variables

A well-formulated hypothesis specifies the independent and dependent variables. It defines the object of manipulation and measurement. According to the definition, the hypothesis is an assumption about the relationship between the objects of study. Since statistics is a field of research, the hypothesis is a predictive statement that can be tested empirically.

3. Facilitates Testability and Empirical Investigation

A well-defined hypothesis indicates a clear relationship between the studied variables, thus providing a foundation for designing experiments and observations. In some cases, a null hypothesis is stated to subsequently apply the appropriate statistical test to either validate an already formulated and appropriate hypothesis or reject it.

4. Enhances Objectivity

A hypothesis helps minimize researcher bias by proposing a specific prediction. It forces the researcher to rely on empirical data rather than subjective opinions or beliefs. This objectivity is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the scientific process and ensuring that the findings are credible and reliable.

5. Promotes Critical Thinking and Theoretical Frameworks

Creating a reasonable and viable hypothesis starts with deeply understanding the problem and the field. With a clear sense of the scope of existing evidence and knowledge, there would be a way to go beyond what other researchers have already done. By thoroughly reviewing the literature, researchers are in a position to critically evaluate it and identify problems or questions that remain unresolved. 

6. Enables Structured Analysis and Interpretation

A hypothesis is a tentative assumption that provides a context for data analysis and interpretation. It allows for determining specific statistical tests to run and understanding how to interpret them. If the results support the hypothesis, then there is sufficient evidence to claim and infer that the chosen variables are related in a particular way to each other. 

If the hypothesis does not match the outcomes, it raises the question of the theoretical assumptions supporting it and additional testing that may be indicated.

7. Drives Scientific Progress

Testing hypotheses continually allows researchers to enrich knowledge beyond merely investigating a particular aspect. The data supporting both hypotheses, the data refuting them, may give rise to new theories, which may serve as the foundation for new research. Such a loop significantly benefits researchers who need to extend their understanding of a particular aspect of the outer world.

{{cta-button}}

What Are The Types of Research Hypotheses?

Research hypotheses can broadly be categorized into several types, each serving different purposes in scientific inquiry. 

Here are the main types of research hypotheses:

1. Simple Hypothesis

A simple hypothesis posits a relationship between two variables. It suggests a direct cause-and-effect relationship without specifying the direction of the effect. For example:

"Increased exercise leads to improved cardiovascular health."

2. Complex Hypothesis

Complex hypotheses involve relationships between multiple variables. These hypotheses may propose how several factors interact to produce a particular outcome. For example:

"The interaction between genetic predisposition, diet, and exercise influences longevity."

3. Associative Hypothesis

An associative hypothesis suggests that there is a relationship between two variables, but it does not imply causation. It states that changes in one variable are associated with changes in another. For example:

"There is a correlation between income level and access to healthcare services."

4. Causal Hypothesis

A causal hypothesis asserts that changes in one variable directly cause changes in another. It implies a cause-and-effect relationship that can be tested through experimentation or controlled observation. For example:

"Increased consumption of sugary drinks causes an increase in body weight."

5. Directional Hypothesis

A directional hypothesis predicts the direction of the relationship between variables. It specifies whether one variable will increase or decrease in response to changes in another variable. For example:

"Higher levels of education lead to higher income levels."

6. Non-directional Hypothesis

A non-directional hypothesis does not predict the direction of the relationship between variables. It simply suggests that there is a relationship without specifying whether one variable will increase or decrease in response to changes in another variable. For example:

"There is a relationship between social media use and levels of anxiety."

7. Null Hypothesis (H₀)

The null hypothesis states no significant relationship exists between the variables being studied. It proposes that any observed differences or effects are due to random chance or sampling error. It is often used to test against the alternative hypothesis (H₁), which proposes the existence of a relationship or effect. For example:

"There is no significant difference in test scores between students who study with music and students who study in silence."

How to Develop a Research Hypothesis?

Developing a research hypothesis involves a systematic process to ensure clarity, testability, and relevance to the research question. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to develop a research hypothesis:

Step 1: Identify the Research Problem or Question

Start by clearly defining the research problem or question you want to investigate. This could be based on gaps in existing literature, observations, theories, or practical issues.

Step 2: Review Existing Literature

Conduct a thorough review of relevant literature to understand what is already known about the topic. Identify theories, findings, and gaps in knowledge that can help inform the development of your hypothesis.

Step 3: Specify Variables

Identify the variables involved in your study. Variables are measurable traits, conditions, or characteristics that can change or vary. 

Specifically, determine:

Independent Variable: The factor you manipulate or study in your research.

Dependent Variable: The outcome or response you are measuring or observing about the independent variable.

Step 4: Formulate a Hypothesis

Formulate a clear and specific hypothesis based on your research problem, literature review, and identified variables. A good hypothesis should:

State the expected relationship between the independent and dependent variables.

Be testable through empirical research methods (e.g., experiments, surveys, observations).

Be concise and specific, avoiding ambiguity.

Simple hypothesis: "Increased exposure to sunlight leads to higher levels of vitamin D in humans."

Directional hypothesis: "Children who participate in regular physical activity will have lower levels of obesity than children who do not."

Non-directional hypothesis: "There is a relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover."

Step 5: Consider Alternative Hypotheses

While formulating your hypothesis, consider alternative explanations or hypotheses that could also explain the relationship between your variables. This helps in ensuring that your hypothesis is well-grounded and comprehensive.

Step 6: Ensure Testability

Ensure that your hypothesis is testable using appropriate research methods and techniques. Define how to measure or manipulate the variables to gather empirical evidence supporting or refuting your hypothesis.

Step 7: Write and Refine

Write down your hypothesis in a clear and concise statement. Revise and refine it as needed to improve clarity and specificity. Ensure that it aligns with the objectives of your study and effectively addresses the research question.

Step 8: Seek Feedback

Before finalizing your hypothesis, seek feedback from colleagues, mentors, or peers in your field. Their input can help identify potential weaknesses or ambiguities in your hypothesis and suggest improvements.

Step 9: Finalize Your Hypothesis

Once you have refined your hypothesis based on feedback and considerations, finalize it as the guiding statement for your research study.

Characteristics of a Good Research Hypothesis

A good research hypothesis possesses several key characteristics that make it effective and suitable for investigation:

1. Clear and Specific

The hypothesis should be precise in its wording and focus. It should clearly state what the researcher intends to investigate or test.

2. Testable

A hypothesis must be capable of being empirically tested and verified or falsified through observation or experimentation. This means there should be a way to gather data that supports or refutes the hypothesis.

3. Falsifiable

There must be a possibility of proving the hypothesis false. A hypothesis that cannot be proven false typically falls outside scientific inquiry. This criterion ensures that research remains objective and open to revision based on evidence.

4. Grounded in Theory

A good hypothesis is usually based on existing theories or literature. It should be informed by a solid understanding of the topic and build upon previous research findings or established principles.

5. Rationale

It should provide a logical rationale or explanation for the expected outcome. This rationale is often derived from the literature review or preliminary observations.

6. Empirical Relevance

The hypothesis should address a question relevant to the field of study and contribute to existing knowledge. It should propose a relationship or difference between variables that is worth investigating.

While the hypothesis should be clear and specific, it should also be concise and to the point. It typically consists of a statement or a few sentences summarizing the expected relationship between variables.

8. Variables

A hypothesis should identify the variables involved and specify how they are expected to relate. This includes independent variables (the factors that are manipulated or controlled) and dependent variables (the outcomes or effects being measured).

9. Observable and Measurable

The variables in the hypothesis should be observable and measurable, allowing for data collection that can be analyzed statistically.

10. Revisable

A hypothesis is not a conclusion but a tentative assumption or prediction that guides the research process. It should be open to revision based on the study's findings.

The Role of Decode in Testing Research Hypotheses

Decode is a powerful survey and consumer research platform powered by Insights AI, that can be instrumental in testing research hypotheses. 

Here's how Decode can support you in this process:

• Survey Design and Data Collection: Craft targeted questions using Decode's intuitive interface to gather relevant data for your research.
• Exploratory Research: Conduct exploratory research to understand the landscape of your topic—Leverage Decode's functionalities for surveys and feedback mechanisms to gain valuable insights from your target audience.
• Literature Review and Background Research: Supplement your literature review by collecting data on sample populations' opinions, experiences, and preferences through Decode surveys . This combined data and a thorough literature evaluation can help you build a well-grounded hypothesis with a strong foundation in real-world knowledge.
• Identifying Variables: Design targeted survey questions within Decode to pinpoint relevant variables crucial to your research topic.
• Testing Assumptions: Before solidifying your research hypothesis, informally test your assumptions using surveys created on Decode. This allows for early feedback and potential refinement.
• Data Analysis Tools: Decode provides built-in data analysis tools. Utilize these tools to uncover patterns, correlations, and trends within the data you collect through your surveys.
• Refining Your Hypotheses: As you gather data through Decode surveys, you can continuously adjust and refine your hypotheses based on the real-world responses you receive. This iterative process ensures your hypothesis stays aligned with the insights you uncover.

Final Words

A research hypothesis serves as a guide for scientists. It is a tested idea that applies across different fields, including medicine, social sciences, and natural sciences. Integrating theories with hands-on information assists researchers in exploring and discovering new information.

Decode is a valuable tool for researchers. It simplifies creating surveys, gathering data, and analyzing information. It supports all types of research, from forming hypotheses to testing them. Start a free trial to explore its features and maximize your research potential.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a research hypothesis example.

A research hypothesis example is: "Students who receive daily math tutoring will have higher test scores than students who do not."

What do you write in a research hypothesis?

In a research hypothesis, you write a clear and testable statement predicting the relationship between two or more variables. It should specify the variables and the expected outcome.

What is the purpose of a research hypothesis?

A research hypothesis provides a focused direction for research. It guides the study design, data collection, and analysis by predicting a specific outcome that can be tested.

What are the three major types of hypotheses?

The three major types of hypotheses are:

• Null Hypothesis (H₀): States that there is no effect or relationship between variables.
• Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): Suggests that there is an effect or relationship between variables.
• Directional Hypothesis: Specifies the expected direction of the relationship between variables (e.g., positive or negative).

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

With lots of unique blocks, you can easily build a page without coding.

Click on Study templates

Start from scratch

Add blocks to the content

Saving the Template

Publish the Template

Soham is a true Manchester United fan who finds joy in more than just football. Whether navigating the open road, scoring virtual goals in FIFA, reading novels, or enjoying quality time with friends, Soham embraces a life full of diverse passions.

Product Marketing Specialist

Related Articles

Top AI Events You Do Not Want to Miss in 2024

Here are all the top AI events for 2024, curated in one convenient place just for you.

Top Insights Events You Do Not Want to Miss in 2024

Here are all the top Insights events for 2024, curated in one convenient place just for you.

Top CX Events You Do Not Want to Miss in 2024

Here are all the top CX events for 2024, curated in one convenient place just for you.

How to Build an Experience Map: A Complete Guide

An experience map is essential for businesses, as it highlights the customer journey, uncovering insights to improve user experiences and address pain points. Read to find more!

Everything You Need to Know about Intelligent Scoring

Are you curious about Intelligent Scoring and how it differs from regular scoring? Discover its applications and benefits. Read on to learn more!

Qualitative Research Methods and Its Advantages In Modern User Research

Discover how to leverage qualitative research methods, including moderated sessions, to gain deep user insights and enhance your product and UX decisions.

The 10 Best Customer Experience Platforms to Transform Your CX

Explore the top 10 CX platforms to revolutionize customer interactions, enhance satisfaction, and drive business growth.

TAM SAM SOM: What It Means and How to Calculate It?

Understanding TAM, SAM, SOM helps businesses gauge market potential. Learn their definitions and how to calculate them for better business decisions and strategy.

Understanding Likert Scales: Advantages, Limitations, and Questions

Using Likert scales can help you understand how your customers view and rate your product. Here's how you can use them to get the feedback you need.

Mastering the 80/20 Rule to Transform User Research

Find out how the Pareto Principle can optimize your user research processes and lead to more impactful results with the help of AI.

Understanding Consumer Psychology: The Science Behind What Makes Us Buy

Gain a comprehensive understanding of consumer psychology and learn how to apply these insights to inform your research and strategies.

A Guide to Website Footers: Best Design Practices & Examples

Explore the importance of website footers, design best practices, and how to optimize them using UX research for enhanced user engagement and navigation.

Customer Effort Score: Definition, Examples, Tips

A great customer score can lead to dedicated, engaged customers who can end up being loyal advocates of your brand. Here's what you need to know about it.

How to Detect and Address User Pain Points for Better Engagement

Understanding user pain points can help you provide a seamless user experiences that makes your users come back for more. Here's what you need to know about it.

What is Quota Sampling? Definition, Types, Examples, and How to Use It?

Discover Quota Sampling: Learn its process, types, and benefits for accurate consumer insights and informed marketing decisions. Perfect for researchers and brand marketers!

What Is Accessibility Testing? A Comprehensive Guide

Ensure inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards through thorough testing. Improve user experience and mitigate legal risks. Learn more.

Maximizing Your Research Efficiency with AI Transcriptions

Explore how AI transcription can transform your market research by delivering precise and rapid insights from audio and video recordings.

Understanding the False Consensus Effect: How to Manage it

The false consensus effect can cause incorrect assumptions and ultimately, the wrong conclusions. Here's how you can overcome it.

5 Banking Customer Experience Trends to Watch Out for in 2024

Discover the top 5 banking customer experience trends to watch out for in 2024. Stay ahead in the evolving financial landscape.

The Ultimate Guide to Regression Analysis: Definition, Types, Usage & Advantages

Master Regression Analysis: Learn types, uses & benefits in consumer research for precise insights & strategic decisions.

EyeQuant Alternative

Meet Qatalyst, your best eyequant alternative to improve user experience and an AI-powered solution for all your user research needs.

EyeSee Alternative

Embrace the Insights AI revolution: Meet Decode, your innovative solution for consumer insights, offering a compelling alternative to EyeSee.

Skeuomorphism in UX Design: Is It Dead?

Skeuomorphism in UX design creates intuitive interfaces using familiar real-world visuals to help users easily understand digital products. Do you know how?

Top 6 Wireframe Tools and Ways to Test Your Designs

Wireframe tools assist designers in planning and visualizing the layout of their websites. Look through this list of wireframing tools to find the one that suits you best.

Revolutionizing Customer Interaction: The Power of Conversational AI

Conversational AI enhances customer service across various industries, offering intelligent, context-aware interactions that drive efficiency and satisfaction. Here's how.

User Story Mapping: A Powerful Tool for User-Centered Product Development

Learn about user story mapping and how it can be used for successful product development with this blog.

Understanding Customer Retention: How to Keep Your Customers Coming Back

Understanding customer retention is key to building a successful brand that has repeat, loyal customers. Here's what you need to know about it.

Demographic Segmentation: How Brands Can Use it to Improve Marketing Strategies

Read this blog to learn what demographic segmentation means, its importance, and how it can be used by brands.

Mastering Product Positioning: A UX Researcher's Guide

Read this blog to understand why brands should have a well-defined product positioning and how it affects the overall business.

Discrete Vs. Continuous Data: Everything You Need To Know

Explore the differences between discrete and continuous data and their impact on business decisions and customer insights.

50+ Employee Engagement Survey Questions

Understand how an employee engagement survey provides insights into employee satisfaction and motivation, directly impacting productivity and retention.

What is Experimental Research: Definition, Types & Examples

Understand how experimental research enables researchers to confidently identify causal relationships between variables and validate findings, enhancing credibility.

A Guide to Interaction Design

Interaction design can help you create engaging and intuitive user experiences, improving usability and satisfaction through effective design principles. Here's how.

Exploring the Benefits of Stratified Sampling

Understanding stratified sampling can improve research accuracy by ensuring diverse representation across key subgroups. Here's how.

A Guide to Voice Recognition in Enhancing UX Research

Learn the importance of using voice recognition technology in user research for enhanced user feedback and insights.

The Ultimate Figma Design Handbook: Design Creation and Testing

The Ultimate Figma Design Handbook covers setting up Figma, creating designs, advanced features, prototyping, and testing designs with real users.

The Power of Organization: Mastering Information Architectures

Understanding the art of information architectures can enhance user experiences by organizing and structuring digital content effectively, making information easy to find and navigate. Here's how.

Convenience Sampling: Examples, Benefits, and When To Use It

Read the blog to understand how convenience sampling allows for quick and easy data collection with minimal cost and effort.

What is Critical Thinking, and How Can it be Used in Consumer Research?

Learn how critical thinking enhances consumer research and discover how Decode's AI-driven platform revolutionizes data analysis and insights.

How Business Intelligence Tools Transform User Research & Product Management

This blog explains how Business Intelligence (BI) tools can transform user research and product management by providing data-driven insights for better decision-making.

What is Face Validity? Definition, Guide and Examples

Read this blog to explore face validity, its importance, and the advantages of using it in market research.

What is Customer Lifetime Value, and How To Calculate It?

Read this blog to understand how Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) can help your business optimize marketing efforts, improve customer retention, and increase profitability.

Systematic Sampling: Definition, Examples, and Types

Explore how systematic sampling helps researchers by providing a structured method to select representative samples from larger populations, ensuring efficiency and reducing bias.

Understanding Selection Bias: A Guide

Selection bias can affect the type of respondents you choose for the study and ultimately the quality of responses you receive. Here’s all you need to know about it.

A Guide to Designing an Effective Product Strategy

Read this blog to explore why a well-defined product strategy is required for brands while developing or refining a product.

A Guide to Minimum Viable Product (MVP) in UX: Definition, Strategies, and Examples

Discover what an MVP is, why it's crucial in UX, strategies for creating one, and real-world examples from top companies like Dropbox and Airbnb.

Asking Close Ended Questions: A Guide

Asking the right close ended questions is they key to getting quantitiative data from your users. Her's how you should do it.

Creating Website Mockups: Your Ultimate Guide to Effective Design

Read this blog to learn website mockups- tools, examples and how to create an impactful website design.

Understanding Your Target Market And Its Importance In Consumer Research

Read this blog to learn about the importance of creating products and services to suit the needs of your target audience.

What Is a Go-To-Market Strategy And How to Create One?

Check out this blog to learn how a go-to-market strategy helps businesses enter markets smoothly, attract more customers, and stand out from competitors.

What is Confirmation Bias in Consumer Research?

Learn how confirmation bias affects consumer research, its types, impacts, and practical tips to avoid it for more accurate and reliable insights.

Market Penetration: The Key to Business Success

Understanding market penetration is key to cracking the code to sustained business growth and competitive advantage in any industry. Here's all you need to know about it.

How to Create an Effective User Interface

Having a simple, clear user interface helps your users find what they really want, improving the user experience. Here's how you can achieve it.

Product Differentiation and What It Means for Your Business

Discover how product differentiation helps businesses stand out with unique features, innovative designs, and exceptional customer experiences.

What is Ethnographic Research? Definition, Types & Examples

Read this blog to understand Ethnographic research, its relevance in today’s business landscape and how you can leverage it for your business.

Product Roadmap: The 2024 Guide [with Examples]

Read this blog to understand how a product roadmap can align stakeholders by providing a clear product development and delivery plan.

Product Market Fit: Making Your Products Stand Out in a Crowded Market

Delve into the concept of product-market fit, explore its significance, and equip yourself with practical insights to achieve it effectively.

Consumer Behavior in Online Shopping: A Comprehensive Guide

Ever wondered how online shopping behavior can influence successful business decisions? Read on to learn more.

How to Conduct a First Click Test?

Why are users leaving your site so fast? Learn how First Click Testing can help. Discover quick fixes for frustration and boost engagement.

What is Market Intelligence? Methods, Types, and Examples

Read the blog to understand how marketing intelligence helps you understand consumer behavior and market trends to inform strategic decision-making.

What is a Longitudinal Study? Definition, Types, and Examples

Is your long-term research strategy unclear? Learn how longitudinal studies decode complexity. Read on for insights.

What Is the Impact of Customer Churn on Your Business?

Understanding and reducing customer churn is the key to building a healthy business that keeps customers satisfied. Here's all you need to know about it.

The Ultimate Design Thinking Guide

Discover the power of design thinking in UX design for your business. Learn the process and key principles in our comprehensive guide.

100+ Yes Or No Survey Questions Examples

Yes or no survey questions simplify responses, aiding efficiency, clarity, standardization, quantifiability, and binary decision-making. Read some examples!

What is Customer Segmentation? The ULTIMATE Guide

Explore how customer segmentation targets diverse consumer groups by tailoring products, marketing, and experiences to their preferred needs.

Crafting User-Centric Websites Through Responsive Web Design

Find yourself reaching for your phone instead of a laptop for regular web browsing? Read on to find out what that means & how you can leverage it for business.

How Does Product Placement Work? Examples and Benefits

Read the blog to understand how product placement helps advertisers seek subtle and integrated ways to promote their products within entertainment content.

The Importance of Reputation Management, and How it Can Make or Break Your Brand

A good reputation management strategy is crucial for any brand that wants to keep its customers loyal. Here's how brands can focus on it.

A Comprehensive Guide to Human-Centered Design

Are you putting the human element at the center of your design process? Read this blog to understand why brands must do so.

How to Leverage Customer Insights to Grow Your Business

Genuine insights are becoming increasingly difficult to collect. Read on to understand the challenges and what the future holds for customer insights.

The Complete Guide to Behavioral Segmentation

Struggling to reach your target audience effectively? Discover how behavioral segmentation can transform your marketing approach. Read more in our blog!

Creating a Unique Brand Identity: How to Make Your Brand Stand Out

Creating a great brand identity goes beyond creating a memorable logo - it's all about creating a consistent and unique brand experience for your cosnumers. Here's everything you need to know about building one.

Understanding the Product Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Guide

Understanding the product life cycle, or the stages a product goes through from its launch to its sunset can help you understand how to market it at every stage to create the most optimal marketing strategies.

Empathy vs. Sympathy in UX Research

Are you conducting UX research and seeking guidance on conducting user interviews with empathy or sympathy? Keep reading to discover the best approach.

What is Exploratory Research, and How To Conduct It?

Read this blog to understand how exploratory research can help you uncover new insights, patterns, and hypotheses in a subject area.

First Impressions & Why They Matter in User Research

Ever wonder if first impressions matter in user research? The answer might surprise you. Read on to learn more!

Cluster Sampling: Definition, Types & Examples

Read this blog to understand how cluster sampling tackles the challenge of efficiently collecting data from large, spread-out populations.

Top Six Market Research Trends

Curious about where market research is headed? Read on to learn about the changes surrounding this field in 2024 and beyond.

Lyssna Alternative

Meet Qatalyst, your best lyssna alternative to usability testing, to create a solution for all your user research needs.

What is Feedback Loop? Definition, Importance, Types, and Best Practices

Struggling to connect with your customers? Read the blog to learn how feedback loops can solve your problem!

UI vs. UX Design: What’s The Difference?

Learn how UI solves the problem of creating an intuitive and visually appealing interface and how UX addresses broader issues related to user satisfaction and overall experience with the product or service.

The Impact of Conversion Rate Optimization on Your Business

Understanding conversion rate optimization can help you boost your online business. Read more to learn all about it.

Insurance Questionnaire: Tips, Questions and Significance

Leverage this pre-built customizable questionnaire template for insurance to get deep insights from your audience.

UX Research Plan Template

Read on to understand why you need a UX Research Plan and how you can use a fully customizable template to get deep insights from your users!

Brand Experience: What it Means & Why It Matters

Have you ever wondered how users navigate the travel industry for your research insights? Read on to understand user experience in the travel sector.

Validity in Research: Definitions, Types, Significance, and Its Relationship with Reliability

Is validity ensured in your research process? Read more to explore the importance and types of validity in research.

The Role of UI Designers in Creating Delightful User Interfaces

UI designers help to create aesthetic and functional experiences for users. Here's all you need to know about them.

Top Usability Testing Tools to Try

Using usability testing tools can help you understand user preferences and behaviors and ultimately, build a better digital product. Here are the top tools you should be aware of.

Understanding User Experience in Travel Market Research

Ever wondered how users navigate the travel industry for your research insights? Read on to understand user experience in the travel sector.

Top 10 Customer Feedback Tools You’d Want to Try

Explore the top 10 customer feedback tools for analyzing feedback, empowering businesses to enhance customer experience.

10 Best UX Communities on LinkedIn & Slack for Networking & Collaboration

Discover the significance of online communities in UX, the benefits of joining communities on LinkedIn and Slack, and insights into UX career advancement.

The Role of Customer Experience Manager in Consumer Research

This blog explores the role of Customer Experience Managers, their skills, their comparison with CRMs, their key metrics, and why they should use a consumer research platform.

Product Review Template

Learn how to conduct a product review and get insights with this template on the Qatalyst platform.

What Is the Role of a Product Designer in UX?

Product designers help to create user-centric digital experiences that cater to users' needs and preferences. Here's what you need to know about them.

Top 10 Customer Journey Mapping Tools For Market Research in 2024

Explore the top 10 tools in 2024 to understand customer journeys while conducting market research.

Generative AI and its Use in Consumer Research

Ever wondered how Generative AI fits in within the research space? Read on to find its potential in the consumer research industry.

All You Need to Know About Interval Data: Examples, Variables, & Analysis

Understand how interval data provides precise numerical measurements, enabling quantitative analysis and statistical comparison in research.

How to Use Narrative Analysis in Research

Find the advantages of using narrative analysis and how this method can help you enrich your research insights.

A Guide to Asking the Right Focus Group Questions

Moderated discussions with multiple participants to gather diverse opinions on a topic.

Maximize Your Research Potential

Experience why teams worldwide trust our Consumer & User Research solutions.

Book a Demo

Research Hypothesis In Psychology: Types, & Examples

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

A research hypothesis, in its plural form “hypotheses,” is a specific, testable prediction about the anticipated results of a study, established at its outset. It is a key component of the scientific method .

Hypotheses connect theory to data and guide the research process towards expanding scientific understanding

Some key points about hypotheses:

• A hypothesis expresses an expected pattern or relationship. It connects the variables under investigation.
• It is stated in clear, precise terms before any data collection or analysis occurs. This makes the hypothesis testable.
• A hypothesis must be falsifiable. It should be possible, even if unlikely in practice, to collect data that disconfirms rather than supports the hypothesis.
• Hypotheses guide research. Scientists design studies to explicitly evaluate hypotheses about how nature works.
• For a hypothesis to be valid, it must be testable against empirical evidence. The evidence can then confirm or disprove the testable predictions.
• Hypotheses are informed by background knowledge and observation, but go beyond what is already known to propose an explanation of how or why something occurs.

Predictions typically arise from a thorough knowledge of the research literature, curiosity about real-world problems or implications, and integrating this to advance theory. They build on existing literature while providing new insight.

Types of Research Hypotheses

Alternative hypothesis.

The research hypothesis is often called the alternative or experimental hypothesis in experimental research.

It typically suggests a potential relationship between two key variables: the independent variable, which the researcher manipulates, and the dependent variable, which is measured based on those changes.

The alternative hypothesis states a relationship exists between the two variables being studied (one variable affects the other).

A hypothesis is a testable statement or prediction about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a key component of the scientific method. Some key points about hypotheses:

• Important hypotheses lead to predictions that can be tested empirically. The evidence can then confirm or disprove the testable predictions.

In summary, a hypothesis is a precise, testable statement of what researchers expect to happen in a study and why. Hypotheses connect theory to data and guide the research process towards expanding scientific understanding.

An experimental hypothesis predicts what change(s) will occur in the dependent variable when the independent variable is manipulated.

It states that the results are not due to chance and are significant in supporting the theory being investigated.

The alternative hypothesis can be directional, indicating a specific direction of the effect, or non-directional, suggesting a difference without specifying its nature. It’s what researchers aim to support or demonstrate through their study.

Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis states no relationship exists between the two variables being studied (one variable does not affect the other). There will be no changes in the dependent variable due to manipulating the independent variable.

It states results are due to chance and are not significant in supporting the idea being investigated.

The null hypothesis, positing no effect or relationship, is a foundational contrast to the research hypothesis in scientific inquiry. It establishes a baseline for statistical testing, promoting objectivity by initiating research from a neutral stance.

Many statistical methods are tailored to test the null hypothesis, determining the likelihood of observed results if no true effect exists.

This dual-hypothesis approach provides clarity, ensuring that research intentions are explicit, and fosters consistency across scientific studies, enhancing the standardization and interpretability of research outcomes.

Nondirectional Hypothesis

A non-directional hypothesis, also known as a two-tailed hypothesis, predicts that there is a difference or relationship between two variables but does not specify the direction of this relationship.

It merely indicates that a change or effect will occur without predicting which group will have higher or lower values.

For example, “There is a difference in performance between Group A and Group B” is a non-directional hypothesis.

Directional Hypothesis

A directional (one-tailed) hypothesis predicts the nature of the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. It predicts in which direction the change will take place. (i.e., greater, smaller, less, more)

It specifies whether one variable is greater, lesser, or different from another, rather than just indicating that there’s a difference without specifying its nature.

For example, “Exercise increases weight loss” is a directional hypothesis.

Falsifiability

The Falsification Principle, proposed by Karl Popper , is a way of demarcating science from non-science. It suggests that for a theory or hypothesis to be considered scientific, it must be testable and irrefutable.

Falsifiability emphasizes that scientific claims shouldn’t just be confirmable but should also have the potential to be proven wrong.

It means that there should exist some potential evidence or experiment that could prove the proposition false.

However many confirming instances exist for a theory, it only takes one counter observation to falsify it. For example, the hypothesis that “all swans are white,” can be falsified by observing a black swan.

For Popper, science should attempt to disprove a theory rather than attempt to continually provide evidence to support a research hypothesis.

Can a Hypothesis be Proven?

Hypotheses make probabilistic predictions. They state the expected outcome if a particular relationship exists. However, a study result supporting a hypothesis does not definitively prove it is true.

All studies have limitations. There may be unknown confounding factors or issues that limit the certainty of conclusions. Additional studies may yield different results.

In science, hypotheses can realistically only be supported with some degree of confidence, not proven. The process of science is to incrementally accumulate evidence for and against hypothesized relationships in an ongoing pursuit of better models and explanations that best fit the empirical data. But hypotheses remain open to revision and rejection if that is where the evidence leads.

• Disproving a hypothesis is definitive. Solid disconfirmatory evidence will falsify a hypothesis and require altering or discarding it based on the evidence.
• However, confirming evidence is always open to revision. Other explanations may account for the same results, and additional or contradictory evidence may emerge over time.

We can never 100% prove the alternative hypothesis. Instead, we see if we can disprove, or reject the null hypothesis.

If we reject the null hypothesis, this doesn’t mean that our alternative hypothesis is correct but does support the alternative/experimental hypothesis.

Upon analysis of the results, an alternative hypothesis can be rejected or supported, but it can never be proven to be correct. We must avoid any reference to results proving a theory as this implies 100% certainty, and there is always a chance that evidence may exist which could refute a theory.

How to Write a Hypothesis

• Identify variables . The researcher manipulates the independent variable and the dependent variable is the measured outcome.
• Operationalized the variables being investigated . Operationalization of a hypothesis refers to the process of making the variables physically measurable or testable, e.g. if you are about to study aggression, you might count the number of punches given by participants.
• Decide on a direction for your prediction . If there is evidence in the literature to support a specific effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable, write a directional (one-tailed) hypothesis. If there are limited or ambiguous findings in the literature regarding the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable, write a non-directional (two-tailed) hypothesis.
• Make it Testable : Ensure your hypothesis can be tested through experimentation or observation. It should be possible to prove it false (principle of falsifiability).
• Clear & concise language . A strong hypothesis is concise (typically one to two sentences long), and formulated using clear and straightforward language, ensuring it’s easily understood and testable.

Consider a hypothesis many teachers might subscribe to: students work better on Monday morning than on Friday afternoon (IV=Day, DV= Standard of work).

Now, if we decide to study this by giving the same group of students a lesson on a Monday morning and a Friday afternoon and then measuring their immediate recall of the material covered in each session, we would end up with the following:

• The alternative hypothesis states that students will recall significantly more information on a Monday morning than on a Friday afternoon.
• The null hypothesis states that there will be no significant difference in the amount recalled on a Monday morning compared to a Friday afternoon. Any difference will be due to chance or confounding factors.

More Examples

• Memory : Participants exposed to classical music during study sessions will recall more items from a list than those who studied in silence.
• Social Psychology : Individuals who frequently engage in social media use will report higher levels of perceived social isolation compared to those who use it infrequently.
• Developmental Psychology : Children who engage in regular imaginative play have better problem-solving skills than those who don’t.
• Clinical Psychology : Cognitive-behavioral therapy will be more effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety over a 6-month period compared to traditional talk therapy.
• Cognitive Psychology : Individuals who multitask between various electronic devices will have shorter attention spans on focused tasks than those who single-task.
• Health Psychology : Patients who practice mindfulness meditation will experience lower levels of chronic pain compared to those who don’t meditate.
• Organizational Psychology : Employees in open-plan offices will report higher levels of stress than those in private offices.
• Behavioral Psychology : Rats rewarded with food after pressing a lever will press it more frequently than rats who receive no reward.

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Sweepstakes
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

How to Write a Great Hypothesis

Hypothesis Definition, Format, Examples, and Tips

Verywell / Alex Dos Diaz

• The Scientific Method

Hypothesis Format

Falsifiability of a hypothesis.

• Operationalization

Hypothesis Types

Hypotheses examples.

• Collecting Data

A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process.

Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test performance. The hypothesis might be: "This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived."

At a Glance

A hypothesis is crucial to scientific research because it offers a clear direction for what the researchers are looking to find. This allows them to design experiments to test their predictions and add to our scientific knowledge about the world. This article explores how a hypothesis is used in psychology research, how to write a good hypothesis, and the different types of hypotheses you might use.

The Hypothesis in the Scientific Method

In the scientific method , whether it involves research in psychology, biology, or some other area, a hypothesis represents what the researchers think will happen in an experiment. The scientific method involves the following steps:

• Forming a question
• Performing background research
• Creating a hypothesis
• Designing an experiment
• Collecting data
• Analyzing the results
• Drawing conclusions
• Communicating the results

The hypothesis is a prediction, but it involves more than a guess. Most of the time, the hypothesis begins with a question which is then explored through background research. At this point, researchers then begin to develop a testable hypothesis.

Unless you are creating an exploratory study, your hypothesis should always explain what you  expect  to happen.

In a study exploring the effects of a particular drug, the hypothesis might be that researchers expect the drug to have some type of effect on the symptoms of a specific illness. In psychology, the hypothesis might focus on how a certain aspect of the environment might influence a particular behavior.

Remember, a hypothesis does not have to be correct. While the hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, the goal of the research is to determine whether this guess is right or wrong. When conducting an experiment, researchers might explore numerous factors to determine which ones might contribute to the ultimate outcome.

In many cases, researchers may find that the results of an experiment  do not  support the original hypothesis. When writing up these results, the researchers might suggest other options that should be explored in future studies.

In many cases, researchers might draw a hypothesis from a specific theory or build on previous research. For example, prior research has shown that stress can impact the immune system. So a researcher might hypothesize: "People with high-stress levels will be more likely to contract a common cold after being exposed to the virus than people who have low-stress levels."

In other instances, researchers might look at commonly held beliefs or folk wisdom. "Birds of a feather flock together" is one example of folk adage that a psychologist might try to investigate. The researcher might pose a specific hypothesis that "People tend to select romantic partners who are similar to them in interests and educational level."

Elements of a Good Hypothesis

So how do you write a good hypothesis? When trying to come up with a hypothesis for your research or experiments, ask yourself the following questions:

• Is your hypothesis based on your research on a topic?
• Can your hypothesis be tested?
• Does your hypothesis include independent and dependent variables?

Before you come up with a specific hypothesis, spend some time doing background research. Once you have completed a literature review, start thinking about potential questions you still have. Pay attention to the discussion section in the  journal articles you read . Many authors will suggest questions that still need to be explored.

How to Formulate a Good Hypothesis

To form a hypothesis, you should take these steps:

• Collect as many observations about a topic or problem as you can.
• Evaluate these observations and look for possible causes of the problem.
• Create a list of possible explanations that you might want to explore.
• After you have developed some possible hypotheses, think of ways that you could confirm or disprove each hypothesis through experimentation. This is known as falsifiability.

In the scientific method ,  falsifiability is an important part of any valid hypothesis. In order to test a claim scientifically, it must be possible that the claim could be proven false.

Students sometimes confuse the idea of falsifiability with the idea that it means that something is false, which is not the case. What falsifiability means is that  if  something was false, then it is possible to demonstrate that it is false.

One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is that it makes claims that cannot be refuted or proven false.

The Importance of Operational Definitions

A variable is a factor or element that can be changed and manipulated in ways that are observable and measurable. However, the researcher must also define how the variable will be manipulated and measured in the study.

Operational definitions are specific definitions for all relevant factors in a study. This process helps make vague or ambiguous concepts detailed and measurable.

For example, a researcher might operationally define the variable " test anxiety " as the results of a self-report measure of anxiety experienced during an exam. A "study habits" variable might be defined by the amount of studying that actually occurs as measured by time.

These precise descriptions are important because many things can be measured in various ways. Clearly defining these variables and how they are measured helps ensure that other researchers can replicate your results.

Replicability

One of the basic principles of any type of scientific research is that the results must be replicable.

Replication means repeating an experiment in the same way to produce the same results. By clearly detailing the specifics of how the variables were measured and manipulated, other researchers can better understand the results and repeat the study if needed.

Some variables are more difficult than others to define. For example, how would you operationally define a variable such as aggression ? For obvious ethical reasons, researchers cannot create a situation in which a person behaves aggressively toward others.

To measure this variable, the researcher must devise a measurement that assesses aggressive behavior without harming others. The researcher might utilize a simulated task to measure aggressiveness in this situation.

Hypothesis Checklist

• Does your hypothesis focus on something that you can actually test?
• Does your hypothesis include both an independent and dependent variable?
• Can you manipulate the variables?
• Can your hypothesis be tested without violating ethical standards?

The hypothesis you use will depend on what you are investigating and hoping to find. Some of the main types of hypotheses that you might use include:

• Simple hypothesis : This type of hypothesis suggests there is a relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable.
• Complex hypothesis : This type suggests a relationship between three or more variables, such as two independent and dependent variables.
• Null hypothesis : This hypothesis suggests no relationship exists between two or more variables.
• Alternative hypothesis : This hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.
• Statistical hypothesis : This hypothesis uses statistical analysis to evaluate a representative population sample and then generalizes the findings to the larger group.
• Logical hypothesis : This hypothesis assumes a relationship between variables without collecting data or evidence.

A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If {this happens} then {this will happen}." One way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the  dependent variable  if you change the  independent variable .

The basic format might be: "If {these changes are made to a certain independent variable}, then we will observe {a change in a specific dependent variable}."

A few examples of simple hypotheses:

• "Students who eat breakfast will perform better on a math exam than students who do not eat breakfast."
• "Students who experience test anxiety before an English exam will get lower scores than students who do not experience test anxiety."​
• "Motorists who talk on the phone while driving will be more likely to make errors on a driving course than those who do not talk on the phone."
• "Children who receive a new reading intervention will have higher reading scores than students who do not receive the intervention."

Examples of a complex hypothesis include:

• "People with high-sugar diets and sedentary activity levels are more likely to develop depression."
• "Younger people who are regularly exposed to green, outdoor areas have better subjective well-being than older adults who have limited exposure to green spaces."

Examples of a null hypothesis include:

• "There is no difference in anxiety levels between people who take St. John's wort supplements and those who do not."
• "There is no difference in scores on a memory recall task between children and adults."
• "There is no difference in aggression levels between children who play first-person shooter games and those who do not."

Examples of an alternative hypothesis:

• "People who take St. John's wort supplements will have less anxiety than those who do not."
• "Adults will perform better on a memory task than children."
• "Children who play first-person shooter games will show higher levels of aggression than children who do not." 

Collecting Data on Your Hypothesis

Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a research design and start collecting data. The research method depends largely on exactly what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research and experimental research.

Descriptive Research Methods

Descriptive research such as  case studies ,  naturalistic observations , and surveys are often used when  conducting an experiment is difficult or impossible. These methods are best used to describe different aspects of a behavior or psychological phenomenon.

Once a researcher has collected data using descriptive methods, a  correlational study  can examine how the variables are related. This research method might be used to investigate a hypothesis that is difficult to test experimentally.

Experimental Research Methods

Experimental methods  are used to demonstrate causal relationships between variables. In an experiment, the researcher systematically manipulates a variable of interest (known as the independent variable) and measures the effect on another variable (known as the dependent variable).

Unlike correlational studies, which can only be used to determine if there is a relationship between two variables, experimental methods can be used to determine the actual nature of the relationship—whether changes in one variable actually  cause  another to change.

The hypothesis is a critical part of any scientific exploration. It represents what researchers expect to find in a study or experiment. In situations where the hypothesis is unsupported by the research, the research still has value. Such research helps us better understand how different aspects of the natural world relate to one another. It also helps us develop new hypotheses that can then be tested in the future.

Thompson WH, Skau S. On the scope of scientific hypotheses .  R Soc Open Sci . 2023;10(8):230607. doi:10.1098/rsos.230607

Taran S, Adhikari NKJ, Fan E. Falsifiability in medicine: what clinicians can learn from Karl Popper [published correction appears in Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun 17;:].  Intensive Care Med . 2021;47(9):1054-1056. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06432-z

Eyler AA. Research Methods for Public Health . 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company; 2020. doi:10.1891/9780826182067.0004

Nosek BA, Errington TM. What is replication ?  PLoS Biol . 2020;18(3):e3000691. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691

Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Study designs: Part 2 - Descriptive studies .  Perspect Clin Res . 2019;10(1):34-36. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18

Nevid J. Psychology: Concepts and Applications. Wadworth, 2013.

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Korean Med Sci
• v.34(45); 2019 Nov 25

Scientific Hypotheses: Writing, Promoting, and Predicting Implications

Armen yuri gasparyan.

1 Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK.

Lilit Ayvazyan

2 Department of Medical Chemistry, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia.

Ulzhan Mukanova

3 Department of Surgical Disciplines, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

Marlen Yessirkepov

4 Department of Biology and Biochemistry, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

George D. Kitas

5 Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Scientific hypotheses are essential for progress in rapidly developing academic disciplines. Proposing new ideas and hypotheses require thorough analyses of evidence-based data and predictions of the implications. One of the main concerns relates to the ethical implications of the generated hypotheses. The authors may need to outline potential benefits and limitations of their suggestions and target widely visible publication outlets to ignite discussion by experts and start testing the hypotheses. Not many publication outlets are currently welcoming hypotheses and unconventional ideas that may open gates to criticism and conservative remarks. A few scholarly journals guide the authors on how to structure hypotheses. Reflecting on general and specific issues around the subject matter is often recommended for drafting a well-structured hypothesis article. An analysis of influential hypotheses, presented in this article, particularly Strachan's hygiene hypothesis with global implications in the field of immunology and allergy, points to the need for properly interpreting and testing new suggestions. Envisaging the ethical implications of the hypotheses should be considered both by authors and journal editors during the writing and publishing process.

INTRODUCTION

We live in times of digitization that radically changes scientific research, reporting, and publishing strategies. Researchers all over the world are overwhelmed with processing large volumes of information and searching through numerous online platforms, all of which make the whole process of scholarly analysis and synthesis complex and sophisticated.

Current research activities are diversifying to combine scientific observations with analysis of facts recorded by scholars from various professional backgrounds. 1 Citation analyses and networking on social media are also becoming essential for shaping research and publishing strategies globally. 2 Learning specifics of increasingly interdisciplinary research studies and acquiring information facilitation skills aid researchers in formulating innovative ideas and predicting developments in interrelated scientific fields.

Arguably, researchers are currently offered more opportunities than in the past for generating new ideas by performing their routine laboratory activities, observing individual cases and unusual developments, and critically analyzing published scientific facts. What they need at the start of their research is to formulate a scientific hypothesis that revisits conventional theories, real-world processes, and related evidence to propose new studies and test ideas in an ethical way. 3 Such a hypothesis can be of most benefit if published in an ethical journal with wide visibility and exposure to relevant online databases and promotion platforms.

Although hypotheses are crucially important for the scientific progress, only few highly skilled researchers formulate and eventually publish their innovative ideas per se . Understandably, in an increasingly competitive research environment, most authors would prefer to prioritize their ideas by discussing and conducting tests in their own laboratories or clinical departments, and publishing research reports afterwards. However, there are instances when simple observations and research studies in a single center are not capable of explaining and testing new groundbreaking ideas. Formulating hypothesis articles first and calling for multicenter and interdisciplinary research can be a solution in such instances, potentially launching influential scientific directions, if not academic disciplines.

The aim of this article is to overview the importance and implications of infrequently published scientific hypotheses that may open new avenues of thinking and research.

Despite the seemingly established views on innovative ideas and hypotheses as essential research tools, no structured definition exists to tag the term and systematically track related articles. In 1973, the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) of the U.S. National Library of Medicine introduced “Research Design” as a structured keyword that referred to the importance of collecting data and properly testing hypotheses, and indirectly linked the term to ethics, methods and standards, among many other subheadings.

One of the experts in the field defines “hypothesis” as a well-argued analysis of available evidence to provide a realistic (scientific) explanation of existing facts, fill gaps in public understanding of sophisticated processes, and propose a new theory or a test. 4 A hypothesis can be proven wrong partially or entirely. However, even such an erroneous hypothesis may influence progress in science by initiating professional debates that help generate more realistic ideas. The main ethical requirement for hypothesis authors is to be honest about the limitations of their suggestions. 5

EXAMPLES OF INFLUENTIAL SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESES

Daily routine in a research laboratory may lead to groundbreaking discoveries provided the daily accounts are comprehensively analyzed and reproduced by peers. The discovery of penicillin by Sir Alexander Fleming (1928) can be viewed as a prime example of such discoveries that introduced therapies to treat staphylococcal and streptococcal infections and modulate blood coagulation. 6 , 7 Penicillin got worldwide recognition due to the inventor's seminal works published by highly prestigious and widely visible British journals, effective ‘real-world’ antibiotic therapy of pneumonia and wounds during World War II, and euphoric media coverage. 8 In 1945, Fleming, Florey and Chain got a much deserved Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the discovery that led to the mass production of the wonder drug in the U.S. and ‘real-world practice’ that tested the use of penicillin. What remained globally unnoticed is that Zinaida Yermolyeva, the outstanding Soviet microbiologist, created the Soviet penicillin, which turned out to be more effective than the Anglo-American penicillin and entered mass production in 1943; that year marked the turning of the tide of the Great Patriotic War. 9 One of the reasons of the widely unnoticed discovery of Zinaida Yermolyeva is that her works were published exclusively by local Russian (Soviet) journals.

The past decades have been marked by an unprecedented growth of multicenter and global research studies involving hundreds and thousands of human subjects. This trend is shaped by an increasing number of reports on clinical trials and large cohort studies that create a strong evidence base for practice recommendations. Mega-studies may help generate and test large-scale hypotheses aiming to solve health issues globally. Properly designed epidemiological studies, for example, may introduce clarity to the hygiene hypothesis that was originally proposed by David Strachan in 1989. 10 David Strachan studied the epidemiology of hay fever in a cohort of 17,414 British children and concluded that declining family size and improved personal hygiene had reduced the chances of cross infections in families, resulting in epidemics of atopic disease in post-industrial Britain. Over the past four decades, several related hypotheses have been proposed to expand the potential role of symbiotic microorganisms and parasites in the development of human physiological immune responses early in life and protection from allergic and autoimmune diseases later on. 11 , 12 Given the popularity and the scientific importance of the hygiene hypothesis, it was introduced as a MeSH term in 2012. 13

Hypotheses can be proposed based on an analysis of recorded historic events that resulted in mass migrations and spreading of certain genetic diseases. As a prime example, familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), the prototype periodic fever syndrome, is believed to spread from Mesopotamia to the Mediterranean region and all over Europe due to migrations and religious prosecutions millennia ago. 14 Genetic mutations spearing mild clinical forms of FMF are hypothesized to emerge and persist in the Mediterranean region as protective factors against more serious infectious diseases, particularly tuberculosis, historically common in that part of the world. 15 The speculations over the advantages of carrying the MEditerranean FeVer (MEFV) gene are further strengthened by recorded low mortality rates from tuberculosis among FMF patients of different nationalities living in Tunisia in the first half of the 20th century. 16

Diagnostic hypotheses shedding light on peculiarities of diseases throughout the history of mankind can be formulated using artefacts, particularly historic paintings. 17 Such paintings may reveal joint deformities and disfigurements due to rheumatic diseases in individual subjects. A series of paintings with similar signs of pathological conditions interpreted in a historic context may uncover mysteries of epidemics of certain diseases, which is the case with Ruben's paintings depicting signs of rheumatic hands and making some doctors to believe that rheumatoid arthritis was common in Europe in the 16th and 17th century. 18

WRITING SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESES

There are author instructions of a few journals that specifically guide how to structure, format, and make submissions categorized as hypotheses attractive. One of the examples is presented by Med Hypotheses , the flagship journal in its field with more than four decades of publishing and influencing hypothesis authors globally. However, such guidance is not based on widely discussed, implemented, and approved reporting standards, which are becoming mandatory for all scholarly journals.

Generating new ideas and scientific hypotheses is a sophisticated task since not all researchers and authors are skilled to plan, conduct, and interpret various research studies. Some experience with formulating focused research questions and strong working hypotheses of original research studies is definitely helpful for advancing critical appraisal skills. However, aspiring authors of scientific hypotheses may need something different, which is more related to discerning scientific facts, pooling homogenous data from primary research works, and synthesizing new information in a systematic way by analyzing similar sets of articles. To some extent, this activity is reminiscent of writing narrative and systematic reviews. As in the case of reviews, scientific hypotheses need to be formulated on the basis of comprehensive search strategies to retrieve all available studies on the topics of interest and then synthesize new information selectively referring to the most relevant items. One of the main differences between scientific hypothesis and review articles relates to the volume of supportive literature sources ( Table 1 ). In fact, hypothesis is usually formulated by referring to a few scientific facts or compelling evidence derived from a handful of literature sources. 19 By contrast, reviews require analyses of a large number of published documents retrieved from several well-organized and evidence-based databases in accordance with predefined search strategies. 20 , 21 , 22

The format of hypotheses, especially the implications part, may vary widely across disciplines. Clinicians may limit their suggestions to the clinical manifestations of diseases, outcomes, and management strategies. Basic and laboratory scientists analysing genetic, molecular, and biochemical mechanisms may need to view beyond the frames of their narrow fields and predict social and population-based implications of the proposed ideas. 23

Advanced writing skills are essential for presenting an interesting theoretical article which appeals to the global readership. Merely listing opposing facts and ideas, without proper interpretation and analysis, may distract the experienced readers. The essence of a great hypothesis is a story behind the scientific facts and evidence-based data.

ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS

The authors of hypotheses substantiate their arguments by referring to and discerning rational points from published articles that might be overlooked by others. Their arguments may contradict the established theories and practices, and pose global ethical issues, particularly when more or less efficient medical technologies and public health interventions are devalued. The ethical issues may arise primarily because of the careless references to articles with low priorities, inadequate and apparently unethical methodologies, and concealed reporting of negative results. 24 , 25

Misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the published ideas and scientific hypotheses may complicate the issue further. For example, Alexander Fleming, whose innovative ideas of penicillin use to kill susceptible bacteria saved millions of lives, warned of the consequences of uncontrolled prescription of the drug. The issue of antibiotic resistance had emerged within the first ten years of penicillin use on a global scale due to the overprescription that affected the efficacy of antibiotic therapies, with undesirable consequences for millions. 26

The misunderstanding of the hygiene hypothesis that primarily aimed to shed light on the role of the microbiome in allergic and autoimmune diseases resulted in decline of public confidence in hygiene with dire societal implications, forcing some experts to abandon the original idea. 27 , 28 Although that hypothesis is unrelated to the issue of vaccinations, the public misunderstanding has resulted in decline of vaccinations at a time of upsurge of old and new infections.

A number of ethical issues are posed by the denial of the viral (human immunodeficiency viruses; HIV) hypothesis of acquired Immune deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) by Peter Duesberg, who overviewed the links between illicit recreational drugs and antiretroviral therapies with AIDS and refuted the etiological role of HIV. 29 That controversial hypothesis was rejected by several journals, but was eventually published without external peer review at Med Hypotheses in 2010. The publication itself raised concerns of the unconventional editorial policy of the journal, causing major perturbations and more scrutinized publishing policies by journals processing hypotheses.

WHERE TO PUBLISH HYPOTHESES

Although scientific authors are currently well informed and equipped with search tools to draft evidence-based hypotheses, there are still limited quality publication outlets calling for related articles. The journal editors may be hesitant to publish articles that do not adhere to any research reporting guidelines and open gates for harsh criticism of unconventional and untested ideas. Occasionally, the editors opting for open-access publishing and upgrading their ethics regulations launch a section to selectively publish scientific hypotheses attractive to the experienced readers. 30 However, the absence of approved standards for this article type, particularly no mandate for outlining potential ethical implications, may lead to publication of potentially harmful ideas in an attractive format.

A suggestion of simultaneously publishing multiple or alternative hypotheses to balance the reader views and feedback is a potential solution for the mainstream scholarly journals. 31 However, that option alone is hardly applicable to emerging journals with unconventional quality checks and peer review, accumulating papers with multiple rejections by established journals.

A large group of experts view hypotheses with improbable and controversial ideas publishable after formal editorial (in-house) checks to preserve the authors' genuine ideas and avoid conservative amendments imposed by external peer reviewers. 32 That approach may be acceptable for established publishers with large teams of experienced editors. However, the same approach can lead to dire consequences if employed by nonselective start-up, open-access journals processing all types of articles and primarily accepting those with charged publication fees. 33 In fact, pseudoscientific ideas arguing Newton's and Einstein's seminal works or those denying climate change that are hardly testable have already found their niche in substandard electronic journals with soft or nonexistent peer review. 34

CITATIONS AND SOCIAL MEDIA ATTENTION

The available preliminary evidence points to the attractiveness of hypothesis articles for readers, particularly those from research-intensive countries who actively download related documents. 35 However, citations of such articles are disproportionately low. Only a small proportion of top-downloaded hypotheses (13%) in the highly prestigious Med Hypotheses receive on average 5 citations per article within a two-year window. 36

With the exception of a few historic papers, the vast majority of hypotheses attract relatively small number of citations in a long term. 36 Plausible explanations are that these articles often contain a single or only a few citable points and that suggested research studies to test hypotheses are rarely conducted and reported, limiting chances of citing and crediting authors of genuine research ideas.

A snapshot analysis of citation activity of hypothesis articles may reveal interest of the global scientific community towards their implications across various disciplines and countries. As a prime example, Strachan's hygiene hypothesis, published in 1989, 10 is still attracting numerous citations on Scopus, the largest bibliographic database. As of August 28, 2019, the number of the linked citations in the database is 3,201. Of the citing articles, 160 are cited at least 160 times ( h -index of this research topic = 160). The first three citations are recorded in 1992 and followed by a rapid annual increase in citation activity and a peak of 212 in 2015 ( Fig. 1 ). The top 5 sources of the citations are Clin Exp Allergy (n = 136), J Allergy Clin Immunol (n = 119), Allergy (n = 81), Pediatr Allergy Immunol (n = 69), and PLOS One (n = 44). The top 5 citing authors are leading experts in pediatrics and allergology Erika von Mutius (Munich, Germany, number of publications with the index citation = 30), Erika Isolauri (Turku, Finland, n = 27), Patrick G Holt (Subiaco, Australia, n = 25), David P. Strachan (London, UK, n = 23), and Bengt Björksten (Stockholm, Sweden, n = 22). The U.S. is the leading country in terms of citation activity with 809 related documents, followed by the UK (n = 494), Germany (n = 314), Australia (n = 211), and the Netherlands (n = 177). The largest proportion of citing documents are articles (n = 1,726, 54%), followed by reviews (n = 950, 29.7%), and book chapters (n = 213, 6.7%). The main subject areas of the citing items are medicine (n = 2,581, 51.7%), immunology and microbiology (n = 1,179, 23.6%), and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology (n = 415, 8.3%).

Interestingly, a recent analysis of 111 publications related to Strachan's hygiene hypothesis, stating that the lack of exposure to infections in early life increases the risk of rhinitis, revealed a selection bias of 5,551 citations on Web of Science. 37 The articles supportive of the hypothesis were cited more than nonsupportive ones (odds ratio adjusted for study design, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–3.1). A similar conclusion pointing to a citation bias distorting bibliometrics of hypotheses was reached by an earlier analysis of a citation network linked to the idea that β-amyloid, which is involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease, is produced by skeletal muscle of patients with inclusion body myositis. 38 The results of both studies are in line with the notion that ‘positive’ citations are more frequent in the field of biomedicine than ‘negative’ ones, and that citations to articles with proven hypotheses are too common. 39

Social media channels are playing an increasingly active role in the generation and evaluation of scientific hypotheses. In fact, publicly discussing research questions on platforms of news outlets, such as Reddit, may shape hypotheses on health-related issues of global importance, such as obesity. 40 Analyzing Twitter comments, researchers may reveal both potentially valuable ideas and unfounded claims that surround groundbreaking research ideas. 41 Social media activities, however, are unevenly distributed across different research topics, journals and countries, and these are not always objective professional reflections of the breakthroughs in science. 2 , 42

Scientific hypotheses are essential for progress in science and advances in healthcare. Innovative ideas should be based on a critical overview of related scientific facts and evidence-based data, often overlooked by others. To generate realistic hypothetical theories, the authors should comprehensively analyze the literature and suggest relevant and ethically sound design for future studies. They should also consider their hypotheses in the context of research and publication ethics norms acceptable for their target journals. The journal editors aiming to diversify their portfolio by maintaining and introducing hypotheses section are in a position to upgrade guidelines for related articles by pointing to general and specific analyses of the subject, preferred study designs to test hypotheses, and ethical implications. The latter is closely related to specifics of hypotheses. For example, editorial recommendations to outline benefits and risks of a new laboratory test or therapy may result in a more balanced article and minimize associated risks afterwards.

Not all scientific hypotheses have immediate positive effects. Some, if not most, are never tested in properly designed research studies and never cited in credible and indexed publication outlets. Hypotheses in specialized scientific fields, particularly those hardly understandable for nonexperts, lose their attractiveness for increasingly interdisciplinary audience. The authors' honest analysis of the benefits and limitations of their hypotheses and concerted efforts of all stakeholders in science communication to initiate public discussion on widely visible platforms and social media may reveal rational points and caveats of the new ideas.

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

• Conceptualization: Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Kitas GD.
• Methodology: Gasparyan AY, Mukanova U, Ayvazyan L.
• Writing - original draft: Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Yessirkepov M.
• Writing - review & editing: Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Mukanova U, Kitas GD.

Public Health Notes

Your partner for better health, hypothesis in research: definition, types and importance .

April 21, 2020 Kusum Wagle Epidemiology 0

Table of Contents

What is Hypothesis?

• Hypothesis is a logical prediction of certain occurrences without the support of empirical confirmation or evidence.
• In scientific terms, it is a tentative theory or testable statement about the relationship between two or more variables i.e. independent and dependent variable.

Different Types of Hypothesis:

1. Simple Hypothesis:

• A Simple hypothesis is also known as composite hypothesis.
• In simple hypothesis all parameters of the distribution are specified.
• It predicts relationship between two variables i.e. the dependent and the independent variable

2. Complex Hypothesis:

• A Complex hypothesis examines relationship between two or more independent variables and two or more dependent variables.

3. Working or Research Hypothesis:

• A research hypothesis is a specific, clear prediction about the possible outcome of a scientific research study based on specific factors of the population.

4. Null Hypothesis:

• A null hypothesis is a general statement which states no relationship between two variables or two phenomena. It is usually denoted by H 0 .

5. Alternative Hypothesis:

• An alternative hypothesis is a statement which states some statistical significance between two phenomena. It is usually denoted by H 1 or H A .

6. Logical Hypothesis:

• A logical hypothesis is a planned explanation holding limited evidence.

7. Statistical Hypothesis:

• A statistical hypothesis, sometimes called confirmatory data analysis, is an assumption about a population parameter.

Although there are different types of hypothesis, the most commonly and used hypothesis are Null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis . So, what is the difference between null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis? Let’s have a look:

Major Differences Between Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis:

Importance of Hypothesis:

• It ensures the entire research methodologies are scientific and valid.
• It helps to assume the probability of research failure and progress.
• It helps to provide link to the underlying theory and specific research question.
• It helps in data analysis and measure the validity and reliability of the research.
• It provides a basis or evidence to prove the validity of the research.
• It helps to describe research study in concrete terms rather than theoretical terms.

Characteristics of Good Hypothesis:

• Should be simple.
• Should be specific.
• Should be stated in advance.

References and For More Information:

https://ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/StatisticalReasoning1/PDFs/2009/BiostatisticsLecture4.pdf

https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-type-i-and-type-ii-errors.html

https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-statistics/tests-significance-ap/error-probabilities-power/a/consequences-errors-significance

https://stattrek.com/hypothesis-test/hypothesis-testing.aspx

http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/A2917.html

https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-a-hypothesis-definition-lesson-quiz.html

https://keydifferences.com/difference-between-null-and-alternative-hypothesis.html

https://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics-2/understanding-hypothesis-tests-why-we-need-to-use-hypothesis-tests-in-statistics

• Characteristics of Good Hypothesis
• complex hypothesis
• example of alternative hypothesis
• example of null hypothesis
• how is null hypothesis different to alternative hypothesis
• Importance of Hypothesis
• null hypothesis vs alternate hypothesis
• simple hypothesis
• Types of Hypotheses
• what is alternate hypothesis
• what is alternative hypothesis
• what is hypothesis?
• what is logical hypothesis
• what is null hypothesis
• what is research hypothesis
• what is statistical hypothesis
• why is hypothesis necessary

Copyright © 2024 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes

Science and Hypothesis

• First Online: 13 June 2021

Cite this chapter

• Satya Sundar Sethy 2  

346 Accesses

In this chapter, we will discuss the significance of a ‘hypothesis’ in a logical inquiry, a scientific investigation, and research work. We will enumerate some of the definitions of ‘hypothesis’. We will elaborate on the nature and scope of the ‘hypothesis’ and the sources to obtain a hypothesis. Further, we will explain the kinds of hypothesis with suitable examples. In the end, we will illustrate methods to verify a hypothesis in a logical inquiry and a scientific investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Werkmeister, W.H. (1948). The basis and structure of knowledge . New York: Haper and Bros Publication.

Lundberg, G.A. (1968). Social research: A study in methods of gathering data . New York: Greenwood Press.

Black, J. A., and Champion, D.J. (1976). Method and issues in social research . New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Goode, W.J., and Hatt, P.K. (1971). Methods in social research . New York: McGraw-Hill Publication.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypothesis .

Sarantakos, S. (2005) (3rd Edition). Social research . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Satya Sundar Sethy

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Sethy, S.S. (2021). Science and Hypothesis. In: Introduction to Logic and Logical Discourse. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2689-0_17

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2689-0_17

Published : 13 June 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-16-2688-3

Online ISBN : 978-981-16-2689-0

eBook Packages : Religion and Philosophy Philosophy and Religion (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

LEARN STATISTICS EASILY

Learn Data Analysis Now!

What is: Hypothesis

What is a hypothesis.

A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon, serving as a foundational element in scientific research and data analysis. It is a statement that can be tested through experimentation and observation, allowing researchers to draw conclusions based on empirical evidence. In the realm of statistics and data science, formulating a clear and testable hypothesis is crucial for guiding the research process and ensuring that the results are valid and reliable.

Ad description. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Types of Hypotheses

There are primarily two types of hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (H1). The null hypothesis posits that there is no effect or no difference between groups, serving as a baseline for comparison. Conversely, the alternative hypothesis suggests that there is an effect or a difference. Understanding these two types is essential for conducting hypothesis testing, which is a core aspect of statistical analysis.

Formulating a Hypothesis

Formulating a hypothesis involves identifying a research question and making an educated guess about the expected outcome. This process typically includes reviewing existing literature, defining variables, and determining the relationship between them. A well-structured hypothesis should be specific, measurable, and falsifiable, enabling researchers to design experiments that can effectively test the proposed statement.

Importance of Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a statistical method that allows researchers to determine the validity of their hypotheses. By using statistical tests, researchers can analyze data to either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. This process is vital for drawing conclusions about the population from which the sample was drawn, and it helps to minimize the risk of making incorrect inferences based on sample data.

Common Statistical Tests for Hypothesis Testing

Several statistical tests are commonly used for hypothesis testing, including t-tests, chi-square tests, and ANOVA. Each test has its specific applications and assumptions, making it essential for researchers to choose the appropriate test based on their data and research design. Understanding these tests is crucial for accurately interpreting the results of hypothesis tests and making informed decisions based on statistical evidence.

Role of P-Values in Hypothesis Testing

P-values play a significant role in hypothesis testing, providing a measure of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. A low p-value indicates strong evidence against H0, leading researchers to reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Conversely, a high p-value suggests insufficient evidence to reject H0. Researchers must carefully consider the p-value in the context of their study, as it can influence the conclusions drawn from the data.

Limitations of Hypotheses

While hypotheses are essential for guiding research, they also have limitations. A hypothesis is only as good as the data and methods used to test it. Poorly formulated hypotheses can lead to misleading results, and researchers must be cautious about overgeneralizing findings. Additionally, the reliance on statistical significance can sometimes overshadow the practical significance of results, leading to misinterpretations of the data.

Hypothesis in Data Science

In data science, hypotheses play a critical role in exploratory data analysis and predictive modeling. Data scientists often formulate hypotheses to guide their analyses, helping them to identify patterns and relationships within the data. By testing these hypotheses, data scientists can refine their models and improve their predictions, ultimately leading to more accurate insights and decision-making.

Conclusion on Hypothesis in Research

In summary, a hypothesis is a fundamental component of scientific research, providing a framework for investigation and analysis. Understanding the types, formulation, and testing of hypotheses is crucial for researchers in statistics, data analysis, and data science. By adhering to rigorous scientific principles, researchers can ensure that their findings are robust, reliable, and contribute meaningfully to the body of knowledge in their respective fields.

Talk to Our counsellor: 9916082261

• Book your demo
• GS Foundation Classroom Program
• Current Affairs Monthly Magazine
• Our Toppers

Practice  Questions  – Write short note on Importance and Sources of Hypothesis in Sociological Research. [ UPSC 2008]

Approach –  Introduction, What makes Hypothesis relevant in a sociological research?, What are the sources which aids us to derive hypothesis?, Conclusion

INTRODUCTION

A hypothesis is a prediction of what will be found at the outcome of a research project and is typically focused on the relationship between two different variables studied in the research. It is usually based on both theoretical expectations about how things work and already existing scientific evidence.

We know that research begins with a problem or a felt need or difficulty. The purpose of research is to find a solution to the difficulty. It is desirable that the researcher should propose a set of suggested solutions or explanations of the  difficulty which the research proposes to solve. Such tentative solutions formulated as a proposition are called hypotheses. The suggested solutions formulated as hypotheses may or may not be the real solutions to the problem. Whether they are or not is the task of research to test and establish.

DEFINTITIONS

• Lundberg- A Hypothesis is a tentative generalisation, the validity of which remains to be tested. In its most elementary stages, the hypothesis may be any hunch, guess imaginative idea or Intuition whatsoever which becomes the basis of action or Investigation.
• Bogardus- A Hypothesis is a proposition to be tested.
• Goode and Hatt- It is a proposition which can be put to test to determinants validity.
• P. V. Yaung- The idea of ​a temporary but central importance that becomes the basis of useful research is called a working hypothesis.

TYPES OF HYPOTHESIS

i)  Explanatory Hypothesis : The purpose of this hypothesis is to explain a certain fact. All hypotheses are in a way explanatory for a hypothesis is advanced only when we try to explain the observed fact. A large number of hypotheses are advanced to explain the individual facts in life. A theft, a murder, an accident are examples.

ii) Descriptive Hypothesis:  Some times a researcher comes across a complex phenomenon. He/ she does not understand the relations among the observed facts. But how to account for these facts? The answer is a descriptive hypothesis. A hypothesis is descriptive when it is based upon the points of resemblance of some thing. It describes the cause and effect relationship of a phenomenon e.g., the current unemployment rate of a state exceeds 25% of the work force. Similarly, the consumers of local made products constitute asignificant market segment.

iii) Analogical Hypothesis : When we formulate a hypothesis on the basis of similarities (analogy), it is called an analogical hypothesis e.g., families with higher earnings invest more surplus income on long term investments.

iv) Working hypothesis : Some times certain facts cannot be explained adequately by existing hypotheses, and no new hypothesis comes up. Thus, the investigation is held up. In this situation, a researcher formulates a hypothesis which enables to continue investigation. Such a hypothesis, though inadequate and formulated for the purpose of further investigation only, is called a working hypothesis. It is simply accepted as a starting point in the process of investigation.

v) Null Hypothesis:  It is an important concept that is used widely in the sampling theory. It forms the basis of many tests of significance. Under this type, the hypothesis is stated negatively. It is null because it may be nullified, if the evidence of a random sample is unfavourable to the hypothesis. It is a hypothesis being tested (H0). If the calculated value of the test is less than the permissible value, Null hypothesis is accepted, otherwise it is rejected. The rejection of a null hypothesis implies that the difference could not have arisen due to chance or sampling fluctuations.

USES OF HYPOTHESIS

i) It is a starting point for many a research work. ii) It helps in deciding the direction in which to proceed. iii) It helps in selecting and collecting pertinent facts. iv) It is an aid to explanation. v) It helps in drawing specific conclusions. vi) It helps in testing theories. vii) It works as a basis for future knowledge.

ROLE  OF HYPOTHESIS

In any scientific investigation, the role of hypothesis is indispensable as it always guides and gives direction to scientific research. Research remains unfocused without a hypothesis. Without it, the scientist is not in position to decide as to what to observe and how to observe. He may at best beat around the bush. In the words of Northrop, “The function of hypothesis is to direct our search for order among facts, the suggestions formulated in any hypothesis may be solution to the problem, whether they are, is the task of the enquiry”.

First ,  it is an operating tool of theory. It can be deduced from other hypotheses and theories. If it is correctly drawn and scientifically formulated, it enables the researcher to proceed on correct line of study. Due to this progress, the investigator becomes capable of drawing proper conclusions. In the words of Goode and Hatt, “without hypothesis the research is unfocussed, a random empirical wandering. The results cannot be studied as facts with clear meaning. Hypothesis is a necessary link between theory and investigation which leads to discovery and addition to knowledge.

Secondly,  the hypothesis acts as a pointer to enquiry. Scientific research has to proceed in certain definite lines and through hypothesis the researcher becomes capable of knowing specifically what he has to find out by determining the direction provided by the hypothesis. Hypotheses acts like a pole star or a compass to a sailor with the help of which he is able to head in the proper direction.

Thirdly , the hypothesis enables us to select relevant and pertinent facts and makes our task easier. Once, the direction and points are identified, the researcher is in a position to eliminate the irrelevant facts and concentrate only on the relevant facts. Highlighting the role of hypothesis in providing pertinent facts, P.V. Young has stated, “The use of hypothesis prevents a blind research and indiscriminate gathering of masses of data which may later prove irrelevant to the problem under study”. For example, if the researcher is interested in examining the relationship between broken home and juvenile delinquency, he can easily proceed in the proper direction and collect pertinent information succeeded only when he has succeed in formulating a useful hypothesis.

Fourthly , the hypothesis provides guidance by way of providing the direction, pointing to enquiry, enabling to select pertinent facts and helping to draw specific conclusions. It saves the researcher from the botheration of ‘trial and error’ which causes loss of money, energy and time.

Finally,  the hypothesis plays a significant role in facilitating advancement of knowledge beyond one’s value and opinions. In real terms, the science is incomplete without hypotheses.

STAGES OF HYPOTHESIS TESTING

• EXPERIMENTATION   : Research study focuses its study which is manageable and approachable to it and where it can test its hypothesis. The study gradually becomes more focused on its variables and influences on variables so that hypothesis may be tested. In this process, hypothesis can be disproved.
• REHEARSAL TESTING :   The researcher should conduct a pre testing or rehearsal before going for field work or data collection.
• FIELD RESEARCH :  To test and investigate hypothesis, field work with predetermined research methodology tools is conducted in which interviews, observations with stakeholders, questionnaires, surveys etc are used to follow. The documentation study may also happens at this stage.
• PRIMARY & SECONDARY DATA/INFORMATION ANALYSIS :  The primary or secondary data and information’s available prior to hypothesis testing may be used to ascertain validity of hypothesis itself.

Formulating a hypothesis can take place at the very beginning of a research project, or after a bit of research has already been done. Sometimes a researcher knows right from the start which variables she is interested in studying, and she may already have a hunch about their relationships. Other times, a researcher may have an interest in ​a particular topic, trend, or phenomenon, but he may not know enough about it to identify variables or formulate a hypothesis. Whenever a hypothesis is formulated, the most important thing is to be precise about what one’s variables are, what the nature of the relationship between them might be, and how one can go about conducting a study of them.

Request a call back.

Let us help you guide towards your career path We will give you a call between 9 AM to 9 PM

Join us to give your preparation a new direction and ultimately crack the Civil service examination with top rank.

• #1360, 2nd floor,above Philips showroom, Marenhalli, 100ft road, Jayanagar 9th Block, Bangalore
• [email protected]
• +91 9916082261
• Terms & Conditions
• Privacy Policy

© 2022 Achievers IAS Classes

Click Here To Download Brochure

1st Edition

Advancing Data Science Education in K-12 Research and Theory for Teaching and Learning

Description.

Advancing Data Science Education in K-12 offers a highly accessible, research-based treatment of the foundations of data science education and its increasingly vital role in K-12 instructional content.

As federal education initiatives and developers of technology-enriched curricula attempt to incorporate the study of data science—the generation, capture, and computational analysis of data at large scale—into schooling, a new slate of skills, literacies, and approaches is needed to ensure an informed, effective, and unproblematic deployment for young learners. Friendly to novices and experts alike, this book provides an authoritative synthesis of the most important research and theory behind data science education, its implementation into K-12 curricula, and clarity to the distinctions between data literacy and data science. Learning with and about data hold equal and interdependent importance across these chapters, conveying the variety of issues, situations, and decision-making integral to a well-rounded, critically minded perspective on data science education.

Students and faculty in teaching, leadership, curriculum development, and educational technology programs will come away with essential insights into the breadth of our current and future engagements with data; the real-world opportunities and challenges data holds when taught in conjunction with other subject matter in formal schooling; and the nature of data as a human and societal construct that demands new competencies of today’s learners.

Table of Contents

1. Data Everywhere  2. Data Literacy, Data Science, and Terms that Trip Us Up  3. Humans Thinking About Data  4. Teaching Data Science in Schools  5. Learning Data Science Outside of Schools  6. Expansive Views for Data Science Education  7. Onward - A Data Science Education Research Ecosystem

Victor R. Lee is Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Education at Stanford University, USA. He is Past-President of the International Society of the Learning Sciences and was Chair of the Advanced Technologies for Learning SIG for the American Educational Research Association. His previous books are Reconceptualizing Libraries: Perspectives from the Information and Learning Sciences and Learning Technologies and the Body: Integration and Implementation in Formal and Informal Learning Environments . He received his PhD in Learning Sciences from Northwestern University and holds bachelor's degrees in Cognitive Science and Mathematics from the University of California San Diego.

About VitalSource eBooks

VitalSource is a leading provider of eBooks.

• Access your materials anywhere, at anytime.
• Customer preferences like text size, font type, page color and more.
• Take annotations in line as you read.

Multiple eBook Copies

This eBook is already in your shopping cart. If you would like to replace it with a different purchasing option please remove the current eBook option from your cart.

Book Preview

The country you have selected will result in the following:

• Product pricing will be adjusted to match the corresponding currency.
• The title Perception will be removed from your cart because it is not available in this region.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Published: 28 August 2024

Earth’s ambipolar electrostatic field and its role in ion escape to space

• Glyn A. Collinson   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4883-9027 1 , 2 , 3 ,
• Alex Glocer 1 ,
• Robert Pfaff 1 ,
• Aroh Barjatya 4 ,
• Rachel Conway 4 ,
• Aaron Breneman 1 ,
• James Clemmons 5 ,
• Francis Eparvier   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-2730 6 ,
• Robert Michell   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-8564 1 ,
• David Mitchell 7 ,
• Suzie Imber 8 ,
• Hassanali Akbari 1 , 2 ,
• Lance Davis 4 ,
• Andrew Kavanagh 9 ,
• Ellen Robertson 1 ,
• Diana Swanson 5 ,
• Shaosui Xu   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5121-600X 7 ,
• Jacob Miller 1 , 10 ,
• Timothy Cameron 1 ,
• Dennis Chornay 1 ,
• Paulo Uribe 1 ,
• Long Nguyen 1 ,
• Robert Clayton 4 ,
• Nathan Graves   ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0004-1397-5779 4 ,
• Shantanab Debchoudhury 4 ,
• Henry Valentine 4 ,
• Ahmed Ghalib 11 &

The Endurance Mission Team

Nature volume  632 ,  pages 1021–1025 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

782 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Magnetospheric physics
• Space physics

Cold plasma of ionospheric origin has recently been found to be a much larger contributor to the magnetosphere of Earth than expected 1 , 2 , 3 . Numerous competing mechanisms have been postulated to drive ion escape to space, including heating and acceleration by wave–particle interactions 4 and a global electrostatic field between the ionosphere and space (called the ambipolar or polarization field) 5 , 6 . Observations of heated O + ions in the magnetosphere are consistent with resonant wave–particle interactions 7 . By contrast, observations of cold supersonic H + flowing out of the polar ionosphere 8 , 9 (called the polar wind) suggest the presence of an electrostatic field. Here we report the existence of a +0.55 ± 0.09 V electric potential drop between 250 km and 768 km from a planetary electrostatic field ( E ∥ ⊕  = 1.09 ± 0.17 μV m −1 ) generated exclusively by the outward pressure of ionospheric electrons. We experimentally demonstrate that the ambipolar field of Earth controls the structure of the polar ionosphere, boosting the scale height by 271%. We infer that this increases the supply of cold O + ions to the magnetosphere by more than 3,800%, in which other mechanisms such as wave–particle interactions can heat and further accelerate them to escape velocity. The electrostatic field of Earth is strong enough by itself to drive the polar wind 9 , 10 and is probably the origin of the cold H + ion population 1 that dominates much of the magnetosphere 2 , 3 .

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

The variable source of the plasma sheet during a geomagnetic storm

Local heating of radiation belt electrons to ultra-relativistic energies

Interchange reconnection as the source of the fast solar wind within coronal holes

Data availability.

Endurance ephemeris data and all science data presented in this article are available at the Space Physics Data Facility of NASA ( https://spdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/data_orbits.html ) through the Coordinated Data Analysis Web (CDAWeb) tool ( https://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/ ) by selecting ‘Sounding Rockets’ from the data sources.

Engwall, E. et al. Earth’s ionospheric outflow dominated by hidden cold plasma. Nat. Geosci. 2 , 24–27 (2009).

Article   ADS   CAS   Google Scholar  

Haaland, S. et al. Estimating the capture and loss of cold plasma from ionospheric outflow. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 117 , A07311 (2012).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

André, M., Toledo-Redondo, S. & Yau, A. W. in Space Physics and Aeronomy Collection Vol. 2: Magnetospheres in the Solar System (eds Maggiolo, R. et al.) Geophysical Monograph 259 (American Geophysical Union, Wiley, 2021).

Kistler, L. M. et al. Cusp and nightside auroral sources of O+ in the plasma sheet. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124 , 10036–10047 (2019).

Strangeway, R. J., Ergun, R. E., Su, Y.-J., Carlson, C. W. & Elphic, R. C. Factors controlling ionospheric outflows as observed at intermediate altitudes. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 110 , A03221 (2005).

Collinson, G. et al. Ionospheric ambipolar electric fields of Mars and Venus: comparisons between theoretical predictions and direct observations of the electric potential drop. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 , 1168–1176 (2019).

Article   ADS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Moore, T. E. & Khazanov, G. V. Mechanisms of ionospheric mass escape. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 115 , A00J13 (2010).

Axford, W. I. The polar wind and the terrestrial helium budget. J. Geophys. Res. 73 , 6855–6859 (1968).

Banks, P. M. & Holzer, T. E. The Polar Wind. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 73 , 6846–6854 (1968).

Li, K. et al. The effects of the polar rain on the polar wind ion outflow from the nightside ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 128 , e2023JA031496 (2023).

Varney, R. H., Solomon, S. C. & Nicolls, M. J. Heating of the sunlit polar cap ionosphere by reflected photoelectrons. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 119 , 8660–8684 (2014).

Khazanov, G. V., Liemohn, M. W. & Moore, T. E. Photoelectron effects on the self-consistent potential in the collisionless polar wind. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 102 , 7509–7521 (1997).

Collinson, G. A. et al. The electric wind of Venus: a global and persistent “polar wind”-like ambipolar electric field sufficient for the direct escape of heavy ionospheric ions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 , 5926–5934 (2016).

Xu, S. et al. Field-aligned potentials at Mars from MAVEN observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45 , 10,119–10,127 (2018).

Article   Google Scholar  

Xu, S., Frahm, R. A., Ma, Y., Luhmann, J. G. & Mitchell, D. L. Magnetic topology at Venus: new insights into the Venus plasma environment. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48 , e2021GL095545 (2021).

Collinson, G. A. et al. A survey of strong electric potential drops in the ionosphere of Venus. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50 , e2023GL104989 (2023).

Coates, A. J., Jonstone, A. D., Sojka, J. J. & Wrenn, G. L. Ionospheric photoelectrons observed in the magnetosphere at distances up to 7 earth radii. Planet. Space Sci. 33 , 1267–1275 (1985).

Fung, S. F. & Hoffman, R. A. A search for parallel electric fields by observing secondary electrons and photoelectrons in the low-altitude auroral zone. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 96 , 3533–3548 (1991).

Collinson, G. et al. The Endurance Rocket Mission. Space Sci. Rev. 218 , 39 (2022).

Coates, A. J. et al. Ionospheric photoelectrons: comparing Venus, Earth, Mars and Titan. Planet. Space Sci. 59 , 1019–1027 (2011).

Collinson, G. A. et al. Rocket measurements of electron energy spectra from Earth’s photoelectron production layer. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49 , e2022GL098209 (2022).

Gardner, J. L. & Samson, J. A. R. 304 Å photoelectron spectra of CO, N 2 , O 2 and CO 2 . J. Electron Spectros. Relat. Phenomena 2 , 259–266 (1973).

Goembel, L., Doering, J. P., Morrison, D. & Paxton, L. J. Atmospheric O/N 2 ratios from photoelectron spectra. J. Geophys. Res. 102 , 7411–7419 (1997).

Gombosi, T. I. & Nagy, A. Time-dependent modeling of field-aligned current-generated ion transients in the polar wind. J. Geophys. Res. 94 , 359–369 (1989).

Liemohn, M. W., Khazanov, G. V., Moore, T. E. & Guiter, S. M. Self-consistent superthermal electron effects on plasmapheric refilling. J. Geophys. Res. 102 , 7523–7536 (1997).

Godbole, N. H. et al. Observations of ion upflow and 630.0 nm emission during pulsating aurora. Front. Phys. 10 , 997229 (2022).

Wahlund, J.-E., Opgenoorth, H. J., Häggström, I., Winser, K. J. & Jones, G. O. L. EISCAT observations of topside ionospheric ion outflows during auroral activity: revisited. J. Geophys. Res. 97 , 3019–3037 (1992).

Wu, J. et al. Observations of the structure and vertical transport of the polar upper ionosphere with the EISCAT VHF radar. II - first investigations of the topside O(+) and H(+) vertical ion flows. Ann. Geophys. 10 , 375–393 (1992).

ADS   CAS   Google Scholar  

Collinson, G. et al. Electric Mars: a large trans-terminator electric potential drop on closed magnetic field lines above Utopia Planitia. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 112 , 2260–2271 (2017).

Schunk, R. & Nagy, A. Ionospheres (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

Collinson, G., Chornay, D. J., Glocer, A., Paschalidis, N. & Zesta, E. A hybrid electrostatic retarding potential analyzer for the measurement of plasmas at extremely high energy resolution. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89 , 113306 (2018).

Article   ADS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Oyama, K. & Takumi, A. Anisotropy of electron temperature in the ionosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 14 , 1195–1198 (1987).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the 100+ strong team of engineers, scientists and technicians who made the Endurance rocketship mission a success. We thank A. P. Collinson for the useful discussions in preparing and editing the paper. Endurance was funded through the NASA grant 80NSSC19K1206. EISCAT support was supported through the National Environment Research Council grant NE/R017000X/1. EISCAT is an international association supported by research organizations in China (CRIRP), Finland (SA), Japan (NIPR and ISEE), Norway (NFR), Sweden (VR) and the UK (UKRI).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

Glyn A. Collinson, Alex Glocer, Robert Pfaff, Aaron Breneman, Robert Michell, Hassanali Akbari, Ellen Robertson, Jacob Miller, Timothy Cameron, Dennis Chornay, Paulo Uribe, Long Nguyen, S. Adkins, H. Akbari, A. Barrie, A. Breneman, T. Cameron, D. Chornay, G. Collinson, A. Glocer, S. Martin, R. Michell, L. Nguyen, N. Paschalidis, R. Pfaff, C. Pirner, Z. Rawlings, E. Robertson, T. Rosnack, M. Samara, C. Tucker, P. Uribe, M. Wallace, D. Zarro & E. Zesta

Institute for Astrophysics and Computational Sciences, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA

Glyn A. Collinson, Hassanali Akbari, H. Akbari, R. Albano, E. Bowlen & G. Collinson

G & K Rocket Yards, Interplanetary Expeditions, Criccieth, UK

Glyn A. Collinson & G. Collinson

Space and Atmospheric Instrumentation Lab, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, USA

Aroh Barjatya, Rachel Conway, Lance Davis, Robert Clayton, Nathan Graves, Shantanab Debchoudhury, Henry Valentine, A. Barjatya, R. Clayton, R. Conway, L. Davis, S. Debchoudhury, N. Graves, P. Ribbens & H. Valentine

College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NC, USA

James Clemmons, Diana Swanson, C. Bancroft, A. Bolton, J. Clemmons, P. Demaine, S. Ellis, M. Francheshini, C. Frost, T. Jones, M. Maimone, D. Puopolo & D. Swanson

Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

Francis Eparvier & F. Eparvier

Space Science Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA

David Mitchell, Shaosui Xu, D. Mitchell & S. Xu

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Suzie Imber & S. Imber

Space Weather and Atmosphere Team, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK

Andrew Kavanagh & A. Kavanagh

Penn State University, State College, PA, USA

Jacob Miller

NASA Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, VA, USA

Ahmed Ghalib, G. Bain, M. Binder, S. Bissett, B. Bonsteel, D. Bowden, D. Bowker, M. Bradshaw, G. Bridges, M. Campbell, P. Cathell, L. Conser, D. Detwiler, M. Disbrow, J. Doughty, R. Ethridge, R. Fahringer, J. Farrell, T. Gass, A. Ghalib, C. Grabusky, G. Harlan, T. Harper, H. Haugh, J. Henderson, D. Henderson, T. Jester, R. Jillard, E. Johnson, H. Johnson, G. Jones, M. King, D. Knight, R. Laman, T. Lankford, P. Lotz, G. Marsh, R. Marshall, T. McFaden, M. Moffett, N. Morris, A. Mueseler, C. Nelson, W. Ogundere, D. Page, E. Pittman, J. Polidan, D. Raley, S. Rodriguez, G. Rosanova, B. Rose, T. Russell, B. Serabian, T. Sherman, T. Snyder, V. Sutton, R. Swift, W. Taylor, R. Terwiliger, S. Tiede, F. Waters, L. West, B. West, T. Wilson & N. Wroblewski

University Center in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Svalbard and Jan Mayen

L. Baddeley

Andøya Space, Andenes, Norway

H. Bahr, K. Blix, H. Borgen, L. Eilertsen, P. Hanssen, K. Herseth, K. Jensen, R. Lien, K. Osbakk, R. Simonsen, J. Søreng & J. Sveen

EISCAT Scientific Association, Kiruna, Sweden

I. Haggstrom & E. Helgesen

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

• , H. Akbari
• , R. Albano
• , L. Baddeley
• , C. Bancroft
• , A. Barjatya
• , A. Barrie
• , M. Binder
• , S. Bissett
• , A. Bolton
• , B. Bonsteel
• , H. Borgen
• , D. Bowden
• , D. Bowker
• , E. Bowlen
• , M. Bradshaw
• , A. Breneman
• , G. Bridges
• , T. Cameron
• , M. Campbell
• , P. Cathell
• , D. Chornay
• , R. Clayton
• , J. Clemmons
• , G. Collinson
• , L. Conser
• , R. Conway
• , S. Debchoudhury
• , P. Demaine
• , D. Detwiler
• , M. Disbrow
• , J. Doughty
• , L. Eilertsen
• , F. Eparvier
• , R. Ethridge
• , R. Fahringer
• , J. Farrell
• , M. Francheshini
• , A. Ghalib
• , A. Glocer
• , C. Grabusky
• , N. Graves
• , I. Haggstrom
• , P. Hanssen
• , G. Harlan
• , T. Harper
• , E. Helgesen
• , J. Henderson
• , D. Henderson
• , K. Herseth
• , K. Jensen
• , T. Jester
• , R. Jillard
• , E. Johnson
• , H. Johnson
• , A. Kavanagh
• , D. Knight
• , T. Lankford
• , M. Maimone
• , R. Marshall
• , S. Martin
• , T. McFaden
• , R. Michell
• , D. Mitchell
• , M. Moffett
• , N. Morris
• , A. Mueseler
• , C. Nelson
• , L. Nguyen
• , W. Ogundere
• , K. Osbakk
• , N. Paschalidis
• , C. Pirner
• , E. Pittman
• , J. Polidan
• , D. Puopolo
• , Z. Rawlings
• , P. Ribbens
• , E. Robertson
• , S. Rodriguez
• , G. Rosanova
• , T. Rosnack
• , T. Russell
• , M. Samara
• , B. Serabian
• , T. Sherman
• , R. Simonsen
• , T. Snyder
• , J. Søreng
• , V. Sutton
• , D. Swanson
• , W. Taylor
• , R. Terwiliger
• , C. Tucker
• , H. Valentine
• , M. Wallace
• , F. Waters
• , T. Wilson
• , N. Wroblewski
•  & E. Zesta

Contributions

The Endurance mission and its overall methodology were conceived by G.A.C. and A. Glocer, who acquired the funding, administered the science team and drafted this paper. The instruments were developed by G.A.C., R.P., A. Barjatya, R. Clayton, A. Breneman, J.C., R.M., L.D., E.R., D.S., L.N., P.U., T.C., A. Ghalib, H.V., N.G. and S.D. Data analysis was performed by G.A.C., A. Glocer, R.P., A. Barjatya, R. Conway, A. Breneman, J.C., F.E., D.M., S.I., H.A., L.D., A.K., D.S., S.X. and J.M.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glyn A. Collinson .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors have no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature thanks Drew Turner and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended data fig. 1 layout of the endurance spacecraft showing scientific instruments used in this study..

View from above looking aft. Magnetic field into page on upleg and out of page on downleg.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Example spectra from the Photoelectron Spectrometer.

Data calibrated but uncorrected for spacecraft potential. a , PES Scan 72 showing standard resolution (black) and high resolution (red). b , PES Scan 72 zoomed in to the He-II photopeaks showing a gaussian fit (blue) to the primary N 2 A 2 Π u dominated photopeak. c , d , The same for PES Scan 38.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Conversion from peak energy of photopeaks to planetary potential drop below Endurance.

Upleg, top panels; downleg, bottom panels. a , d , Peak energy of N 2 A 2 Π u dominated photopeak as measured. b , e , Energy of photopeak after correction for S/C potential from SLP. c , f , Potential drop below Endurance (as Fig. 2a,b ).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Measurements by the Swept Langmuir Probe.

Area denotes ±1σ error. a , Colour-coded timeline of Endurance mission (as per Fig. 1a , Fig. 2a ). b , Altitude versus time. c , Total Electron density (cm −3 ). d , Electron temperature (K). e , Potential difference between Endurance and ambient plasma. The periodic (70 s) firing of the ACS thrusters (amber, panel a ) temporarily perturbed the plasma environment around the spacecraft. The resulting erroneous measurements by SLP have been cut from the dataset.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Supporting Measurements by the FIELDS instrument.

a , Colour-coded timeline of Endurance mission (as per Fig. 1a , Fig. 2b ). b , Mean potential between the two pairs of electric field probes.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Radar measurements from the EISCAT Radar in black compared to in situ measurements by the SLP instrument in gold.

a,b , Plasma density; c,d , Electron temperature. e,f , Ion temperature; g,h , Ion velocity. These plots were made by time-averaging measurements from the upleg and downleg portion of the flight. Error bars represent the standard deviation. EISCAT data were truncated above 500 km in Fig. 3 owing to the large error bars but are shown here in full. The good agreement between independent measurements of \({n}_{e}\) and \({t}_{e}\) by EISCAT and SLP give good confidence in our SLP data analysis.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Geomagnetic activity for the two days surrounding the launch of Endurance.

a , Planetary KP index; b , planetary AP index. Both indexes show low activity (G0).

Supplementary information

Peer review file, rights and permissions.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Collinson, G.A., Glocer, A., Pfaff, R. et al. Earth’s ambipolar electrostatic field and its role in ion escape to space. Nature 632 , 1021–1025 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07480-3

Download citation

Received : 01 September 2023

Accepted : 25 April 2024

Published : 28 August 2024

Issue Date : 29 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07480-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.