community engagement solidarity and citizenship essay

Relationship of ’Community Engagement’ to Society Essay

Introduction, the role and relationship of ‘community engagement’ to society.

Bibliography

This paper seeks to analyze the role and relationship of ‘community engagement’ to society. The analysis provides different strategies in enhancing community engagement within the society.

Apart from providing a fixed approach in viewing community engagement, it also provides a flexible approach that aims to understand community engagement as a solution to ethical problems associated with spin or propaganda.

Along with explaining what entails community engagement, the concept shall also be supported by various theories in playing its role and responsibility to the society.

Community engagement is the major concern of strong economic and social transformation in the society. The involvement of community engagement has ensured development of an effective and sustainable environment – a concept that has led to the solution of ethical problems associated with ‘spin’, or rather scheming tactics.

The strong connection ensured has also resulted to a greater influence to those who formulate and implement policies that govern the society. Community engagement examines the developmental and implementation of key principles within the society and the processes that are fundamental to community participation.

In addition, such familiarity among the societal members has resulted to a relationship formation: a social justice structures and communication awareness in the society.

Addressing ethical issues within the community may be impossible, and therefore there is need to have guidelines or programs to undertake such functions.

In enlightening the society, the educated have resolved to use different ways and projects that are compatible with the type of society, which such issues are addressed. Creating developmental programs within the institutions and community-based programs are the feasible methods applied in the realization of community participation.

Therefore, the society has developed an understanding on importance of the community engagement, aimed at creating a difference in their lives. Moreover, theories such as ethical theory, citizenship theory, stakeholder theory and democratic theory will help explain how community engagement is linked to the ethical issues associated with change.

Community Engagement is a keystone for effective public health practice. It represents the methods of ethical communication that are in building capabilities among individuals in the society, in a way to encourage participation and association in political debate.

Community participation enhances knowledge and ability in the society, and this is an essential aspect towards the wellbeing of the society. In a wider perspective, engagement within a society implies that people are able to use their own resources and knowledge to formulate and implement policies that can solve ethical problems (Sarkissian et al., 2009).

Community commitment can also incorporate trust, communication, and association. Therefore, a successful community engagement leads to activities and strategies that depict the desire, the requirements, and the resources that are reasonable to the entire community.

Alongside the community engagement being involved traditional risk reduction activities; it also plays a vital role in improving the health care of the society at large.

As it has recently been noted by the institute of medicine(IOM) if there is possible which could eliminate the social problems that the community is experiencing at the present time, it will only be through building better relationships with communities and therefore derive from the communities assessments of their need s and priorities (CDC, 1997).

Community engagement tries to harmonize the community regardless of the status in the society, and it does this by bringing people to the table – both the community members and the elites. They both put down their differences and focus on one issue, and therefore such an engagement will help in nurturing their participation in all the aspects of decision –making process.

Such participation is said to be “constructive citizen participation”, an orderly process that enable all people in the community to share their ideas towards a common goal. In the process of generating a favorable environment, strengths and values of the community provide a platform for independence through knowledge. In addition, the members of the society are respected with equality.

Ethical theory

In the process of generating the right decisions that the society should assume in leading a desirable life, there is a need for the participants to borrow a leaf from what composes the ethical theory. In this case, there is a need to explain what an ethical theory composes.

An ethical theory is the foundation of ethical analysis since according to the viewpoints generated from the theory; it offers guidance along the pathway to making a decision. The theory emphasizes on different points alongside giving predicting on the outcomes that may be expected out of one’s duties to others in reaching out to an ethically correct decision (Superstone, 2009).

In a broader perspective, ethical theory is aimed at guiding the community in doing what is good, at the least possible harm and also giving people an opportunity to make decisions on their own as they are the ones who entirely know what they really require in life.

This is also endorsed by the Utilitarian ethical theory, which is established on the ability to predict on the consequences of an action.

According to Utilitarian, the choice that relent the greatest benefit to most of the people is a decision that is ethically correct. Ethical theory therefore strongly supports the aspect of community engagement if only it is established on a common goal of bringing forth a successful society.

Citizenship theory

Citizenship theory is an increasingly essential focus when analyzing the concept of community engagement. Citizenship mainly focuses in political and social theory as well as in philosophy, legal studies, and touches on some of the humanities. The theory has also a vital concern on the kind of life that is lived in the society.

It mainly figures out on the way justice is outsourced in the society, that is, in terms of denial of rights, the economic benefits and also on the social services.

Though it focuses on this and many more issues all in the name of generating quality decisions towards the community, it’s a theory that does not guarantee on equality, fairness, justice, economic status of the citizens, dignity and the respect of each other in the society.

Such and others are some of the problems that have re-emerged in trying to harmonize the concept of community engagement within the society. This has not only affected the political affiliation of people in the society but also their sociology.

Citizenship theory therefore supports the concept of community engagement in the sense in tries to bring people together and develops a healthy relationship among the citizens (Goldlust, 1996).

Stakeholder theory

Stakeholder theory explains the importance of essential aspects in support of the roles and responsibilities associated with community engagement, and to the overall understanding of the concept.

In this case, the stakeholders are necessary within the community as they can find a solution for the community, which in turn will be used to trigger some thought and action. It is therefore from the stakeholders that one would be in a better position to learn about the community engagement.

This can somehow explain some issues concerning the community and help in strengthening the community bonds in an informed and respectful ways. However, this theory does not provide the ways and methods that ought to be used by the experts in bringing people together, and how the success ought to be achieved (Vandenberg, 2000).

Stakeholder theory somehow solves the ethical problems associated with spin. This is because when stakeholders engage in various activities in the society, they are able to understand the various values accepted by people, and therefore work towards developing sustainable communities.

Democratic Theory

To understand the idea behind community engagement, it is worth noting the notion behind the theoretical provenance. In essence, community engagement, to an extent, is linked to the citizenship theory and its various models such as equality.

In this case, democratic models are also essential and vital to the understanding of community engagement. Democracy may therefore be used to mean ‘freely and frequently’. Moreover, it may also mean practicing fairness and justice, or in other words – “rule by the people”.

The citizens may also establish the idea of democracy on the fact of direct participation. This would also refer to a situation where citizens play an imperative role towards the state. This can however be a difficult task to achieve in situations where the society is large (Gastil and Levine, 2005).

Representative democracy is another model of democracy that ought to be playing a pivotal role in enhancing community engagement in the society. This concept seeks to address the fact that the cities are too big to apply the concept of direct democracy.

This would mean that the decisions that are implemented in the society and the problems linked to them are not associated to the community, but by the members who are elected to represent the entire society. Additionally, deliberative democracy is a model in support of the roles played by community engagement to the society.

This aspect expands on the concept of democracy as a form of ‘government ruled by many people, and accentuates on communication as inherent in the making decisions within a political aspect.

Deliberative democracy would therefore outsource the idea of community engagement as a measure of quality decision making and as a tool for effective communication within the society (Sarkissian et al., 2009).

Therefore, the concept of community engagement is determined by how stakeholders such as non-governmental organizations, social groups, governments, and business organizations can decide on important issues surrounding them.

Is “Community Engagement” a solution to ethical problems?

From the above explanation, people need to be free to select the best solution in solving ethical problems. Democracy enables the community to participate in developmental programs without fear. People can present their views on how their leaders operate and on the pressing issues within the society. In doing so, the community becomes enlightened and thus, avoids problems associated with spin.

The community may not always be able to harmonize their ideas and build an outstanding relationship, a problem that may be generated by the environment. Theory sometimes becomes hard to fulfill since some things cannot be thought, but may be difficult to do them practically.

In this case, the roles and responsibilities played by community engagement may not be sensible to the entire society since some aspects might demand a lot from the community and therefore such issues are assumed. To an extent, community engagement may not be a better parameter or a measure towards solving ethical problems.

Ethics as discussed in the ethical theory is at times too philosophical and religious – an aspect that may not be conversant to every person in the society. Therefore, saying that community engagement may solve ethical problems in the society can be a little bit biased.

Some issues within the society do not require a process in generating a decision but rather an instant solution. In this juncture, the society thus goes against the Utilitarian theory, which bases most of its arguments on fairness and equality.

Is community engagement a solution to the ethical problems associated with Spin?

The term Spin is a concept or a form of propaganda that is achieved through providing an interpretation about an event in order to gain favor from the public against an organization or a person which or who might be viewed as a public figure.

Therefore, a person manipulates an issue in order to support him or herself. On the other hand, he or she might be defaming the name of the other person or thing in order for the public to have a negative feeling towards the other individual.

In other words, the term spin might imply dishonesty, deception since in most of the times it is done in fulfillment of one’s interest. As mentioned in the discussion not all aspects in the society that ought to be solved in an ethical manner since some might cause commotions or chaos in the society.

In the United States, the public affairs that deal with the military contacts during the commencement of the war against Iraq used a spin tactic. In this case, several military wanted to high public relations firms to send out misleading information for the public to support them to begin the war.

Some officers did not want to join hand since this reduced military’s credibility. The type of spin used here was to blow up some certain circumstances in the public that would be seen viable and thus, the public would heartedly see the need of the war.

However, the war could solve very many issues in America and stop the Iraq from attacking the nation, but that is unethical. The nation could use another method to stop the attacks, for instance bar them from any trade affairs.

On the other hand, the country is justified to fight back. Considering this, one cannot conclusively say that community engagement can be a solution towards the ethical problems associated with spin.

The above discussion has affirmed that various examples have been brought since the concept of ‘community engagement’ emerged, all in the name of addressing issues of inequity and injustice. Indeed, community engagement is now a key player in the struggle against drawbacks in the society.

Improving community engagement within the concept of business strategies, policies, and in various societal sectors has resulted to the transition of education sector to become committed to community service as one of the community engagement aspect.

However, such a transition is still underway, but it also requires some support from the society. It is also very vital to note that the partakers in the community development affairs have a long way to go before stemming such aspects in the minds of people.

Therefore, the knowledge acquired from the service learning programs, besides theories used in support of this concept, has provided a force for this transition in implementation of community engagement.

Furthermore, the collaborative and development of effective and sustainable commonness within the society strengthens the role and responsibilities played by community engagement, which strives to solve ethical problems associated with spin.

Through the discussed theories (stakeholder, democratic, and citizenship), it can be established that critical relevance of community engagement is that the society brings a great difference in people’s lives. Moreover, such an insight has also resulted to providing various ideas in the organizational structures needed for an effective community engagement.

In essence, it is very critical for the society to provide structures, and a favorable environment that will enable community engagement to take effect to overcome the society’s problems and transform the society into a better place.

Alasdair, R. S. 2005. “Spin Control and Freedom of Information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada”. Public Administration , 83: 1.

CDC., 1997. Principles of Community Engagement . Atlanta, GA: Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. Web.

Gastil, J. and Levine, P., 2005. The deliberative democracy and handbook: strategies for effective civil engagement in the twenty first centuries , San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

Goldlust, J.,1996. Understanding citizenship in Australia, Bureau of immigration, multicultural and population research . London: Australian Government Publishing service.

Sarkissian, W., Hofer, N., Shore, Y, Vajda, S. and Wilkinson, C., 2009. Kitchen stable sustainability: practical recipes for community engagement with sustainability . Earthscan: London.

Superstone, A., 2009. The Moral Skeptic . New York: Oxford University Press.

Vandenberg, A., 2000. Citizenship and democracy in a global era. London: St Martins Press.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, January 8). Relationship of ’Community Engagement’ to Society. https://ivypanda.com/essays/community-engagement/

"Relationship of ’Community Engagement’ to Society." IvyPanda , 8 Jan. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/community-engagement/.

IvyPanda . (2024) 'Relationship of ’Community Engagement’ to Society'. 8 January.

IvyPanda . 2024. "Relationship of ’Community Engagement’ to Society." January 8, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/community-engagement/.

1. IvyPanda . "Relationship of ’Community Engagement’ to Society." January 8, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/community-engagement/.

IvyPanda . "Relationship of ’Community Engagement’ to Society." January 8, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/community-engagement/.

• Value of Persuasion: Spin-Doctoring
• Spin, Science and Climate Change
• Spin-Out Management: Theory and Practice
• Significance of Arterial Spin Labeling in Research and Clinical Studies
• Business Idea of Manufacturing Smart Blankets
• Crossover Complexes of Iron Coordination Compounds
• Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility
• Good Citizenship and Global Citizenship
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging Shortening Techniques
• The Forms of Capital
• Globalization Opportunities and Challenges
• The Phenomena of Multiculturalism: Cultural and Social Values
• The Concept of Community Development to the Homeless Youths in Australia
• Concept of a small world
• Testing of life expectancy

Home > Schools & Departments > HE > School of Social Sciences > Development Studies Dept. > Development Studies Faculty Publications > 90

Development Studies Faculty Publications

Community engagement, solidarity, and citizenship.

Mark Anthony Dayot Abenir , Ateneo de Manila University

This book is designed to make students appreciate the importance of community engagement, solidarity, and citizenship as applied in real life and in dealing with real-world problems. Through the varied learning activities, quality of discussions, and authenticity of assessment tools, this book equips students with the essential competencies and skills for life-long learning, employment, and socio-civic engagement.

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS
• Collections
• Libraries & Archives
• Ateneo Journals
• Disciplines

Author Corner

• Why contribute?
• Getting started
• Working with publishers and Open Access
• Copyright and intellectual property
• Contibutor FAQ

About Archium

• License agreement
• University website
• University libraries

Home About Help My Account Accessibility Statement

Privacy & Data Protection Copyright

Platform Solutions

Agenda and public meeting automation

Custom, user-friendly website for government

Smart online forms, workflows, and easy request fulfillment

Email, text, and social communications to reach your whole community

Digital storage of public information

Services and Support

Let Granicus help you build better resident experiences

Leverage our team of experts for best practice sharing, guidance, and training options

See how governments are using the Granicus Civic Engagement Platform to improve the delivery of information and services to their residents

Versatile Solutions for Governments

Granicus solutions are purpose-built for government agencies of all sizes.

Learn More .arrow-fill {fill: none;stroke: #fff;stroke-width: 3px;}

United kingdom.

Empowering government to build better resident and employee experiences and get more value out of their civic engagement technology.

Why is Community Engagement Important?

With the rise in deepening and expanding public engagement globally, the importance of community engagement has become pivotal for well-functioning, twenty-first century democracies. Constructive relationships between communities and the institutions of government make community engagement not only desirable, but necessary and viable as it is likely to lead to more equitable, sustainable public decisions and improve the liveability of local communities. This is why community engagement is important for individuals, public organizations, and governments alike.

Where traditional, executive-led approaches are ineffective, community engagement is important in its collaborative approach to the design and/or delivery of services. For the complexity of issues in any given community – where traditional approaches have been ineffective if non-inclusive in the extreme – community engagement enables better understanding of communities’ needs and aspirations.

This article will explore the following topics

Why is community engagement important for:

• building and sustaining cohesive communities
• improving outcomes
• ensuring access and community empowerment
• helping local governments to promote sustainable decisions
• driving social transformation
• deepening democracies

Why should we use community engagement?

Community engagement builds and sustains cohesive communities.

Community engagement is primarily, part of a dialogue where organizations and communities can make decisions to create social capital.

Compelling stories of the importance of community engagement range from creating (or indeed preventing) change in local policies and service provisions that not only enrich everyday lives and liveability of communities, but help shape and envision a community’s future, bringing with it not only wider societal change but global impacts.

Community engagement leads to improved outcomes

Community engagement can lead to improved outcomes for communities when government organizations and public decision-making entities seek out the aspirations, concerns and values of communities, who, in turn, share their aspirations, concerns and values with governing entities. Incorporated into decision-making processes, public decision makers are better informed and better able to meet community needs.

Establishing long standing, effective partnerships between government organizations and communities, too, results in a greater sense of community ownership and an improved uptake of services as they are tailored to the unique aspirations of the community.

Community engagement ensures access and community empowerment

Meaningful, inclusive community engagement is important, even critical, to community well being.

Understood through the values of access and inclusivity, where community members are informed and educated on issues at hand, locals are able to contribute meaningfully to engagement and have the capacity to shape those activities. Building on the ideas of empowerment and participation, people’s wellbeing involves participating meaningfully in all aspects of one’s life . Community engagement, then, ensures that community members have access to valued social settings and activities, feel that they are able to contribute meaningfully to those activities, and develop functional capabilities that enable them to participate fully.

By including diverse voices, usually marginalized or overlooked voices are actively empowered within their community to participate in decision making that affects their everyday lives.

Community engagement helps local governments to promote sustainable decisions

Community engagement helps governments improve the efficiency, legitimacy and transparency of their decision making. By embracing and encouraging participation, it enables policy makers to make more informed decisions by engaging with, and carefully mapping out the needs, opinions and visions of local communities on issues that matter to them. It promotes sustainable decisions by recognizing and communicating the needs and interests of all participants – including decision makers. This increases acceptance of decisions and community commitment to outcomes as local knowledge from diverse groups shapes and creates inclusive, effective solutions. The flow on effect is increased trust in organizations and governance to make better public decisions.

This is especially vital given the declining trust in governments worldwide, which, coupled with the Smart City agenda, creates an opportunity for community engagement to deliver a transformative form of continuous engagement between citizens and governments.

“Community engagement is important as it takes action to influence stakeholders with government, political or funding power to implement public projects and policies that primarily benefit individual communities and drive social change.”

Community engagement drives social transformation

With an emphasis on collaboration and the promise of influence on decision making, the importance of community engagement is clear as it drives social transformation. It promotes advocacy that not only works to raise awareness, but passionate, locally-informed voices can be heard – especially during election time. As voters, communities have the power to make their voices heard. And elections represent a significant opportunity to drive change. Advocacy campaigns are at their most effective when local governments, municipalities and councils activate communities, mobilizing on issues that impact their everyday lives. For it is in the local, placed-based arena that community members can have their most direct impact on policy.

Traditionally, local government advocacy priorities have been determined by executive-led approach – essentially, without community input (and often buoyed by third-party research and data at times, leading to advocacy campaigns that worked to benefit external agencies). Community engagement is important as it takes action to influence stakeholders with government, political or funding power to implement public projects and policies that primarily benefit individual communities and drive social change.

Community engagement is critical to deepening democracies

Depending on the types of community engagement, and level of influence given over to communities in a public decision-making process, community engagement strives towards deliberative democracy which facilitates a collaborative exchange regarding a set of policies or actions.

Researchers have observed a pronounced expansion in community organizing since the mid 1980s – where they have increasingly become a locus of engagement during governments’ deregulation of power. Broadly speaking, since the 1990s, we have witnessed a rapid expansion in formal, state-based initiatives to facilitate public participation in decision making, where communities are invited to engage beyond voting.

The attendant mistrust or loss of faith in government and information on public policy through traditional and social news channels walks hand in hand with the shift from top-down governance to more horizontally organized governments. Here, all stakeholders of public policy projects – local governments and organizations, businesses, residents and communities – are brought into the decision-making process, nurturing the very democratic idea of community engagement that people should have a say over decisions that impact their everyday lives.

“All stakeholders[…] are brought into the decision-making process, nurturing the very democratic idea of community engagement that people should have a say over decisions that impact their everyday lives.”

Increasingly, over recent years, through digital democracy and digital participation in open government and e-democracy, digitization has spread into policy and decision making. This is coupled with wider social transformations as there is a call for transparency around public decisions and residents and communities are more motivated to weigh in on policies affecting their cities, towns and neighborhoods.

This is not to overlook the unbridled enthusiasm for technology that has, paradoxically, fuelled the current digital mistrust of tech and big data and the unreliability of information via social media. But, governments now must create intentional interactions that facilitates community engagement. In this way, digital-first engagement has a vital role. While the benefits of online community engagement are manifold in the current global state of digitization, digital-first engagement supports a continuous democracy and can enhance transparency and trust. For, primarily, digital-first engagement is more efficient – giving community leaders added opportunity to focus on community issues.

Community engagement increases the visibility and understanding of issues and empowers communities to have their say over decisions that affect their lives, their towns, cities and neighborhoods.

It provides opportunities for community members to contribute to public decision-making processes – and informing and educating communities on policy issues that impact their everyday lives. Through feedback, community engagement enables government and public decision-making organizations to listen and, in turn, demonstrate the impact of community contribution. Community engagement, then, builds deeper, stronger and more trusting relationships between public organizations and communities.

Explore the Community Engagement 101 Series:

What is Community Engagement

Why is Community Engagement Important

Benefits of Online Community Engagement

How do you Engage Communities Online

Solidarity and Citizenship

Cite this chapter.

• Steven Lukes 5  

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture ((PSCC,volume 5))

623 Accesses

1 Citations

These two words are words to be treated with a certain caution. They are rhetorical words that are used in many different ways and for a variety of purposes. Consider the different uses of “solidarity” by Christians, trade unionists, humanists, Fascists. Each conjures up a different set of connotations and suggests a different set of social relations and a different image of social cooperation; and each tends to have a different scope of application. With whom are we supposed to be solidary? With co-religionists, with the poor and suffering, with fellow workers, with fellow members of our nation or State? As for “citizenship”, it is remarkable how popular this term has become, both in the rhetoric of our politicians and journalists, but also among academic commentators. Everyone is interested in citizenship and in favor of taking it seriously, even if they do not all agree about what taking it seriously would involve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Siena, Italy

Steven Lukes

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Philosophisches Seminar, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany

Kurt Bayertz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Lukes, S. (1999). Solidarity and Citizenship. In: Bayertz, K. (eds) Solidarity. Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_14

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_14

Publisher Name : Springer, Dordrecht

Print ISBN : 978-90-481-5137-0

Online ISBN : 978-94-015-9245-1

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

A Detailed Lesson Plan in Community Engagement, Solidarity, and Citizenship Grade 12

Related Papers

Özlem Kahya Nizam

Rafiq Jaffer

Rahnuma Family Planning Association of Pakistan (R-FPAP) engaged the Institute of Social Sciences (ISS) to conduct a research study to identify different kinds of sources of SRH information available to PWDs (Persons With Disabilities), identify assistance required and services available to and attained by PWDs to fulfil their SRH needs, and document perceptions, practices and attitudes of service providers, parents or immediate care takers and PWDs themselves, which make them more vulnerable for access to SRH information and services. The study involved in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with a wide range of stakeholders involved with the rehabilitation and welfare of PWDs, including PWDs themselves, their parents, staff of institutions involved in the education and care of PWDs, SRH and public health experts, physicians, government officials, and disability experts and advocates, assessment of the existing attitudes of service providers regarding PWDs using an attitude scale, and semi-structured interviews of 104 PWDs. A Reference Group consisting of key stakeholders reviewed and made inputs into the research design and instruments, as well as the study report, and participated in the dissemination meeting of the report. The key findings of the study are summarized below. There is a huge gap between the needs of PWDs for SRH information, counselling and services and the availability of the same to PWDs, both in mainstream institutions like hospitals, as well as institutions dedicated to PWDs. The study identified many myths, misconceptions and unscientific thinking regarding SRH, disability and PWDs (e.g. many PWDs attributed the infertility of a couple, the birth of a disabled child, the determination of the sex of a child, or a person becoming disabled due to God’s will), and most PWDs and their teachers declared masturbation sinful and harmful to health. However, about one-fourth of PWDs, mostly young, provided scientific explanations for most of these SRH myths. Many staff members of special education had stereotypes of PWDs (e.g. over-sexed, stubborn, argumentative; prefer to interact with/marry persons of their own disability, do not share SRH matters with families). One reason for these stereotypes may be a lack of intimacy between the staff and students of special education institutions. This is also evident in the disciplinary approach adopted by many staff members towards PWDs (separate boys and girls, do not let them be alone, always keep an eye on them, keep them busy, punish them for misbehaviour, etc.), focusing not on the SRH problems faced by PWDs, but the problems faced by staff in dealing with the SRH issues of PWDs. There was considerable sharing regarding SRH matters between students with disabilities and their family members, as well as their friends and acquaintances (though the latter is considered an unreliable source by many PWDs). The incorrect idea that PWDs do not share SRH matters with family members may be based on the fact that this is more likely to be true of non-disabled children, who are much more independent, and have far greater access to persons outside the family than PWDs. Since most PWDs are greatly dependent on their families, it can be expected that they share SRH matters with them much more frequently than non-disabled persons. The data clearly shows that sexual harassment takes place in institutions where PWDs live and/or study, that there is a definite increase in the reporting of harassment of PWDs in institutions during the last year, and most cases are dealt with by the staff of the concerned institutions without informing or involving high ups. At the same time we find that most staff members tend to deny the presence of harassment in their own institutions. There is limited awareness of the law regarding sexual harassment, and is limited to punishment for the harasser, without any knowledge for the need for a committee to deal with complaints. There is also a tendency to focus on the victim of harassment but not the perpetrator. On the whole one finds the prevalence of an exclusive approach regarding PWDs. Most service providers and staff talk about separate facilities for PWDs regarding SRH and other services. There is considerable talk of fixing the impairments and disabilities of PWDs, but little talk of fixing the society which is responsible for impairments and disabilities turning into handicaps, mainstreaming PWDs, or focusing on their constitutional rights. What is heartening to see however, perhaps for the first time in Pakistan, is the growing voice of PWDs themselves, which is both challenging and influencing decision makers at the highest levels, and bringing the discussion on inclusiveness and rights at the centre stage of the debate. This is of course timely, since a number of policies and bills regarding PWDs are in the process of being finalised. Recommendations It is obvious from the findings and conclusions of the study that improving the situation of SRHR of PWDs in Pakistan will require a massive, concerted and long-term effort of all key stakeholders. The present study is only a small beginning, and highlights some of the key issues involved. In order to move forward certain short, medium and long term measures are recommended. To start with the findings and recommendations of this report should be disseminated to key stakeholders and decision makers. Since the present study is limited to one city, it cannot be deemed to represent the situation of SRH in Pakistan. In order to use the study findings for advocacy and lobbying, a larger, national level study will have to be conducted, including the formation of a National Reference Group, on the lines of the Reference Group formed for this study. The findings of such a national study should be used to develop key messages for policy makers, which can sensitize them to the need to develop a national policy and strategy for improving SRHR of PWDs. Organisations of PWDs, which have become quite active in Pakistan, and which have contributed significantly to this study, can play a prominent role in leading the advocacy effort. Another important strategy to get useful information on SRHR and PWDs is to lobby the government/Ministry of Health/Statistical Bureau so that future surveys on reproductive health in Pakistan include PWDs in their sample and report findings separately for people without disabilities and people with disabilities. This has been done successfully in other countries and would provide very useful information on similarities and differences in the knowledge, attitude and practice and help target services better. Since there is easy access to special education and health care institutions at the Lahore level, a pilot programme for developing the SRH knowledge and skills of special education staff, health care staff dealing with PWDs, parents of PWDs, and PWDs themselves should be initiated. It could include the following: development and distribution of easy to read pamphlets (including graphics, braille) on SRH for PWDs and their parents; development and conduct of a training programme for staff on CRPD, SRH, interpersonal skills, scientific and religious views regarding SRH; orientation of parents on SRH at Parent Teacher Meetings by trainers/staff; formation of anti-sexual harassment committees at each institution as per the law, followed by preventive actions at institutional level; establishment of peer counselling centres in institutions for PWDs, with SRH trained PWDs as mentors and trainers; development of culturally sensitive audio and video clips on SRH of PWDs for dissemination through electronic media, and simple articles for dissemination through print media. Besides the training of staff mentioned above, other measures (e.g. involvement of former students as volunteers/interns, tutorial system, diary writing by PWDs) may also be considered for improving interaction between staff and students. These initiatives could be coordinated by a lead agency (e.g. provincial directorates of special education) with external technical support. Based on the outcomes of the pilot test mentioned in the foregoing, the programme may be expanded to other settings (e.g. hospitals, clinics). Some possible measures include the introduction of SRH needs of PWDs in public health programmes so that health care providers are sensitized and equipped to deal with these needs in an appropriate manner, and the demonstration of a model of health care in public and private health care settings addressing the SRH needs of PWDs (e.g. easy access to health providers, providers trained to handle SRH needs of PWDs, sign language facilities). Long term measures could include the review of draft bills and policies on SRH from the perspective of PWDs, and the inclusion of SRH needs in policies and bills on PWDs. Civil society and research organisations focusing on health, human rights, special education, inclusive development, need to be actively involved in advocacy for the provision of services and awareness-raising for de-stigmatizing barriers. The sample may be widened to include transgender persons with disabilities, and persons from diverse religious communities and ethnic backgrounds in Pakistan.

Andrea Vogt

Abate Benti

David J Connor

The purpose of this article is to explore how ideas from disability studies can inform “mainstream” educational practice. In this autoethnographic narrative I describe a personal journey of planning, teaching, and evaluating a 3-hour “in service” presentation for high school principals. In my account of this event I alternate between a description of the content, my personal reflections, and participant reactions. I demonstrate how the content and format of this kind of presentation can serve as a formalized context for generating a much needed dialogue between disability studies and current practices in the field of education.

Austin Lord , Jeevan Baniya , Tracy Ghale

This report empirically assesses the contemporary landscape of disability in Nepal, with a focus on the unique challenges faced by persons with disabilities (PwDs) in the wake of the earthquakes that devastated Nepal in April and May of 2015. Based on research conducted by a team from Social Science Baha, with the collaboration of the National Federation of the Disabled Nepal, this report presents a series of important findings related to the complex relationship between social exclusion, uneven access, and vulnerability. Situating field observations from Nepal within the recent literature on disability and disaster, this report also makes a series of policy recommendations focused on the meaningful inclusion of Nepalis with disabilities within both disaster risk reduction activities and the broader development agenda. The report therefore offers a toolkit for the timely operationalization of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals, and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction within Nepal.

Raja Iskandar Bin Raja Halid

Dikir barat is an art form which is both traditional and popular in Kelantan. It involves solo and group singing, hand clapping, synchronized body and hand movements, accompanied by percussion instruments. One unique aspect of dikir barat is when songs or verses are composed extemporaneously by the singer during a competition with another group. Topics for such ‘debate’ are not predetermined and may range from the profane to the profound. Dikir barat’s popularity made it a suitable means of disseminating information and instilling values to the masses. The government saw this potential, and dikir barat was thus “plucked” out of its folk roots, “cleaned” and promoted through the media as one of Malaysia’s cultural heritage. Competitions and performances were broadcasted on national TV and its songs played on the airwaves. From its humble origins in the kampongs of Kelantan, dikir barat was suddenly pushed into the limelight and became known nationwide. Schools and universities began to form their own dikir barat groups. Audio and video recordings further popularized dikir barat and made it a marketable cultural commodity with a thriving CD and VCD industry in Kelantan. Dikir barat also goes online. Albums, performances and artists are promoted through the internet, while songs and videos are freely uploaded on YouTube and other sites. This paper hopes to provide a descriptive account and preliminary analysis of the role played by the media in the transformation of dikir barat, against the backdrop of the changing cultural, social and political dynamics of Malaysia.

Wan Roselezam Wan Yahya Wan Yahya

Mrs. Dalloway (1925), one of Virginia Woolf‘s widely read novels, has often been studied through the concept of time or from the feminist perspective highlighting the modernist features. But the present study draws on the concept of abandonment to analyze the underlying development of thanatos in the life of the major characters of the novel that to what extent can be a derivation of the author’s personal life.

Jeevan Baniya

Baniya Jeevan with Austin Lord, Bandita Sijapati, Tracy Ghale, Obindra Chand. Research project completed, supported by UNDP, Report getting published soon.

RELATED PAPERS

Shahid Bilal Hassan

London School Motoring

Temas em Educação e Saúde

Ariane Onohara

Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia

Danilo Oliveira

E3S Web of Conferences

Mihaela Constantin

Surface Science

Michael Bedzyk

Global Business Review

Emmanuel Gabreyohannes

Zaheer Qureshi

Dimas Waluyo Jati

2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)

Luis Pastor guardia

Josefina Cervantes

Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

Emigdia Guadalupe Sumbarda Ramos

P. Baenziger

The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques

Namita Sinha

ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)

Ludmilla Chinen

European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety

lucy robertson

ten77, IIA Cochin

Tanashree Redij

Bittu Kaveri Rajaraman

David Reynolds

Agronomy research

Maarika Alaru

International Journal of Infectious Diseases

Steve Blevins

Urban Climate

Rosanna Rivero

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union

James O Chibueze

panteha farmanesh

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Have an account?

2ND SEM 3RD QUARTER SUMMATIVE EXAM IN CO...

Social studies.

2ND SEM 3RD QUARTER SUMMATIVE EXAM IN COMUNNITY ENGAGEMENT

50 questions

Introducing new   Paper mode

No student devices needed.   Know more

This is the community that is located in the city

Virtual space

The livelihood of people living in this area is mostly livestock and farming

Informal Sector

Angel createdba group called "Charles' Angel" in her facebook account

Informal sector

The process in which individuals build an ongoing and permanent relationships for the purpose of applying a collective vision for the benefit of a community

Community action

Community dynamic

Commnutiy engagement

A group of people who share something in common

Human being

Social sector

Type of communities that includes non profit/fundraising communities

Community of Interest

Community of Action

Community of Place

Typenof community who are concerned more about the experiences or emotional reactions of people about the different situations

Community of Circumstances

Type of community where people mentally enjoy about films,games, fashion, differentnculture or more

Communities of people in the same profession

Community of practice

A community of people united by geography

Community of place

Community of circumstances

Action is the heart of community building

A community embodies a personality derived from its members.

Community engagement is all about connecting to the community and its people.

What government agency mobilizes a more rounded approach to risk management and reduction?

What government agency serve as the focal point of community safety?

What government agency helped millions across the country gain access to medicine as well as services of medical experts.

DepEd is the government agency that is responsible for the

________of the youth.

A group of people who share something in common or a social unit (a group of living things) with commonality such as norms, religion, values, customs, or identity.

Community Dynamics

Formed when two or more people come together to accomplish a specific task which is mainly socially geared.

Formal groups

Informal groups

Formed when people come together to accomplish specific goals and objectives.

An open swath of land that has few homes or other buildings, and not very many people. Population density is very low.

The region surrounding a city. An area with high density of population.

The people or nations of the world, considered as being closely connected by modern telecommunications and as being economically, socially, and politically interdependent.

Global community

It means relating to the various economic sectors of a society or to a particular economic sector.

These are physical or virtual space such as a social center, online social media, or other gathering place where people gather and interact.

Social space

Communities of people trying to bring about change.

Communities of people in the same profession or undertake the same activities.

The process of change and development in communities of all living organisms—including plants, microorganisms, and small and large creatures of every sort.

Community Action

Any activity that increases the understanding, engagement and empowerment of communities in the design and delivery of local services

Helping the community to share knowledge, skills and ideas.

Building community and social capacity

Community resilience

Helping the community to support itself.

What is the role of the community?

community consultation

joint planning and designing

joint delivery

community-led activities

all of the above

The Complete name of your Subject

Community Engagement and Solidarity

Community Engagement, Solidarity and Citizenship

Community Engagement Solidarity and Citizenry

Community Engagement Citizenship and Solidarity

Community engagement;

collective vision for community

being citizen in community

Unity/action for community

none of these

Which of the following are common/similar in community engagement and solidarity;

Engagement in action

engage citizenry

Unified citizenry

refers to the collective effort done by people directed toward addressing social problems.

community engagement

community action

citizenship

One of the most collative action that is helpful to conduct in this pandemic is;

feeding program

medical mission

relief operation

In this area, the air is fresh, but the transport difficulties are great.

In suburban area, apartments are popular place to live in the city.

This area often called the suburbs. It is less crowded than the city. The buildings and people are also less than in the city.

In Rural area, we need to travel to a town nearby for shopping.

In Suburban area, it does not have yard in their house because of the space is limited.

In Urban area, it has modern transport facilities such as car, bus, taxi, etc.

Many people that live near James don’t drives cars because the streets are too busy. He drives a bus that hundreds of people use to travel quickly across the city. He lives and works in a(n) _________________ community.

Richie goes to work, he cleans the windows on tall skyscrapers. His job is not meant for people who afraid of high place! Richie works in a(n) _________________ community.

Digo is a police officer. He patrols a small town with small shops and one-story houses. He helps keep everyone in town safe. He works in a(n) _______________ community.

This morning, Elisha and her mom woke up early because they need to travel to a town nearby for shopping. Elisha and her mom live in a(n) _______________ community.

It is derived from the Latin word communitas that means coomon, public or share by many.

It The study that uses the knowledge-based theories, principles, and methods of interdisciplinary disciplines of basic social science to understand the society and to help address or solve a social problem or practical problem in the community.

General Science Perspective

Applied Social Science Perspective

Social Science Perspective

Physical Science Perspective

It refers on the people coming together to tackle an issue, support other people, or improve their local area.

Action in Social Science

Action force

Action in community

Action in command

Explore all questions with a free account

Continue with email

Continue with phone