Foundations of Army Leadership BLC Essay
Leadership is significant for every organization, and the Army is not an exception. It is so because leaders are responsible for addressing the existing challenges and achieving the stipulated goals. These people also provide mentorship to younger and less experienced individuals, contributing to their better adaptation. The phenomenon under analysis is complicated since it consists of and draws attention to many issues. Thus, this paper examines the foundation of Army leadership, focusing on its levels and leaders’ characteristic features.
To begin with, one should define the concept under consideration. According to the US Department of the Army (2019), leadership denotes an activity to make people accomplish the mission. Such a broad definition does not mean that the Army does not need the issue. This phenomenon is essential for the organization because it unifies its warfighting abilities. Leadership also motivates and inspires people to make them achieve the desired outcomes. It is necessary to mention that the Army has three levels of leadership.
Various leadership levels are required to ensure that all soldiers and officers understand the organization’s expectations. According to the US Department of the Army (2019), there are direct, organizational, and strategic leadership levels. Firstly, direct leadership occurs during face-to-face contact between leaders and their subordinates. Secondly, the US Department of the Army (2019, 1-23) states that “organizational leaders exercise leadership through subordinate leaders.” Thirdly, a strategic level involves civilian and military leaders who determine the development of the Army. Even though strategic leadership seems to address more significant issues, one should not underestimate the importance of lower levels.
There is no doubt that the foundation of Army leadership begins in its smallest elements. Coleman Jr. (2011) admits that leadership comes from the team, section, and squad. It is so because young soldiers who require supervision spend much time in these structural units. Consequently, team, section, and squad officers should draw specific attention to provide them with the required assistance. This state of affairs makes these low-ranking officials apply leadership principles to cope with the task. Furthermore, one should state that not every person who makes others achieve the desired outcome is an Army leader. One should emphasize that Army leaders should have specific qualities and meet particular requirements, which will be described below.
Firstly, it is worth emphasizing that a person’s character has an impact on how they lead. It means that leaders should have particular moral qualities to affect and inspire their subordinates. That is why the US Department of the Army (2019) lists specific characteristic features that successful leaders should have. They include Army values, empathy, two types of ethos, discipline, and humility. These issues demonstrate that leaders should meet multiple requirements to succeed in their activity. For example, these individuals should be loyal, understand others’ emotions, express obedience toward fulfilling lawful orders, and so on. However, the character is not the only phenomenon that an effective leader should have to affect subordinates efficiently.
Secondly, presence plays a significant role in how effective a leader is. This phenomenon explains that leaders are successful and influential if their subordinates perceive them as having such traits. It means that individuals should invest in developing their presence in the Army. One should explain that presence does not only mean that a person should be seen. The given issue stipulates that leaders should bring qualitative changes to the organization. Army leaders have multiple variants to show that they meet this criterion. For example, it refers to demonstrating competence, having sound health, projecting self-confidence, recovering from stressful situations quickly, and others. In addition to that, it is not reasonable to forget about leaders’ mental capabilities.
Thirdly, the Army draws specific attention to leaders’ intellect that relies on knowledge and brainpower. People have different intelligence levels, meaning that some of them can show better results in this area. That is why various people can be leaders of different quality. One should explain that leaders’ intellect is a complex phenomenon. According to the US Department of the Army (2019), it includes mental agility, innovation, sound judgement, expertise, and interpersonal tact. These competencies are significant because they allow individuals to adapt to changing conditions, form sound opinions, and many others. This information means that those Army leaders who have decent intellectual abilities tend to succeed in leading and motivating others.
In conclusion, the essay has demonstrated that leadership is of significance for the Army. Through motivation, this phenomenon ensures that all military personnel aims at achieving shared goals. It is worth mentioning that three leadership levels explain how thoughts move from leaders to their subordinates. Furthermore, it has been mentioned that successful Army leaders should bear specific qualities and meet particular requirements. The idea is that character, presence, and intellect are of significance for the Army. These three phenomena are essential since they ensure that leaders can influence others and cope with the existing challenges. Consequently, the foundation of Army leadership is a significant issue that includes many fundamental aspects.
Coleman Jr., Arthur L. 2011. “Team, Squad, Section Leaders: Foundation of Army.” Fort Hood Sentinel. Web.
United States of America Department of the Army. 2019. “ADP 6-22. Army Leadership and the Profession.” Web.
- Elite Squad 1&2: The Theme of Corruption
- Intellect and Will in Descartes’ Philosophy
- Battle of Brandywine in the American Revolution
- Sexual Assault and Harassment in the U.S. Military
- Family Readiness Officer in Marine Forces Command
- Leadership and Learning Organizations in the US Military
- Leadership in the Arms Profession
- Sexual Assault in the United States Military
- Chicago (A-D)
- Chicago (N-B)
IvyPanda. (2020, December 8). Foundations of Army Leadership BLC. https://ivypanda.com/essays/foundation-of-army-leadership/
"Foundations of Army Leadership BLC." IvyPanda , 8 Dec. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/foundation-of-army-leadership/.
IvyPanda . (2020) 'Foundations of Army Leadership BLC'. 8 December.
IvyPanda . 2020. "Foundations of Army Leadership BLC." December 8, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/foundation-of-army-leadership/.
1. IvyPanda . "Foundations of Army Leadership BLC." December 8, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/foundation-of-army-leadership/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "Foundations of Army Leadership BLC." December 8, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/foundation-of-army-leadership/.
Army Leadership Levels
This essay about the hierarchical tiers of leadership within the military, outlining the distinct roles and responsibilities of direct, organizational, and strategic leaders. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these tiers for individuals involved in or studying military leadership, as they illuminate the structure and dynamics of command within the armed forces. From hands-on guidance at the direct level to long-term strategic planning at the highest echelons, each tier requires specific skills and competencies to ensure the effectiveness of military operations now and in the future.
How it works
The notion of leadership within the military realm transcends conventional conceptions, evolving into a multifaceted structure with diverse tiers, each laden with distinct responsibilities, hurdles, and aspirations. Grasping these tiers proves imperative for individuals entrenched in, or investigating, military leadership, illuminating the flow of order, obligation, and sway within such a meticulously structured domain.
At its essence, military leadership manifests in three overarching tiers: direct, organizational, and strategic. Each tier embodies a unique function, finely tailored to the requisites of the military and the objectives it endeavors to accomplish.
Direct Leadership epitomizes the most palpable tier of leadership in the military echelon. It encompasses leaders who engage directly with soldiers on a quotidian basis, including squad leaders, platoon leaders, and company commanders. Direct leaders shoulder the onus of training, welfare, discipline, and overall soldier performance. They serve as the vanguard, ensuring soldiers are adequately prepared, both physically and mentally, for their obligations. The efficacy of direct leadership hinges on the adept execution of missions with meticulousness and the nurturance of troop welfare.
Ascending, Organizational Leadership envelops those operating at battalion level and beyond, spanning brigade and division commanders. These leaders must harmonize and synchronize the endeavors of myriad units, oversee resource allocation, and orchestrate operations spanning broader geographical scopes and lengthier time frames. Organizational leaders collaborate with staff to amass intelligence, formulate strategic decisions, and disseminate these blueprints down the command chain. Though less hands-on compared to direct leaders, their influence on the military’s effectiveness is profound as they erect the frameworks within which smaller units function.
Crowning the hierarchy is Strategic Leadership , epitomized by high-ranking officers such as generals and admirals, who steer the Army at its zenith. Strategic leaders are tasked with delineating the overarching trajectory of the army, devising long-term strategies, and interfacing with political leaders and other governmental branches. Their decisions must factor not solely military exigencies but also political, economic, and social variables that impinge on national security. The strategic tier of leadership necessitates a holistic comprehension of both global scenarios and domestic implications, striking a balance amid often discordant needs against the backdrop of international diplomacy and policy-making.
The transition from one echelon of leadership to the subsequent is not merely a reallocation of duties but also a metamorphosis in outlook and competencies. For instance, while direct leaders may concentrate predominantly on tactical protocols and immediate team dynamics, organizational leaders must cultivate prowess in operational planning and resource administration. Strategic leaders, conversely, must excel in visionary cogitation and diplomatic adeptness, often amidst high-stakes conditions.
Moreover, the army underscores the cultivation of leaders capable of operating effectively across all tiers through incessant training and education. This approach guarantees that military leaders are not solely primed to discharge their extant roles but are also armed with the erudition and skills requisite to assume loftier responsibilities as they ascend in their vocations.
In summation, the tiers of leadership within the army delineate a lucid framework through which authority and responsibilities are apportioned. This hierarchical arrangement ensures efficacy and lucidity in command, with each tier tailored to the operational exigencies of the military. From direct to strategic leadership, army leaders are anticipated to adapt and burgeon, ensuring they are poised to confront the exigencies of both present and future eras. Comprehending these tiers is indispensable for any individual entangled in military endeavors or investigating military leadership, furnishing insights into the intricate dynamics impelling the armed forces.
Cite this page
Army Leadership Levels. (2024, May 01). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/army-leadership-levels/
"Army Leadership Levels." PapersOwl.com , 1 May 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/army-leadership-levels/
PapersOwl.com. (2024). Army Leadership Levels . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/army-leadership-levels/ [Accessed: 27 May. 2024]
"Army Leadership Levels." PapersOwl.com, May 01, 2024. Accessed May 27, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/army-leadership-levels/
"Army Leadership Levels," PapersOwl.com , 01-May-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/army-leadership-levels/. [Accessed: 27-May-2024]
PapersOwl.com. (2024). Army Leadership Levels . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/army-leadership-levels/ [Accessed: 27-May-2024]
Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade
Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.
Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!
Please check your inbox.
You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.
Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide
1. Tell Us Your Requirements
2. Pick your perfect writer
3. Get Your Paper and Pay
Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!
Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.
short deadlines
100% Plagiarism-Free
Certified writers
Army and The Military Levels of Leadership
The Army and the Military are constructed of many levels through the method of rank. These ranks are greatly significant in allowing for order and efficiency. They do this by appointing progressively more experienced and educated soldiers to lead those less experienced through the means of effective leadership. However, there are different form of leadership, and they develop into three types in the Army: Direct, Organizational, and Strategic. Each leadership occurs at a different grouping of rank and position and determines the type of work they do and the impact of the work.
Direct level leadership is the most abundant form of leadership. Direct leadership is the leadership that is the most immediate betweenness the conductor and the followers, with no levels of subordinates in between to carry the information. This level refers to the small communications and directional orders that occur to achieve daily minor task. Direct leadership effects small numbers of people ranging to just a few to roughly a hundred. They are in charge of groupings such as squads, platoons, and companies. Typically these types of leaders will physically see their subordinates often, and typically, when the organization assembles, this type of leader can be easily approached. The positions of this leadership include NCOs up to first Sargent, sometimes Sargent Majors, junior officers (company officers) such as second and first lieutenants through captains, including lower ranking warrant officers, and army civilians that work at a unit level.
Organizational
Organizational level leadership is the second most common form of leadership followed behind direct. Organizational leadership is where there is at least one level of subordinates intervening in order to get to the bottom level of subordinates in which are effected by the task. These leaders effect hundreds to thousands of people, usually through giving commands to direct leaders. The lowest level of subordinates may go only a minimal amount of times seeing this leadership, if at all. The ranks in this leadership typically include senior NCO’S such as first Sargent through Sargent major, senior (field-grade officers) such as majors, lieutenant colonel and colonel, and high grade civilian leaders. These leaders positions have a great impact on the goals of the army.
Lastly, the Strategic level leadership is the rarest form of leadership. This is the form of leadership in which the greatest decisions are made that sometimes impact the entirety of the army, our nation and even other major parts of the world in ways that can be life altering. The decisions made at this level effect millions of people in extreme ways. There are layers of subordinates comprised of organizational leadership and direct leadership that reach down to the lowest level of subordinates from the strategic leadership. Almost certainly will nobody but the people directly under the strategic level talk to these leaders. This level is served by all Generals and senior executive service army civilians.
Cite this page
Army and The Military Levels of Leadership. (2021, Jul 05). Retrieved from https://supremestudy.com/army-and-the-military-levels-of-leadership/
"Army and The Military Levels of Leadership." supremestudy.com , 5 Jul 2021, https://supremestudy.com/army-and-the-military-levels-of-leadership/
supremestudy.com. (2021). Army and The Military Levels of Leadership . [Online]. Available at: https://supremestudy.com/army-and-the-military-levels-of-leadership/ [Accessed: 27 May. 2024]
"Army and The Military Levels of Leadership." supremestudy.com, Jul 05, 2021. Accessed May 27, 2024. https://supremestudy.com/army-and-the-military-levels-of-leadership/
"Army and The Military Levels of Leadership," supremestudy.com , 05-Jul-2021. [Online]. Available: https://supremestudy.com/army-and-the-military-levels-of-leadership/ . [Accessed: 27-May-2024]
supremestudy.com. (2021). Army and The Military Levels of Leadership . [Online]. Available at: https://supremestudy.com/army-and-the-military-levels-of-leadership/ [Accessed: 27-May-2024]
Army and The Military Levels of Leadership. (2021, Jul 05). Retrieved May 27, 2024 , from https://supremestudy.com/army-and-the-military-levels-of-leadership/
This paper was written and submitted by a fellow student
Our verified experts write your 100% original paper on any topic
Having doubts about how to write your paper correctly?
Our editors will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!
Leave your email and we will send a sample to you.
Please check your inbox
Sorry, copying content is not allowed on this website
Please indicate where to send you the sample.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The purpose of this essay is to discuss the three levels of leadership in the Army. As stated in AR 600-100, the definition of Army leadership is influencing Soldiers by purpose, direction, and motivation to carry out the mission and improve the organization. (AR 600-100, 1-6) The three levels of leadership in the Army are direct, organizational, and strategic.
the mission or assignment, at all levels, across all cohorts. ARMY LEADER DEFINED 1. Leadership, the lifeblood of an army, makes a difference every day in the United States Army. Since the formation of the Continental Army until today with Soldiers deployed around the globe, Army leaders have accepted the challenges before them.
In conclusion, the essay has demonstrated that leadership is of significance for the Army. Through motivation, this phenomenon ensures that all military personnel aims at achieving shared goals. It is worth mentioning that three leadership levels explain how thoughts move from leaders to their subordinates.
This edition of FM 22-100 establishes a unified leadership theory for all Army leaders based on the Army leadership framework and three leadership levels. Specifically, it— • Defines and discusses Army values and leader attributes. • Discusses character-based leadership. • Establishes leader attributes as part of character.
Effective leadership in the Army is a function of the compliance and commitment of a leader's subordinates. 3 Commitment is defined as the "willing dedication or allegiance" to the mission, unit, or Army, while compliance is the mere act of "conforming to a requirement or demand." 4 A committed soldier will expend more effort ...
Here are just a few of those qualities as listed in Army Doctrine Publication 6-22: Army Leadership [Now Army Leadership and the Profession]: an ideal leader should possess strong intellect, professional competence, high moral character, and serves as a role model. The same manual goes on to state that these leaders must be willing to make ...
ADP 6-22, Army Leadership and the Profession, establishes and describes the Army Profession and the foundations of Army leadership, (outlines the echelons of leadership (direct, organizational, and strategic), and describes the attributes and core leader competencies expected of all leaders across all levels and cohorts.
Essay Example: This essay will be over three main different levels of leadership within the United States Army to drive the force. These levels are stated in ADP 6-22 (ARMY LEADERSHIP) and how they apply to today's armed forces. The types of leadership levels are direct, organizational, and
a. For most of you, the Strategic Leadership course continues your development of Army leadership at the last of three levels: Direct (taught at the basic and captain's level courses), Organizational (taught at the intermediate level education course), and Strategic (taught at the USAWC). For others, it complements the training, education,
Field Manual 6-22, Leader Development, states the overarching tenets of Army leader development are: Strong commitment by the Army, superiors, and individuals to leader development. Clear purpose for what, when, and how to develop leadership. Supportive relationships and culture of learning. Three mutually supportive domains (institutional ...
Section 1 Leadership Track Key Points 1 What Is Leadership? 2 The Be, Know, DoLeadership Philosophy 3 Levels of Army Leadership 4 Leadership Versus Management 5 The Cadet Command Leadership Development Program INTRODUCTION TO ARMY LEADERSHIP All my life, both as a soldier and as an educator, I have been engaged in a search for a mysterious intangible.
information.1 The strategic leader understands strategic art, which is the skillful formulation, coordination, and application of ends, ways, and means to promote and defend the national interests.2 The strategic. leader provides the organization's strategic vision and focus, inspires others to think and act, and.
Leader development is an investment required to maintain the Army as a profession. Previously published as Brian J. Reed, "Leader Development, Learning Agility and the Army Profession, Association of the U.S. Army, Institute of Land Warfare, The Land Warfare Papers no. 92 (October 2012). Used with permission by the Institute of Land Warfare.
We must develop our junior Soldiers and officers in a manner that will position them and our military for success now and in the future. Army Regulation 600-100: Army Profession and Leadership Policy defines leader development as the deliberate, continuous, sequential, and progressive process, grounded in Army Values, that grows Soldiers and ...
Class Objectives. Define Leadership according to Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 6-22, Army Leadership. Identify the three levels of Army Leadership: direct, organizational, and strategic. Understand the Army Leadership Requirements Model. Identify "Be, Know, and Do" as the pillars of the Army Leadership Requirements Model. Define "Be ...
levels of leadership. The Army has also identified key leadership attributes that can positively affect a unit, and destructive leadership styles that can result in a toxic leader. Below are the "core leader competencies" identified by the Army, all of which can assist with producing quality performance and mission success:
Direct Leadership epitomizes the most palpable tier of leadership in the military echelon. It encompasses leaders who engage directly with soldiers on a quotidian basis, including squad leaders, platoon leaders, and company commanders. Direct leaders shoulder the onus of training, welfare, discipline, and overall soldier performance.
ADRP 6-22 contains four parts comprised of 11 chapters that describe the Army's view on leadership: Part One defines leadership, describes the foundations of Army leadership, and introduces the Army Leadership Requirements Model in Chapter 1. It addresses the various roles of Army leaders and the levels of leadership in Chapter 2.
Army Leadership Informal and Collective Leadership Many people believe that the leader in any group or organization is one of the most important factors necessary to achieve the group's objectives. As a result of the perceived importance of the formal leadership, this role receives a lot of attention and a plethora of research has been conducted to better understand the qualities and actions ...
Leadership is what helps keep the Army together and moving. The three different levels of leadership are direct, organizational and strategic. Direct is the lowest level going to organizational then strategic being the highest. In direct it all deals with leadership in the battalion levels. With organizational it all deals with brigade level.
The purpose of this essay is to reflect on what I learned during my time at BLC. During my time of attending BLC, I have learned how the Army produces NCOs and reinforces these methods with applied learning. Several of the things that I have learned is conflict management in the army, leadership styles, and the various levels of group development.
The Army and the Military are constructed of many levels through the method of rank. These ranks are greatly significant in allowing for order and efficiency. They do this by appointing progressively more experienced and educated soldiers to lead those less experienced through the means of effective leadership.
NCO LEADERSHIP CENTER OF EXCELLENCE, FT. BLISS, Texas - The Army is eliminating the requirement for all enlisted Soldiers to complete the Distributed Leader Course (DLC I-VI) no later than Oct. 1 ...