what is a research proposal in psychology

We use cookies on reading.ac.uk to improve your experience, monitor site performance and tailor content to you

Read our cookie policy to find out how to manage your cookie settings

This site may not work correctly on Internet Explorer. We recommend switching to a different browser for a better experience.

Writing your research proposal

When applying to study for a PhD or MPhil in the School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, you will typically need to send us an initial 500-word research proposal.

The content and structure of your research proposal will be influenced by the nature of the project you wish to pursue. The guidance and suggested headings provided here should help you to structure and present your ideas clearly.

Your initial research proposal

When writing your initial research proposal, you can either address it to the School generally, or to a specific supervisor if you have one in mind. 

Potential supervisors in the School will review your initial research proposal, and get in touch with you to discuss it. Your proposal may change following this conversation. Depending on the supervisor and the outcome of this discussion, you may be asked to produce a longer research proposal of between 2,000 and 4,000 words.

Tips on writing a research proposal

Before you write your research proposal, we strongly recommend that you check our  research page  and  individual supervisor profiles  to view our areas of expertise.

• You should avoid the use of overly long sentences and technical jargon.
• It is important that the proposed research is realistic and feasible so that the outcomes can be achieved within the scale of a typical research degree programme. This is usually three years full-time for a PhD (or two years for an MPhil). 
• A strong research proposal can and should make a positive first impression about your potential to become a good researcher. It should demonstrate that your ideas are focused, interesting and realistic.

Although you should write your proposal yourself, it is best if you discuss its contents with your proposed supervisor before you submit it. If this is not possible, then try to get someone else (such as an academic at your current or previous institution) to read and comment on it to ensure that it is sufficiently clear.

Your proposal needs a clear working title that gives an indication of what you want to study. You are not committed to continuing with the same title once you begin your studies.

Research question

For many projects, you'll usually address one main question, which can sometimes be broken down into several sub-questions. However, it's OK to have two or three research questions where appropriate.

In your research proposal, you'll need to state your main research question(s), explain its significance, and locate it within the relevant literature, in order to set out the context into which your research will fit. You should only refer to research that is directly relevant to your proposal. 

Questions to address in your research proposal

You will need to address questions such as:

• What is the general area in which you will be working, and the specific aspect(s) of that area that will be your focus of inquiry?
• What is the problem, shortcoming, or gap in this area that you would like to address?
• What is the main research question or aim that you want to address?
• What are the specific objectives for the proposed research that follow from this?
• Why is the proposed research significant, why does it matter (either theoretically or practically), and why does it excite you?
• How does your work relate to other relevant research in the department?

Methodology

You will need to explain how you will go about answering your question (or achieving your aim), and why you will use your intended approach to address the question/aim. 

Questions you might need to address include:

• What steps will you take and what methods will you use to address your question? For instance, do you plan to use quantitative or qualitative methods?
• How will your proposed method provide a reliable answer to your question?
• What sources or data will you use?
• If your project involves an experimental approach, what specific hypothesis or hypotheses will you address?
• What specific techniques will you use to test the hypothesis? For example, laboratory procedures, interviews, questionnaires, modelling, simulation, text analysis, use of secondary data sources.
• What practical considerations are there? For example, what equipment, facilities, and other resources will be required?
• What relevant skills and experience do you have with the proposed methods?
• Will you need to collaborate with other researchers and organisations?
• Are there particular ethical issues that will need to be considered (for example, all projects using human participants require ethical approval)?
• Are there any potential problems or difficulties that you foresee (for example, delays in gaining access to special populations or materials) that might affect your rate of progress?

You will need to provide a rough timeline for the completion of your research to show that the project is achievable (given the facilities and resources required) in no more than three years of full-time study (or part-time equivalent) for a PhD, and two years for an MPhil.

Expected outcomes

You need to say something about what the expected outcomes of your project would be.

How, for example, does it make a contribution to knowledge? How does it advance theoretical understanding? How might it contribute to policy or practice?

If you are aiming to study for a PhD, then you need to say how your proposed research will make an original contribution to knowledge. This is not essential if you are aiming to study for an MPhil, although you will still need to show originality in the application of knowledge.

List of references

You will need to provide a list of any key articles or texts that you have referred to in your proposal.

References should be listed in the appropriate style for your subject area (e.g. Harvard). You should only reference texts that you think are central to your proposed work, rather than a bibliography listing everything written on the subject. 

Format and proofreading

Make sure that your proposal is well structured and clearly written. It is important that you carefully check your proposal for typographical and spelling errors, consistency of style, and accuracy of references, before submitting it.

The proposal should be aesthetically well presented, and look professional (e.g. no font inconsistencies, headings clearly identifiable). If you include figures, then they should be accompanied by captions underneath).

How to apply for a PhD

PhD opportunities

Our research

Take the next step

• How to apply
• Get a prospectus
• Ask us a question
• Learn about the Doctoral and Researcher College

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Research process
• How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

Published on 30 October 2022 by Shona McCombes and Tegan George. Revised on 13 June 2023.

A research proposal describes what you will investigate, why it’s important, and how you will conduct your research.

The format of a research proposal varies between fields, but most proposals will contain at least these elements:

Introduction

Literature review.

• Research design

Reference list

While the sections may vary, the overall objective is always the same. A research proposal serves as a blueprint and guide for your research plan, helping you get organised and feel confident in the path forward you choose to take.

Table of contents

Research proposal purpose, research proposal examples, research design and methods, contribution to knowledge, research schedule, frequently asked questions.

Academics often have to write research proposals to get funding for their projects. As a student, you might have to write a research proposal as part of a grad school application , or prior to starting your thesis or dissertation .

In addition to helping you figure out what your research can look like, a proposal can also serve to demonstrate why your project is worth pursuing to a funder, educational institution, or supervisor.

Research proposal length

The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.

One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.

Download our research proposal template

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.

• Example research proposal #1: ‘A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management’
• Example research proposal #2: ‘ Medical Students as Mediators of Change in Tobacco Use’

Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:

• The proposed title of your project
• Your supervisor’s name
• Your institution and department

The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.

Your introduction should:

• Introduce your topic
• Give necessary background and context
• Outline your  problem statement  and research questions

To guide your introduction , include information about:

• Who could have an interest in the topic (e.g., scientists, policymakers)
• How much is already known about the topic
• What is missing from this current knowledge
• What new insights your research will contribute
• Why you believe this research is worth doing

As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review  shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.

In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:

• Comparing and contrasting the main theories, methods, and debates
• Examining the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches
• Explaining how will you build on, challenge, or synthesise prior scholarship

Following the literature review, restate your main  objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.

To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasise again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.

For example, your results might have implications for:

• Improving best practices
• Informing policymaking decisions
• Strengthening a theory or model
• Challenging popular or scientific beliefs
• Creating a basis for future research

Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .

Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.

Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.

Download our research schedule template

If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.

Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:

• Cost : exactly how much money do you need?
• Justification : why is this cost necessary to complete the research?
• Source : how did you calculate the amount?

To determine your budget, think about:

• Travel costs : do you need to go somewhere to collect your data? How will you get there, and how much time will you need? What will you do there (e.g., interviews, archival research)?
• Materials : do you need access to any tools or technologies?
• Help : do you need to hire any research assistants for the project? What will they do, and how much will you pay them?

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement.

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.

A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.

A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.

All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.

Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.

Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, June 13). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved 29 April 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/the-research-process/research-proposal-explained/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, what is a literature review | guide, template, & examples, how to write a results section | tips & examples.

What (Exactly) Is A Research Proposal?

A simple explainer with examples + free template.

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Reviewed By: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | June 2020 (Updated April 2023)

Whether you’re nearing the end of your degree and your dissertation is on the horizon, or you’re planning to apply for a PhD program, chances are you’ll need to craft a convincing research proposal . If you’re on this page, you’re probably unsure exactly what the research proposal is all about. Well, you’ve come to the right place.

Overview: Research Proposal Basics

• What a research proposal is
• What a research proposal needs to cover
• How to structure your research proposal
• Example /sample proposals
• Proposal writing FAQs
• Key takeaways & additional resources

What is a research proposal?

Simply put, a research proposal is a structured, formal document that explains what you plan to research (your research topic), why it’s worth researching (your justification), and how  you plan to investigate it (your methodology). 

The purpose of the research proposal (its job, so to speak) is to convince  your research supervisor, committee or university that your research is  suitable  (for the requirements of the degree program) and  manageable  (given the time and resource constraints you will face). 

The most important word here is “ convince ” – in other words, your research proposal needs to  sell  your research idea (to whoever is going to approve it). If it doesn’t convince them (of its suitability and manageability), you’ll need to revise and resubmit . This will cost you valuable time, which will either delay the start of your research or eat into its time allowance (which is bad news). 

What goes into a research proposal?

A good dissertation or thesis proposal needs to cover the “ what “, “ why ” and” how ” of the proposed study. Let’s look at each of these attributes in a little more detail:

Your proposal needs to clearly articulate your research topic . This needs to be specific and unambiguous . Your research topic should make it clear exactly what you plan to research and in what context. Here’s an example of a well-articulated research topic:

An investigation into the factors which impact female Generation Y consumer’s likelihood to promote a specific makeup brand to their peers: a British context

As you can see, this topic is extremely clear. From this one line we can see exactly:

• What’s being investigated – factors that make people promote or advocate for a brand of a specific makeup brand
• Who it involves – female Gen-Y consumers
• In what context – the United Kingdom

So, make sure that your research proposal provides a detailed explanation of your research topic . If possible, also briefly outline your research aims and objectives , and perhaps even your research questions (although in some cases you’ll only develop these at a later stage). Needless to say, don’t start writing your proposal until you have a clear topic in mind , or you’ll end up waffling and your research proposal will suffer as a result of this.

Need a helping hand?

As we touched on earlier, it’s not good enough to simply propose a research topic – you need to justify why your topic is original . In other words, what makes it  unique ? What gap in the current literature does it fill? If it’s simply a rehash of the existing research, it’s probably not going to get approval – it needs to be fresh.

But,  originality  alone is not enough. Once you’ve ticked that box, you also need to justify why your proposed topic is  important . In other words, what value will it add to the world if you achieve your research aims?

As an example, let’s look at the sample research topic we mentioned earlier (factors impacting brand advocacy). In this case, if the research could uncover relevant factors, these findings would be very useful to marketers in the cosmetics industry, and would, therefore, have commercial value . That is a clear justification for the research.

So, when you’re crafting your research proposal, remember that it’s not enough for a topic to simply be unique. It needs to be useful and value-creating – and you need to convey that value in your proposal. If you’re struggling to find a research topic that makes the cut, watch  our video covering how to find a research topic .

It’s all good and well to have a great topic that’s original and valuable, but you’re not going to convince anyone to approve it without discussing the practicalities – in other words:

• How will you actually undertake your research (i.e., your methodology)?
• Is your research methodology appropriate given your research aims?
• Is your approach manageable given your constraints (time, money, etc.)?

While it’s generally not expected that you’ll have a fully fleshed-out methodology at the proposal stage, you’ll likely still need to provide a high-level overview of your research methodology . Here are some important questions you’ll need to address in your research proposal:

• Will you take a qualitative , quantitative or mixed -method approach?
• What sampling strategy will you adopt?
• How will you collect your data (e.g., interviews, surveys, etc)?
• How will you analyse your data (e.g., descriptive and inferential statistics , content analysis, discourse analysis, etc, .)?
• What potential limitations will your methodology carry?

So, be sure to give some thought to the practicalities of your research and have at least a basic methodological plan before you start writing up your proposal. If this all sounds rather intimidating, the video below provides a good introduction to research methodology and the key choices you’ll need to make.

How To Structure A Research Proposal

Now that we’ve covered the key points that need to be addressed in a proposal, you may be wondering, “ But how is a research proposal structured? “.

While the exact structure and format required for a research proposal differs from university to university, there are four “essential ingredients” that commonly make up the structure of a research proposal:

• A rich introduction and background to the proposed research
• An initial literature review covering the existing research
• An overview of the proposed research methodology
• A discussion regarding the practicalities (project plans, timelines, etc.)

In the video below, we unpack each of these four sections, step by step.

Research Proposal Examples/Samples

In the video below, we provide a detailed walkthrough of two successful research proposals (Master’s and PhD-level), as well as our popular free proposal template.

Proposal Writing FAQs

How long should a research proposal be.

This varies tremendously, depending on the university, the field of study (e.g., social sciences vs natural sciences), and the level of the degree (e.g. undergraduate, Masters or PhD) – so it’s always best to check with your university what their specific requirements are before you start planning your proposal.

As a rough guide, a formal research proposal at Masters-level often ranges between 2000-3000 words, while a PhD-level proposal can be far more detailed, ranging from 5000-8000 words. In some cases, a rough outline of the topic is all that’s needed, while in other cases, universities expect a very detailed proposal that essentially forms the first three chapters of the dissertation or thesis.

The takeaway – be sure to check with your institution before you start writing.

How do I choose a topic for my research proposal?

Finding a good research topic is a process that involves multiple steps. We cover the topic ideation process in this video post.

How do I write a literature review for my proposal?

While you typically won’t need a comprehensive literature review at the proposal stage, you still need to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the key literature and are able to synthesise it. We explain the literature review process here.

How do I create a timeline and budget for my proposal?

We explain how to craft a project plan/timeline and budget in Research Proposal Bootcamp .

Which referencing format should I use in my research proposal?

The expectations and requirements regarding formatting and referencing vary from institution to institution. Therefore, you’ll need to check this information with your university.

What common proposal writing mistakes do I need to look out for?

We’ve create a video post about some of the most common mistakes students make when writing a proposal – you can access that here . If you’re short on time, here’s a quick summary:

• The research topic is too broad (or just poorly articulated).
• The research aims, objectives and questions don’t align.
• The research topic is not well justified.
• The study has a weak theoretical foundation.
• The research design is not well articulated well enough.
• Poor writing and sloppy presentation.
• Poor project planning and risk management.
• Not following the university’s specific criteria.

Key Takeaways & Additional Resources

As you write up your research proposal, remember the all-important core purpose:  to convince . Your research proposal needs to sell your study in terms of suitability and viability. So, focus on crafting a convincing narrative to ensure a strong proposal.

At the same time, pay close attention to your university’s requirements. While we’ve covered the essentials here, every institution has its own set of expectations and it’s essential that you follow these to maximise your chances of approval.

By the way, we’ve got plenty more resources to help you fast-track your research proposal. Here are some of our most popular resources to get you started:

• Proposal Writing 101 : A Introductory Webinar
• Research Proposal Bootcamp : The Ultimate Online Course
• Template : A basic template to help you craft your proposal

If you’re looking for 1-on-1 support with your research proposal, be sure to check out our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through the proposal development process (and the entire research journey), step by step.

Psst… there’s more!

This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Research Proposal Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .

You Might Also Like:

51 Comments

I truly enjoyed this video, as it was eye-opening to what I have to do in the preparation of preparing a Research proposal.

I would be interested in getting some coaching.

I real appreciate on your elaboration on how to develop research proposal,the video explains each steps clearly.

Thank you for the video. It really assisted me and my niece. I am a PhD candidate and she is an undergraduate student. It is at times, very difficult to guide a family member but with this video, my job is done.

In view of the above, I welcome more coaching.

Wonderful guidelines, thanks

This is very helpful. Would love to continue even as I prepare for starting my masters next year.

Thanks for the work done, the text was helpful to me

Bundle of thanks to you for the research proposal guide it was really good and useful if it is possible please send me the sample of research proposal

You’re most welcome. We don’t have any research proposals that we can share (the students own the intellectual property), but you might find our research proposal template useful: https://gradcoach.com/research-proposal-template/

Cheruiyot Moses Kipyegon

Thanks alot. It was an eye opener that came timely enough before my imminent proposal defense. Thanks, again

thank you very much your lesson is very interested may God be with you

I am an undergraduate student (First Degree) preparing to write my project,this video and explanation had shed more light to me thanks for your efforts keep it up.

Very useful. I am grateful.

this is a very a good guidance on research proposal, for sure i have learnt something

Wonderful guidelines for writing a research proposal, I am a student of m.phil( education), this guideline is suitable for me. Thanks

You’re welcome 🙂

Thank you, this was so helpful.

A really great and insightful video. It opened my eyes as to how to write a research paper. I would like to receive more guidance for writing my research paper from your esteemed faculty.

Thank you, great insights

Thank you, great insights, thank you so much, feeling edified

Wow thank you, great insights, thanks a lot

Thank you. This is a great insight. I am a student preparing for a PhD program. I am requested to write my Research Proposal as part of what I am required to submit before my unconditional admission. I am grateful having listened to this video which will go a long way in helping me to actually choose a topic of interest and not just any topic as well as to narrow down the topic and be specific about it. I indeed need more of this especially as am trying to choose a topic suitable for a DBA am about embarking on. Thank you once more. The video is indeed helpful.

Have learnt a lot just at the right time. Thank you so much.

thank you very much ,because have learn a lot things concerning research proposal and be blessed u for your time that you providing to help us

Hi. For my MSc medical education research, please evaluate this topic for me: Training Needs Assessment of Faculty in Medical Training Institutions in Kericho and Bomet Counties

I have really learnt a lot based on research proposal and it’s formulation

Thank you. I learn much from the proposal since it is applied

Your effort is much appreciated – you have good articulation.

You have good articulation.

I do applaud your simplified method of explaining the subject matter, which indeed has broaden my understanding of the subject matter. Definitely this would enable me writing a sellable research proposal.

This really helping

Great! I liked your tutoring on how to find a research topic and how to write a research proposal. Precise and concise. Thank you very much. Will certainly share this with my students. Research made simple indeed.

Thank you very much. I an now assist my students effectively.

Thank you very much. I can now assist my students effectively.

I need any research proposal

Thank you for these videos. I will need chapter by chapter assistance in writing my MSc dissertation

Very helpfull

the videos are very good and straight forward

thanks so much for this wonderful presentations, i really enjoyed it to the fullest wish to learn more from you

Thank you very much. I learned a lot from your lecture.

I really enjoy the in-depth knowledge on research proposal you have given. me. You have indeed broaden my understanding and skills. Thank you

interesting session this has equipped me with knowledge as i head for exams in an hour’s time, am sure i get A++

This article was most informative and easy to understand. I now have a good idea of how to write my research proposal.

Thank you very much.

Wow, this literature is very resourceful and interesting to read. I enjoyed it and I intend reading it every now then.

Thank you for the clarity

Thank you. Very helpful.

Thank you very much for this essential piece. I need 1o1 coaching, unfortunately, your service is not available in my country. Anyways, a very important eye-opener. I really enjoyed it. A thumb up to Gradcoach

What is JAM? Please explain.

Thank you so much for these videos. They are extremely helpful! God bless!

very very wonderful…

thank you for the video but i need a written example

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

How to Write a Psychology Research Proposal

Writing a brief research proposal cultivates all kinds of intellectual skills..

Posted May 3, 2018 | Reviewed by Matt Huston

NOTE: This post was co-authored with the SUNY New Paltz students in PSY 307 (1) of Spring 2018 (in particular, Zachary Ertrachter, Mariah Griffin, and Gianna Petrera).

A solid psychology education should lead to all kinds of outcomes related to analytical skills, statistical reasoning, and research design. One of the core skills that I try to cultivate in my students is the ability to write a clear and concise research proposal. Being able to write a solid research proposal demonstrates the following qualities:

* An understanding of some theoretical concepts in the behavioral sciences

* The ability to organize one's ideas in a coherent and efficient way

* The ability to get to the foundation of a set of research ideas

* The ability to write clearly and concisely in a scientific manner

* The ability to describe a hypothesis, proposed methodology, and proposed set of statistical analyses

* The ability to efficiently contextualize one's ideas in the existing scientific literature in some area

* The ability to think about how statistics can be used to examine some research-based predictions

* and probably more

Toward this end, I tend to give the following assignment to students in my undergraduate class in evolutionary psychology :

"Evolutionary psychology is a research-based enterprise. And learning about evolutionary psychology tends to lead people to develop hypotheses about human nature. For this assignment, you are to write a brief paper that does the following:

• Articulates a hypothesis based on evolutionary reasoning
• Describes methods that would test this hypothesis
• Includes predicted outcomes and implications

Importantly, this paper is to be no more than two pages—printed on two sides of a single page. And it should be double-spaced.

This kind of assignment, forcing you to get your ideas reduced in a small space matches the kinds of assignments that professionals have all the time—this assignment will help prepare you for this kind of assignment in your future."

As an end-of-the-semester activity, to demonstrate the process of writing a research proposal, we actually worked together today (5/3/2018) as a class to develop and to fully create a research proposal. The document below is the result of this work. Nice job, evolutionary psychology students!

Research Proposal: A Proposed Study on the Mental Health Effects of Outdoor Experiences

Written by the SUNY New Paltz Spring 2018 Evolutionary Psychology Class

The evolutionary psychological perspective on human behavior suggests that instances of evolutionary mismatch may lead to adverse psychological functioning (e.g., Geher, 2014). Mismatch can exist in multiple domains, including nutritional offerings, exercise, community size, technology, transportation, and the nature of one’s physical environment—among many others.

One important way that modern environments are mismatched to ancestral environments pertains to the proportion of time that people spend in the out of doors. In fact, many evolutionists have made the case that humans have a natural love of the living world (see Wilson, 1984). Based on this reasoning, it may be the case that increased time spent in the outdoors leads to positive mental health outcomes. On the other hand, we might predict that increased time spent in human-made, non-natural environments might have adverse mental health outcomes.

Several mental health outcomes have been documented as important in all kinds of human psychological functioning. In particular, this research will focus on depressive tendencies, tendencies toward anxiety , and general psychological well-being. The basic prediction is that increased out-of-door experiences will correspond to less depression and anxiety and higher scores on a measure of well-being.

This study will utilize a randomized between-groups design using 200 relatively fit American adults ranging in age from 18-34 selected from Southern California. Using a random-assignment process, participants will be assigned to either (a) the outdoor condition or (b) the indoor condition.

Participants in the two experimental conditions will all be included in a climbing camp for two weeks. The outdoor participants will be at an all-outside version of the camp in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of Southern California in September. The indoor participants will be at an all-indoor version of the camp at an indoor climbing gym for the same two weeks. Importantly, these climbing experiences will be overseen by the same Climbing Camp with the same activities and personnel.

This methodology would allow for the isolation of the “out of doors” variable and will have participants across groups have the same experiences otherwise. Given the random assignment to experimental conditions, this methodology would allow for an examination of the specific effects of the outdoor experience.

To measure anxiety, Liebowitz’s (1987) measure of social anxiety will be used. To measure depressive tendencies, Kessler et al.’s (2003) measure will be used. We will create a 5-item Likert scale of subjective well-being that participants will also complete.

Anticipated Results

Across the three outcome measures, including social anxiety, depressive tendencies, and subjective well-being, it is predicted that the outdoor group will score as less anxious, less depressed, and as higher in subjective well-being. These results will be examined using three between-groups t-tests.

Potential Implications

Evolutionists are interested in the mismatches between modern conditions and ancestral conditions. Simply being in the out-of-doors or not is a classic mismatch that surrounds us all the time, often unbeknownst to ourselves. The experimental design here would allow us to zero in on the effects of the outdoor experience as it relates to mental health outcomes, controlling for individual differences between groups.

If the predicted pattern of results is obtained, then we would have strong evidence suggesting that people function best when they are provided with outdoor experiences. Such a pattern would support an evolutionary-mismatch approach to understanding the interface of people with their physical environments.

Here is a PDF link to the two-page paper. Enjoy!

Geher, G. (2014). Evolutionary Psychology 101. New York: Springer.

Kessler, R .C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L.J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D.K., Normand, S.L....Zaslavsky,A.M. (2002) Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959-956.

Liebowitz, M. R . (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141-173.

Wilson, Edward O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

Glenn Geher, Ph.D. , is professor of psychology at the State University of New York at New Paltz. He is founding director of the campus’ Evolutionary Studies (EvoS) program.

• Find Counselling
• Find Online Therapy
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Understanding what emotional intelligence looks like and the steps needed to improve it could light a path to a more emotionally adept world.

• Emotional Intelligence
• Gaslighting
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

Study at Cambridge

About the university, research at cambridge.

• Undergraduate courses
• Events and open days
• Fees and finance
• Postgraduate courses
• How to apply
• Postgraduate events
• Fees and funding
• International students
• Continuing education
• Executive and professional education
• Courses in education
• How the University and Colleges work
• Term dates and calendars
• Visiting the University
• Annual reports
• Equality and diversity
• A global university
• Public engagement
• Give to Cambridge
• For Cambridge students
• For our researchers
• Business and enterprise
• Colleges & departments
• Email & phone search
• Museums & collections

Prospective Postgraduates

Department of Psychology

• About Us overview
• Wellbeing, Equality and Diversity overview
• Athena SWAN overview
• Career Development
• Celebrating Women in the Department overview
• Professor of Comparative Cognition, Nicola Clayton FRS FSB FAPS C Psychol
• Professor of Cognitive Developmental Neuroscience, Usha Goswami FBA
• Professor of Psychology, Melissa Hines
• Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, Lorraine K. Tyler
• Professor of Experimental Psychology, Zoe Kourtzi
• Professor of Developmental Psychology, Claire Hughes
• Professor of Family Research and Director of the Centre for Family Research, Susan Golombok
• Dignity At Work
• Race Equality
• Neurodivergent Socialities Discussion Group
• Work-Life Balance
• Visitors to the Department overview
• Guidance for Visitors and their Supervisors
• Visitor Application Form
• People overview
• Head of Department
• Professional Services Team
• Academic Staff
• Research Professors
• Researchers and Visitors
• Artist in Residence
• Postgraduate Students
• Psychology Analytical Laboratory Staff
• Study overview
• Psychology A-Z
• Prospective Undergraduates overview
• Applying to Cambridge
• Letter from an undergraduate
• PBS Tripos FAQ
• PBS alumni profiles
• Current Undergraduates overview
• Natural Sciences Tripos Part IB Experimental Psychology
• Natural Sciences Tripos Part II Courses overview
• Data Retention Policy - University Examinations
• Psychological and Behavioural Sciences Tripos
• Letter from an Undergraduate
• Prospective Postgraduates overview
• Introduction to Graduate Courses
• PhD in Psychology (Course Code BLPC22) overview
• Available projects
• Potential PhD Psychology supervisor
• MPhil in Psychology (Course Code BLPCM1)
• Application procedure
• Postgraduate Funding
• Frequently asked questions
• Current Postgraduates overview
• Research overview
• Research Centres & Groups overview
• Adaptive Brain Lab
• ADPRG overview
• Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
• The New Parents Study overview
• New Parents Study Recruitment Partners
• Hayden Henderson
• Auditory Perception Group - Hearing overview
• Auditory demonstrations and useful software
• Publications of Brian C. J. Moore: Books
• BCJM papers in refereed journals
• BCJM Book chapters
• CAM2 (CAMEQ2-HF) Hearing AID fitting software
• THE PATIENT-CENTRED TINNITUS MANAGEMENT TOOL
• CDs for Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea – TEN(HL) and TEN(ER3)
• CD of audio demonstrations
• Measuring psychophysical tuning curves
• Two methods for determining TFS sensitivity
• Determining binaural TFS sensitivity: The TFS-AF test
• Software for running psychoacoustic experiments
• Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute - BCNI overview
• About us - BCNI
• About us BCNI
• Research BCNI overview
• BCNI Publications 2003 onwards.doc
• Past events - BCNI
• BCNI Find us
• Contact BCNI
• Online Resources BCNI overview
• Get involved BCNI
• Believing Brain Project overview
• Brain, Language and Bilingualism overview
• Opportunities and Contact - Brain, Language and Bilingualism
• People - Brain, Language and Bilingualism
• Publications - Brain, Language and Bilingualism
• Research at Brain, Language and Bilingualism
• Cambridge Babylab overview
• Meet the Members - BabyLab
• Research Methods - Babylab
• Get Involved!
• Where to Find Us - Babylab
• FAQ's - Babylab
• BabyLab News overview
• BabyPaL Principal Investigator, Dr Rebecca Lawson is a selected performer for the Wellcome Leap, $45M 1kD program!
• Check out the new paper on bilingualism in infants by our own Dr Hana D'Souza!
• Dianna publishes a new paper in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews: Infant social interactions and brain development: A systematic review!
• Dr Ellie Smith publishes new paper in Infant Behavior and Development!
• Dr Hana D'Souza & the Embodied Lab are moving to Cardiff University!
• Dr Sarah Lloyd-Fox writes about "Generation COVID: pregnancy, birth and postnatal life in the pandemic".
• Dr Sinead Rocha-Thomas presented some BabyRhythm data at a Conference!
• Dr. Borja Blanco publishes paper on bilingual adaptations in resting state functional connectivity!
• Ellie & Addie finish data collection for the BabyPaL-GiggleDOT Collaboration!
• Ellie & Addie present at the Society of fNIRS Virtual Conference 2021!
• The BabyPaL monkey-LEAP Project has begun!
• The CNE Babylab's paper was chosen as Editor's Choice in Brain & Language!
• The PIPKIN Project: at home!!
• COVID-19 Changes: How are we making the Babylab safe for our Researchers & your Family to visit?
• Meet Labs - BabyLab
• ANIMATE - Babylab
• Brain Imaging for Global HealTh (BRIGHT)
• Baby Prediction and Learning Lab
• CNE Babylab
• Embodied Attention & Learning - BabyLab overview
• Selected publications
• Summaries of our research
• Current Projects overview
• How does infant social behaviour develop neurologically over the first year of life: using a wearable, baby-friendly brain imaging system? - BabyLab
• Baby Prediction and Learning Lab - Babylab
• How do infants' learn about their environment?
• How has COVID-19 effected the experience of pregnancy for young families?
• Does your Little Scientist like to move? - BabyLab
• Cambridge Body, Mind and Behaviour Laboratory
• Cambridge Centre for the Integration of Science, Technology and Culture
• Cambridge Laboratory for Research into Autism
• Cambridge Personality and Social Dynamics Research Group
• Cambridge Political Psychology Lab overview
• Join the Lab
• Lab Resources
• Publications
• Cambridge Social Decision-Making Lab
• Cambridge University Behavioural Insights Team - CUBIT
• Centre for Family Research
• Centre for Neuroscience in Education
• Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain
• Cognition and Motivated Behaviour Lab
• Comparative Cognition Lab. overview
• Research Output
• Consciousness and Cognition Lab
• Higher Values: Aesthetic Experiences, Transcendence, and Prosociality overview
• Project Publications - Higher Values
• Project Team - Higher Values
• IC Thinking Research Group
• Memory Laboratory
• Research Funding
• Study Participation
• Applying for Research Fellowships
• COVID-19 Research
• Work with us overview
• Current vacancies
• Guidance for Applications
• New Starters
• Current Staff
• Professional Development
• Retirement & Pensions
• Visas & Immigration
• Services overview
• The Archive
• Psychology Analytical Laboratory
• Staff Intranet (Raven Login)
• Biotronix Electronics Workshop
• Intranet overview
• DA Monday updates overview
• Committee meetings
• Ethics Committee
• Undergraduate Teaching
• Postgraduate Supervisors

Research proposal

Your research proposal is your opportunity to show your prospective supervisor that you have interesting ideas, and that you have some idea of how to test them.

It should consist of about two sides of A4, including references and it should include:

• clear empirical objective
• some idea of the research methods you would use
• some theoretical background

Firstly you need to lay out the theoretical background to your research question, and then provide a rationale for testing a hypothesis or two. You should briefly outline your methods, your sample, and the various techniques you hope to use. Finally give a brief statement of how the data will be analysed, and outline what various findings might lead to.

Current Postgraduates​ ​​​​​ ​

Introduction, open day 2024, application procedure​, mphil in psychology, phd in psychology, application deadline - to start october 2024.

Applications for October 2024 will open in September 2023.

The Department will continue to accept applications up until Wednesday 24 April 2024 for October 2024 start date. 

Any application submitted after 5 December 2023 will not be considered for the funding round.

Research Councils​

Downing Street, Cambridge

webmaster[at]psychol.cam.ac.uk

• Downing Site
• New Museums Site

Data Protection

Privacy policy.

Information on personal information we gather when you visit the website and how that information is used.

© 2024 University of Cambridge

• Contact the University
• Accessibility
• Freedom of information
• Privacy policy and cookies
• Statement on Modern Slavery
• Terms and conditions
• University A-Z
• Undergraduate
• Postgraduate
• Research news
• About research at Cambridge
• Spotlight on...

Psychology Research Proposal

Proposals, whatever they may be, may it be a wedding proposal , business proposal , or a research proposal , all have a similar goal. It is to hear the word “yes” from the mouths of the recipient. Despite that, these proposals give different feelings to the proposer. If you are here to get tips on coming up with a research proposal, you get what I mean. Don’t worry, this article will help you get ideas on how to devise your psychology research proposal.

6+ Psychology Research Proposal Examples

1. cognitive psychology research proposal.

2.  Psychology Counselling Research Proposal

3. Undergraduate Psychology Research Proposal

Size: 94 KB

4. PhD Psychology Research Proposal

Size: 174 KB

5. Forensic Psychology Research Proposal

Size: 353 KB

6. Social Psychology Research Proposal

Size: 683 KB

7. Psychology Research Grant Proposal

Size: 599 KB

What Is a Psychology Research Proposal?

A psychology research proposal is an academic document that a person submits to propose a research project, specifically in the field of clinical psychology. The purpose of research proposals is to outline the research questions and summarize your selected research topic. Another necessary reason for creating this proposal is to present ways that you think would be best in conducting the study and justifying it.

How to Compose a Reliable Psychology Research Proposal

There’s a time psychology students dread. It’s the moment that signifies the beginning of hell week or maybe hell month. It is when the professors ask their students to submit their research proposals.  Coming up with a psychology research proposal might cost you a lot of sleepless nights. To get back the sleep that you deserve, instead of pulling your hair out, read this article and follow the steps mentioned below. 

1. Formulate a Working Title

The title of your educational research should reflect what your study will discuss. Omit unnecessary words. Only keep those words that contribute to the meaning and the impact of your title. Make your title engaging to attract the attention of the readers. It is necessary to take a moment to think about a research title that is both powerful and meaningful.

2. Construct Your Abstract

Abstracts should be short and concise. That said, it should be at least a hundred words and three hundred words at most. Describe your research in your proposal but don’t include too many details yet. A good abstract would provide an introduction to the key objectives and the hypothesis of your proposed research.

3. Include Necessary Components

There are necessary components that make an abstract complete. After your title and abstract statement, you should also include the research scope and your methodology. This segment will explain who your respondents are and how you will deal with possible problems you will encounter while conducting your study. Also, you should include the resources that you will use in the process.

4. Devise Your Appendices

Appendices have sections A to E. Appendix A is where you should cite a list of your sources. In the second section, Appendix B is where you should present your project timeline . Your list of skills and achievements relevant to the research belongs in Appendix C. You should detail your budget plan in Appendix D and print your approval letter in the last appendix.

What are interesting psychology research topics?

You can choose from plenty of compelling topics. Discrimination, social cognition, propaganda, gender roles, and bullying are some examples of it. Whatever topic you choose, the quality of your paper depends on how well you carry out your research. Even the most boring topics can be made interesting by a good researcher.

What are the differences between quantitative and qualitative approaches?

These approaches are two very different things. Qualitative research focuses more on analyzing and interpreting ideas, theories, and data. The methods employed in this approach are discourse analysis, content analysis, and thematic analysis. In contrast, quantitative research deals more with statistics and numbers and often involves a research survey , experiment, and testing hypotheses.

What are the qualitative approaches?

You can apply different approaches in conducting qualitative research. The most common ones are narrative research, action research , ethnography, grounded theory, and phenomenological research. Although all of these falls under the qualitative approach, they incorporate different data collection. Researchers implementing these approaches have varying aims. They also have different perspectives in the direction they should take in conducting their thesis.

The study of psychology focuses on people’s minds and cognitive behavior and how they function in different social settings and environments. That said, there are still a lot of mysteries about how people process their thoughts. If your goal is to uncover one of them, take your first step by composing a foolproof psychology research proposal and get it approved.

Proposal Maker

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

Generate a proposal for a new school recycling program

Compose a proposal for a school field trip to a science museum.

• AI Content Shield
• AI KW Research
• AI Assistant
• SEO Optimizer
• AI KW Clustering
• Customer reviews
• The NLO Revolution
• Press Center
• Help Center
• Content Resources
• Facebook Group

Key Elements of Psychology Research Proposals + Sample Templates

Table of Contents

Need help writing a research proposal for your psychology study? Then you’ve come to the right place! In this article, we’ll guide you through the key elements you should include for a winning proposal. We’ll also share a  research proposal sample psychology that you can refer to! With a well-written research proposal, you’ll be able to showcase the significance of your study. Plus, it can impress potential reviewers and secure the necessary funding for your project.

What is a Psychology Research Proposal?

A psychology research proposal outlines a proposed study consisting of the objectives, hypotheses, methods, and expected outcomes . This document serves as the blueprint for conducting a successful experiment or data collection effort in the field of psychology. Research proposals are often required by granting agencies or academic institutions. Taking the time to create an effective proposal is essential for ensuring the success of any research project.

Key Elements of Psychology Research Proposals

The section you should include in a research proposal depend on the requirements set by your professor or grant agency. But in general, research proposals will need to have the following key elements:

Research Topic

This is the main focus of the research proposal. It should be explained clearly and concisely. This section aims to:

• Identify the specific area of psychology that will be explored.
• Provide a brief overview of existing knowledge on the subject.
• Outline the objectives and goals of the proposed study.

Research Questions

A list of research questions should be included in the proposal to help guide the study’s investigation. These can range from broad inquiries into a given topic to more specific queries regarding certain aspects or areas related to the topic.

Literature Review

An effective literature review serves two essential purposes:

• It provides an overview of the current understanding of the topic.
• Demonstrates that the researcher has conducted adequate background research to develop an informed hypothesis.

Hypothesis/Research Objectives

The hypothesis forms the basis of the research project and outlines what the researcher expects to find. It should also include any specific objectives associated with testing the hypothesis.

Methodology

This sections focuses on the methods used to conduct the study. It provides information on the study’s sample size, participant demographics, research environment, data collection techniques, and so on.

Data Analysis Plan

Once data has been collected, it must be analyzed to draw meaningful conclusions. Outlining a data analysis plan helps ensure that all relevant aspects are considered during analysis.

Expected Results

You won’t be able to predict precisely how an experiment will play out. But you can still give some insight into expected outcomes based on available evidence. This will allow readers to evaluate the validity and practicality of the proposed research project.

Significance and Implications

Explaining the project’s significance gives readers a better idea of why it was conducted in the first place. Detail the potential implications of the findings. This will help others consider the study’s broader application beyond simply answering the research question.

Research Proposal Sample Psychology Template

Introduction.

A. Background of the study : Provide an overview of the studied topic. This includes pertinent facts and figures demonstrating the need for further research. Be sure to include any relevant literature reviews and a concise explanation of the focus of your proposal. B. Rationale/Rationale for Study : Explain why this study should be conducted, including its value to the scientific community. Include evidence from previous studies or theories that may suggest your proposed project’s potential outcomes. C. Hypothesis/Objectives : State your hypothesis or research objectives clearly and succinctly. Describe how you plan to conduct the study and provide detailed information on collecting and analyzing data.

A. Participants : Detail the criteria used to identify and select participants for the study. Specify how many participants are needed and describe their demographic profiles (e.g., age range, gender, education level, etc.). B. Instruments : Identify the instruments (e.g., questionnaires, interviews, surveys) used to collect data and discuss how they were developed and validated. Cite any sources consulted when creating these instruments. C. Procedures : Outline all procedures to be followed during the study, including recruitment methods, data collection techniques, and analysis processes.

D. Data Analysis

Describe the statistical tests to analyze data and explain how results will be interpreted. Make sure to specify whether any ethical issues have been considered when conducting the study and discuss any implications for future research projects.

A. Summarize your study’s purpose, methodology, and findings and make recommendations for future action based on these results. B. Conclude by comprehensively reviewing what has been learned through your work. You can also thank anyone who assisted or supported you throughout the process.

A. Background : Describe the need for research in psychology and how it relates to your study. Give a brief overview of past studies or experiments conducted on the same topic and explain why further exploration is necessary. B. Purpose & Significance : Explain why you are undertaking this research project and what impact it could have on society. Elucidate what questions will be answered by carrying out the proposed study and which theories may be examined as part of the process. C. Objectives : Outline the specific objectives of the research, such as exploring certain phenomena or measuring particular variables. Specify any hypotheses that may be tested during the investigation. D. Study Design & Methodology : Summarize the methods chosen to achieve the project’s aims and justify their selection. Describe key components of the methodology used, including participant selection criteria, data collection techniques, and analysis plans.

A. Overview : Include relevant literature on your research question and discuss its implications. B. Strengths & Limitations : Analyze the strengths and limitations of existing work in the field. You can also identify gaps that need to be filled with further research. C. Synthesis & Recommendations : Present a literature review synthesis and make recommendations for future studies based on your findings.

Results & Analysis

A. Data Collection : Describe how data was collected from participants, such as surveys or interviews, along with details about sample size and demographics. B. Analysis Techniques : Clarify which statistical tools were used for analyzing results, such as linear regression or ANOVA tests. Explain how data was processed before being presented in charts or tables. C. Findings & Implications : Present the key findings from the analysis, commenting on both positive and negative outcomes where applicable. Discuss potential implications for psychological theory, practice, or policy in light of these results.

Discussion & Conclusions

Summarize the main points discussed throughout the paper and reiterate the purpose of the study and its results/implications.

Final Words

 So there you have it: the key elements of a psychology research proposal and some sample templates to get you started. Writing a winning proposal is not easy. But by taking a cue from this  research proposal sample psychology , you can present your project more effectively.

Abir Ghenaiet

Abir is a data analyst and researcher. Among her interests are artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing. As a humanitarian and educator, she actively supports women in tech and promotes diversity.

Explore All Proposal Generator Articles

Creative terms and conditions agreement in business proposal.

In business, proposals are essential for securing contracts and agreements with clients. However, a proposal is only complete with terms…

• Proposal Generator

Free guide to a statement of proposal sample

A statement of proposal is a document that outlines a proposed project or initiative in detail. It is typically used…

Free Proposal Letter for Training and Development for a Head Start

Training and development are essential to improve employees’ skills, knowledge, and productivity. A well-crafted training proposal can help an organization…

Detailed Guide to Free HR Consulting Proposal

HR consulting is an essential service for businesses of all sizes. HR consultants provide expert guidance to organizations on various…

Key Guide to Better Remote Work Proposal

The rise of remote work has been a significant trend in the business world over the last few years. With…

Guide to Free E-Commerce Proposal Template

E-commerce has become one of the most popular ways of doing business recently. With the increasing number of people using…

UCL Doctorate In Clinical Psychology

Guidelines for the Research Proposal

The purpose of the research proposal is to help you organise your ideas about your major research project, and to enable you to get feedback on what you are planning to do. It is worth putting in careful thought at this stage: it will mean that the project is more likely to run smoothly in the long run, and much of what you write in it can eventually be recycled into the final thesis write-up. The proposal is also needed for NHS ethics applications.

The proposal is a course requirement, but is not an assessed piece of work. It is due early in Term 1 of Year 2 (the date will be announced). Please submit an electronic copy to the Research Administrator (following the procedure detailed on the Project Support Moodle site).

There is no formal word limit (but conciseness is essential): we suggest that you aim for around 2500 words, plus references and any necessary appendices. Format it double-spaced, and include page numbers so that reviewers can easily refer back to specific points. Since it is not assessed work, it does not need your code number; please put your name on it.

Some sample proposals from previous years are available on the 'Proposal' (Topic 4) section of the Research Project Support Moodle. 

The structure and content of the proposal is similar to that of the introduction and method sections of a journal article:

A title page with (1) the provisional title of the project (this can be modified later on), (2) your name, (3) your internal and external supervisors, (4) the setting where the study is likely to take place and (5) the date. If you are doing a joint project with other trainees, this should be stated here and the other trainees should be named. (Including all of this information on the title page is very helpful for the course's administrative purposes.)

The introduction (3 or 4 pages) states what the research topic is and why it is important. It succinctly reviews previous research in the area and relevant psychological theory, and summarises the rationale for the intended study. The introduction should end with one or more clearly stated research questions or hypotheses.

The method section (3 or 4 pages) describes in detail the proposed research methods: the setting, participants, sample size, research design, measures, ethical considerations, and data analysis procedures. For quantitative research, the sample size needs to be determined by a power calculation, which should be reported here (a separate document on power calculations is on the Project Support Moodle site). Measures that are not well known should be included as an appendix. For qualitative research, describe your interview schedule (append a draft) and your proposed method of analysis, including the types of "credibility checks" that you propose to use.

The service user involvement section (one or two or paragraphs) describes how the needs and views of service users or other relevant members of the public have shaped or will shape your project. This could include examples of service users influencing: (1) the choice of topic to be researched; (2) decisions about methodology; (3) the design of materials such as invitation letters and participant information sheets; (4) the design of a qualitative interview schedule, and (5) the ethics of the research. Please outline any plans for service user involvement later in the project.  Remember, whilst there are formal ways of eliciting service user views, such as the use of focus groups and services such as FAST-R ( Feasibility And Support to Timely recruitment for Research ), informal sources of information are also valuable, and can be described here. This might include conversations with individual service users, experiences from clinical work, or interactions that take place on-line.

Whilst we strongly encourage trainees to use service user input when developing their research, this is not obligatory. Sometimes consultation with service users and other members of the public is not necessary, for example in some studies of healthy volunteers. If there has been no input from service users or members of the public, please use this section to state this, and briefly (a couple of sentences) explain why. 

The feasibility section has a brief appraisal of how realistic your project is in practical terms, particularly with regard to recruiting participants. Many trainees (and their supervisors!) tend to be over-optimistic at this stage of the project, and it is a good idea to address potential recruitment problems at the outset. You should also include a fallback plan in case things go pear-shaped (which, sadly, in clinical research they often do). It would be helpful if you provided an estimate of what the smallest viable sample size would be, so that we (and you) have an idea of what a worst-case scenario might look like. A general timetable for the project is given in the guidelines for the major research project . If you anticipate any major departures from this, give details and a rationale.

The joint working section is, of course, only required if you are proposing a joint project. In this section provide a brief outline of what your anticipated contribution to the overall study will be, and what will be done by others. There should be a statement of how your research question(s) and analyses will be distinct from those of other students involved in the project. It will be helpful to consult the course guidelines on joint projects when planning any joint study. 

The institutional arrangements , e.g., the setting, and who has agreed to be your internal and external supervisors.

The costings section sets out any substantial expenses that the project may entail. Note that the Department has limited funds and does not normally fund projects costing more than £250 over two years (see the course document on research funding ). If your project is likely to cost more than this,  the course may possibly  be able to provide some additional funding up to £400, although this cannot be guaranteed. It is your responsibility to secure additional funding for expenses beyond that allocated by the course.

The reference list gives all cited works. (It is important to check that this is complete, because reviewers may consult some of your references to understand the background to your study.)

Appendices include measures not in common use, draft qualitative interview schedules, etc.

Supervisors' input

Research proposals usually need to go through several drafts. Show your internal and external supervisors a draft early enough so that you can incorporate their comments into a revised draft before submission.

Review of the proposal

The proposal will be read by one of the academic staff, and will be discussed at a proposals review meeting in October. The resultant written feedback that you receive (towards the end of October) will give you a clear indication of the general feasibility of your project, and suggest any changes that will need to be made before it goes ahead. 

This process counts as the "peer review" that is required for all NHS ethics applications. Therefore, once your proposal has passed the review stage, those of you applying for NHS ethics should contact Will Mandy to ask for a letter confirming that your project has been successfully peer reviewed.  

Printable version of this page

Pilot Study in Research: Definition & Examples

Julia Simkus

Editor at Simply Psychology

BA (Hons) Psychology, Princeton University

Julia Simkus is a graduate of Princeton University with a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology. She is currently studying for a Master's Degree in Counseling for Mental Health and Wellness in September 2023. Julia's research has been published in peer reviewed journals.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Saul Mcleod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

A pilot study, also known as a feasibility study, is a small-scale preliminary study conducted before the main research to check the feasibility or improve the research design.

Pilot studies can be very important before conducting a full-scale research project, helping design the research methods and protocol.

How Does it Work?

Pilot studies are a fundamental stage of the research process. They can help identify design issues and evaluate a study’s feasibility, practicality, resources, time, and cost before the main research is conducted.

It involves selecting a few people and trying out the study on them. It is possible to save time and, in some cases, money by identifying any flaws in the procedures designed by the researcher.

A pilot study can help the researcher spot any ambiguities (i.e., unusual things), confusion in the information given to participants, or problems with the task devised.

Sometimes the task is too hard, and the researcher may get a floor effect because none of the participants can score at all or can complete the task – all performances are low.

The opposite effect is a ceiling effect, when the task is so easy that all achieve virtually full marks or top performances and are “hitting the ceiling.”

This enables researchers to predict an appropriate sample size, budget accordingly, and improve the study design before performing a full-scale project.

Pilot studies also provide researchers with preliminary data to gain insight into the potential results of their proposed experiment.

However, pilot studies should not be used to test hypotheses since the appropriate power and sample size are not calculated. Rather, pilot studies should be used to assess the feasibility of participant recruitment or study design.

By conducting a pilot study, researchers will be better prepared to face the challenges that might arise in the larger study. They will be more confident with the instruments they will use for data collection.

Multiple pilot studies may be needed in some studies, and qualitative and/or quantitative methods may be used.

To avoid bias, pilot studies are usually carried out on individuals who are as similar as possible to the target population but not on those who will be a part of the final sample.

Feedback from participants in the pilot study can be used to improve the experience for participants in the main study. This might include reducing the burden on participants, improving instructions, or identifying potential ethical issues.

Experiment Pilot Study

In a pilot study with an experimental design , you would want to ensure that your measures of these variables are reliable and valid.

You would also want to check that you can effectively manipulate your independent variables and that you can control for potential confounding variables.

A pilot study allows the research team to gain experience and training, which can be particularly beneficial if new experimental techniques or procedures are used.

Questionnaire Pilot Study

It is important to conduct a questionnaire pilot study for the following reasons:

• Check that respondents understand the terminology used in the questionnaire.
• Check that emotive questions are not used, as they make people defensive and could invalidate their answers.
• Check that leading questions have not been used as they could bias the respondent’s answer.
• Ensure that the questionnaire can be completed in a reasonable amount of time. If it’s too long, respondents may lose interest or not have enough time to complete it, which could affect the response rate and the data quality.

By identifying and addressing issues in the pilot study, researchers can reduce errors and risks in the main study. This increases the reliability and validity of the main study’s results.

Assessing the practicality and feasibility of the main study

Testing the efficacy of research instruments

Identifying and addressing any weaknesses or logistical problems

Collecting preliminary data

Estimating the time and costs required for the project

Determining what resources are needed for the study

Identifying the necessity to modify procedures that do not elicit useful data

Adding credibility and dependability to the study

Pretesting the interview format

Enabling researchers to develop consistent practices and familiarize themselves with the procedures in the protocol

Addressing safety issues and management problems

Limitations

Require extra costs, time, and resources.

Do not guarantee the success of the main study.

Contamination (ie: if data from the pilot study or pilot participants are included in the main study results).

Funding bodies may be reluctant to fund a further study if the pilot study results are published.

Do not have the power to assess treatment effects due to small sample size.

• Viscocanalostomy: A Pilot Study (Carassa, Bettin, Fiori, & Brancato, 1998)
• WHO International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia (Sartorius, Shapiro, Kimura, & Barrett, 1972)
• Stephen LaBerge of Stanford University ran a series of experiments in the 80s that investigated lucid dreaming. In 1985, he performed a pilot study that demonstrated that time perception is the same as during wakefulness. Specifically, he had participants go into a state of lucid dreaming and count out ten seconds, signaling the start and end with pre-determined eye movements measured with the EOG.
• Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot Study (Richins, 1983)
• A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self‐compassion program (Neff & Germer, 2013)
• Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol (Pitman et al., 2002)
• In unstructured observations, the researcher records all relevant behavior without a system. There may be too much to record, and the behaviors recorded may not necessarily be the most important, so the approach is usually used as a pilot study to see what type of behaviors would be recorded.
• Perspectives of the use of smartphones in travel behavior studies: Findings from a literature review and a pilot study (Gadziński, 2018)

Further Information

• Lancaster, G. A., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. R. (2004). Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 10 (2), 307-312.
• Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., … & Goldsmith, C. H. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10 (1), 1-10.
• Moore, C. G., Carter, R. E., Nietert, P. J., & Stewart, P. W. (2011). Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clinical and translational science, 4 (5), 332-337.

Carassa, R. G., Bettin, P., Fiori, M., & Brancato, R. (1998). Viscocanalostomy: a pilot study. European journal of ophthalmology, 8 (2), 57-61.

Gadziński, J. (2018). Perspectives of the use of smartphones in travel behaviour studies: Findings from a literature review and a pilot study. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 88 , 74-86.

In J. (2017). Introduction of a pilot study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70 (6), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.601

LaBerge, S., LaMarca, K., & Baird, B. (2018). Pre-sleep treatment with galantamine stimulates lucid dreaming: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. PLoS One, 13 (8), e0201246.

Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011). The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. Journal of psychiatric research, 45 (5), 626–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008

Malmqvist, J., Hellberg, K., Möllås, G., Rose, R., & Shevlin, M. (2019). Conducting the Pilot Study: A Neglected Part of the Research Process? Methodological Findings Supporting the Importance of Piloting in Qualitative Research Studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341

Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the mindful self‐compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69 (1), 28-44.

Pitman, R. K., Sanders, K. M., Zusman, R. M., Healy, A. R., Cheema, F., Lasko, N. B., … & Orr, S. P. (2002). Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol. Biological psychiatry, 51 (2), 189-192.

Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47 (1), 68-78.

Sartorius, N., Shapiro, R., Kimura, M., & Barrett, K. (1972). WHO International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia1. Psychological medicine, 2 (4), 422-425.

Teijlingen, E. R; V. Hundley (2001). The importance of pilot studies, Social research UPDATE, (35)

NASP: The National Association of School Psychologists

• Proposal Submission Instructions

In This Section

Workshop submission instructions.

Thank you for submitting your proposal for the 2024 annual convention in New Orleans, LA. The convention is an outstanding venue in which to showcase your research and practice. We are especially seeking advanced-level presentations that are related to the theme of the convention and will appeal to seasoned practitioners and assist them in delivering the highest quality, evidence-based practices in schools.  

Proposal Deadlines and Timeline

Presentation proposal submission process .

The online submission process will ask for the names and information for the PRIMARY PRESENTER, SECONDARY PRESENTER(S) and CONTRIBUTORS. Each of these categories is defined below.

PRIMARY PRESENTER: This individual is the person submitting the information online and will be listed first in the program book for the session. Primary presenters are responsible for:

• Registering for the full convention by the November 20, 2024 , deadline (fee required). If a primary presenter does not register by the deadline, the presentation will be canceled.
• Communicating all deadlines and procedures to secondary presenters.
• Communicating with contributors (other authors of the session material who will not be attending the session) regarding the order of contribution listed in the program book.

SECONDARY PRESENTERS: These individuals are authors of the session material who are committed to attending the session and registering for the full convention. Individuals should be included as secondary presenters ONLY if they actually will present the session. Secondary presenters are responsible for:

• Registering for the full convention by the November 20, 2024 , deadline (fee required). Secondary presenters who do not register by the deadline will be listed in the program as contributors, rather than as presenters.” No changes in status will possible after the November 20 , 2024 , presenter registration deadline.

CONTRIBUTORS: These individuals are authors of the work who will NOT attend the convention. Please use good judgment in the listing of contributors (considering the maximums per session listed below); only those who would be listed as authors on a formal publication of the material included in the session should be included. All contributors’ names will be included in the final program; please list contributors in the order you would like them listed in the program. 

You will enter full information about the primary presenter first and then be prompted to enter secondary presenters’ and session contributors’ names/information after you click on the “Submit” button.

Be prepared to enter the following information for yourself and any secondary presenters:

• Employer/Affiliation/University, city, state
• NASP membership number(s), if applicable. The accuracy of this information is very important, as it will be used in the convention final program and to determine the membership status/registration fee for secondary presenter(s).

All proposals must be submitted online. It will be helpful to prepare all of the information requested below BEFORE going online to submit your proposal.

• PAPERS (PA): (50-minute presentations) maximum of four total presenters and four total contributors : Papers address topics relevant to the profession and inform research and/or practice. Although a wide range of topics is acceptable, information should be based on sound evidence and support data-based decision-making in the field.
• PRACTITIONER CONVERSATIONS (PC): (50-minute sessions) maximum of two total presenters and two total contributors: These sessions are designed for smaller groups, ideally about 30, to come together around topics that may be less mainstream, but relevant to some. The presenter acts as a facilitator, providing a brief introduction of the topic and then guiding discussion among participants. The purpose of these sessions is to create an environment where practitioners with similar issues can come together to discuss these and interact together. To that end, when considering submitting a proposal for a PC session, please keep in mind that it is better to choose a niche topic than a more popular or mainstream topic that more participants are likely to attend, risking an overcrowded session. Topics that address narrow or more focused issues tend to achieve better results for PC sessions. For example, “Social Skills Interventions for Students With Autism” (which may be more suited to a Paper session) is likely to be a mainstream topic that could attract far more than the desired 30 attendees; whereas “Navigating Faculty-Administrator Roles in Higher Education” is a more focused, narrow topic that is more likely to attract a smaller crowd, which will facilitate the flow of conversation.
• SYMPOSIA (SY): (80-minute presentations) maximum of ten total presenters and ten total contributors : These sessions provide several (sometimes contrasting) views on a single topic or issue. Typically, three brief presentations are made and then a discussant provides reactions to each of the three. Ample time for questions from participants should be provided.
• POSTERS (PO): (90-minute presentations) maximum of four total presenters and four total contributors : Posters are visual presentations with 40–80 Posters occurring simultaneously in each timeslot. Each presenter is provided a 4’ x 8’ board on which to provide a visual display of information. Please note that multiple, related Posters are presented simultaneously in thematic blocks. If you submit more than one Poster session proposal on similar topics, those accepted will be scheduled in the same time block and located next to each other.
• MINI-SKILLS (MS): (1 hour, 50-minute presentations) maximum of four total presenters and four total contributors : These sessions are designed to provide skills and information that will be immediately applicable by practitioners (“tools to use on Monday morning”). These sessions are especially appropriate for seasoned practitioners to share their knowledge with other practitioners. The session length is sufficient for a comprehensive presentation focused on skill development. Presenters should leave ample time for questions and exchanges among participants.
• NASP CONVENTION WORKSHOPS (WS): These half-day and full-day sessions require attendees to pay a fee (in addition to the convention registration fee). These proposals are reviewed in a separate process; see separate instructions if you wish to submit a proposal for a NASP Convention.

Your title may be a maximum of 10 words and should appear in initial caps, as in the following example: Response-to-Intervention: Making It Work in Secondary Schools. A good title captures readers’ attention and clearly previews session content. (Please be sure your title remains exactly consistent in all documents submitted.)  Do not self-identify in the title by including a title page with authors listed.

Tips For Writing Attention-Grabbing Session Titles and Descriptions

The SUMMARY is used to determine acceptance for the convention program. Therefore, it should be carefully prepared. Each SUMMARY is read by three reviewers (please note: reviewers only see your summary; they do not see the description). The review committee is composed of practitioners and trainers. All decisions of the reviewers are final. SAMPLE SUMMARY There are several important considerations in the preparation of the SUMMARY.

Do not include ANY information that identifies the proposal’s presenters and other authors in the SUMMARY. Proposals go through a masked review process and those that identify authors or contributors in any way are disqualified. There are common mistakes made in this area so, please attend to the following:

Do NOT include author name(s) in the file name of the uploaded SUMMARY document (e.g., SmithNASP25.docx).

Do not use an author name as part of a running head in the document.

Remember to turn off and clear “track changes” from the document (if track changes remain, the author’s name is typically visible in the edits)

Do not identify an author in describing related work. That is, rather than writing, “Our prior work (Smith, 2019) showed…”, simply say, “Smith (2019) showed…”

Do not include learner objectives you will be prompted/required to submit a minimum of three and a maximum of six (depending on the length of your session) Learner Objectives for your presentation in separate fields.

The SUMMARY must not exceed 800 words. This limit excludes the title and supporting documentation (e.g., tables, figures, references), but does include appendices. Please be selective in the inclusion of supporting documentation; include only information that is essential to the evaluation of your proposal.

Provide clear information that will allow reviewers to rate the proposal fairly. The proposal is rated on three dimensions:

Clarity and organization of content: This criterion refers to the organization and clarity of the written proposal. A clear, logical, organized, well-written proposal usually leads to a high quality presentation. Reviewers should be able to easily understand what you plan to present and how you will present it.

Evidence base: This criterion refers to the quality of the evidence on which the proposal is based.

If the proposal involves results of a formal research study , sufficient information should be provided so that reviewers can easily identify the use of good methodology (e.g., with respect to subject selection, procedures, analyses) and conclusions appropriate to those methods (e.g., causal inferences are avoided in a correlation study). Although it is acceptable to submit a proposal for a study in progress, do NOT submit unless you are certain that the study will be complete in time for the presentation.

If the proposal does not involve the results of a formal research study, reviewers should be able to see that the information to be presented is drawn from a sound theoretical or evidence base and/or has been assessed for efficacy in some way. Field-based, practitioner-led presentations that provide examples of “best practice” and implementation of the NASP Practice Model are encouraged. These proposals should include evidence of evaluation through progress monitoring, single subject, multiple baseline, consumer satisfaction, or similar data.

Quality of learner objectives for participants: This criterion refers to the degree to which the proposal includes appropriate learner objectives for session attendees.  That is, they should clearly indicate what benefits attendees should expect as a result of participating in the session. The learner objectives should be clearly stated and clearly related to the proposal content. In addition, the objectives should be relevant for school psychologists. The rating in this area does not consider the popularity of the topic. That is, even if the topic of your session is relevant to only a specialized group (e.g., school psychologists who work in higher education, or school psychologists who work with students with low incidence disabilities), the proposal should receive a high rating in this area if detailed, relevant learner objectives are provided.

Prepare the SUMMARY as a Word document with a file extension of .doc, .docx, or .rtf. The file must be typed in a 10- or 12-point Times New Roman font, double spaced, and formatted to be printable on 8½” x 11” paper. The exact TITLE of the presentation must appear at the beginning of the summary , but DO NOT include any identifying information about the authors or presenters. Be sure the SUMMARY does not exceed 800 words. Any SUMMARY that contains identifying information and/or exceeds 800 words will be disqualified. Be especially careful if you have “cut and pasted” from your description to avoid the identification of the authors. Also, be sure you have removed any “tracked changes” from the final file, as these can be visible to the reviewers. Be sure that the description is NOT in the same document as the summary.

The DESCRIPTION of all accepted proposals will be published in the 2025 convention Final Program. The purpose of the DESCRIPTION is to attract attendees to your session; it must meet the following criteria:

• MAXIMUM of 30 words; fewer words are preferred
• Clear and accurate description of session content (e.g., research study, literature review, program evaluation)
• Written in an inviting way that captures the attention of potential attendees Tips For Writing Attention-Grabbing Session Titles and Descriptions
• Indicates who will most likely want to attend (e.g., novice or experienced practitioners, graduate educators, researchers)
• Benefits to attendees
• Promoting Safe and Positive Schools
• Promoting Social and Emotional Development
• Promoting Diversity and Multicultural Competence in School Psychology
• Assessment and Intervention in an RTI Framework
• Promoting Academic Success
• Recent Developments in Assessment and Research
• Psychological Services for Specific Groups of Students
• Psychological Services for Students With Autism
• Issues in School Psychology, Education, and Supervision
• Health and Well-Being
• Consultation and Collaboration With Educators and Parents

NASP Presentation Policies and Procedures

Acknowledgment of proposal receipt: Once you submit your proposal, you should receive an e-mail message within minutes acknowledging its receipt and contents. If you do not receive this email, please contact Marcia Harvey at 301-347-1667 or [email protected] . (Note:  You will be asked to update your contact information with NASP once you log into the membership system, so be sure your e-mail information is correct.). 

Notes Regarding Presenter Names:  If the name of a presenter changes after the proposal submission closes, that presenter must register for the convention under the exact name used in the proposal or notify the NASP Meetings and Conventions Department of the name change. If the name used on the proposal differs from the one used to register for the convention (i.e., using a maiden name as part of the last name one time but not the other, or using a formal first name one time and a nickname the other) the NASP registration system will not recognize the registrant as the same person who submitted a presentation proposal and will assume that *they are NOT registered for the convention. If this problem occurs with a primary presenter, the presentation will be canceled. If it occurs with secondary presenters, they will be listed as contributors.

Notes Regarding Presenter Registration:  Primary and secondary presenter(s) must register for the convention under the same NASP account used on the presentation proposal or notify the NASP Meetings and Conventions Department if they accidentally registered using a different account. If the Account ID differs during the proposal submission and convention registration processes, the NASP registration system will not recognize the individual as the same person and will assume that they are NOT registered for the convention. in this event, primary presenters’ presentations will be canceled, and secondary presenters will be listed as contributors.

Maximum number of proposals : Due to scheduling/space limitations, individuals may submit a maximum of two (2) proposals for review on which they are the PRIMARY presenter.

Maximum number of authors : Please limit the authors on your proposal to those who had a central role in the conceptualization and production of the work. That is, only those who would be considered an author of a formal publication of the work should be included. Papers, Posters, and Mini-Skills presentations may include no more than FOUR total contributors and FOUR total presenters; Practitioner Conversation sessions may include no more than TWO total contributors and TWO total presenters; Symposia may include no more than TEN total contributors and TEN total presenters. The Primary Presenter is responsible for correctly listing contributors. Any contributor who is attending the convention MUST register and be listed as a presenter. Authors who will not attend the convention are not required to register and will be listed as contributors (not presenters).

IMPORTANT SCHEDULING NOTE: When presenters appear on multiple sessions, there is the possibility of unavoidable conflicts in scheduling. Only PRIMARY presenters are guaranteed that their two sessions will not conflict. No schedule changes are possible based on conflicts for secondary presenters. Please consider this limitation before you submit.

Presentation Room Set-Ups:

All presentation rooms for Mini-Skills , Papers, Practitioner Conversations, and Symposia will be set theater-style, to the maximum capacity of each room, with Practitioner Conversations taking place in the smallest rooms, due to the nature of this session type, which involves more time for discussion than for the introductory presentation . NASP will provide an LCD projector, laptop computer, screen, and microphone ONLY in each of these presentation rooms.

I nternet access is not provided by NASP in any presentation rooms, due to the extremely high costs of this service.  Please note that Mini-Skills, Paper, Practitioner Conversations and Symposium presenters will be responsible to make arrangements for any other desired audio-visual equipment or Internet service, all of which will be at the presenters’ expense.

NASP Convention Workshop presentation rooms will be set in schoolroom style. NASP will provide an LCD projector, screen, and microphone ONLY ( no laptop ) in each workshop presentation room. I nternet access is not provided by NASP in workshop presentation rooms due to the extremely high costs of this service.  Please note that workshop presenters will be responsible to make arrangements for any other desired audio-visual equipment or Internet service, all of which will be at the presenters’ expense.

Information about ordering additional audio-visual equipment will be forwarded to presenters from NASP Headquarters. 

Handouts: Presenters are responsible for providing handouts for session participants. The cost of any photocopying of materials for participants is the sole responsibility of the presenters. Presenters MUST post their handouts online for attendees who were not present for the convention or attended other sessions. IMPORTANT: Presenters must provide handouts on-site (and not rely solely on uploading to the website), as only NASP members have access to the online handouts. Feedback from attendees suggests that presenters tend not to bring enough handouts and many people are disappointed. Please bring ample handouts to the session. NASP staff will provide information about the maximum capacity for your session room.

Proposal Submission Checklist:

You are now ready to submit your proposal.  Please have the following information ready:

• Your NASP ID: If you are currently a NASP member or have been a member or NCSP in the last ten years, please click "Log In" and enter your username and password.  (Don't know your login information?  Click "Reset your password" if NASP has your current e-mail address, or contact [email protected] for assistance.) If you have never been a member or NCSP and have never created an account on the NASP site, click "Create an Account."   
• The names, affiliations, city, state, email address and NASP ID of the primary presenter and any secondary presenters (that is, those who are actually attending the convention and will present the session). 
• The names (no affiliations or addresses needed) of ALL contributors to the session’s content, in the order they should be listed in the program book . This list should NOT include the primary and secondary presenters above. If there are no additional contributors to list, then no names will be listed here. Please remember to list as authors only those who had a central role in the conceptualization and production of the work (i.e., those who would be authors on a formal publication of the work). This may not exceed FOUR total authors for Paper, Poster, and Mini-Skills sessions, TWO total authors for Practitioner Conversation sessions and TEN total authors for Symposia sessions.
• The type of presentation as well as the TITLE (maximum of 10 words.) Please make sure the title you enter in this field matches the EXACT title on your description and summary and does not include your name. 
• Your SUMMARY ( maximum 800 words and NO author identification ) should be ready to upload when prompted. This document should be in one file; do not use authors’ names as any part of the file name. Before submitting, open the document to make sure author name is not in the running head, track changes is off, and there is not a title page containing identifying information.  Your description (maximum 30 words and NO author identification) must be typed in the description box. 
• Do not use single or double quotes (e.g., ', or ") in your information, as they may cause the page to generate an error message. 
• You will be prompted/required to submit a minimum of three and a maximum of six (depending on the length of your session) Learner Objectives for your presentation in separate fields. Please remember that this is one of the areas that your submission will be rated on. (See page 5, dimension 3 above.)

Guidelines For Writing Learner Objectives For Continuing Professional Development Activities

You also will be prompted/ required to select a primary index term for your session. This term will appear in the printed Final Program and should be the broadest or single-most applicable term for your session. Please review the list provided carefully and select the one term that best represents your session. If none of these terms is suitable, you may supply a different term of your own.  Additionally, you may, if you like, select up to three secondary index terms for your session, which will be included, along with the primary index term, in the online program listing for better searchability.

Lastly, you will be prompted/ required to select a maximum of two Practice Domains for your session, the Skill Level to which the session material is applicable and to indicate if the session addresses Diversity issues or those of particular interest to Graduate Students and/or Early Career professionals.

Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion In keeping with NASP’s social justice strategic goal, a range of convention sessions are offered to promote equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in the association and school psychology practice. These sessions will cover topics including: social justice and equity; aspects of diversity such as race, language, culture, sexual orientation, and gender identity; and affirming the diverse and intersecting identities of students, families, and colleagues from minoritized backgrounds. To assist convention attendees interested in identifying and attending sessions addressing such topics, these sessions are indicated throughout the program by a [D] symbol after the session titles. Presenters of the peer-reviewed sessions self-identified sessions as fitting the EDI designation.

• Please be very sure to add the email address [email protected] to your address book or Safe Sender list, so you do not risk having important email communications from the NASP Meetings and Conventions Department go to your Junk or Spam folders, due to firewalls or spam filters.
• Please make sure you are subscribed to receive ALL emails from NASP. The initial confirmation of NASP’s receipt of your proposal submission will be sent differently than most NASP emails; receiving that confirmation does not guarantee that you are subscribed to receive future correspondence about your proposal submission. For example, if you do not receive NASP in Brief via email on Thursdays, then you likely are unsubscribed.

PDF Version

Additional Documents

Sample description (pdf).

Contact us at [email protected] , 866-331-6277, or 301-347-1667 with questions or requests for more information.