generate hypothesis online

Hypothesis Maker Online

Looking for a hypothesis maker? This online tool for students will help you formulate a beautiful hypothesis quickly, efficiently, and for free.

Are you looking for an effective hypothesis maker online? Worry no more; try our online tool for students and formulate your hypothesis within no time.

• 🔎 How to Use the Tool?
• ⚗️ What Is a Hypothesis in Science?

👍 What Does a Good Hypothesis Mean?

• 🧭 Steps to Making a Good Hypothesis

🔗 References

📄 hypothesis maker: how to use it.

Our hypothesis maker is a simple and efficient tool you can access online for free.

If you want to create a research hypothesis quickly, you should fill out the research details in the given fields on the hypothesis generator.

Below are the fields you should complete to generate your hypothesis:

• Who or what is your research based on? For instance, the subject can be research group 1.
• What does the subject (research group 1) do?
• What does the subject affect? - This shows the predicted outcome, which is the object.
• Who or what will be compared with research group 1? (research group 2).

Once you fill the in the fields, you can click the ‘Make a hypothesis’ tab and get your results.

⚗️ What Is a Hypothesis in the Scientific Method?

A hypothesis is a statement describing an expectation or prediction of your research through observation.

It is similar to academic speculation and reasoning that discloses the outcome of your scientific test . An effective hypothesis, therefore, should be crafted carefully and with precision.

A good hypothesis should have dependent and independent variables . These variables are the elements you will test in your research method – it can be a concept, an event, or an object as long as it is observable.

You can observe the dependent variables while the independent variables keep changing during the experiment.

In a nutshell, a hypothesis directs and organizes the research methods you will use, forming a large section of research paper writing.

Hypothesis vs. Theory

A hypothesis is a realistic expectation that researchers make before any investigation. It is formulated and tested to prove whether the statement is true. A theory, on the other hand, is a factual principle supported by evidence. Thus, a theory is more fact-backed compared to a hypothesis.

Another difference is that a hypothesis is presented as a single statement , while a theory can be an assortment of things . Hypotheses are based on future possibilities toward a specific projection, but the results are uncertain. Theories are verified with undisputable results because of proper substantiation.

When it comes to data, a hypothesis relies on limited information , while a theory is established on an extensive data set tested on various conditions.

You should observe the stated assumption to prove its accuracy.

Since hypotheses have observable variables, their outcome is usually based on a specific occurrence. Conversely, theories are grounded on a general principle involving multiple experiments and research tests.

This general principle can apply to many specific cases.

The primary purpose of formulating a hypothesis is to present a tentative prediction for researchers to explore further through tests and observations. Theories, in their turn, aim to explain plausible occurrences in the form of a scientific study.

It would help to rely on several criteria to establish a good hypothesis. Below are the parameters you should use to analyze the quality of your hypothesis.

🧭 6 Steps to Making a Good Hypothesis

Writing a hypothesis becomes way simpler if you follow a tried-and-tested algorithm. Let’s explore how you can formulate a good hypothesis in a few steps:

Step #1: Ask Questions

The first step in hypothesis creation is asking real questions about the surrounding reality.

Why do things happen as they do? What are the causes of some occurrences?

Your curiosity will trigger great questions that you can use to formulate a stellar hypothesis. So, ensure you pick a research topic of interest to scrutinize the world’s phenomena, processes, and events.

Step #2: Do Initial Research

Carry out preliminary research and gather essential background information about your topic of choice.

The extent of the information you collect will depend on what you want to prove.

Your initial research can be complete with a few academic books or a simple Internet search for quick answers with relevant statistics.

Still, keep in mind that in this phase, it is too early to prove or disapprove of your hypothesis.

Step #3: Identify Your Variables

Now that you have a basic understanding of the topic, choose the dependent and independent variables.

Take note that independent variables are the ones you can’t control, so understand the limitations of your test before settling on a final hypothesis.

Step #4: Formulate Your Hypothesis

You can write your hypothesis as an ‘if – then’ expression . Presenting any hypothesis in this format is reliable since it describes the cause-and-effect you want to test.

For instance: If I study every day, then I will get good grades.

Step #5: Gather Relevant Data

Once you have identified your variables and formulated the hypothesis, you can start the experiment. Remember, the conclusion you make will be a proof or rebuttal of your initial assumption.

So, gather relevant information, whether for a simple or statistical hypothesis, because you need to back your statement.

Step #6: Record Your Findings

Finally, write down your conclusions in a research paper .

Outline in detail whether the test has proved or disproved your hypothesis.

Edit and proofread your work, using a plagiarism checker to ensure the authenticity of your text.

We hope that the above tips will be useful for you. Note that if you need to conduct business analysis, you can use the free templates we’ve prepared: SWOT , PESTLE , VRIO , SOAR , and Porter’s 5 Forces .

❓ Hypothesis Formulator FAQ

Updated: Oct 25th, 2023

• How to Write a Hypothesis in 6 Steps - Grammarly
• Forming a Good Hypothesis for Scientific Research
• The Hypothesis in Science Writing
• Scientific Method: Step 3: HYPOTHESIS - Subject Guides
• Hypothesis Template & Examples - Video & Lesson Transcript
• Free Essays
• Writing Tools
• Lit. Guides
• Donate a Paper
• Referencing Guides
• Free Textbooks
• Tongue Twisters
• Job Openings
• Expert Application
• Video Contest
• Writing Scholarship
• Discount Codes
• IvyPanda Shop
• Terms and Conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Cookies Policy
• Copyright Principles
• DMCA Request
• Service Notice

Use our hypothesis maker whenever you need to formulate a hypothesis for your study. We offer a very simple tool where you just need to provide basic info about your variables, subjects, and predicted outcomes. The rest is on us. Get a perfect hypothesis in no time!

Use Our Free A/B Testing Hypothesis Generator . Never Miss Key Elements From Your Hypotheses. Get Big Conversion Lifts.

Observation, inadvertent impact.

Streamline Your Hypothesis Generation Research with Custom Templates the Pros Use.

Have questions about a/b testing hypotheses, what is a hypothesis.

Many people define a hypothesis as an “educated guess”.

To be more precise, a properly constructed hypothesis predicts a possible outcome to an experiment or a test where one variable (the independent one ) is tweaked and/or modified and the impact is measured by the change in behavior of another variable (generally the dependent one).

A hypothesis should be specific (it should clearly define what is being altered and what is the expected impact), data-driven (the changes being made to the independent variable should be based on historic data or theories that have been proven in the past), and testable (it should be possible to conduct the proposed test in a controlled environment to establish the relationship between the variables involved, and disprove the hypothesis - should it be untrue.)

What is the Cost of a Hastily Assembled Hypothesis?

According to an analysis of over 28,000 tests run using the Convert Experiences platform, only 1 in 5 tests proves to be statistically significant.

While more and more debate is opening up around sticking to the concept of 95% statistical significance, it is still a valid rule of thumb for optimizers who do not want to get into the fray with peeking vs. no peeking, and custom stopping rules for experiments.

There might be a multitude of reasons why a test does not reach statistical significance. But framing a tenable hypothesis that already proves itself logistically feasible on paper is a better starting point than a hastily assembled assumption.

Moreover, the aim of an A/B test may be to extract a learning, but some learnings come with heavy costs. 26% decrease in conversion rates to be specific.

A robust hypothesis may not be the answer to all testing woes, but it does help prioritisation of possible solutions and leads testing teams to pick low hanging fruits.

How is an A/B Testing Hypothesis Different?

An A/B test should be treated with the same rigour as tests conducted in laboratories. That is an easy way to guarantee better hypotheses, more relevant experiments, and ultimately more profitable optimization programs.

The focus of an A/B test should be on first extracting a learning , and then monetizing it in the form of increased registration completions, better cart conversions and more revenue.

If that is true, then an A/B test hypothesis is not very different from a regular scientific hypothesis. With a couple of interesting points to note:

• Most scientific hypotheses proceed with one independent variable and one dependent variable, for the sake of simplicity. But in A/B tests, there might be changes made to several independent variables at the same time. Under such circumstances it is good to explore the relationship between the independent variables to make sure that they do not inadvertently impact one another. For example changing both the value proposition and button copy of a landing page to determine improvement in click through or completion rates is tricky. Reaching a point where the browser is compelled to click the button could easily have been impacted by the value proposition (as in a strong hook and heading). So what caused the improvement in the dependent variable? Was it the change to the first element or the second one?
• The concept of Operational Definition is non-negotiable in most laboratory experiments. And comes baked with the question of ethics or morality. Operation Definition is the specific process that will be used to quantify the change in the value/behavior of the independent variable in the test. As an example, if a test wishes to measure the level of frustration that subjects experience when they are exposed to certain stimuli, researchers must be careful to define exactly how they will measure the output or frustration. Should they allow the test subjects to act out, in which case they may hurt or harm other individuals. Or should they use a non-invasive technique like an fMRI scan to monitor brain activity and collect the needed data. In A/B tests however, since data is collected through relatively inanimate channels like analytics dashboards, generally little thought is spared to Operational Definition and the impact of A/B testing on the human subjects (site traffic in this case).

The 5 Essential Parts of an A/B Testing Hypothesis

A robust A/B testing hypothesis should be assembled in 5 key parts:

1. OBSERVATION

This includes a clear outline of the problem (the unexplained phenomenon) observed and what it entails. This section should be completely free of conjecture and rely solely on good quality data - either qualitative and/or quantitative - to bring a potential area of improvement to light. It also includes a mention of the way in which the data is collected.

Proper observation ensures a credible hypothesis that is easy to “defend” later down the line.

2. EXECUTION

This is the where, what, and the who of the A/B test. It specifies the change(s) you will be making to site element(s) in an attempt to solve the problem that has been outlined under “OBSERVATION”. It serves to also clearly define the segment of site traffic that will be exposed to the experiment.

Proper execution guidelines set the rhythm for the A/B test. They define how easy or difficult it will be to deploy the test and thus aid hypothesis prioritization .

This is where you make your educated guess or informed prediction. Based on a diligently identified OBSERVATION and EXECUTION guidelines that are possible to deploy, your OUTCOME should clearly mention two things:

• The change (increase or decrease) you expect to see to the problem or the symptoms of the problem identified under OBSERVATION.
• The Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) you will be monitoring to gauge whether your prediction has panned out, or not.

In general most A/B tests have one primary KPI and a couple of secondary KPIs or ways to measure impact. This is to ensure that external influences do not skew A/B test results and even if the primary KPI is compromised in some way, the secondary KPIs do a good job of indicating that the change is indeed due to the implementation of the EXECUTION guidelines, and not the result of unmonitored external factors.

4. LOGISTICS

An important part of hypothesis formulation, LOGISTICS talk about what it will take to collect enough clean data from which a reliable conclusion can be drawn. How many unique tested visitors, what is the statistical significance desired, how many conversions is enough and what is the duration for which the A/B test should run? Each question on its own merits a blog or a lesson. But for the sake of convenience, Convert has created a Free Sample Size & A/B/N Test Duration Calculator .

Set the right logistical expectations so that you can prioritise your hypotheses for maximum impact and minimum effort .

5. INADVERTENT IMPACT

This is a nod in the direction of ethics in A/B testing and marketing, because experiments involve humans and optimizers should be aware of the possible impact on their behavior.

Often a thorough analysis at this stage can modify the way impact is measured or an experiment is conducted. Or Convert certainly hopes that this will be the case in future. Here’s why ethics do matter in testing.

Now Organize, Prioritise & Learn from Your Hypotheses.

Try convert experiences in free trial & access compass beta - our hypothesis management platform., always working to improve outcomes..

Start Your 15 -Day Free Trial Right Now. No Credit Card Required

Important. Please Read.

• Check your inbox for the password to Convert’s trial account.
• Log in using the link provided in that email.

This sign up flow is built for maximum security. You’re worth it!

Research Hypothesis Generator

Generate research hypotheses with ai.

• Academic Research: Formulate a hypothesis for your thesis or dissertation based on your research topic and objectives.
• Data Analysis: Generate a hypothesis to guide your data collection and analysis strategy.
• Market Research: Develop a hypothesis to guide your investigation into market trends and consumer behavior.
• Scientific Research: Create a hypothesis to direct your experimental design and data interpretation.

New & Trending Tools

Stem cells and regenerative medicine tutor, cell differentiation and development tutor, regulation of gene expression tutor.

• Pricing Lightweight Script Blog
• Sign Up Log In

AI Hypothesis Generator

Hypothesis Generator to help you come up with a boilerplate hypothesis for your test ideas. Generate well-structured hypothesis in under 10 seconds! Turn your images into hypothesis with our new A/B Test image-to-text hypothesis generator

1. Give us a brief about your hypothesis...

Hypotheses in A/B Testing

Hypotheses form an integral part of A/B Testing. They provide a clear path and expected outcome for the test, based on the initial conditions, such as the user interface and user experience, among others. A well-defined hypothesis is the foundation of any successful A/B test, guiding the direction of the test and serving as a benchmark against which the test’s results are evaluated.

What are the benefits?

The Automated Hypothesis Creator simplifies the first step in the A/B testing process and provides several benefits:

• Quick and efficient hypothesis generation.
• Saves time and resources which can often be invested in analysing the output of the A/B test.
• Provides insightful and scientifically-backed predictions.
• Outlines a clear picture for the A/B test, thus leading to more accurate outcomes.

How to Use it with A/B Testing?

To use the Automated Hypothesis Creator with A/B testing, follow these simple steps:

• Begin by clearly formulating your query.
• Use the text area in the tool to provide the necessary input data.
• Click the “Create Hypothesis” button.
• Wait for a while for the tool to process your request and generate a hypothesis.
• Once the hypothesis is created, use it as a basis for your A/B test.

Try other free tools:

• A/B Test Headline Generator
• Sample Size Calculator
• A/B Test Duration Calculator
• Statistical Significance Calculator

A/B testing platform for people who cares about website performance

Mida is 10X faster than everything you have ever considered. Try it yourself.

Mida.so is a super lightweight A/B testing tool to help you experiment, analyze and implement conversion strategies in minutes.

Why you need a faster A/B testing tool?

Traditional A/B testing tools are heavy and bulky which can easily add 500ms loading time and have serious impact to your site: ‍ 👎 Drop in SEO ranking (Google penalize slow websites) 🤕 Bad overall user experience 💸 Hurt your website sales ‍

Research Hypothesis Generator Online

• ️👍 Hypothesis Maker: the Benefits
• ️🔎 How to Use the Tool?
• ️🕵️ What Is a Research Hypothesis?
• ️⚗️ Scientific Method
• ️🔗 References

👍 Hypothesis Maker: the Benefits

Here are the key benefits of this null and alternative hypothesis generator.

🔎 Hypothesis Generator: How to Use It?

Whenever you conduct research, whether a 5-paragraph essay or a more complex assignment, you need to create a hypothesis for this study.

Clueless about how to create a good hypothesis?

No need to waste time and energy on this small portion of your writing process! You can always use our hypothesis creator to get a researchable assumption in no time.

To get a ready-made hypothesis idea, you need to:

• State the object of your study
• Specify what the object does
• Lay out the outcome of that activity
• Indicate the comparison group

Once all data is inserted into the fields, you can press the “Generate now” button and get the result from our hypothesis generator for research paper or any other academic task.

🕵️ What Is a Research Hypothesis?

A hypothesis is your assumption based on existing academic knowledge and observations of the surrounding natural world.

It also involves a healthy portion of intuition because you should arrive at an interesting, commonsense question about the phenomena or processes you observe.

The traditional formula for hypothesis generation is an “if…then” statement, reflecting its falsifiability and testability.

What do these terms mean?

• Testability means you can formulate a scientific guess and test it with data and analysis.
• Falsifiability is a related feature, allowing you to refute the hypothesis with data and show that your guess has no tangible support in real-world data.

For example, you might want to hypothesize the following:

If children are given enough free play time, their intelligence scores rise quicker.

You can test this assumption by observing and measuring two groups – children involved in much free play and those who don’t get free play time. Once the study period ends, you can measure the intelligence scores in both groups to see the difference, thus proving or disproving your hypothesis, which will be testing your hypothesis. If you find tangible differences between the two groups, your hypothesis will be proven, and if there is no difference, the hypothesis will prove false.

Null and Alternative Hypothesis

As a rule, hypotheses are presented in pairs in academic studies, as your scientific guess may be refuted or proved. Thus, you should formulate two hypotheses – a null and alternative variant of the same guess – to see which one is proved with your experiment.

The alternative hypothesis is formulated in an affirmative form, assuming a specific relationship between variables. In other words, you hypothesize that the predetermined outcome will be observed if one condition is met.

Watching films before sleep reduces the quality of sleep.

The null hypothesis is formulated in a negative form, suggesting that there is no association between the variables of your interest. For example:

Watching films before sleep doesn’t affect the quality of sleep.

⚗️ Creating a Hypothesis: the Key Steps

The development and testing of multiple hypotheses are the basis of the scientific method .

Without such inquiries, academic knowledge would never progress, and humanity would remain with a limited understanding of the natural world.

How can you contribute to the existing academic base with well-developed and rigorously planned scientific studies ? Here is an introduction to the empirical method of scientific inquiry.

Step #1: Observe the World Around You

Look around you to see what’s taking place in your academic area. If you’re a biology researcher, look into the untapped biological processes or intriguing facts that nobody has managed to explain before you.

What’s surprising or unusual in your observations? How can you approach this area of interest?

That’s the starting point of an academic journey to new knowledge.

Step #2: Ask Questions

Now that you've found a subject of interest, it's time to generate scientific research questions .

A question can be called scientific if it is well-defined, focuses on measurable dimensions, and is largely testable.

Some hints for a scientific question are:

• What effect does X produce on Y?
• What happens if the intensity of X’s impact reduces or rises?
• What is the primary cause of X?
• How is X related to Y in this group of people?
• How effective is X in the field of C?

As you can see, X is the independent variable , and Y is the dependent variable.

This principle of hypothesis formulation is vital for cases when you want to illustrate or measure the strength of one variable's effect on the other.

Step #3: Generate a Research Hypothesis

After asking the scientific question, you can hypothesize what your answer to it can be.

You don't have any data yet to answer the question confidently, but you can assume what effect you will observe during an empirical investigation.

For example, suppose your background research shows that protein consumption boosts muscle growth.

In that case, you can hypothesize that a sample group consuming much protein after physical training will exhibit better muscle growth dynamics compared to those who don’t eat protein. This way, you’re making a scientific guess based on your prior knowledge of the subject and your intuition.

Step #4: Hold an Experiment

With a hypothesis at hand, you can proceed to the empirical study for its testing. As a rule, you should have a clearly formulated methodology for proving or disproving your hypothesis before you create it. Otherwise, how can you know that it is testable? An effective hypothesis usually contains all data about the research context and the population of interest.

For example:

Marijuana consumption among U. S. college students reduces their motivation and academic achievement.

• The study sample here is college students.
• The dependent variable is motivation and academic achievement, which you can measure with any validated scale (e.g., Intrinsic Motivation Inventory).
• The inclusion criterion for the study's experimental group is marijuana use.
• The control group might be a group of marijuana non-users from the same population.
• A viable research methodology is to ask both groups to fill out the survey and compare the results.

Step #5: Analyze Your Findings

Once the study is over and you have the collected dataset, it's time to analyze the findings.

The methodology should also delineate the criteria for proving or disproving the hypothesis.

Using the previous section's example, your hypothesis is proven if the experimental group reveals lower motivational scores and has a lower GPA . If both groups' motivation and GPA scores aren't statistically different, your hypothesis is false.

Step #6: Formulate Your Conclusion

Using your study's hypothesis and outcomes, you can now generate a conclusion . If the alternative hypothesis is proven, you can conclude that marijuana use hinders students' achievement and motivation. If the null hypothesis is validated, you should report no identified relationship between low academic achievement and weed use.

Thank you for reading this article! Note that if you need to conduct a business analysis, you can try our free tools: SWOT , VRIO , SOAR , PESTEL , and Porter’s Five Forces .

❓ Research Hypothesis Generator FAQ

❓ what is a research hypothesis.

A hypothesis is a guess or assumption you make by looking at the available data from the natural world. You assume a specific relationship between variables or phenomena and formulate that supposition for further testing with experimentation and analysis.

❓ How to write a hypothesis?

To compose an effective hypothesis, you need to look at your research question and formulate a couple of ways to answer it. The available scientific data can guide you to assume your study's outcome. Thus, the hypothesis is a guess of how your research question will be answered by the end of your research.

❓ What is the difference between prediction and hypothesis?

A prediction is your forecast about the outcome of some activities or experimentation. It is a guess of what will happen if you perform some actions with a specific object or person. A hypothesis is a more in-depth inquiry into the way things are related. It is more about explaining specific mechanisms and relationships.

❓ What makes a good hypothesis?

A strong hypothesis should indicate the dependent and independent variables, specifying the relationship you assume between them. You can also strengthen your hypothesis by indicating a specific population group, an intervention period, and the context in which you'll hold the study.

🔗 References

• What is and How to Write a Good Hypothesis in Research?
• Research questions, hypotheses and objectives - PMC - NCBI
• Developing the research hypothesis - PubMed
• Alternative Hypothesis - SAGE Research Methods
• Alternative Hypothesis Guide: Definition, Types and Examples

Online Hypothesis Generator

Add the required information into the fields below to build a list of well-formulated hypotheses.

• If patients follow medical prescriptions, then their condition will improve.
• If patients follow medical prescriptions, then their condition will show better results.
• If patients follow medical prescriptions, then their condition will show better results than those who do not follow medical prescriptions.
• H0 (null hypothesis) - Attending most lectures by first-year students has no effect on their exam scores.
• H1 (alternative hypothesis) - Attending most lectures by first-year students has a positive effect on their exam scores.

* Hint - choose either null or alternative hypothesis

⭐️ Hypothesis Creator: the Benefits

• 🔎 How to Use the Tool?
• 🤔 What Is a Hypothesis?
• 👣 Steps to Generating a Hypothesis
• 🔍 References

🔎 Hypothesis Generator: How to Use It?

The generation of a workable hypothesis is not an easy task for many students. You need to research widely, understand the gaps in your study area, and comprehend the method of hypothesis formulation to the dot. Lucky for you, we have a handy hypothesis generator that takes hours of tedious work out of your study process.

To use our hypothesis generator, you’ll need to do the following:

• Indicate your experimental group (people, phenomena, event)
• Stipulate what it does
• Add the effect that the subject’s activities produce
• Specify the comparison group

Once you put all this data into our online hypothesis generator, click on the “Generate hypothesis” tab and enjoy instant results. The tool will come up with a well-formulated hypothesis in seconds.

🤔 What Is a Research Hypothesis?

A hypothesis is a claim or statement you make about the assumed relationship between the dependent and independent variables you're planning to test. It is formulated at the beginning of your study to show the direction you will take in the analysis of your subject of interest.

The hypothesis works in tandem with your research purpose and research question , delineating your entire perspective.

For example, if you focus on the quality of palliative care in the USA , your perspective may be as follows.

This way, your hypothesis serves as a tentative answer to your research question, which you aim to prove or disprove with scientific data, statistics, and analysis.

Hypothesis Types

In most scholarly studies, you’ll be required to write hypotheses in pairs – as a null and alternative hypothesis :

• The alternative hypothesis assumes a statistically significant relationship between the identified variables. Thus, if you find that relationship in the analysis process, you can consider the alternative hypothesis proven.
• A null hypothesis is the opposite; it assumes that there is no relationship between the variables. Thus, if you find no statistically significant association, the null hypothesis is considered proven.

A handy example is as follows:

You are researching the impact of sugar intake on child obesity . So, based on your data, you can either find that the number of sugar spoons a day directly impacts obesity or that the sugar intake is not associated with obesity in your sample. The hypotheses for this study would be as follows:

ALTERNATIVE

There is a relationship between the number of sugar spoons consumed daily and obesity in U.S. preschoolers.

There is no relationship between the number of sugar spoons consumed daily and obesity in U.S. preschoolers.

Besides, hypotheses can be directional and non-directional by type:

• A directional hypothesis assumes a cause-and-effect relationship between variables, clearly designating the assumed difference in study groups or parameters.
• A non-directional hypothesis , in turn, only assumes a relationship or difference without a clear estimate of its direction.

NON-DIRECTIONAL

Students in high school and college perform differently on critical thinking tests.

DIRECTIONAL

College students perform better on critical thinking tests that high-school students.

👣 How to Make a Hypothesis in Research

Now let’s cover the algorithm of hypothesis generation to make this process simple and manageable for you.

Step #1: Formulate Your Research Question

The first step is to create a research question . Study the topic of interest and clarify what aspect you're fascinated about, wishing to learn more about the hidden connections, effects, and relationships.

Step #2: Research the Topic

Next, you should conduct some research to test your assumption and see whether there’s enough published evidence to back up your point. You should find credible sources that discuss the concepts you’ve singled out for the study and delineate a relationship between them. Once you identify a reasonable body of research, it’s time to go on.

Step #3: Make an Assumption

With some scholarly data, you should now be better positioned to make a researchable assumption.

For instance, if you find out that many scholars associate heavy social media use with a feeling of loneliness, you can hypothesize that the hours spent on social networks will directly correlate with perceived loneliness intensity.

Step #4: Improve Your Hypothesis

Now that you have a hypothesis, it’s time to refine it by adding context and population specifics. Who will you study? What social network will you focus on? In this example, you can focus on the student sample’s use of Instagram .

Step #5: Try Different Phrasing

The final step is the proper presentation of your hypothesis. You can try several variants, focusing on the variables, correlations , or groups you compare.

For instance, you can say that students spending 3+ hours on Instagram every day are lonelier than their peers. Otherwise, you can hypothesize that heavy social media use leads to elevated feelings of loneliness.

👀 Null Hypothesis Examples

If you’re unsure about how to generate great hypotheses, get some inspiration from the list of examples formulated by our writing pros.

Thank you for reading this article! If you’re planning to analyze business issues, try our free templates: PEST , PESTEL , SWOT , SOAR , VRIO , and Five Forces .

❓ Hypothesis Generator FAQ

❓ what does hypothesis mean.

A hypothesis in an essay or a larger research assignment is your claim or prediction of the relationship you assume between the identified dependent and independent variables. You share an assumption that you’re going to test with research and data analysis in the later sections of your paper.

❓ How to create a hypothesis?

The first step to formulating a good hypothesis is to ask a question about your subject of interest and understand what effects it may experience from external sources or how it changes over time. You can identify differences between groups and inquire into the nature of those distinctions. In any way, you need to voice some assumption that you’ll further test with data; that assumption will be your hypothesis for a study.

❓ What is a null and alternative hypothesis?

You need to formulate a null and alternative hypothesis if you plan to test some relationship between variables with statistical instruments. For example, you might compare a group of students on an emotional intelligence scale to determine whether first-year students are less emotionally competent than graduates. In this case, your alternative hypothesis would state that they are, and a null hypothesis would say that there is no difference between student groups.

❓ What does it mean to reject the null hypothesis?

A null hypothesis assumes that there is no difference between groups or that the dependent variables don't have any sizable impact on the independent variable. If your null hypothesis gets rejected, it means that your alternative hypothesis has been proved, showing that there is a tangible difference or relationship between your variables.

🔗 References

• How to Write a Hypothesis in 6 Steps - Grammarly
• The Hypothesis in Science Writing
• Hypothesis Definition & Examples - Simply Psychology
• Hypothesis Examples: Different Types in Science and Research
• Forming a Good Hypothesis for Scientific Research

• How it Works
• Member Area

“Write your paper 10x faster”

The #1 AI Research Tool for Students, Teachers, Scholars, and those in Academia

Generate study guides, outlines, research topics, key findings, hypotheses, and exam questions in seconds..

Streamline your planning and preparation with the top AI-generated answers for your specific academic field.

How Research Panda Works

1. pick the research template, 2. fill out the form in less than 2 minutes, 3. generate your academic content.

Save Hours and Days of Research Work

What You Get

Topic and idea selection.

Retrieve topics and subtopics, a longside possible ideas to e nforce and expand upon. Simplify and expand any topic or subtopic of reference.

Brainstorm and Outline Build

Have a thought flow built out s o you’re not mentally stuck. C reate a concrete outline and structure f or your research paper.

Research Questions, Gaps, and Hypothesis Generator

Based on a topic and keywords, g et a list of questions, gaps in research, a nd possible hypotheses t o utilize.

Methodology and Techniques Creator

Explain how the qualitative or quantitive approach  can be used to address the topic. Get the top data collection practices.

Research Paper and Article Locator

Literature Review – Based on a given topic and keywords, p roduce articles for reference.

Summary and Analysis Generator

Get the main arguments and key findings  of a given text. Describe the theoretical framework and methodology used.

Personal Study Guide and Plan Build

Create a step-by-step c omprehensive guide and plan b ased on y our timeframe to study.

Exam Preparation Creator

Generate multiple choice questions based on your given research topic

…ranging in various difficulties.

Book Summarizer

Give the title and author. Condense books into concise and comprehensive summaries for effortless learning.

Lesson Plan Generator

Structured lesson plans for any subject, idea, course, or concept. Just plug in the topic and grade level. AI will provide the rest.

Educational Handout Writer

Efficiently create comprehensive handouts encompassing all the essential information about a particular topic, concept, or subject area for both yourself and a student.

Gaps in Understanding Identifier

Provide your own understanding of a given topic, idea, or concept. An analysis will take place pointing out the gaps in knowledge of the said topic.

Bonus #1: The Quick Learner

Pick the topic, keywords, and main points you want to focus on and learn about. Be broad or specific as need be. Use the 80/20 principle to learn faster than ever.

Bonus #2: The Proofreader

Improvise your writing. Proofread, correct, and get tailored feedback to what you need to do to better your writing. This detailed feedback will give you the steps needed to take next.

Bonus #3: The Detailer

Completely understand a topic, idea, or research point. Have a concept broken down to have a strong mental grasp on it, being able to speak and write on it intelligently.

Why Research Panda?

Enhance your planning and preparation process through the power of comprehensive AI. Discover streamlined templates for study guides and receive tailored writing prompts and answers for each section of your paper that cater to your specific academic field. Research Panda was built for the academic .

Pick a Plan

Optimize your research and writing, get all the ai research tools, built for students, teachers, scholars, and academics.

1. Topic Selection and

Idea Generator

2. Brainstorm and Outline Generator

3. Research Questions, Research Gaps,

and Hypothesis Generator

4. Methodology and Technique Generator

5. Research Paper

and Article Locator Generator

6. Summary and Analysis Generator

7. Study Guide and Plan Generator

8. Exam Preparation Generator

Research Panda works for education levels ranging from high school students to doctoral academics. Nevertheless, it is for any academic looking to further their research in any given field.

Research Panda is capable of generating educational guides, study plans, academic content, and much more. If you can think it, Research Panda can create it. This includes materials related to mathematics, English Language Arts (reading, writing, grammar), science (biology, chemistry, physics), social Studies (history, geography, civics, economics), computer science, political science, and any subject you work in.

To use Research Panda, simply click one of the membership options above to “Try for 3 Days Free” to access the sign up page. From there, you can give Research Panda detailed instructions using any of the 8+ premium AI tools. Once you’ve generated your first AI content, go ahead and edit it to your liking, and copy it for your research use.

Yes! All Research Panda users get unlimited usage and access to all AI tools as long as they are a member. This means you can create as many guides, handouts, article reviews, outlines, and academic content as you’d like.

We offer a 3-day free trial with both membership tiers, Monthly and Quarterly. If you are not 100% satisfied, no worries! Just cancel before your free trial ends. Because of the work in the upkeep of Research Panda, we do not offer any refunds.

Feel free to send us a message using the form below! We will get back to you within 48 hours.

Get in Touch

©2023 by ResearchPanda.io | All Rights Reserved | Site Built by Nathan Schweikart

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Hypothesis Testing | A Step-by-Step Guide with Easy Examples

Published on November 8, 2019 by Rebecca Bevans . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics . It is most often used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses, that arise from theories.

There are 5 main steps in hypothesis testing:

• State your research hypothesis as a null hypothesis and alternate hypothesis (H o ) and (H a  or H 1 ).
• Collect data in a way designed to test the hypothesis.
• Perform an appropriate statistical test .
• Decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis.
• Present the findings in your results and discussion section.

Though the specific details might vary, the procedure you will use when testing a hypothesis will always follow some version of these steps.

Table of contents

Step 1: state your null and alternate hypothesis, step 2: collect data, step 3: perform a statistical test, step 4: decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis, step 5: present your findings, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about hypothesis testing.

After developing your initial research hypothesis (the prediction that you want to investigate), it is important to restate it as a null (H o ) and alternate (H a ) hypothesis so that you can test it mathematically.

The alternate hypothesis is usually your initial hypothesis that predicts a relationship between variables. The null hypothesis is a prediction of no relationship between the variables you are interested in.

• H 0 : Men are, on average, not taller than women. H a : Men are, on average, taller than women.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

For a statistical test to be valid , it is important to perform sampling and collect data in a way that is designed to test your hypothesis. If your data are not representative, then you cannot make statistical inferences about the population you are interested in.

There are a variety of statistical tests available, but they are all based on the comparison of within-group variance (how spread out the data is within a category) versus between-group variance (how different the categories are from one another).

If the between-group variance is large enough that there is little or no overlap between groups, then your statistical test will reflect that by showing a low p -value . This means it is unlikely that the differences between these groups came about by chance.

Alternatively, if there is high within-group variance and low between-group variance, then your statistical test will reflect that with a high p -value. This means it is likely that any difference you measure between groups is due to chance.

Your choice of statistical test will be based on the type of variables and the level of measurement of your collected data .

• an estimate of the difference in average height between the two groups.
• a p -value showing how likely you are to see this difference if the null hypothesis of no difference is true.

Based on the outcome of your statistical test, you will have to decide whether to reject or fail to reject your null hypothesis.

In most cases you will use the p -value generated by your statistical test to guide your decision. And in most cases, your predetermined level of significance for rejecting the null hypothesis will be 0.05 – that is, when there is a less than 5% chance that you would see these results if the null hypothesis were true.

In some cases, researchers choose a more conservative level of significance, such as 0.01 (1%). This minimizes the risk of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis ( Type I error ).

The results of hypothesis testing will be presented in the results and discussion sections of your research paper , dissertation or thesis .

In the results section you should give a brief summary of the data and a summary of the results of your statistical test (for example, the estimated difference between group means and associated p -value). In the discussion , you can discuss whether your initial hypothesis was supported by your results or not.

In the formal language of hypothesis testing, we talk about rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis. You will probably be asked to do this in your statistics assignments.

However, when presenting research results in academic papers we rarely talk this way. Instead, we go back to our alternate hypothesis (in this case, the hypothesis that men are on average taller than women) and state whether the result of our test did or did not support the alternate hypothesis.

If your null hypothesis was rejected, this result is interpreted as “supported the alternate hypothesis.”

These are superficial differences; you can see that they mean the same thing.

You might notice that we don’t say that we reject or fail to reject the alternate hypothesis . This is because hypothesis testing is not designed to prove or disprove anything. It is only designed to test whether a pattern we measure could have arisen spuriously, or by chance.

If we reject the null hypothesis based on our research (i.e., we find that it is unlikely that the pattern arose by chance), then we can say our test lends support to our hypothesis . But if the pattern does not pass our decision rule, meaning that it could have arisen by chance, then we say the test is inconsistent with our hypothesis .

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Descriptive statistics
• Measures of central tendency
• Correlation coefficient

Methodology

• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Types of interviews
• Cohort study
• Thematic analysis

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Survivorship bias
• Availability heuristic
• Nonresponse bias
• Regression to the mean

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess — it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).

Null and alternative hypotheses are used in statistical hypothesis testing . The null hypothesis of a test always predicts no effect or no relationship between variables, while the alternative hypothesis states your research prediction of an effect or relationship.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bevans, R. (2023, June 22). Hypothesis Testing | A Step-by-Step Guide with Easy Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/hypothesis-testing/

Is this article helpful?

Rebecca Bevans

Other students also liked, choosing the right statistical test | types & examples, understanding p values | definition and examples, what is your plagiarism score.

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback.

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly.

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation .

• Notifications

An AI Tool for Automated Research Question and Hypothesis Generation from a given Scientific Literature

bhaskatripathi/HypothesisHub

Folders and files, repository files navigation, hypothesishub.

HypothesisHub is an AI Tool for the Automated Generation of Research Questions and Hypotheses from Scientific Literature. It applies a chain of reasoning to scientific literature to generate questions and hypotheses. OpenAI and Langchain serve as the underlying technologies for the tool.

• Generates research questions from a given scientific literature
• Generates a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternate hypothesis (H1) for each research question
• Handles cases where either H0 or H1 is not present
• Automatically generates missing H1 using the LLMChain if needed
• Negates hypothesis statement if H0 is missing

Sequence Diagram

Please give a star if you like this project and find it useful.

Star History

• Jupyter Notebook 100.0%

Hypothesis Testing Calculator

Related: confidence interval calculator, type ii error.

The first step in hypothesis testing is to calculate the test statistic. The formula for the test statistic depends on whether the population standard deviation (σ) is known or unknown. If σ is known, our hypothesis test is known as a z test and we use the z distribution. If σ is unknown, our hypothesis test is known as a t test and we use the t distribution. Use of the t distribution relies on the degrees of freedom, which is equal to the sample size minus one. Furthermore, if the population standard deviation σ is unknown, the sample standard deviation s is used instead. To switch from σ known to σ unknown, click on $\boxed{\sigma}$ and select $\boxed{s}$ in the Hypothesis Testing Calculator.

Next, the test statistic is used to conduct the test using either the p-value approach or critical value approach. The particular steps taken in each approach largely depend on the form of the hypothesis test: lower tail, upper tail or two-tailed. The form can easily be identified by looking at the alternative hypothesis (H a ). If there is a less than sign in the alternative hypothesis then it is a lower tail test, greater than sign is an upper tail test and inequality is a two-tailed test. To switch from a lower tail test to an upper tail or two-tailed test, click on $\boxed{\geq}$ and select $\boxed{\leq}$ or $\boxed{=}$, respectively.

In the p-value approach, the test statistic is used to calculate a p-value. If the test is a lower tail test, the p-value is the probability of getting a value for the test statistic at least as small as the value from the sample. If the test is an upper tail test, the p-value is the probability of getting a value for the test statistic at least as large as the value from the sample. In a two-tailed test, the p-value is the probability of getting a value for the test statistic at least as unlikely as the value from the sample.

To test the hypothesis in the p-value approach, compare the p-value to the level of significance. If the p-value is less than or equal to the level of signifance, reject the null hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than the level of significance, do not reject the null hypothesis. This method remains unchanged regardless of whether it's a lower tail, upper tail or two-tailed test. To change the level of significance, click on $\boxed{.05}$. Note that if the test statistic is given, you can calculate the p-value from the test statistic by clicking on the switch symbol twice.

In the critical value approach, the level of significance ($\alpha$) is used to calculate the critical value. In a lower tail test, the critical value is the value of the test statistic providing an area of $\alpha$ in the lower tail of the sampling distribution of the test statistic. In an upper tail test, the critical value is the value of the test statistic providing an area of $\alpha$ in the upper tail of the sampling distribution of the test statistic. In a two-tailed test, the critical values are the values of the test statistic providing areas of $\alpha / 2$ in the lower and upper tail of the sampling distribution of the test statistic.

To test the hypothesis in the critical value approach, compare the critical value to the test statistic. Unlike the p-value approach, the method we use to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis depends on the form of the hypothesis test. In a lower tail test, if the test statistic is less than or equal to the critical value, reject the null hypothesis. In an upper tail test, if the test statistic is greater than or equal to the critical value, reject the null hypothesis. In a two-tailed test, if the test statistic is less than or equal the lower critical value or greater than or equal to the upper critical value, reject the null hypothesis.

When conducting a hypothesis test, there is always a chance that you come to the wrong conclusion. There are two types of errors you can make: Type I Error and Type II Error. A Type I Error is committed if you reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true. Ideally, we'd like to accept the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true. A Type II Error is committed if you accept the null hypothesis when the alternative hypothesis is true. Ideally, we'd like to reject the null hypothesis when the alternative hypothesis is true.

Hypothesis testing is closely related to the statistical area of confidence intervals. If the hypothesized value of the population mean is outside of the confidence interval, we can reject the null hypothesis. Confidence intervals can be found using the Confidence Interval Calculator . The calculator on this page does hypothesis tests for one population mean. Sometimes we're interest in hypothesis tests about two population means. These can be solved using the Two Population Calculator . The probability of a Type II Error can be calculated by clicking on the link at the bottom of the page.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Korean Med Sci
• v.36(50); 2021 Dec 27

Formulating Hypotheses for Different Study Designs

Durga prasanna misra.

1 Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

Armen Yuri Gasparyan

2 Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK.

Olena Zimba

3 Department of Internal Medicine #2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.

Marlen Yessirkepov

4 Department of Biology and Biochemistry, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.

Vikas Agarwal

George d. kitas.

5 Centre for Epidemiology versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Generating a testable working hypothesis is the first step towards conducting original research. Such research may prove or disprove the proposed hypothesis. Case reports, case series, online surveys and other observational studies, clinical trials, and narrative reviews help to generate hypotheses. Observational and interventional studies help to test hypotheses. A good hypothesis is usually based on previous evidence-based reports. Hypotheses without evidence-based justification and a priori ideas are not received favourably by the scientific community. Original research to test a hypothesis should be carefully planned to ensure appropriate methodology and adequate statistical power. While hypotheses can challenge conventional thinking and may be controversial, they should not be destructive. A hypothesis should be tested by ethically sound experiments with meaningful ethical and clinical implications. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has brought into sharp focus numerous hypotheses, some of which were proven (e.g. effectiveness of corticosteroids in those with hypoxia) while others were disproven (e.g. ineffectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin).

Graphical Abstract

DEFINING WORKING AND STANDALONE SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESES

Science is the systematized description of natural truths and facts. Routine observations of existing life phenomena lead to the creative thinking and generation of ideas about mechanisms of such phenomena and related human interventions. Such ideas presented in a structured format can be viewed as hypotheses. After generating a hypothesis, it is necessary to test it to prove its validity. Thus, hypothesis can be defined as a proposed mechanism of a naturally occurring event or a proposed outcome of an intervention. 1 , 2

Hypothesis testing requires choosing the most appropriate methodology and adequately powering statistically the study to be able to “prove” or “disprove” it within predetermined and widely accepted levels of certainty. This entails sample size calculation that often takes into account previously published observations and pilot studies. 2 , 3 In the era of digitization, hypothesis generation and testing may benefit from the availability of numerous platforms for data dissemination, social networking, and expert validation. Related expert evaluations may reveal strengths and limitations of proposed ideas at early stages of post-publication promotion, preventing the implementation of unsupported controversial points. 4

Thus, hypothesis generation is an important initial step in the research workflow, reflecting accumulating evidence and experts' stance. In this article, we overview the genesis and importance of scientific hypotheses and their relevance in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

DO WE NEED HYPOTHESES FOR ALL STUDY DESIGNS?

Broadly, research can be categorized as primary or secondary. In the context of medicine, primary research may include real-life observations of disease presentations and outcomes. Single case descriptions, which often lead to new ideas and hypotheses, serve as important starting points or justifications for case series and cohort studies. The importance of case descriptions is particularly evident in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic when unique, educational case reports have heralded a new era in clinical medicine. 5

Case series serve similar purpose to single case reports, but are based on a slightly larger quantum of information. Observational studies, including online surveys, describe the existing phenomena at a larger scale, often involving various control groups. Observational studies include variable-scale epidemiological investigations at different time points. Interventional studies detail the results of therapeutic interventions.

Secondary research is based on already published literature and does not directly involve human or animal subjects. Review articles are generated by secondary research. These could be systematic reviews which follow methods akin to primary research but with the unit of study being published papers rather than humans or animals. Systematic reviews have a rigid structure with a mandatory search strategy encompassing multiple databases, systematic screening of search results against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, critical appraisal of study quality and an optional component of collating results across studies quantitatively to derive summary estimates (meta-analysis). 6 Narrative reviews, on the other hand, have a more flexible structure. Systematic literature searches to minimise bias in selection of articles are highly recommended but not mandatory. 7 Narrative reviews are influenced by the authors' viewpoint who may preferentially analyse selected sets of articles. 8

In relation to primary research, case studies and case series are generally not driven by a working hypothesis. Rather, they serve as a basis to generate a hypothesis. Observational or interventional studies should have a hypothesis for choosing research design and sample size. The results of observational and interventional studies further lead to the generation of new hypotheses, testing of which forms the basis of future studies. Review articles, on the other hand, may not be hypothesis-driven, but form fertile ground to generate future hypotheses for evaluation. Fig. 1 summarizes which type of studies are hypothesis-driven and which lead on to hypothesis generation.

STANDARDS OF WORKING AND SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESES

A review of the published literature did not enable the identification of clearly defined standards for working and scientific hypotheses. It is essential to distinguish influential versus not influential hypotheses, evidence-based hypotheses versus a priori statements and ideas, ethical versus unethical, or potentially harmful ideas. The following points are proposed for consideration while generating working and scientific hypotheses. 1 , 2 Table 1 summarizes these points.

Evidence-based data

A scientific hypothesis should have a sound basis on previously published literature as well as the scientist's observations. Randomly generated (a priori) hypotheses are unlikely to be proven. A thorough literature search should form the basis of a hypothesis based on published evidence. 7

Unless a scientific hypothesis can be tested, it can neither be proven nor be disproven. Therefore, a scientific hypothesis should be amenable to testing with the available technologies and the present understanding of science.

Supported by pilot studies

If a hypothesis is based purely on a novel observation by the scientist in question, it should be grounded on some preliminary studies to support it. For example, if a drug that targets a specific cell population is hypothesized to be useful in a particular disease setting, then there must be some preliminary evidence that the specific cell population plays a role in driving that disease process.

Testable by ethical studies

The hypothesis should be testable by experiments that are ethically acceptable. 9 For example, a hypothesis that parachutes reduce mortality from falls from an airplane cannot be tested using a randomized controlled trial. 10 This is because it is obvious that all those jumping from a flying plane without a parachute would likely die. Similarly, the hypothesis that smoking tobacco causes lung cancer cannot be tested by a clinical trial that makes people take up smoking (since there is considerable evidence for the health hazards associated with smoking). Instead, long-term observational studies comparing outcomes in those who smoke and those who do not, as was performed in the landmark epidemiological case control study by Doll and Hill, 11 are more ethical and practical.

Balance between scientific temper and controversy

Novel findings, including novel hypotheses, particularly those that challenge established norms, are bound to face resistance for their wider acceptance. Such resistance is inevitable until the time such findings are proven with appropriate scientific rigor. However, hypotheses that generate controversy are generally unwelcome. For example, at the time the pandemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and AIDS was taking foot, there were numerous deniers that refused to believe that HIV caused AIDS. 12 , 13 Similarly, at a time when climate change is causing catastrophic changes to weather patterns worldwide, denial that climate change is occurring and consequent attempts to block climate change are certainly unwelcome. 14 The denialism and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic, including unfortunate examples of vaccine hesitancy, are more recent examples of controversial hypotheses not backed by science. 15 , 16 An example of a controversial hypothesis that was a revolutionary scientific breakthrough was the hypothesis put forth by Warren and Marshall that Helicobacter pylori causes peptic ulcers. Initially, the hypothesis that a microorganism could cause gastritis and gastric ulcers faced immense resistance. When the scientists that proposed the hypothesis themselves ingested H. pylori to induce gastritis in themselves, only then could they convince the wider world about their hypothesis. Such was the impact of the hypothesis was that Barry Marshall and Robin Warren were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2005 for this discovery. 17 , 18

DISTINGUISHING THE MOST INFLUENTIAL HYPOTHESES

Influential hypotheses are those that have stood the test of time. An archetype of an influential hypothesis is that proposed by Edward Jenner in the eighteenth century that cowpox infection protects against smallpox. While this observation had been reported for nearly a century before this time, it had not been suitably tested and publicised until Jenner conducted his experiments on a young boy by demonstrating protection against smallpox after inoculation with cowpox. 19 These experiments were the basis for widespread smallpox immunization strategies worldwide in the 20th century which resulted in the elimination of smallpox as a human disease today. 20

Other influential hypotheses are those which have been read and cited widely. An example of this is the hygiene hypothesis proposing an inverse relationship between infections in early life and allergies or autoimmunity in adulthood. An analysis reported that this hypothesis had been cited more than 3,000 times on Scopus. 1

LESSONS LEARNED FROM HYPOTHESES AMIDST THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

The COVID-19 pandemic devastated the world like no other in recent memory. During this period, various hypotheses emerged, understandably so considering the public health emergency situation with innumerable deaths and suffering for humanity. Within weeks of the first reports of COVID-19, aberrant immune system activation was identified as a key driver of organ dysfunction and mortality in this disease. 21 Consequently, numerous drugs that suppress the immune system or abrogate the activation of the immune system were hypothesized to have a role in COVID-19. 22 One of the earliest drugs hypothesized to have a benefit was hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine was proposed to interfere with Toll-like receptor activation and consequently ameliorate the aberrant immune system activation leading to pathology in COVID-19. 22 The drug was also hypothesized to have a prophylactic role in preventing infection or disease severity in COVID-19. It was also touted as a wonder drug for the disease by many prominent international figures. However, later studies which were well-designed randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate any benefit of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19. 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 Subsequently, azithromycin 27 , 28 and ivermectin 29 were hypothesized as potential therapies for COVID-19, but were not supported by evidence from randomized controlled trials. The role of vitamin D in preventing disease severity was also proposed, but has not been proven definitively until now. 30 , 31 On the other hand, randomized controlled trials identified the evidence supporting dexamethasone 32 and interleukin-6 pathway blockade with tocilizumab as effective therapies for COVID-19 in specific situations such as at the onset of hypoxia. 33 , 34 Clues towards the apparent effectiveness of various drugs against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in vitro but their ineffectiveness in vivo have recently been identified. Many of these drugs are weak, lipophilic bases and some others induce phospholipidosis which results in apparent in vitro effectiveness due to non-specific off-target effects that are not replicated inside living systems. 35 , 36

Another hypothesis proposed was the association of the routine policy of vaccination with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) with lower deaths due to COVID-19. This hypothesis emerged in the middle of 2020 when COVID-19 was still taking foot in many parts of the world. 37 , 38 Subsequently, many countries which had lower deaths at that time point went on to have higher numbers of mortality, comparable to other areas of the world. Furthermore, the hypothesis that BCG vaccination reduced COVID-19 mortality was a classic example of ecological fallacy. Associations between population level events (ecological studies; in this case, BCG vaccination and COVID-19 mortality) cannot be directly extrapolated to the individual level. Furthermore, such associations cannot per se be attributed as causal in nature, and can only serve to generate hypotheses that need to be tested at the individual level. 39

IS TRADITIONAL PEER REVIEW EFFICIENT FOR EVALUATION OF WORKING AND SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESES?

Traditionally, publication after peer review has been considered the gold standard before any new idea finds acceptability amongst the scientific community. Getting a work (including a working or scientific hypothesis) reviewed by experts in the field before experiments are conducted to prove or disprove it helps to refine the idea further as well as improve the experiments planned to test the hypothesis. 40 A route towards this has been the emergence of journals dedicated to publishing hypotheses such as the Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics. 41 Another means of publishing hypotheses is through registered research protocols detailing the background, hypothesis, and methodology of a particular study. If such protocols are published after peer review, then the journal commits to publishing the completed study irrespective of whether the study hypothesis is proven or disproven. 42 In the post-pandemic world, online research methods such as online surveys powered via social media channels such as Twitter and Instagram might serve as critical tools to generate as well as to preliminarily test the appropriateness of hypotheses for further evaluation. 43 , 44

Some radical hypotheses might be difficult to publish after traditional peer review. These hypotheses might only be acceptable by the scientific community after they are tested in research studies. Preprints might be a way to disseminate such controversial and ground-breaking hypotheses. 45 However, scientists might prefer to keep their hypotheses confidential for the fear of plagiarism of ideas, avoiding online posting and publishing until they have tested the hypotheses.

SUGGESTIONS ON GENERATING AND PUBLISHING HYPOTHESES

Publication of hypotheses is important, however, a balance is required between scientific temper and controversy. Journal editors and reviewers might keep in mind these specific points, summarized in Table 2 and detailed hereafter, while judging the merit of hypotheses for publication. Keeping in mind the ethical principle of primum non nocere, a hypothesis should be published only if it is testable in a manner that is ethically appropriate. 46 Such hypotheses should be grounded in reality and lend themselves to further testing to either prove or disprove them. It must be considered that subsequent experiments to prove or disprove a hypothesis have an equal chance of failing or succeeding, akin to tossing a coin. A pre-conceived belief that a hypothesis is unlikely to be proven correct should not form the basis of rejection of such a hypothesis for publication. In this context, hypotheses generated after a thorough literature search to identify knowledge gaps or based on concrete clinical observations on a considerable number of patients (as opposed to random observations on a few patients) are more likely to be acceptable for publication by peer-reviewed journals. Also, hypotheses should be considered for publication or rejection based on their implications for science at large rather than whether the subsequent experiments to test them end up with results in favour of or against the original hypothesis.

Hypotheses form an important part of the scientific literature. The COVID-19 pandemic has reiterated the importance and relevance of hypotheses for dealing with public health emergencies and highlighted the need for evidence-based and ethical hypotheses. A good hypothesis is testable in a relevant study design, backed by preliminary evidence, and has positive ethical and clinical implications. General medical journals might consider publishing hypotheses as a specific article type to enable more rapid advancement of science.

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

• Data curation: Gasparyan AY, Misra DP, Zimba O, Yessirkepov M, Agarwal V, Kitas GD.

“extremely user friendly”

“truly amazing!”

“so easy to use!”

Statistics Calculator

You want to analyze your data effortlessly? DATAtab makes it easy and online.

Online Statistics Calculator

What do you want to calculate online? The online statistics calculator is simple and uncomplicated! Here you can find a list of all implemented methods!

Create charts online with DATAtab

Create your charts for your data directly online and uncomplicated. To do this, insert your data into the table under Charts and select which chart you want.

The advantages of DATAtab

Statistics, as simple as never before..

DATAtab is a modern statistics software, with unique user-friendliness. Statistical analyses are done with just a few clicks, so DATAtab is perfect for statistics beginners and for professionals who want more flow in the user experience.

Directly in the browser, fully flexible.

Directly in the browser, fully flexible. DATAtab works directly in your web browser. You have no installation and maintenance effort whatsoever. Wherever and whenever you want to use DATAtab, just go to the website and get started.

All the statistical methods you need.

DATAtab offers you a wide range of statistical methods. We have selected the most central and best known statistical methods for you and do not overwhelm you with special cases.

Data security is a top priority.

All data that you insert and evaluate on DATAtab always remain on your end device. The data is not sent to any server or stored by us (not even temporarily). Furthermore, we do not pass on your data to third parties in order to analyze your user behavior.

Many tutorials with simple examples.

In order to facilitate the introduction, DATAtab offers a large number of free tutorials with focused explanations in simple language. We explain the statistical background of the methods and give step-by-step explanations for performing the analyses in the statistics calculator.

Practical Auto-Assistant.

DATAtab takes you by the hand in the world of statistics. When making statistical decisions, such as the choice of scale or measurement level or the selection of suitable methods, Auto-Assistants ensure that you get correct results quickly.

Charts, simple and clear.

With DATAtab data visualization is fun! Here you can easily create meaningful charts that optimally illustrate your results.

New in the world of statistics?

DATAtab was primarily designed for people for whom statistics is new territory. Beginners are not overwhelmed with a lot of complicated options and checkboxes, but are encouraged to perform their analyses step by step.

Online survey very simple.

DATAtab offers you the possibility to easily create an online survey, which you can then evaluate immediately with DATAtab.

Our references

Alternative to statistical software like SPSS and STATA

DATAtab was designed for ease of use and is a compelling alternative to statistical programs such as SPSS and STATA. On datatab.net, data can be statistically evaluated directly online and very easily (e.g. t-test, regression, correlation etc.). DATAtab's goal is to make the world of statistical data analysis as simple as possible, no installation and easy to use. Of course, we would also be pleased if you take a look at our second project Statisty .

Extensive tutorials

Descriptive statistics.

Here you can find out everything about location parameters and dispersion parameters and how you can describe and clearly present your data using characteristic values.

Hypothesis Test

Here you will find everything about hypothesis testing: One sample t-test , Unpaired t-test , Paired t-test and Chi-square test . You will also find tutorials for non-parametric statistical procedures such as the Mann-Whitney u-Test and Wilcoxon-Test . mann-whitney-u-test and the Wilcoxon test

The regression provides information about the influence of one or more independent variables on the dependent variable. Here are simple explanations of linear regression and logistic regression .

Correlation

Correlation analyses allow you to analyze the linear association between variables. Learn when to use Pearson correlation or Spearman rank correlation . With partial correlation , you can calculate the correlation between two variables to the exclusion of a third variable.

Partial Correlation

The partial correlation shows you the correlation between two variables to the exclusion of a third variable.

Levene Test

The Levene Test checks your data for variance equality. Thus, the levene test is used as a prerequisite test for many hypothesis tests .

The p-value is needed for every hypothesis test to be able to make a statement whether the null hypothesis is accepted or rejected.

Distributions

DATAtab provides you with tables with distributions and helpful explanations of the distribution functions. These include the Table of t-distribution and the Table of chi-squared distribution

Contingency table

With a contingency table you can get an overview of two categorical variables in the statistics.

Equivalence and non-inferiority

In an equivalence trial, the statistical test aims at showing that two treatments are not too different in characteristics and a non-inferiority trial wants to show that an experimental treatment is not worse than an established treatment.

If there is a clear cause-effect relationship between two variables, then we can speak of causality. Learn more about causality in our tutorial.

Multicollinearity

Multicollinearity is when two or more independent variables have a high correlation.

Effect size for independent t-test

Learn how to calculate the effect size for the t-test for independent samples.

Reliability analysis calculator

On DATAtab, Cohen's Kappa can be easily calculated online in the Cohen’s Kappa Calculator . there is also the Fleiss Kappa Calculator . Of course, the Cronbach's alpha can also be calculated in the Cronbach's Alpha Calculator .

Analysis of variance with repeated measurement

Repeated measures ANOVA tests whether there are statistically significant differences in three or more dependent samples.

Cite DATAtab: DATAtab Team (2024). DATAtab: Online Statistics Calculator. DATAtab e.U. Graz, Austria. URL https://datatab.net

Automated Hypothesis Generation

Automated hypothesis generation: when machine-learning systems produce ideas, not just test them.

Testing ideas at scale. Fast.

While algorithms are mostly used as tools to number-crunch and test-drive ideas, they have yet been used to generate the ideas themselves. Let alone at scale.

Rather than thinking up one idea at a time and testing it, what if a machine could generate millions of ideas automatically? What if this same machine would then proceed to autonomously test and rank the ideas, discovering which are better supported by the data? A machine that can even identify the type of data that could refute one’s theories and challenge existing practices.

This machine lies at the heart of SparkBeyond Discovery: its Hypothesis Engine. The engine automatically generates millions of ideas, many of them novel. Asks questions we would never think to even ask.

This Hypothesis Engine integrates the world’s largest collection of algorithms, and bypasses human cognitive bias to produce millions of ideas, hypotheses and questions in minutes. These hypotheses ensure that any meaningful signals in the data are surfaced. Then, these signals are often immediately actionable, and can be used as predictive features in machine learning models.

Going beyond the bias

Human ideation is inherently limited by cognitive bottlenecks and biases, which restrict us in generating and testing ideas at scale and high throughput. We're also limited by the speed at which we can communicate. We don’t have the capacity to read and comprehend the thousands of scientific articles and patents published every day. 

What’s more, the questions we ask are biased by our experience and knowledge, or even our mood.

In data science and research workflows, there are key bottlenecks that limit what a person or team can accomplish while working on a problem within a finite amount of time. 

For example, when exploring for useful patterns in data, a data scientist only has time to conceive, engineer, and evaluate a limited number of distinct hypotheses, leaving many areas unexplored. 

One of these areas is the gaps within an organization’s own data. This internal data may only reveal part of the story, whereas augmented external data sources can provide valuable contextual information. Without it, hypotheses based only on internal data don’t take into account the influence of external factors, such as weather and local events, or macro-economic factors and market conditions. 

Instead, by mapping out the entire spectrum of dynamics that happen on earth,SparkBeyond Discovery connects the dots between every data set that exists and offers a comprehensive viewpoint.

Tap into humanity's collective intelligence

Just like search engines crawl the web for text, our machine started indexing the code, data and knowledge on the web, and amassed one of the world's largest libraries of open-source code functions. 

Using both automation and AI, the Hypothesis Engine employs these functions to generate four million hypotheses per minute—a capacity that allows the technology to work through hundreds of good and bad ideas every second.

Related Articles

Overcoming the Enterprise LLM Blindspot

Turns out Enterprise LLMs have a massive blindspot, diminishing AI's impact on real-world performance. Here's how to solve it.

Continue reading

Generative AI for data analytics: the future of enterprise sense-making

In the case of enterprise data analytics, generative AI will radically change the way we interrogate our data to explore, react to and shape our business realities.

Turning enterprise data into accessible knowledge for LLMs

With the recent release of the GPT edition of our Discovery Platform, we introduce novel ways to unlock the vault of deep enterprise knowledge and internally developed insights, making them accessible to decision makers at all levels

It was easier in this project since we used this outpout

Business insights.

Apply key dataset transformations through no/low-code workflows to clean, prep, and scope your datasets as needed for analysis

Predictive Models

Micro-segments, features for external models, business automation rules, root-cause analysis, join our event about this topic today..

Learn all about the SparkBeyond mission and product vision.

A conversation worth having today

Drop us a message and we'll get back to you promptly

Book a virtual meeting to see SparkBeyond products in action

Explore current job openings at SparkBeyond worldwide

Research Studio

Applications.

Descriptive Statistics

Hypothesis test, online statistics calculator.

On Statisty you can statistically analyse your data online. Simply copy your own data into the table above and select the variables you want to analyse.

Statisty thus is a free statistical software that makes your calculations directly online. In contrast to SPSS, JASP or Excel, nothing needs to be installed in order to statistically evaluate your data.

Depending on how many variables you click on and what scale level they have, the appropriate tests are calculated.

• One sample t-Test
• Independent t-test
• Paired t-Test
• Binomial Test
• Chi-Square Test
• One-way ANOVA
• Two-way ANOVA
• Repeated measures ANOVA
• Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures
• Mann-Whitney U-test
• Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test
• Kruskal-Wallis Test
• Friedman-Test
• Correlation analysis
• Pearson correlation
• Spearman correlation
• Simple Lineare Regression
• Multiple Lineare Regression
• Logistische Regression

Statistics App

The results are then displayed clearly. First you get the descriptive statistics and then the appropriate hypothesis test. Of course, you can also calculate a linear regression or a logistic regression .

If you like also have a look at the Online Statistics Calculator at DATAtab

History Hypothesis Generator

If you’re searching for a hypothesis generator, you’re in the right place! With this free online tool, you’ll easily make a hypothesis from a question or from scratch.

Need a hypothesis for your history paper? This automatic hypothesis generator will save your time and nerves! Follow these 3 steps:

• ❓ Definitions
• 💡 What’s This Tool?

🔬 How to Generate a Hypothesis from a Question?

• ✅ Characteristics
• ✍️ Examples

🔗 References

❓ hypothesis in history: definitions.

In high school or college, you might need to develop a historical hypothesis for your academic paper or any other project. In the sections below, we have explained what it means for this subject.

What Is a Hypothesis?

A hypothesis is a statement or proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For it to be scientific, researchers should be able to test it.

The words “hypothesis” and “ theory ” are often used interchangeably. However, they are not the same. In exact science, a hypothesis needs to be provable to become a theory. In the non-scientific environment, the word is used more loosely.

What about a Hypothesis in History?

A historical hypothesis consists of:

• Attitudes that demonstrate relations between variables.

It is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon different from recorded facts , which is useful when:

• the existing evidence is limited,
• no recognized historical methodology is available,
• or researchers want to examine a specific aspect of a historical event.

A reasonable hypothesis should give a straightforward answer with substantial explanatory power . If you also need a unique idea to write about, check our list of history topics .

Hypothesis vs. Theory

💡 hypothesis maker: what it is.

An automatic hypothesis generator is a tool that can save you time and energy. It uses advanced AI technology to create an appropriate assumption:

• The generator analyzes the variables you have input into the cycle.
• Then, it formulates the relations between them.
• Finally, it generates a hypothesis that you can use for your paper.

Our history hypothesis generator is a straightforward tool. You can use it whenever you need help inventing or wording your idea. It’s free and available all the time!

At a particular stage of your research, you will need to generate a hypothesis from a research question. A hypothesis is a statement that you will further test.

To do that, you need to take five steps:

• Define independent and dependent variables.
• Brainstorm ideas to explain the question.
• Choose the most convincing explanation.
• Formulate a statement based on this explanation.
• Check if the claim is testable in a scientific study.

✅ How to Make a Good Hypothesis in History

So that you don’t get confused when developing your historical hypothesis, let’s see what characteristics a successful one should obtain:

✍️ History Hypothesis Maker: Examples

So, you’ve read about the characteristics of a good hypothesis in history. Now you may be wondering what one actually looks like. In this section, we have listed some examples based on sample academic papers .

Italian industrial capacities were underutilized, while other Axis partners exploited their capabilities. Such countries as Hungary, Bulgaria, and Slovakia even granted loans to Nazi Germany. The WWII could have ended differently if German-Italian cooperation had been more efficient.

People from dominant racial groups deny racism because they are ignorant of human history. At the same time, minorities see the issue differently. They are aware of the records and experience systemic racism in the present.

Islamic Art has features distinctive from the Platonic influence on Islamic thought. Thus, there is a philosophical explanation of why it follows the principles of order and harmony.

The world ignored the Korean crisis in 1948 due to the situation in Germany and the deterioration of Soviet-American relations.

Thanks for reading!

If you’re working on a history paper, try out our automatic hypothesis generator. It will come up with great ideas and save you a lot of time. Use our tips and examples to make your paper and research better. Besides, share it with other students who may need our advice.

Updated: Apr 5th, 2024

• Hypothesis-Based Research | Michigan Tech
• A Brief Guide to Writing a History Paper | Harvard College
• Hypothesis Formulation | Boston University
• Developing a Hypothesis | Pressbooks

Null and Alternative Hypothesis Generator

Take the 4 steps to use this null & alternative hypothesis generator:

• Indicate your research group;
• Add the predicate and the outcome of your study;
• Define the control group if necessary;
• Choose the predicted effect and click “Generate now!”.

Whom or what are you analyzing in your study?

What is the activity or characteristic specific to your research group? The verb should correlate with your research group.

What are you measuring in your study? What thing does the above predicate affect?

Whom or what are you comparing with your research group? This field is optional.

Add here the effect of the predicate on the dependent variable.

Whatever quantitative study you write, you'll surely need to design a null and alternative hypothesis to test with statistical analysis in your study. Don't be scared off by these seemingly complex terms; in fact, formulating these hypotheses may be really fun, especially if you're using our simple, free online tool.

⭐️ Null Hypothesis Generator: the Benefits

• ⚪ How to Use the Tool
• 🔠 Null Vs. Alternative Hypothesis
• 📊 How to Choose between Them

🔗 References

⚪ null hypothesis generator: how to use it.

Let's first clarify how our automated null hypothesis generator can serve your research goals. Its use is an easy and intuitive process that requires little onboarding. Feel free to create a hypothesis for your essay using these steps:

• Indicate the subject of your study (people, processes, or phenomena you're going to examine) – it will be your experimental group.
• Stipulate the activities you expect to measure (that will be the action of your subject).
• Point out the measure (variable) you plan to measure.
• Add a comparison group that will serve as a control for your experimental group.
• Specify the expected effect of the relationship measurement – as we're talking about a null hypothesis here, you should indicate a negative effect.

After you feed that data into the online null hypothesis generator, you will get a well-formulated sentence reflecting your assumed null relationship (that is, an absence of a statistically significant relationship). The same goes for the alternative hypothesis generator, with the only difference in the expectation of a positive effect.

🔠 How to Generate a Null and Alternative Hypothesis

Now it's time to clarify the distinctions between null and alternative hypotheses to give you clear guidance on their formulation.

In other words, these two claims should contradict each other, with one stating that one variable has a visible effect on the other and the second stating that there is no such effect at all.

So, how can you apply these definitions to practice and transform your research question into workable hypotheses?

Here is a handy table with explanations and illustrations of how this happens.

Use this principle for formulating your hypothesis from any other research question you might want to explore. Think of it in the following terms: the null hypothesis stands for no effect, and an alternative hypothesis assumes the existence of that effect.

📊 How to Choose between Null and Alternative Hypothesis

Let's first depart from question about choosing one of the hypotheses, as in most cases, they work in tandem and are inseparable.

So, the good news is that you won't need to choose one of them for your study; they will be presented as a pair of hypotheses. Depending on your study findings, one will be proved, and the other will be disproved.

Now, we have come to the point of using statistics to detect which one is good. In other words, you will need to choose which hypothesis works out and explains the relationship you're examining better than its counterpart. Here are the simple steps you should take to prove and disprove your academic assumptions.

Step 1 - Collect Relevant Data

Once the hypotheses are ready, it's time to check whether the data proves or disproves any of them. Thus, for instance, if you measure the correlation between a person's leadership style and personality type, you should evaluate every respondent's leadership style and personality type with specific quantitative questionnaires.

Step 2 - Use Statistical Analysis

The collected data should be fed into statistical software (e.g., SPSS ) for analysis. You will have a series of quantitative measures for every respondent and every variable neatly organized in rows and lines, assigning specific categories to each number.

Then you can run a t-test or a correlation test depending on the relationship you're studying and see what results you get. Let's talk about the example given above. You will need to run a correlation test for leadership style and personality type measures to see whether the Pearson correlation score is statistically significant.

Step 3 - Reject One Hypothesis & Prove the Other One

Now that you have the statistical analysis results in front of you, it's time to interpret them and reject one of the mutually exclusive hypotheses.

Continuing with the example given above, you will need to see whether your resulting Pearson correlation is high or low:

• Coefficients below 0.5 show a loose correlation;
• 0.5 to 0.7 signify a moderate correlation;
• 0.7-0.9 stands for a high correlation.

Thus, if you see a figure below 0.5, you can consider your null hypothesis proven – there is no significant correlation between leadership style and personality type in the sample of your participants. If your figure is 0.5 and higher, you can consider your alternative hypothesis validated – there is a correlation between a leadership style and a personality type in your chosen sample.

Thank you for reading this article! Try our other free writing tools to prepare and polish any assignment quickly and efficiently.

Updated: Apr 9th, 2024

• When Do You Reject the Null Hypothesis? (With Examples)
• Hypothesis Testing (P-Value Approach) - STAT ONLINE
• What 'Fail to Reject' Means in a Hypothesis Test - ThoughtCo
• Difference between Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis
• How to Write a Null Hypothesis - Video & Lesson Transcript

You can Choose category

Null Hypothesis Generator with Examples

Fill in the fields to get a hypothesis

Add above the person or phenomenon you are focusing on in your study.

Add above the activity or characteristic of your research group). Start with a verb correlating with your subject.

Add above the thing that you are going to measure in your study.

Add above the person or phenomenon you are comparing with your research group.

Add here the effect of the predicate on the dependent variable.

Show Example

Are you looking for a free null hypothesis generator? Writing a hypothesis is important in academic writing since it shows the direction of your research paper. Don’t stress yourself with endless research hours; try our efficient hypothesis generator and get instant results. It is free, simple, and accessible online for students at any academic level. You can formulate a correct hypothesis within minutes, regardless of your paper’s complexity.

• 🤖 How to Use the Tool
• 🧩 What Is a Null Hypothesis

❌ How to Reject a Null Hypothesis

• ❗ References

🤖 Null Hypothesis Generator: How to Use It

A null hypothesis generator is simple to use. You no longer have to write wrong hypotheses because this generator provides accurate results for your research project.

You have to add correct information about your research paper in the provided fields below:

• The subject of your research or experimental group – who or what.
• What the subject or group does – independent variable .
• The measured thing – dependent variable .
• The result.
• The control group (optional).

After filling out the above fields, you can click on the button, and the system will generate results. Ensure you provide accurate information to get relevant results that align with your research question .

🧩 What Is a Null Hypothesis & Why Is It Important?

A null hypothesis is a statement that claims there is no relationship between a dependent and independent variable . The hypothesis is not supposed to show any connection; if it does, the research could have a sampling or experimental error. Thus, a false null hypothesis shows a relationship in the measured observation.

The null hypothesis is vital in research since it determines whether two measured observation subjects are related. It also lets the user know if the outcome is a product of chance or manipulation. However, the hypothesis must be tested to evaluate if it is true or false. The test determines if the null hypothesis should be accepted or rejected.

Researchers often use 2 strategies to test a null hypothesis:

• Significance testing;
• Hypothesis testing.

Both approaches are distinguished based on the observed data. Thus, a null hypothesis is important in research since it will reveal the direction of your essay.

👀 Null Hypothesis Examples

To formulate a null hypothesis, you must drive your statement from a question. Rewrite that question in a different format that presumes there is no relationship between the subjects of observation.

Here are examples of a null hypothesis.

When formulating a null hypothesis, you should always assume that the variables have no relationship. Always start with a question if you want to create a good null hypothesis that reflects your research.

When testing the null hypothesis, the p-value is important in determining the outcome of the observed variables. The p-value in statistics is a number that is calculated from a test. It illustrates the probability of getting the results if the null hypothesis is true.

In short, this value helps researchers decide whether the null hypothesis will be rejected .

Understanding the aspects that lead to the rejection of null hypothesis is essential. The entire process is vital in data analysis , interpretation, and calculations. Besides, you will be able to improve your analytical and research skills in different industries.

Therefore, rejecting a null hypothesis is possible if you follow the falsifiability principle .

What does it mean?

It means that a hypothesis may be regarded as scientifically valid only if it can be tested and proved or disproved based on the resulting data. Therefore, both null and alternative hypotheses should be falsifiable to inform a scholarly inquiry.

So, you must first establish the null hypothesis before testing.

Follow the 4 steps below:

• Establish the hypothesis;
• Create an experimental outline to test the null hypothesis;
• Perform the experiments;
• Interpret the outcome of the investigation.

There are some factors involved when it comes to rejecting a null hypothesis. The p-value is used as an indicator to reject the hypothesis if it is less or equal to the significance level. This level reveals the difference between the test outcome and the null hypothesis.

Therefore, you can use our null hypothesis maker to simplify your work and generate accurate results. Whether you are working on a biology research paper or a statistics paper, understanding how to identify and reject a null hypothesis is important.

We hope the tool and the information were helpful. You are welcome to try our other online writing apps to quickly polish your psychology essay.

❓ Null Hypothesis Generator FAQ

❓ what is a null hypothesis.

A null hypothesis is a statement that claims there is no relationship between independent and independent variables. It is usually based on insufficient evidence that needs more testing to prove if the observed information is true or false.

❓ How to write a null hypothesis?

Writing a null hypothesis requires you to ask a question. You need to rephrase the question in a form that makes no assumptions about the connection between the variables. Formulate the null hypotheses to show the treatment is ineffective.

❓ What does it mean to reject the null hypothesis?

A null hypothesis states that no difference exists between a set of groups. It means that the dependent variable doesn’t have a substantial impact effect on the independent variable. When researchers reject a null hypothesis, they have proven the alternative hypothesis. So, the final result shows there is a relationship between the variables.

❓ What is a null hypothesis example?

An example of a null hypothesis can start with this question: Are adults better at music than children? The null hypothesis, in this case, will state that age doesn’t affect musical ability. Thus, there is no relationship between music and a person’s age.

Updated: Apr 9th, 2024

🔗 References

• Hypothesis Definition & Examples - Simply Psychology
• Hypothesis - APA Dictionary of Psychology
• Why Are Statistics Necessary in Psychology? - Verywell Mind
• Scientific Inquiry Definition: How the Scientific Method Works
• Karl Popper Life & Theory of Falsification - Study.com

Piedmont cancels fix-your-own-pothole event after residents lampoon idea on Facebook

Piedmont City Manager Joshua Williams thought he had a fun idea to generate community involvement amid the city's beautification efforts this month.

But after publicizing Pothole Purge Day on the city's Facebook page, it took just a few hours for Williams to cancel those plans.

Pothole Purge Day would have been this Saturday in Piedmont, a community of about 8,000 off the northwest corner of Oklahoma City. Residents were invited to meet up with Public Works Department personnel, receive training on how to cold-patch a pothole and be sent off with a bucket of their own asphalt.

"This was meant to be a positive community project," Williams told The Oklahoman. "Engagement, get out and meet your neighbor, you know. We weren't asking residents to reconstruct roads."

But despite Williams' best intentions, Piedmont residents lampooned the idea. Several asked if it was a joke, while others seemed angry at the premise, questioning why taxpayers were being asked to patch roads.

"It's just due to, I think, not really understanding the intent of what we're trying to do. With the negativity surrounding the event, I just think it's best to cancel it and look for other opportunities for community volunteerism and meet-your-neighbor opportunities," Williams said.

What is Pothole Purge Day?

In the original Facebook post, the city asked residents if they "have a pesky pothole that you just can't stand."

"Public Works will be on site at 164th and Cemetery Road to demonstrate and train you on how to lay cold patch! After a very brief demo, you will be a pro and they will fill up your bucket with material so you can take it with you to exact your revenge!!," the city wrote.

Cold patch asphalt is a pre-made mixture that can be applied to a road's surface without heat. It's a temporary fix intended for minor cracks and potholes.

The post drew dozens of replies, some of which asked whether it was a joke. Others asked if they'd get paid, or questioned who would be liable in case of injury or shoddy work.

The city initially clarified that everyone participating will be volunteers who sign a general liability waiver. Public Works employees would inspect the patches and fix them if necessary.

Eventually, however, the negative feedback was too much.

"You know, potholes (and roads) are a big topic in Piedmont. I just thought this would be a great opportunity to get the community involved, make the city better, and it just didn't take off the way that I expected it to," Williams said.