How to Write Critical Reviews
When you are asked to write a critical review of a book or article, you will need to identify, summarize, and evaluate the ideas and information the author has presented. In other words, you will be examining another person’s thoughts on a topic from your point of view.
Your stand must go beyond your “gut reaction” to the work and be based on your knowledge (readings, lecture, experience) of the topic as well as on factors such as criteria stated in your assignment or discussed by you and your instructor.
Make your stand clear at the beginning of your review, in your evaluations of specific parts, and in your concluding commentary.
Remember that your goal should be to make a few key points about the book or article, not to discuss everything the author writes.
Understanding the Assignment
To write a good critical review, you will have to engage in the mental processes of analyzing (taking apart) the work–deciding what its major components are and determining how these parts (i.e., paragraphs, sections, or chapters) contribute to the work as a whole.
Analyzing the work will help you focus on how and why the author makes certain points and prevent you from merely summarizing what the author says. Assuming the role of an analytical reader will also help you to determine whether or not the author fulfills the stated purpose of the book or article and enhances your understanding or knowledge of a particular topic.
Be sure to read your assignment thoroughly before you read the article or book. Your instructor may have included specific guidelines for you to follow. Keeping these guidelines in mind as you read the article or book can really help you write your paper!
Also, note where the work connects with what you’ve studied in the course. You can make the most efficient use of your reading and notetaking time if you are an active reader; that is, keep relevant questions in mind and jot down page numbers as well as your responses to ideas that appear to be significant as you read.
Please note: The length of your introduction and overview, the number of points you choose to review, and the length of your conclusion should be proportionate to the page limit stated in your assignment and should reflect the complexity of the material being reviewed as well as the expectations of your reader.
Write the introduction
Below are a few guidelines to help you write the introduction to your critical review.
Introduce your review appropriately
Begin your review with an introduction appropriate to your assignment.
If your assignment asks you to review only one book and not to use outside sources, your introduction will focus on identifying the author, the title, the main topic or issue presented in the book, and the author’s purpose in writing the book.
If your assignment asks you to review the book as it relates to issues or themes discussed in the course, or to review two or more books on the same topic, your introduction must also encompass those expectations.
For example, before you can review two books on a topic, you must explain to your reader in your introduction how they are related to one another.
Within this shared context (or under this “umbrella”) you can then review comparable aspects of both books, pointing out where the authors agree and differ.
In other words, the more complicated your assignment is, the more your introduction must accomplish.
Finally, the introduction to a book review is always the place for you to establish your position as the reviewer (your thesis about the author’s thesis).
As you write, consider the following questions:
- Is the book a memoir, a treatise, a collection of facts, an extended argument, etc.? Is the article a documentary, a write-up of primary research, a position paper, etc.?
- Who is the author? What does the preface or foreword tell you about the author’s purpose, background, and credentials? What is the author’s approach to the topic (as a journalist? a historian? a researcher?)?
- What is the main topic or problem addressed? How does the work relate to a discipline, to a profession, to a particular audience, or to other works on the topic?
- What is your critical evaluation of the work (your thesis)? Why have you taken that position? What criteria are you basing your position on?
Provide an overview
In your introduction, you will also want to provide an overview. An overview supplies your reader with certain general information not appropriate for including in the introduction but necessary to understanding the body of the review.
Generally, an overview describes your book’s division into chapters, sections, or points of discussion. An overview may also include background information about the topic, about your stand, or about the criteria you will use for evaluation.
The overview and the introduction work together to provide a comprehensive beginning for (a “springboard” into) your review.
- What are the author’s basic premises? What issues are raised, or what themes emerge? What situation (i.e., racism on college campuses) provides a basis for the author’s assertions?
- How informed is my reader? What background information is relevant to the entire book and should be placed here rather than in a body paragraph?
Write the body
The body is the center of your paper, where you draw out your main arguments. Below are some guidelines to help you write it.
Organize using a logical plan
Organize the body of your review according to a logical plan. Here are two options:
- First, summarize, in a series of paragraphs, those major points from the book that you plan to discuss; incorporating each major point into a topic sentence for a paragraph is an effective organizational strategy. Second, discuss and evaluate these points in a following group of paragraphs. (There are two dangers lurking in this pattern–you may allot too many paragraphs to summary and too few to evaluation, or you may re-summarize too many points from the book in your evaluation section.)
- Alternatively, you can summarize and evaluate the major points you have chosen from the book in a point-by-point schema. That means you will discuss and evaluate point one within the same paragraph (or in several if the point is significant and warrants extended discussion) before you summarize and evaluate point two, point three, etc., moving in a logical sequence from point to point to point. Here again, it is effective to use the topic sentence of each paragraph to identify the point from the book that you plan to summarize or evaluate.
Questions to keep in mind as you write
With either organizational pattern, consider the following questions:
- What are the author’s most important points? How do these relate to one another? (Make relationships clear by using transitions: “In contrast,” an equally strong argument,” “moreover,” “a final conclusion,” etc.).
- What types of evidence or information does the author present to support his or her points? Is this evidence convincing, controversial, factual, one-sided, etc.? (Consider the use of primary historical material, case studies, narratives, recent scientific findings, statistics.)
- Where does the author do a good job of conveying factual material as well as personal perspective? Where does the author fail to do so? If solutions to a problem are offered, are they believable, misguided, or promising?
- Which parts of the work (particular arguments, descriptions, chapters, etc.) are most effective and which parts are least effective? Why?
- Where (if at all) does the author convey personal prejudice, support illogical relationships, or present evidence out of its appropriate context?
Keep your opinions distinct and cite your sources
Remember, as you discuss the author’s major points, be sure to distinguish consistently between the author’s opinions and your own.
Keep the summary portions of your discussion concise, remembering that your task as a reviewer is to re-see the author’s work, not to re-tell it.
And, importantly, if you refer to ideas from other books and articles or from lecture and course materials, always document your sources, or else you might wander into the realm of plagiarism.
Include only that material which has relevance for your review and use direct quotations sparingly. The Writing Center has other handouts to help you paraphrase text and introduce quotations.
Write the conclusion
You will want to use the conclusion to state your overall critical evaluation.
You have already discussed the major points the author makes, examined how the author supports arguments, and evaluated the quality or effectiveness of specific aspects of the book or article.
Now you must make an evaluation of the work as a whole, determining such things as whether or not the author achieves the stated or implied purpose and if the work makes a significant contribution to an existing body of knowledge.
Consider the following questions:
- Is the work appropriately subjective or objective according to the author’s purpose?
- How well does the work maintain its stated or implied focus? Does the author present extraneous material? Does the author exclude or ignore relevant information?
- How well has the author achieved the overall purpose of the book or article? What contribution does the work make to an existing body of knowledge or to a specific group of readers? Can you justify the use of this work in a particular course?
- What is the most important final comment you wish to make about the book or article? Do you have any suggestions for the direction of future research in the area? What has reading this work done for you or demonstrated to you?
Academic and Professional Writing
This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels.
A Short Guide to Close Reading for Literary Analysis
Using Literary Quotations
Writing a Rhetorical Précis to Analyze Nonfiction Texts
Incorporating Interview Data
Planning and Writing a Grant Proposal: The Basics
Additional Resources for Grants and Proposal Writing
Job Materials and Application Essays
Writing Personal Statements for Ph.D. Programs
- Before you begin: useful tips for writing your essay
- Guided brainstorming exercises
- Get more help with your essay
- Frequently Asked Questions
Resume Writing Tips
CV Writing Tips
Proposals and Dissertations
Resources for Proposal Writers
Resources for Dissertators
Planning and Writing Research Papers
Quoting and Paraphrasing
Writing Annotated Bibliographies
Creating Poster Presentations
Writing an Abstract for Your Research Paper
Advice for Students Writing Thank-You Notes to Donors
Reading for a Review
Writing a Review of Literature
Scientific Report Format
Sample Lab Assignment
Writing for the Web
Writing an Effective Blog Post
Writing for Social Media: A Guide for Academics
Evaluation Essay - Definition, Examples, and Writing Tips
13 min read
Published on: Jan 12, 2020
Last updated on: Nov 22, 2023
People also read
Get Better at Math: Solving Math Problems Quick and Easy
Learn How to Write an Editorial on Any Topic
Best Tips on How to Avoid Plagiarism
How to Write a Movie Review - Guide & Examples
A Complete Guide on How to Write a Summary for Students
Write Opinion Essay Like a Pro: A Detailed Guide
How to Write a Thematic Statement - Tips & Examples
How to Write a Bio - Quick Tips, Structure & Examples
How to Write a Synopsis – A Simple Format & Guide
How to Write a Comparative Essay – A Complete Guide
Visual Analysis Essay - A Writing Guide with Format & Sample
List of Common Social Issues Around the World
Writing Character Analysis - Outline, Steps, and Examples
11 Common Types of Plagiarism Explained Through Examples
Article Review Writing: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide with Examples
A Detailed Guide on How to Write a Poem Step by Step
Detailed Guide on Appendix Writing: With Tips and Examples
Share this article
Are you unsure about what it takes to evaluate things from your perspective in an evaluation essay?
If you’re having a hard time understanding how to present a balanced assessment of the subject, worry not! We are here to help you get through the evaluation essay writing process.
In this blog, you will learn all about evaluation essays. From the definition, writing process, topics, tips, and a lot more, you’ll learn how to write an evaluation essay effortlessly!
Continue reading to get a better idea.
On This Page On This Page -->
What is an Evaluation Essay?
Let’s first understand the evaluation essay meaning, here is the standard definition:
An evaluation essay offers a value judgment or an opinion of something. It presents an overall view of a particular subject’s quality. Moreover, it provides a critical analysis and a complete evaluation of something.
What is the Purpose of an Evaluation Essay?
The main purpose of an evaluation essay is to present an opinion and evaluate a topic critically. This type of writing determines the condition, worth, or significance by careful appraisal and study.
This essay features the writer’s opinion, but when done correctly, it does not sound opinionated. Instead, it provides the facts and evidence to justify the opinions about the essay’s subject.
To write a good evaluation essay, you need to master critical evaluation and present the evaluation in an unbiased manner. You may also discuss both the pros and cons of the subject.
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job
Evaluation Essay Structure
The four different ways to format and organize the evaluation essay are as follows.
1. Chronological Structure
It is a sequential organization that could be used for evaluating historical or current events. It tells how something works and assesses the effectiveness of a mechanism, procedure, or process.
2. Spatial Structure
The spatial organization structure is used for evaluating or describing art or architecture. Here, you will define one element of the artifact and spatially move to the next.
3. Compare and Contrast Structure
The compare and contrast structure is used to evaluate or review the culinary or music genre. Here the writer evaluates a subject by comprising and contrasting it with the known subject.
4. Point-by-Point Structure
The point-by-point structure is also used for culinary and music reviews. But, in this structure, you describe one element and then evaluate it, describe the second element and evaluate it, and so on.
After setting the criteria and collecting evidence for strengthening your judgment, you’ll start your evaluation essay. Let’s see what are the steps involved in starting an evaluation essay.
How to Start an Evaluation Essay?
When you start writing an evaluation essay, grabbing the reader’s attention is essential. For this, hook the reader from the beginning until the end to ensure that your essay’s opening follows an engaging tone.
Step 1. Choose an Interesting Topic
Deciding the topic and evaluation essay criteria is important. Make sure it's not just compelling and interesting, but also informative so that you can find enough material for a detailed evaluation.
Step 2. Set the Evaluation Essay Criteria
For an evaluation essay, you have to set the criteria for evaluation first. Criteria are the standards or measures by which someone assesses the quality or value of the subject.
Some key points to establish the criteria are:
- Identifying relevant aspects that relate to the subject
- Defining the criteria clearly so that it is specific and understandable for readers
- Your criteria should be directly relevant to the nature of the subject
- Always consider the audience’s expectations and standards while setting the criteria
- Your thesis statement should always align with your evaluation criteria
Step 3. Collect Evidence for Your Judgment
The author’s judgment of the subject states whether the subject is good or bad. It is an overall assessment or the opinion supported by the evidence. The judgment corresponds to the benchmarks set by the author in the essay criteria.
The evidence is a combination of supporting data and facts. Using the evidence, the author demonstrates how well the subject meets the judgment. The evidence serves as the foundation of your evaluation.
Without providing strong and accurate evidence, you will not be able to convince the readers of your judgment.
Step 4. Decide the Essay Structure
After that, decide on the structure that you want to follow. It can be a chronological or point-by-point structure
Step 5. Craft the Essay Outline
When you create an essay outline , evaluate what should be added and removed. If you skip this step before writing, you may lose track of what to include in your essay while you write.
So, writing an outline for your evaluation essay is a critical step that eases your writing journey.
Here is a sample evaluation essay outline:
Step 6. Declare Your Thesis Statement
For an evaluation essay that keeps the reader hooked from the start, opt for a catchy thesis statement . The thesis should state the main point of the evaluation.
In the thesis statement, you should always express your stance on the subject clearly. In doing so, the readers will have a clear idea about the purpose and direction of your essay.
Now, understand how to write an evaluation essay by following the detailed procedure mentioned below.
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!
How to Write an Evaluation Essay?
Here is a step-by-step guide for you to write an evaluation essay.
Step 1. Write the Introduction
The introduction is the first impression your readers will have of you, so it's crucial to make a good one. It should capture attention and excite readers, drawing them into what you have to say about this topic.
The following are the elements that you should consider while writing the introduction:
- Start with an interesting hook statement so that you can get the reader’s attention.
- Provide background information about the topic for the reader to understand the subject
- Establish the evaluation essay thesis statement. It sets out the overall purpose of the evaluation, so make sure it is apparent and to the point
Read this evaluation essay introduction example, and you’ll understand exactly what to pen down in yours:
Step 2. Draft the Body Section
The body of the essay consists of three paragraphs. Each paragraph holds different ideas related to one another and flows smoothly from start to finish, just like how a good story should be told.
Here are the important points that must be included in the body paragraphs.
- Start with the topic sentence that presents your judgment about the topic
- Present the supporting evidence to back up the topic sentence and your viewpoint.
- Present a balanced evaluative argument to show impartiality
- Compare and contrast the subject to another subject to show the strengths and weaknesses
- Present the evaluation from multiple perspectives, while being both positive and critical
- Always use transition words between your paragraphs to ensure a smooth and coherent flow for the reader.
Step 3. Write the Conclusion
It is the final chance to convince your reader to agree with your point of view. You’re supposed to summarize and conclude the essay. In the conclusion , you present your final evaluation of the essay.
Keep in mind the following aspects while writing a closing paragraph of an evaluation essay.
- Summarize the points and evaluative arguments that you made in the body section.
- Justify your thesis statement.
- Provide a concrete and secure conclusion to your argument by ultimately leaving the reader convinced by your evaluation.
Step 4. Proofread, Revise, and Edit
The final step is proofreading and editing. Always spend enough time reading your essay carefully. It will help you catch the unintentional mistakes you have made and recover them. If needed, you can also revise your essay 2–3 times.
How to Format Your Evaluation Essay?
For formatting your evaluation essay, follow the standard academic writing guidelines. You can opt for different formatting styles like APA, MLA, or Chicago.
In general, you should stick to the below formatting guidelines:
Font and Size:
- Use a legible font such as Times New Roman or Arial.
- Choose a standard font size, often 12-point.
- Set one-inch margins on all sides of the paper.
- Double-space the entire essay, including the title, headings, and body paragraphs.
- Create a title for your essay that reflects the subject and purpose of the evaluation.
- Center the title on the page.
- Use title case (capitalize the first letter of each major word).
- Include a header with your last name and page number in the top right corner.
- Follow the format “Last Name Page Number” (e.g., “Smith 1”).
Citations (if applicable):
- Include citations for any sources used in your evaluation.
- Follow the citation style specified by your instructor or the required style guide (APA, MLA, Chicago).
Counterargument (if included):
- Clearly label and present any counterargument.
- Provide a well-reasoned response to the counterargument.
References or Works Cited Page (if applicable):
- Include a separate page for references or a works cited page if your essay includes citations.
- List all sources in the appropriate citation style.
Well, the time has come to look at some great evaluation essay examples. Getting help from sample essays is always a great way to perfect your evaluation papers.
Evaluation Essay Examples
Evaluation can be written on any topic, i.e., book, movie, music, etc. Below, we have given some evaluation essay examples for students:
Evaluation Essay Sample PDF
Movie Evaluation Essay Example
Critical evaluation Essay Example PDF
Product Evaluation Essay PDF
Source Evaluation Essay Example PDF
Employee Self-Evaluation Essay Example
How to Start A Self-Evaluation Essay Example PDF
Evaluation Essay Topics For College Students
For writing an amazing evaluation essay, the first thing that you require is an essay topic. Here are some incredible topic ideas for college students. You can use or mold them according to your preference.
- Artificial intelligence's impact on society: A double-edged sword?
- Evaluate the online teaching and on-campus teaching styles
- Analyze and evaluate the Real Madrid football team and their performance
- Is media a threat to cultural cohesion or a source of enrichment?
- Compare and evaluate recorded music and live performance
- Evaluate how a university's football team impacts students' personalities
- Critically evaluate a remake of an original movie you have watched recently
- Analyze how the roles of females and males changed in recent romantic movies
- Evaluate your favorite restaurant, its food, aroma, and everything
- Critically evaluate gender disparities in college majors and career choices.
Evaluation Essay vs. Review
At first glance, an evaluation essay might look like a review. But, there are some notable differences between them. See this table to see how both pieces of writing differ from each other.
After reading the step-by-step guide and examples, you must have learned the art of writing a good evaluation essay. We’re confident that you’re now able to provide a balanced and effective evaluation of the topics you choose for your essay.
But writing a perfect essay is not that simple; you require a lot of practice and experience to become a good writer. That is why we are here to help you write any type of academic essay.
MyPerfectWords.com is a professional essay writing service that offers help for all academic writing assignments. We have a team of professional writers who are experts in writing all types of essays and evaluation papers.
So what are you waiting for? Let us handle your evaluation essay worries and have a sigh of relief!
Frequently Asked Questions
1. what are the four components of an evaluation essay.
The four components of an evaluation essay are:
- Background information
2. What are the 4 types of evaluation?
The four types of evaluation are:
Barbara P (Literature, Marketing)
Dr. Barbara is a highly experienced writer and author who holds a Ph.D. degree in public health from an Ivy League school. She has worked in the medical field for many years, conducting extensive research on various health topics. Her writing has been featured in several top-tier publications.
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!
We value your privacy
Website Data Collection
Are you sure you want to cancel?
Your preferences have not been saved.
7 Steps for How to Write an Evaluation Essay (Example & Template)
In this ultimate guide, I will explain to you exactly how to write an evaluation essay.
1. What is an Evaluation Essay?
An evaluation essay should provide a critical analysis of something.
You’re literally ‘evaluating’ the thing you’re looking up.
Here’s a couple of quick definitions of what we mean by ‘evaluate’:
- Merriam-Webster defines evaluation as: “to determine the significance, worth, or condition of usually by careful appraisal and study”
- Collins Dictionary says: “If you evaluate something or someone, you consider them in order to make a judgment about them, for example about how good or bad they are.”
Here’s some synonyms for ‘evaluate’:
So, we could say that an evaluation essay should carefully examine the ‘thing’ and provide an overall judgement of it.
Here’s some common things you may be asked to write an evaluation essay on:
This is by no means an exhaustive list. Really, you can evaluate just about anything!
Get a Pdf of this article for class
Enjoy subscriber-only access to this article’s pdf
2. How to write an Evaluation Essay
There are two secrets to writing a strong evaluation essay. The first is to aim for objective analysis before forming an opinion. The second is to use an evaluation criteria.
Aim to Appear Objective before giving an Evaluation Argument
Your evaluation will eventually need an argument.
The evaluation argument will show your reader what you have decided is the final value of the ‘thing’ you’re evaluating.
But in order to convince your reader that your evaluative argument is sound, you need to do some leg work.
The aim will be to show that you have provided a balanced and fair assessment before coming to your conclusion.
In order to appear balanced you should:
- Discuss both the pros and cons of the thing
- Discuss both the strengths and weaknesses of the thing
- Look at the thing from multiple different perspectives
- Be both positive and critical. Don’t make it look like you’re biased towards one perspective.
In other words, give every perspective a fair hearing.
You don’t want to sound like a propagandist. You want to be seen as a fair and balanced adjudicator.
Use an Evaluation Criteria
One way to appear balanced is to use an evaluation criteria.
An evaluation criteria helps to show that you have assessed the ‘thing’ based on an objective measure.
Here’s some examples of evaluation criteria:
- Strength under pressure
- Longevity (ability to survive for a long time)
- Ease of use
- Ability to get the job done
- Ability to predict my needs
- Calmness under pressure
A Bed and Breakfast
- Breakfast options
- Taste of food
- Comfort of bed
- Local attractions
- Service from owner
We can use evaluation criteria to frame out ability to conduct the analysis fairly.
This is especially true for if you have to evaluate multiple different ‘things’. For example, if you’re evaluating three novels, you want to be able to show that you applied the same ‘test’ on all three books!
This will show that you gave each ‘thing’ a fair chance and looked at the same elements for each.
3. How to come up with an Evaluation Argument
After you have:
- Looked at both good and bad elements of the ‘thing’, and
- Used an evaluation criteria
You’ll then need to develop an evaluative argument. This argument shows your own overall perspective on the ‘thing’.
Remember, you will need to show your final evaluative argument is backed by objective analysis. You need to do it in order!
Analyze first. Evaluate second.
Here’s an example.
Let’s say you’re evaluating the quality of a meal.
You might say:
- A strength of the meal was its presentation. It was well presented and looked enticing to eat.
- A weakness of the meal was that it was overcooked. This decreased its flavor.
- The meal was given a low rating on ‘cost’ because it was more expensive than the other comparative meals on the menu.
- The meal was given a high rating on ‘creativity’. It was a meal that involved a thoughtful and inventive mix of ingredients.
Now that you’ve looked at some pros and cons and measured the meal based on a few criteria points (like cost and creativity), you’ll be able to come up with a final argument:
- Overall, the meal was good enough for a middle-tier restaurant but would not be considered a high-class meal. There is a lot of room for improvement if the chef wants to win any local cooking awards.
Evaluative terms that you might want to use for this final evaluation argument might include:
- All things considered
- With all key points in mind
4. Evaluation Essay Outline (with Examples)
Okay, so now you know what to do, let’s have a go at creating an outline for your evaluation essay!
Here’s what I recommend:
4.1 How to Write your Introduction
In the introduction, feel free to use my 5-Step INTRO method . It’ll be an introduction just like any other essay introduction .
And yes, feel free to explain what the final evaluation will be.
So, here it is laid out nice and simple.
Write one sentence for each point to make a 5-sentence introduction:
- Interest: Make a statement about the ‘thing’ you’re evaluating that you think will be of interest to the reader. Make it a catchy, engaging point that draws the reader in!
- Notify: Notify the reader of any background info on the thing you’re evaluating. This is your chance to show your depth of knowledge. What is a historical fact about the ‘thing’?
- Translate: Re-state the essay question. For an evaluative essay, you can re-state it something like: “This essay evaluates the book/ product/ article/ etc. by looking at its strengths and weaknesses and compares it against a marking criteria”.
- Report: Say what your final evaluation will be. For example you can say “While there are some weaknesses in this book, overall this evaluative essay will show that it helps progress knowledge about Dinosaurs.”
- Outline: Simply give a clear overview of what will be discussed. For example, you can say: “Firstly, the essay will evaluate the product based on an objective criteria. This criteria will include its value for money, fit for purpose and ease of use. Next, the essay will show the main strengths and weaknesses of the product. Lastly, the essay will provide a final evaluative statement about the product’s overall value and worth.”
If you want more depth on how to use the INTRO method, you’ll need to go and check out our blog post on writing quality introductions.
4.2 Example Introduction
This example introduction is for the essay question: Write an Evaluation Essay on Facebook’s Impact on Society.
“Facebook is the third most visited website in the world. It was founded in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg in his college dorm. This essay evaluates the impact of Facebook on society and makes an objective judgement on its value. The essay will argue that Facebook has changed the world both for the better and worse. Firstly, it will give an overview of what Facebook is and its history. Then, it will examine Facebook on the criteria of: impact on social interactions, impact on the media landscape, and impact on politics.”
You’ll notice that each sentence in this introduction follows my 5-Step INTRO formula to create a clear, coherent 5-Step introduction.
4.3 How to Write your Body Paragraphs
The first body paragraph should give an overview of the ‘thing’ being evaluated.
Then, you should evaluate the pros and cons of the ‘thing’ being evaluated based upon the criteria you have developed for evaluating it.
Let’s take a look below.
4.4 First Body Paragraph: Overview of your Subject
This first paragraph should provide objective overview of your subject’s properties and history. You should not be doing any evaluating just yet.
The goal for this first paragraph is to ensure your reader knows what it is you’re evaluating. Secondarily, it should show your marker that you have developed some good knowledge about it.
If you need to use more than one paragraph to give an overview of the subject, that’s fine.
Similarly, if your essay word length needs to be quite long, feel free to spend several paragraphs exploring the subject’s background and objective details to show off your depth of knowledge for the marker.
4.5 First Body Paragraph Example
Sticking with the essay question: Write an Evaluation Essay on Facebook’s Impact on Society , this might be your paragraph:
“Facebook has been one of the most successful websites of all time. It is the website that dominated the ‘Web 2.0’ revolution, which was characterized by user two-way interaction with the web. Facebook allowed users to create their own personal profiles and invite their friends to follow along. Since 2004, Facebook has attracted more than one billion people to create profiles in order to share their opinions and keep in touch with their friends.”
Notice here that I haven’t yet made any evaluations of Facebook’s merits?
This first paragraph (or, if need be, several of them) should be all about showing the reader exactly what your subject is – no more, no less.
4.6 Evaluation Paragraphs: Second, Third, Forth and Fifth Body Paragraphs
Once you’re confident your reader will know what the subject that you’re evaluating is, you’ll need to move on to the actual evaluation.
For this step, you’ll need to dig up that evaluation criteria we talked about in Point 2.
For example, let’s say you’re evaluating a President of the United States.
Your evaluation criteria might be:
- Impact on world history
- Ability to pass legislation
- Popularity with voters
- Morals and ethics
- Ability to change lives for the better
Really, you could make up any evaluation criteria you want!
Once you’ve made up the evaluation criteria, you’ve got your evaluation paragraph ideas!
Simply turn each point in your evaluation criteria into a full paragraph.
How do you do this?
Well, start with a topic sentence.
For the criteria point ‘Impact on world history’ you can say something like: “Barack Obama’s impact on world history is mixed.”
This topic sentence will show that you’ll evaluate both pros and cons of Obama’s impact on world history in the paragraph.
Then, follow it up with explanations.
“While Obama campaigned to withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, he was unable to completely achieve this objective. This is an obvious negative for his impact on the world. However, as the first black man to lead the most powerful nation on earth, he will forever be remembered as a living milestone for civil rights and progress.”
Keep going, turning each evaluation criteria into a full paragraph.
4.7 Evaluation Paragraph Example
Let’s go back to our essay question: Write an Evaluation Essay on Facebook’s Impact on Society .
I’ve decided to use the evaluation criteria below:
- impact on social interactions;
- impact on the media landscape;
- impact on politics
Naturally, I’m going to write one paragraph for each point.
If you’re expected to write a longer piece, you could write two paragraphs on each point (one for pros and one for cons).
Here’s what my first evaluation paragraph might look like:
“Facebook has had a profound impact on social interactions. It has helped people to stay in touch with one another from long distances and after they have left school and college. This is obviously a great positive. However, it can also be seen as having a negative impact. For example, people may be less likely to interact face-to-face because they are ‘hanging out’ online instead. This can have negative impact on genuine one-to-one relationships.”
You might notice that this paragraph has a topic sentence, explanations and examples. It follows my perfect paragraph formula which you’re more than welcome to check out!
4.8 How to write your Conclusion
To conclude, you’ll need to come up with one final evaluative argument.
This evaluation argument provides an overall assessment. You can start with “Overall, Facebook has been…” and continue by saying that (all things considered) he was a good or bad president!
Remember, you can only come up with an overall evaluation after you’ve looked at the subject’s pros and cons based upon your evaluation criteria.
In the example below, I’m going to use my 5 C’s conclusion paragraph method . This will make sure my conclusion covers all the things a good conclusion should cover!
Like the INTRO method, the 5 C’s conclusion method should have one sentence for each point to create a 5 sentence conclusion paragraph.
The 5 C’s conclusion method is:
- Close the loop: Return to a statement you made in the introduction.
- Conclude: Show what your final position is.
- Clarify: Clarify how your final position is relevant to the Essay Question.
- Concern: Explain who should be concerned by your findings.
- Consequences: End by noting in one final, engaging sentence why this topic is of such importance. The ‘concern’ and ‘consequences’ sentences can be combined
4.9 Concluding Argument Example Paragraph
Here’s a possible concluding argument for our essay question: Write an Evaluation Essay on Facebook’s Impact on Society .
“The introduction of this essay highlighted that Facebook has had a profound impact on society. This evaluation essay has shown that this impact has been both positive and negative. Thus, it is too soon to say whether Facebook has been an overall positive or negative for society. However, people should pay close attention to this issue because it is possible that Facebook is contributing to the undermining of truth in media and positive interpersonal relationships.”
Note here that I’ve followed the 5 C’s conclusion method for my concluding evaluative argument paragraph.
5. Evaluation Essay Example Template
Below is a template you can use for your evaluation essay , based upon the advice I gave in Section 4:
6. 23+ Good Evaluation Essay Topics
Okay now that you know how to write an evaluation essay, let’s look at a few examples.
For each example I’m going to give you an evaluation essay title idea, plus a list of criteria you might want to use in your evaluation essay.
6.1 Evaluation of Impact
- Evaluate the impact of global warming on the great barrier reef. Recommended evaluation criteria: Level of bleaching; Impact on tourism; Economic impact; Impact on lifestyles; Impact on sealife
- Evaluate the impact of the Global Financial Crisis on poverty. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on jobs; Impact on childhood poverty; Impact on mental health rates; Impact on economic growth; Impact on the wealthy; Global impact
- Evaluate the impact of having children on your lifestyle. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on spare time; Impact on finances; Impact on happiness; Impact on sense of wellbeing
- Evaluate the impact of the internet on the world. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on connectedness; Impact on dating; Impact on business integration; Impact on globalization; Impact on media
- Evaluate the impact of public transportation on cities. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on cost of living; Impact on congestion; Impact on quality of life; Impact on health; Impact on economy
- Evaluate the impact of universal healthcare on quality of life. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on reducing disease rates; Impact on the poorest in society; Impact on life expectancy; Impact on happiness
- Evaluate the impact of getting a college degree on a person’s life. Recommended evaluation criteria: Impact on debt levels; Impact on career prospects; Impact on life perspectives; Impact on relationships
6.2 Evaluation of a Scholarly Text or Theory
- Evaluate a Textbook. Recommended evaluation criteria: clarity of explanations; relevance to a course; value for money; practical advice; depth and detail; breadth of information
- Evaluate a Lecture Series, Podcast or Guest Lecture. Recommended evaluation criteria: clarity of speaker; engagement of attendees; appropriateness of content; value for monet
- Evaluate a journal article. Recommended evaluation criteria: length; clarity; quality of methodology; quality of literature review ; relevance of findings for real life
- Evaluate a Famous Scientists. Recommended evaluation criteria: contribution to scientific knowledge; impact on health and prosperity of humankind; controversies and disagreements with other scientists.
- Evaluate a Theory. Recommended evaluation criteria: contribution to knowledge; reliability or accuracy; impact on the lives of ordinary people; controversies and contradictions with other theories.
6.3 Evaluation of Art and Literature
- Evaluate a Novel. Recommended evaluation criteria: plot complexity; moral or social value of the message; character development; relevance to modern life
- Evaluate a Play. Recommended evaluation criteria: plot complexity; quality of acting; moral or social value of the message; character development; relevance to modern life
- Evaluate a Film. Recommended evaluation criteria: plot complexity; quality of acting; moral or social value of the message; character development; relevance to modern life
- Evaluate an Artwork. Recommended evaluation criteria: impact on art theory; moral or social message; complexity or quality of composition
6.4 Evaluation of a Product or Service
- Evaluate a Hotel or Bed and Breakfast. Recommended evaluation criteria: quality of service; flexibility of check-in and check-out times; cleanliness; location; value for money; wi-fi strength; noise levels at night; quality of meals; value for money
- Evaluate a Restaurant. Recommended evaluation criteria: quality of service; menu choices; cleanliness; atmosphere; taste; value for money.
- Evaluate a Car. Recommended evaluation criteria: fuel efficiency; value for money; build quality; likelihood to break down; comfort.
- Evaluate a House. Recommended evaluation criteria: value for money; build quality; roominess; location; access to public transport; quality of neighbourhood
- Evaluate a Doctor. Recommended evaluation criteria: Quality of service; knowledge; quality of equipment; reputation; value for money.
- Evaluate a Course. Recommended evaluation criteria: value for money; practical advice; quality of teaching; quality of resources provided.
7. Concluding Advice
Evaluation essays are common in high school, college and university.
The trick for getting good marks in an evaluation essay is to show you have looked at both the pros and cons before making a final evaluation analysis statement.
You don’t want to look biased.
That’s why it’s a good idea to use an objective evaluation criteria, and to be generous in looking at both positives and negatives of your subject.
Read Also: 39 Better Ways to Write ‘In Conclusion’ in an Essay
I recommend you use the evaluation template provided in this post to write your evaluation essay. However, if your teacher has given you a template, of course use theirs instead! You always want to follow your teacher’s advice because they’re the person who will be marking your work.
Good luck with your evaluation essay!
Chris Drew (PhD)
Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/admin/ 13 Secondary Data Examples
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/admin/ 31 Instinct Examples (In Humans and Animals)
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/admin/ Montessori vs Reggio Emilia vs Steiner-Waldorf vs Froebel
- Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/admin/ 15 Meritocracy Examples
2 thoughts on “7 Steps for How to Write an Evaluation Essay (Example & Template)”
What an amazing article. I am returning to studying after several years and was struggling with how to present an evaluative essay. This article has simplified the process and provided me with the confidence to tackle my subject (theoretical approaches to development and management of teams).
I just wanted to ask whether the evaluation criteria has to be supported by evidence or can it just be a list of criteria that you think of yourself to objectively measure?
Many many thanks for writing this!
Usually we would want to see evidence, but ask your teacher for what they’re looking for as they may allow you, depending on the situation.
Leave a Comment Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
- Jump to menu
- Student Home
- Accept your offer
- How to enrol
- Student ID card
- Set up your IT
- Orientation Week
- Fees & payment
- Academic calendar
- Special consideration
- The Nucleus: Student Hub
- Essay writing
- Learning abroad & exchange
- Professional development & UNSW Advantage
- Financial assistance
- International students
- Equitable learning
- Postgraduate research
- Health Service
- Events & activities
- Clubs and societies
- Health services
- Sport and gym
- Arc student organisation
- Security on campus
- Maps of campus
- Careers portal
- Change password
Writing a Critical Review
The advice below is a general guide only. We strongly recommend that you also follow your assignment instructions and seek clarification from your lecturer/tutor if needed.
Purpose of a critical review
The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review can be of a book, a chapter, or a journal article. Writing the critical review usually requires you to read the selected text in detail and to read other related texts so you can present a fair and reasonable evaluation of the selected text.
What is meant by critical?
At university, to be critical does not mean to criticise in a negative manner. Rather, it requires you to question the information and opinions in a text and present your evaluation or judgement of the text. To do this well, you should attempt to understand the topic from different perspectives (i.e. read related texts), and in relation to the theories, approaches and frameworks in your course.
What is meant by evaluation or judgement?
This is where you decide the strengths and weaknesses of a text. This is usually based on specific criteria. Evaluating requires an understanding of not just the content of the text, but also an understanding of a text’s purpose, the intended audience, and why it is structured the way it is.
What is meant by analysis?
Analysis requires separating the content and concepts of a text into their main components and then understanding how these interrelate, connect and possibly influence each other.
Next: Structure of a critical review
Essay and assignment writing guide.
- Essay writing basics
- Essay and assignment planning
- Answering assignment questions
- Editing checklist
- Structure of a critical review
- General criteria for evaluating
- Sample extracts
- Annotated bibliography
- Reflective writing
- ^ More support
News and notices
UNSW's Education Festival 2023 Published: 6 Nov 2023
Critical Analysis and Evaluation
Many assignments ask you to critique and evaluate a source. Sources might include journal articles, books, websites, government documents, portfolios, podcasts, or presentations.
When you critique, you offer both negative and positive analysis of the content, writing, and structure of a source.
When you evaluate , you assess how successful a source is at presenting information, measured against a standard or certain criteria.
Elements of a critical analysis:
opinion + evidence from the article + justification
Your opinion is your thoughtful reaction to the piece.
Evidence from the article offers some proof to back up your opinion.
The justification is an explanation of how you arrived at your opinion or why you think it’s true.
How do you critique and evaluate?
When critiquing and evaluating someone else’s writing/research, your purpose is to reach an informed opinion about a source. In order to do that, try these three steps:
- Read and react to the piece. As you read, take notes. Record what the article means AND how you feel about it. Identify the parts that are worth talking about by asking
- How do you feel?
- What surprised you?
- What left you confused?
- What pleased or annoyed you?
- What was interesting?
- Ask deeper questions based on your reactions above.
- What is the purpose of this text?
- Who is the intended audience?
- What kind of bias is there?
- What was missing?
TIP: See our resource on analysis and synthesis ( Move From Research to Writing: How to Think ) for other examples of questions to ask. 3. Form an assessment. The questions you asked in the last step should lead you to form an assessment. Here are some assessment/opinion words that might help you build your critique and evaluation:
illogical helpful sophisticated simplistic concise clear interesting undocumented insightful confusing disorganized creative deep superficial powerful not cited unconventional inappropriate interpretation of evidence unsound or discredited methodology traditional unsubstantiated unsupported well-researched easy to understand 4. Write your critique or evaluation using the opinion+ evidence from the text + jusitification model. Here is a sample:
Opinion : This article’s assessment of the power balance in cities is confusing.
Evidence: It first says that the power to shape policy is evenly distributed among citizens, local government, and business (Rajal, 232)
Justification : but then it goes on to focus almost exclusively on business. Next, in a much shorter section, it combines the idea of citizens and local government into a single point of evidence. This leaves the reader with the impression that the citizens have no voice at all. It is not helpful in trying to determine the role of the common voter in shaping public policy.
Sample criteria for critical analysis
Sometimes the assignment will specify what criteria to use when critiquing and evaluating a source. If not, consider the following prompts to approach your analysis. Choose the questions that are most suitable for your source.
- What do you think about the quality of the research? Is it significant?
- Did the author answer the question they set out to? Did the author prove their thesis?
- Did you find contradictions to other things you know?
- What new insight or connections did the author make?
- How does this piece fit within the context of your course, or the larger body of research in the field?
- The structure of an article or book is often dictated by standards of the discipline or a theoretical model. Did the piece meet those standards?
- Did the piece meet the needs of the intended audience?
- Was the material presented in an organized and logical fashion?
- Is the argument cohesive and convincing? Is the reasoning sound? Is there enough evidence?
- Is it easy to read? Is it clear and easy to understand, even if the concepts are sophisticated?
IOE Writing Centre
- Writing a Critical Review
Writing a Critique
A critique (or critical review) is not to be mistaken for a literature review. A 'critical review', or 'critique', is a complete type of text (or genre), discussing one particular article or book in detail. In some instances, you may be asked to write a critique of two or three articles (e.g. a comparative critical review). In contrast, a 'literature review', which also needs to be 'critical', is a part of a larger type of text, such as a chapter of your dissertation.
Most importantly: Read your article / book as many times as possible, as this will make the critical review much easier.
1. Read and take notes 2. Organising your writing 3. Summary 4. Evaluation 5. Linguistic features of a critical review 6. Summary language 7. Evaluation language 8. Conclusion language 9. Example extracts from a critical review 10. Further resources
Read and Take Notes
To improve your reading confidence and efficiency, visit our pages on reading.
Further reading: Read Confidently
After you are familiar with the text, make notes on some of the following questions. Choose the questions which seem suitable:
- What kind of article is it (for example does it present data or does it present purely theoretical arguments)?
- What is the main area under discussion?
- What are the main findings?
- What are the stated limitations?
- Where does the author's data and evidence come from? Are they appropriate / sufficient?
- What are the main issues raised by the author?
- What questions are raised?
- How well are these questions addressed?
- What are the major points/interpretations made by the author in terms of the issues raised?
- Is the text balanced? Is it fair / biased?
- Does the author contradict herself?
- How does all this relate to other literature on this topic?
- How does all this relate to your own experience, ideas and views?
- What else has this author written? Do these build / complement this text?
- (Optional) Has anyone else reviewed this article? What did they say? Do I agree with them?
^ Back to top
Organising your writing
You first need to summarise the text that you have read. One reason to summarise the text is that the reader may not have read the text. In your summary, you will
- focus on points within the article that you think are interesting
- summarise the author(s) main ideas or argument
- explain how these ideas / argument have been constructed. (For example, is the author basing her arguments on data that they have collected? Are the main ideas / argument purely theoretical?)
In your summary you might answer the following questions: Why is this topic important? Where can this text be located? For example, does it address policy studies? What other prominent authors also write about this?
Evaluation is the most important part in a critical review.
Use the literature to support your views. You may also use your knowledge of conducting research, and your own experience. Evaluation can be explicit or implicit.
Explicit evaluation involves stating directly (explicitly) how you intend to evaluate the text. e.g. "I will review this article by focusing on the following questions. First, I will examine the extent to which the authors contribute to current thought on Second Language Acquisition (SLA) pedagogy. After that, I will analyse whether the authors' propositions are feasible within overseas SLA classrooms."
Implicit evaluation is less direct. The following section on Linguistic Features of Writing a Critical Review contains language that evaluates the text. A difficult part of evaluation of a published text (and a professional author) is how to do this as a student. There is nothing wrong with making your position as a student explicit and incorporating it into your evaluation. Examples of how you might do this can be found in the section on Linguistic Features of Writing a Critical Review. You need to remember to locate and analyse the author's argument when you are writing your critical review. For example, you need to locate the authors' view of classroom pedagogy as presented in the book / article and not present a critique of views of classroom pedagogy in general.
Linguistic features of a critical review
The following examples come from published critical reviews. Some of them have been adapted for student use.
- This article / book is divided into two / three parts. First...
- While the title might suggest...
- The tone appears to be...
- Title is the first / second volume in the series Title, edited by...The books / articles in this series address...
- The second / third claim is based on...
- The author challenges the notion that...
- The author tries to find a more middle ground / make more modest claims...
- The article / book begins with a short historical overview of...
- Numerous authors have recently suggested that...(see Author, Year; Author, Year). Author would also be once such author. With his / her argument that...
- To refer to title as a...is not to say that it is...
- This book / article is aimed at... This intended readership...
- The author's book / article examines the...To do this, the author first...
- The author develops / suggests a theoretical / pedagogical model to…
- This book / article positions itself firmly within the field of...
- The author in a series of subtle arguments, indicates that he / she...
- The argument is therefore...
- The author asks "..."
- With a purely critical / postmodern take on...
- Topic, as the author points out, can be viewed as...
- In this recent contribution to the field of...this British author...
- As a leading author in the field of...
- This book / article nicely contributes to the field of...and complements other work by this author...
- The second / third part of...provides / questions / asks the reader...
- Title is intended to encourage students / researchers to...
- The approach taken by the author provides the opportunity to examine...in a qualitative / quantitative research framework that nicely complements...
- The author notes / claims that state support / a focus on pedagogy / the adoption of...remains vital if...
- According to Author (Year) teaching towards examinations is not as effective as it is in other areas of the curriculum. This is because, as Author (Year) claims that examinations have undue status within the curriculum.
- According to Author (Year)…is not as effective in some areas of the curriculum / syllabus as others. Therefore the author believes that this is a reason for some school's…
- This argument is not entirely convincing, as...furthermore it commodifies / rationalises the...
- Over the last five / ten years the view of...has increasingly been viewed as 'complicated' (see Author, Year; Author, Year).
- However, through trying to integrate...with...the author...
- There are difficulties with such a position.
- Inevitably, several crucial questions are left unanswered / glossed over by this insightful / timely / interesting / stimulating book / article. Why should...
- It might have been more relevant for the author to have written this book / article as...
- This article / book is not without disappointment from those who would view...as...
- This chosen framework enlightens / clouds...
- This analysis intends to be...but falls a little short as...
- The authors rightly conclude that if...
- A detailed, well-written and rigorous account of...
- As a Korean student I feel that this article / book very clearly illustrates...
- The beginning of...provides an informative overview into...
- The tables / figures do little to help / greatly help the reader...
- The reaction by scholars who take a...approach might not be so favourable (e.g. Author, Year).
- This explanation has a few weaknesses that other researchers have pointed out (see Author, Year; Author, Year). The first is...
- On the other hand, the author wisely suggests / proposes that...By combining these two dimensions...
- The author's brief introduction to...may leave the intended reader confused as it fails to properly...
- Despite my inability to...I was greatly interested in...
- Even where this reader / I disagree(s), the author's effort to...
- The author thus combines...with...to argue...which seems quite improbable for a number of reasons. First...
- Perhaps this aversion to...would explain the author's reluctance to...
- As a second language student from ...I find it slightly ironic that such an anglo-centric view is...
- The reader is rewarded with...
- Less convincing is the broad-sweeping generalisation that...
- There is no denying the author's subject knowledge nor his / her...
- The author's prose is dense and littered with unnecessary jargon...
- The author's critique of...might seem harsh but is well supported within the literature (see Author, Year; Author, Year; Author, Year). Aligning herself with the author, Author (Year) states that...
- As it stands, the central focus of Title is well / poorly supported by its empirical findings...
- Given the hesitation to generalise to...the limitation of...does not seem problematic...
- For instance, the term...is never properly defined and the reader left to guess as to whether...
- Furthermore, to label...as...inadvertently misguides...
- In addition, this research proves to be timely / especially significant to... as recent government policy / proposals has / have been enacted to...
- On this well researched / documented basis the author emphasises / proposes that...
- Nonetheless, other research / scholarship / data tend to counter / contradict this possible trend / assumption...(see Author, Year; Author, Year).
- Without entering into detail of the..., it should be stated that Title should be read by...others will see little value in...
- As experimental conditions were not used in the study the word 'significant' misleads the reader.
- The article / book becomes repetitious in its assertion that...
- The thread of the author's argument becomes lost in an overuse of empirical data...
- Almost every argument presented in the final section is largely derivative, providing little to say about...
- She / he does not seem to take into consideration; however, that there are fundamental differences in the conditions of…
- As Author (Year) points out, however, it seems to be necessary to look at…
- This suggest that having low…does not necessarily indicate that…is ineffective.
- Therefore, the suggestion made by Author (Year)…is difficult to support.
- When considering all the data presented…it is not clear that the low scores of some students, indeed, reflects…
- Overall this article / book is an analytical look at...which within the field of...is often overlooked.
- Despite its problems, Title offers valuable theoretical insights / interesting examples / a contribution to pedagogy and a starting point for students / researchers of...with an interest in...
- This detailed and rigorously argued...
- This first / second volume / book / article by...with an interest in...is highly informative...
Example extracts from a critical review
If you have been told your writing is not critical enough, it probably means that your writing treats the knowledge claims as if they are true, well supported, and applicable in the context you are writing about. This may not always be the case.
In these two examples, the extracts refer to the same section of text. In each example, the section that refers to a source has been highlighted in bold. The note below the example then explains how the writer has used the source material.
There is a strong positive effect on students, both educationally and emotionally, when the instructors try to learn to say students' names without making pronunciation errors (Kiang, 2004).
Use of source material in example a:
This is a simple paraphrase with no critical comment. It looks like the writer agrees with Kiang. (This is not a good example for critical writing, as the writer has not made any critical comment).
Kiang (2004) gives various examples to support his claim that "the positive emotional and educational impact on students is clear" (p.210) when instructors try to pronounce students' names in the correct way. He quotes one student, Nguyet, as saying that he "felt surprised and happy" (p.211) when the tutor said his name clearly . The emotional effect claimed by Kiang is illustrated in quotes such as these, although the educational impact is supported more indirectly through the chapter. Overall, he provides more examples of students being negatively affected by incorrect pronunciation, and it is difficult to find examples within the text of a positive educational impact as such.
Use of source material in example b:
The writer describes Kiang's (2004) claim and the examples which he uses to try to support it. The writer then comments that the examples do not seem balanced and may not be enough to support the claims fully. This is a better example of writing which expresses criticality.
^Back to top
You may also be interested in our page on criticality, which covers criticality in general, and includes more critical reading questions.
Further reading: Read and Write Critically
We recommend that you do not search for other university guidelines on critical reviews. This is because the expectations may be different at other institutions. Ask your tutor for more guidance or examples if you have further questions.
IOE Writing Centre Online
Self-access resources from the Academic Writing Centre at the UCL Institute of Education.
Anonymous Suggestions Box
Information for Staff
Academic Writing Centre
Academic Writing Centre, UCL Institute of Education [email protected] Twitter: @AWC_IOE Skype: awc.ioe
What Is a Critical Analysis Essay: Definition
Have you ever had to read a book or watch a movie for school and then write an essay about it? Well, a critical analysis essay is a type of essay where you do just that! So, when wondering what is a critical analysis essay, know that it's a fancy way of saying that you're going to take a closer look at something and analyze it.
So, let's say you're assigned to read a novel for your literature class. A critical analysis essay would require you to examine the characters, plot, themes, and writing style of the book. You would need to evaluate its strengths and weaknesses and provide your own thoughts and opinions on the text.
Similarly, if you're tasked with writing a critical analysis essay on a scientific article, you would need to analyze the methodology, results, and conclusions presented in the article and evaluate its significance and potential impact on the field.
The key to a successful critical analysis essay is to approach the subject matter with an open mind and a willingness to engage with it on a deeper level. By doing so, you can gain a greater appreciation and understanding of the subject matter and develop your own informed opinions and perspectives. Considering this, we bet you want to learn how to write critical analysis essay easily and efficiently, so keep on reading to find out more!
Meanwhile, if you'd rather have your own sample critical analysis essay crafted by professionals from our custom writings , contact us to buy essays online .
Critical Analysis Essay Topics by Category
If you're looking for an interesting and thought-provoking topic for your critical analysis essay, you've come to the right place! Critical analysis essays can cover many subjects and topics, with endless possibilities. To help you get started, we've compiled a list of critical analysis essay topics by category. We've got you covered whether you're interested in literature, science, social issues, or something else. So, grab a notebook and pen, and get ready to dive deep into your chosen topic. In the following sections, we will provide you with various good critical analysis paper topics to choose from, each with its unique angle and approach.
Need a CRITICAL ANALYSIS Essay Written?
Simply pick a topic, send us your requirements and choose a writer. That’s all we need to write you an original paper.
Critical Analysis Essay Topics on Mass Media
From television and radio to social media and advertising, mass media is everywhere, shaping our perceptions of the world around us. As a result, it's no surprise that critical analysis essays on mass media are a popular choice for students and scholars alike. To help you get started, here are ten critical essay example topics on mass media:
- The Influence of Viral Memes on Pop Culture: An In-Depth Analysis.
- The Portrayal of Mental Health in Television: Examining Stigmatization and Advocacy.
- The Power of Satirical News Shows: Analyzing the Impact of Political Commentary.
- Mass Media and Consumer Behavior: Investigating Advertising and Persuasion Techniques.
- The Ethics of Deepfake Technology: Implications for Trust and Authenticity in Media.
- Media Framing and Public Perception: A Critical Analysis of News Coverage.
- The Role of Social Media in Shaping Political Discourse and Activism.
- Fake News in the Digital Age: Identifying Disinformation and Its Effects.
- The Representation of Gender and Diversity in Hollywood Films: A Critical Examination.
- Media Ownership and Its Impact on Journalism and News Reporting: A Comprehensive Study.
Critical Analysis Essay Topics on Sports
Sports are a ubiquitous aspect of our culture, and they have the power to unite and inspire people from all walks of life. Whether you're an athlete, a fan, or just someone who appreciates the beauty of competition, there's no denying the significance of sports in our society. If you're looking for an engaging and thought-provoking topic for your critical analysis essay, sports offer a wealth of possibilities:
- The Role of Sports in Diplomacy: Examining International Relations Through Athletic Events.
- Sports and Identity: How Athletic Success Shapes National and Cultural Pride.
- The Business of Sports: Analyzing the Economics and Commercialization of Athletics.
- Athlete Activism: Exploring the Impact of Athletes' Social and Political Engagement.
- Sports Fandom and Online Communities: The Impact of Social Media on Fan Engagement.
- The Representation of Athletes in the Media: Gender, Race, and Stereotypes.
- The Psychology of Sports: Exploring Mental Toughness, Motivation, and Peak Performance.
- The Evolution of Sports Equipment and Technology: From Innovation to Regulation.
- The Legacy of Sports Legends: Analyzing Their Impact Beyond Athletic Achievement.
- Sports and Social Change: How Athletic Movements Shape Societal Attitudes and Policies.
Critical Analysis Essay Topics on Literature and Arts
Literature and arts can inspire, challenge, and transform our perceptions of the world around us. From classic novels to contemporary art, the realm of literature and arts offers many possibilities for critical analysis essays. Here are ten original critic essay example topics on literature and arts:
- The Use of Symbolism in Contemporary Poetry: Analyzing Hidden Meanings and Significance.
- The Intersection of Art and Identity: How Self-Expression Shapes Artists' Works.
- The Role of Nonlinear Narrative in Postmodern Novels: Techniques and Interpretation.
- The Influence of Jazz on African American Literature: A Comparative Study.
- The Complexity of Visual Storytelling: Graphic Novels and Their Narrative Power.
- The Art of Literary Translation: Challenges, Impact, and Interpretation.
- The Evolution of Music Videos: From Promotional Tools to a Unique Art Form.
- The Literary Techniques of Magical Realism: Exploring Reality and Fantasy.
- The Impact of Visual Arts in Advertising: Analyzing the Connection Between Art and Commerce.
- Art in Times of Crisis: How Artists Respond to Societal and Political Challenges.
Critical Analysis Essay Topics on Culture
Culture is a dynamic and multifaceted aspect of our society, encompassing everything from language and religion to art and music. As a result, there are countless possibilities for critical analysis essays on culture. Whether you're interested in exploring the complexities of globalization or delving into the nuances of cultural identity, there's a wealth of topics to choose from:
- The Influence of K-Pop on Global Youth Culture: A Comparative Study.
- Cultural Significance of Street Art in Urban Spaces: Beyond Vandalism.
- The Role of Mythology in Shaping Indigenous Cultures and Belief Systems.
- Nollywood: Analyzing the Cultural Impact of Nigerian Cinema on the African Diaspora.
- The Language of Hip-Hop Lyrics: A Semiotic Analysis of Cultural Expression.
- Digital Nomads and Cultural Adaptation: Examining the Subculture of Remote Work.
- The Cultural Significance of Tattooing Among Indigenous Tribes in Oceania.
- The Art of Culinary Fusion: Analyzing Cross-Cultural Food Trends and Innovation.
- The Impact of Cultural Festivals on Local Identity and Economy.
- The Influence of Internet Memes on Language and Cultural Evolution.
How to Write a Critical Analysis: Easy Steps
When wondering how to write a critical analysis essay, remember that it can be a challenging but rewarding process. Crafting a critical analysis example requires a careful and thoughtful examination of a text or artwork to assess its strengths and weaknesses and broader implications. The key to success is to approach the task in a systematic and organized manner, breaking it down into two distinct steps: critical reading and critical writing. Here are some tips for each step of the process to help you write a critical essay.
Step 1: Critical Reading
Here are some tips for critical reading that can help you with your critical analysis paper:
- Read actively : Don't just read the text passively, but actively engage with it by highlighting or underlining important points, taking notes, and asking questions.
- Identify the author's main argument: Figure out what the author is trying to say and what evidence they use to support their argument.
- Evaluate the evidence: Determine whether the evidence is reliable, relevant, and sufficient to support the author's argument.
- Analyze the author's tone and style: Consider the author's tone and style and how it affects the reader's interpretation of the text.
- Identify assumptions: Identify any underlying assumptions the author makes and consider whether they are valid or questionable.
- Consider alternative perspectives: Consider alternative perspectives or interpretations of the text and consider how they might affect the author's argument.
- Assess the author's credibility : Evaluate the author's credibility by considering their expertise, biases, and motivations.
- Consider the context: Consider the historical, social, cultural, and political context in which the text was written and how it affects its meaning.
- Pay attention to language: Pay attention to the author's language, including metaphors, symbolism, and other literary devices.
- Synthesize your analysis: Use your analysis of the text to develop a well-supported argument in your critical analysis essay.
Step 2: Critical Analysis Writing
Here are some tips for critical analysis writing, with examples:
- Start with a strong thesis statement: A strong critical analysis thesis is the foundation of any critical analysis essay. It should clearly state your argument or interpretation of the text. You can also consult us on how to write a thesis statement . Meanwhile, here is a clear example:
- Weak thesis statement: 'The author of this article is wrong.'
- Strong thesis statement: 'In this article, the author's argument fails to consider the socio-economic factors that contributed to the issue, rendering their analysis incomplete.'
- Use evidence to support your argument: Use evidence from the text to support your thesis statement, and make sure to explain how the evidence supports your argument. For example:
- Weak argument: 'The author of this article is biased.'
- Strong argument: 'The author's use of emotional language and selective evidence suggests a bias towards one particular viewpoint, as they fail to consider counterarguments and present a balanced analysis.'
- Analyze the evidence : Analyze the evidence you use by considering its relevance, reliability, and sufficiency. For example:
- Weak analysis: 'The author mentions statistics in their argument.'
- Strong analysis: 'The author uses statistics to support their argument, but it is important to note that these statistics are outdated and do not take into account recent developments in the field.'
- Use quotes and paraphrases effectively: Use quotes and paraphrases to support your argument and properly cite your sources. For example:
- Weak use of quotes: 'The author said, 'This is important.'
- Strong use of quotes: 'As the author points out, 'This issue is of utmost importance in shaping our understanding of the problem' (p. 25).'
- Use clear and concise language: Use clear and concise language to make your argument easy to understand, and avoid jargon or overly complicated language. For example:
- Weak language: 'The author's rhetorical devices obfuscate the issue.'
- Strong language: 'The author's use of rhetorical devices such as metaphor and hyperbole obscures the key issues at play.'
- Address counterarguments: Address potential counterarguments to your argument and explain why your interpretation is more convincing. For example:
- Weak argument: 'The author is wrong because they did not consider X.'
- Strong argument: 'While the author's analysis is thorough, it overlooks the role of X in shaping the issue. However, by considering this factor, a more nuanced understanding of the problem emerges.'
- Consider the audience: Consider your audience during your writing process. Your language and tone should be appropriate for your audience and should reflect the level of knowledge they have about the topic. For example:
- Weak language: 'As any knowledgeable reader can see, the author's argument is flawed.'
- Strong language: 'Through a critical analysis of the author's argument, it becomes clear that there are gaps in their analysis that require further consideration.'
Creating a Detailed Critical Analysis Essay Outline
Creating a detailed outline is essential when writing a critical analysis essay. It helps you organize your thoughts and arguments, ensuring your essay flows logically and coherently. Here is a detailed critical analysis outline from our dissertation writers :
A. Background information about the text and its author
B. Brief summary of the text
C. Thesis statement that clearly states your argument
II. Analysis of the Text
A. Overview of the text's main themes and ideas
B. Examination of the author's writing style and techniques
C. Analysis of the text's structure and organization
III. Evaluation of the Text
A. Evaluation of the author's argument and evidence
B. Analysis of the author's use of language and rhetorical strategies
C. Assessment of the text's effectiveness and relevance to the topic
IV. Discussion of the Context
A. Exploration of the historical, cultural, and social context of the text
B. Examination of the text's influence on its audience and society
C. Analysis of the text's significance and relevance to the present day
V. Counter Arguments and Responses
A. Identification of potential counterarguments to your argument
B. Refutation of counterarguments and defense of your position
C. Acknowledgement of the limitations and weaknesses of your argument
A. Recap of your argument and main points
B. Evaluation of the text's significance and relevance
C. Final thoughts and recommendations for further research or analysis.
This outline can be adjusted to fit the specific requirements of your essay. Still, it should give you a solid foundation for creating a detailed and well-organized critical analysis essay.
Useful Techniques Used in Literary Criticism
There are several techniques used in literary criticism to analyze and evaluate a work of literature. Here are some of the most common techniques:
- Close reading: This technique involves carefully analyzing a text to identify its literary devices, themes, and meanings.
- Historical and cultural context: This technique involves examining the historical and cultural context of a work of literature to understand the social, political, and cultural influences that shaped it.
- Structural analysis: This technique involves analyzing the structure of a text, including its plot, characters, and narrative techniques, to identify patterns and themes.
- Formalism: This technique focuses on the literary elements of a text, such as its language, imagery, and symbolism, to analyze its meaning and significance.
- Psychological analysis: This technique examines the psychological and emotional aspects of a text, including the motivations and desires of its characters, to understand the deeper meanings and themes.
- Feminist and gender analysis: This technique focuses on the representation of gender and sexuality in a text, including how gender roles and stereotypes are reinforced or challenged.
- Marxist and social analysis: This technique examines the social and economic structures portrayed in a text, including issues of class, power, and inequality.
By using these and other techniques, literary critics can offer insightful and nuanced analyses of works of literature, helping readers to understand and appreciate the complexity and richness of the texts.
Sample Critical Analysis Essay
Now that you know how to write a critical analysis, take a look at the critical analysis essay sample provided by our research paper writers and better understand this kind of paper!
At our professional writing services, we understand the challenges and pressures that students face regarding academic writing. That's why we offer high-quality, custom-written essays designed to meet each student's specific needs and requirements.
By using our essay writing service , you can save time and energy while also learning from our expert writers and improving your own writing skills. We take pride in our work and are dedicated to providing friendly and responsive customer support to ensure your satisfaction with every order. So why struggle with difficult assignments when you can trust our professional writing services to deliver the quality and originality you need? Place your order today and experience the benefits of working with our team of skilled and dedicated writers.
If you need help with any of the STEPS ABOVE
Feel free to use EssayPro Outline Help
- Skip to content
- Accessibility Help
How to write a critical essay
- It is important to plan your critical essay before you start writing.
- An essay has a clear structure with an introduction, paragraphs with evidence and a conclusion.
- Evidence , in the form of quotations and examples is the foundation of an effective essay and provides proof for your points.
It is important to plan before you start writing an essay.
The essay question or title should provide a clear focus for your plan. Exploring this will help you make decisions about what points are relevant to the essay. What are you being asked to consider?
Organise your thoughts. Researching, mind mapping and making notes will help sort and prioritise your ideas. If you are writing a critical essay, planning will help you decide which parts of the text to focus on and what points to make.
An introduction should focus directly on the essay question or title and aim to present your main idea , in your answer. In an essay titled ‘What makes Slim an important character in John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men ?’ you could start with:
'Slim plays an important role in Steinbeck’s novella because he represents moral authority.'
The statement gives a clear answer to the essay question. The rest of your essay could justify that answer by looking at all the different ways that he seems to represent moral authority, and the impact that has at different points in the story.
An introduction briefly introduces your main ideas and arguments - that the rest of the essay will explore this in greater detail.
When writing an introduction to an essay avoid :
- using the phrase ‘In this essay I’m going to write about …’
- launching into a close analysis of the text
- straying away from the topic
Evidence is the foundation of an effective essay and provides proof for your points.
For an essay about a piece of literature, the best evidence will come from the text itself.
Back up each of your supporting statements with evidence. The evidence should be relevant and clearly connected to the point you’re making.
In a critical essay, evidence could take the form of:
Quotations from the text, for example, Steinbeck describes Slim’s ‘godlike eyes’, which suggests his power and authority on the ranch.
Examples from the text, for example, Slim’s reaction to the fight between Lennie and Curley shows his authority and natural leadership.
Think about how you are going to organise each paragraph.
You might want to start with a topic sentence that summarises the main point of the paragraph. This sentence acts like a mini introduction for this paragraph of the essay:
'Because the other men on the ranch respect him, Slim is able to influence their actions.'
The rest of the paragraph should then develop this main point by providing more explanation, detail and evidence:
'After the fight between Curley and Lennie, Slim takes charge. ‘I think you got your han' caught in a machine,’ he persuades Curley, defusing the situation and preventing Lennie’s dismissal from the ranch.'
A conclusion is the final paragraph of your essay. It should tie all the loose ends of your argument together.
An effective conclusion may:
- restate your main idea
- directly link back to the essay title or question
- briefly summarise the key supporting points
- give readers something to remember - a final thoughtful idea or reflection
It’s useful to show the reader that you have reached your conclusion by using words or phrases such as:
- In conclusion
- To conclude
Thinking about what to include in a critical essay first will make it easier to structure and write the essay. Your essay will be much more convincing if you can offer evidence for each of your ideas.
Are you ready to write an essay? Let's find out in this short quiz!
Critical essay writing
How to punctuate quotations in a critical essay
How to use the passive voice to sound more objective
- Call: +61-2-8005-7535
- Email: [email protected]
- Marketing Assignment Help
- Essay Writing Help
- Nursing Assignment Help
- Academic Writing Services
- Accounting Assignment Help
- Homework Help
- Assignment Editing Services
- Law Assignment Help
- Engineering Assignment Help
- Dissertation Help Australia
- View More Services
- Word Counter
- Text To Speech Converter
- Order Now
- How To Write A Critical Evaluation Essay?
- Feb 18, 2023
- Essay Writing
Writing a critical evaluation essay requires you to critically analyze and evaluate an idea, issue, or piece of art. You must be able to thoroughly research the topic, gather evidence and facts, and then clearly present your opinion in the essay. In this blog, we'll look at how to write a critical evaluation essay step-by-step so that you can get the grade you deserve.
What is a Critical Evaluation Essay?
A critical evaluation essay is an essay in which the writer evaluates a text, usually an article or book. The purpose of a critical evaluation essay is to analyze a text critically and to determine its effectiveness.
You should first read the text thoroughly when writing a critical evaluation essay. Then, it would help if you analyzed the text critically, considering its content, style, and structure. After that, you should write your essay, supporting your points with evidence from the text.
Preparing to Write the Essay
Before you start writing your essay, it is essential to understand a critical evaluation essay. This essay is designed to analyze a specific piece of writing or artwork. It can be used to evaluate a book, film, play, or other work of art. A critical evaluation essay aims to provide an unbiased analysis of the subject matter.
When writing a critical evaluation essay, you must provide your opinion on the subject matter. However, you will need to support your opinion with work evidence. This means you must read and analyze the work before writing carefully.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- Choose a topic that you are familiar with. Ideally, it would be best to choose a work you have recently read or seen. This will make it easier for you to provide a detailed analysis.
- Carefully read or view the work several times. As you read/view the work, take note of any elements that stand out to you. These could be things like the author's use of language, the structure of the piece, or the characters' development over time.
- Once you have identified some key elements, start brainstorming your ideas for the essay. What are your thoughts on the work? How does it compare to other similar works? What did you like or dislike about it?
- Once your ideas and evidence are gathered, begin writing your essay. Remember to use evidence from the work to back up your claims.
By following these steps, you should be able to write a strong critical evaluation essay. Good luck!
Identifying Critical Thinking Skills
Critical thinking skills are important to have when writing an evaluation Essay Writing Help . One way to identify these skills is to look for keywords and phrases in the prompt or question that indicate that you will need to use them. For example, keywords and phrases such as "analyze," "evaluate," "compare and contrast," or "critically assess" all require the application of critical thinking skills.
Once you have identified the keywords and phrases indicating that critical thinking skills are required, the next step is to start applying those skills. When analyzing something, you need to break it down into smaller parts and examine each part closely. This examination should include looking at the positive and negative aspects of your evaluation. When evaluating something, you will need to weigh the pros and cons to conclude whether or not it is good or bad. When comparing and contrasting two things, you will need to look at how they are similar and different. And when critically assessing something, you will need to consider all sides of the issue before coming to a judgment about it.
By using critical thinking skills when writing your evaluation essay, you will be able to produce a well-reasoned and balanced piece that thoroughly examines all aspects of the topic at hand.
Selecting Criteria for Evaluation
There is no definitive answer to this question since it will vary depending on the particular assignment and the individual instructor's preferences. However, some general criteria can be used to evaluate any essay. These include:
-Is the purpose of the essay clear?
-Does the essay stay on topic?
-Is the argument well-supported by evidence?
-Are the sources credible?
-Is the writing clear and free of errors?
Remember that your instructor may have specific requirements for how your essay should be organized and what type of evaluation you should perform. Be sure to consult your assignment instructions before you begin writing.
Writing an Outline
When writing an outline for a critical evaluation essay, there are a few key things that you will want to keep in mind:
- You will want to ensure that your outline is organized logically and flows well. This means you will want to start with a general overview of your topic and then move on to more specific points.
- You will want to ensure that each point is clearly defined and supported by evidence.
- You will want to conclude your outline with a summary of your overall argument.
Introduction to the Essay
A critical evaluation essay asks the writer to analyze a text, article, book, movie, or anything else. The goal is twofold: one, to find the strengths and weaknesses of the thing being critiqued and two, to provide an evaluation based on a set of standards.
To write a critical evaluation essay, first, introduce the work. Give basic information, such as the title and author (if available). Then briefly describe what the work is about and how you will be approaching your analysis. After that, jump into your evaluations of the work. Use evidence from the work itself to support your claims. Finally, sum up your findings in a conclusion paragraph.
Body of the Essay
The body of the essay must support the thesis statement. Each paragraph should address a different point, and the sentences within each paragraph should support that point. You may use direct quotes from the work you are evaluating, but make sure you do not use too many; your own analysis is the most important thing. Be sure to discuss positive and negative points about the work in question.
Conclusion of the Essay
In conclusion, a critical evaluation essay is a paper that critically analyzes a particular subject. This type of essay aims to provide readers with an understanding of the subject's main points and evaluate its strengths and weaknesses. To write a successful critical evaluation essay, you must clearly understand what you are critiquing. You should also be able to identify the main arguments of the subject and evaluate them objectively.
Revising and Editing Your Work
When you have finished writing your first draft, revising and editing your work before submitting it for evaluation is important. Here are some tips on how to do this:
- Read your essay aloud to yourself or someone else. This will help you catch any errors or awkward phrasing.
- Print out your essay and mark any changes you want to make with a pencil or pen.
- Use a grammar checker to identify any grammatical errors.
- Have someone else read your essay and give feedback on what could be improved.
- Take a break from your essay for a day or two before returning to it with fresh eyes. This will help you see mistakes that you might have missed before.
Finalizing Your Work
The final step in writing your critical evaluation essay is proofreading and editing your work. Make sure to check for grammar and spelling errors, as well as any typos. Once you have edited and proofread your essay, you are ready to submit it for assessment.
Top 8 Benefits Of Choosing Assignment Help Experts To Write Your Assignment
- 22 November, 2023
Get All Your Kaplan Mortgage Broking Assignment Answers: Hassle Free
- 07 November, 2023
Which University Is No 1 For Nursing in Australia?
- 03 October, 2023
What Is the Best Nursing Assignment Help Australia?
- 15 September, 2023
- Assignment Writing
- Online Tutoring
- Student Tips
- Research Paper
Get Flat 40% Off On All Assignments
Get in touch with our skilled academic staff for exceptional writing assistance.
What Our Students Have To Say
Eager to know what our students have to tell about us? Do not accept our phrase for it - discover it directly from the source!
The very best is AssignmentPark. They have assignment writing services that are very affordable all over the world. Anyone, from anywhere, can request assistance from them.
This website is highly recommended by me to students who need urgent case study writing assistance but are short on cash. AssignmentPark charges a reasonable fee for their assistance. I also received management case study assistance and did well on it.
Thank you, AssignmentPark, for assisting me in completing my marketing assignment on time. The information that gave to me was error-free and was legitimately referenced with numerous authoritative references. Thank you so much for your assistance.
How to Start a Critical Evaluation Essay
Amy mahoney, 25 jun 2018.
A critical evaluation essay involves writing about the quality and value of something, such as a book, movie, sporting event, restaurant or product. But starting a critical evaluation essay isn’t just about presenting your opinion. It’s also about drawing the reader in so he will want to read your whole paper. It’s important to create an interesting introduction that clearly presents your opinion but also holds the reader's attention and makes him want to read more.
Explore this article
- Set the Scene
- Provide Historical Context
- Highlight Surprising Facts
- Explain Your Purpose
1 Set the Scene
A great way to start a critical essay is to share an interesting anecdote about the piece you’re evaluating. Tell a brief story about a poignant moment in the book or film you reviewed, or recap the heart-stopping home run during the baseball season you evaluated. Stories help illustrate the high or low points of an experience, which can capture a reader’s interest. For example: “The moment I walked into Sinfully Delicious bakery and smelled the aromas of melting chocolate, toasting hazelnuts and freshly baked blueberry muffins, I knew the bakery would live up to its name.” Just keep it brief so you don’t lose your reader with a long introduction.
2 Provide Historical Context
Providing historical context can be a smart way to start a critical evaluation essay. For example, if you were to evaluate a team’s season performance, you could start with some brief information about how that team performed in the past. If you were going to evaluate the plot of a novel, provide some context about the author and his or her previous work. Providing a bit of background information can help establish your credibility by showing you’ve done your research. This can make the reader more interested in your opinion.
3 Highlight Surprising Facts
Start by writing about the most interesting or surprising discovery you made during your evaluation. Chances are, that’s going to be the most interesting or surprising element for your reader too. For example, if you were surprised to discover that the smartphone you were evaluating had a battery life of three days, odds are your reader is interested in that, too. Highlighting what is unique or surprising about the piece or product you’re evaluating can hook your reader right away.
4 Explain Your Purpose
A simple but effective introduction explains why you’re evaluating this particular piece or product. Many writers forget to mention why their review is valuable or useful. For example, if you were evaluating the quality of a new home alarm system, you could write about the importance of safety and security. If you were reviewing the effectiveness of your school’s new uniform policy, you could write about how this is an issue that affects every parent, teacher and student in your school district. This approach can give your readers a sense of meaning and purpose, which may make them keep reading.
- 1 Academic Help: How to Write an Evaluation Essay
- 2 University of Sussex: Critical Essay Writing
- 3 Southeastern University: Critical Analysis
About the Author
Amy Mahoney has been a writer for more than 15 years. Her articles have appeared in newspapers and magazines including “The Boston Globe,” “Reader’s Digest” and the “Miami Herald.” She holds a Master of Fine Arts in fiction.
How to Write a Reflective Report
How to Write Funeral Tributes
Ideas for Evaluation Essays
How to Write a Report on a Jazz Concert
What is a Personal Narrative?
What is a Clincher in an Essay?
How to Enhance a Narrative Essay
How to Write an Introductory Paragraph for a Narrative
Guidelines for Students to Write a Memoir
How to Write About Your Proudest Accomplishment in...
How to Write a 7th Grade Book Report
The Average Starting Salary of a College Graduate
What Are the Writing Elements for a Personal Narrative?
How to Tip for Furniture Delivery
How to Give a Good Lecture
How Should I Start My Thesis for My Personal Narrative?
How to Write a Lecture Report
How to Write an Evaluation Essay on TV Shows
Anasazi Indian Tools
Regardless of how old we are, we never stop learning. Classroom is the educational resource for people of all ages. Whether you’re studying times tables or applying to college, Classroom has the answers.
- Copyright Policy
- Manage Preferences
© 2020 Leaf Group Ltd. / Leaf Group Media, All Rights Reserved. Based on the Word Net lexical database for the English Language. See disclaimer .
Jun 29, 2023
Evaluation Essay Examples: Master the Art of Critical Assessment with Examples and Techniques
Want to turn good evaluation essays into great ones? We've got you covered with the guidance and insights you need. Join us as we delve into the art of critical assessment!
An evaluation paper's main purpose is to assess entities like a book, movie, restaurant, or product and provide constructive criticism. This writing style can be approached with serious objectivity or with humor and sarcasm. Reviewing is a common form of academic writing that serves to assess something and is often used in various fields as a research method. For example, research papers might include literature reviews or case studies, using evaluation as an analytical tool.
Evaluation reports can also take the form of analyses and critiques. A critique of a scientific study would look at its methodology and findings, while an analysis of a novel would focus on its themes, characters, and writing style. It's essential to consider your audience and your purpose before starting an evaluation document.
Evaluation papers are a versatile and meaningful writing form that can both educate and entertain audiences. Regardless of whether the tone is serious or humorous, objective or subjective, a well-written review can engage and educate.
To understand everything about evaluation essays, from their definition and purpose to potential topics and writing tips, read on.
What are Evaluation Essays?
An evaluation essay allows the author to make a claim and offer a verdict on a topic. This essay type can be used to identify the best option among several alternatives, or to analyze a specific method, product, or situation. It is a common academic task across all levels. Evaluation essays come in different forms, from online product reviews to business cases prepared by management professionals.
In contrast to a descriptive essay, an evaluation essay aims to express the author's judgment. However, this essay type is defined by an objective tone. The author's judgment should be based on careful examination of the available evidence. This differs from a persuasive essay, which seeks to convince the reader to adopt the author's point of view. An evaluation essay starts with the facts and forms conclusions based on these facts.
How to Write an Evaluation Essay?
To write an effective evaluation essay, follow these essential writing tips:
1. Select a Topic
The essay topic is crucial. It should be both educational and interesting, providing enough information to fill an entire essay.
2. Draft an Evaluation Essay Outline
Professional writers always advise creating an evaluation essay outline before writing the essay itself. This aids in writing and ensures content coherence. An outline is also easier to modify than a complete essay. Think about what should be included and excluded when designing your essay's outline. However, skipping this step and diving straight into the essay writing can create extra work later, as it can mean editing and revising the entire piece.
The general components of an evaluation essay outline include:
The introduction is vital as it forms the readers' first impression. It should engage readers and arouse their interest in the topic. The aspects to consider when writing the introduction are as follows:
Begin with a compelling hook statement to capture the reader's interest.
Provide background information on the topic for better understanding.
Formulate a clear and concise thesis statement, outlining the main objective of the evaluation.
b. Body Section
The body of the essay consists of three paragraphs. Each paragraph should deliver several related ideas and flow seamlessly from start to finish. The key ideas to cover in the body paragraphs include:
Start with a sentence that presents your view on the topic.
Provide arguments that support the topic sentence and your stance.
Present a well-rounded argument to show impartiality.
Compare the subject to a different topic to showcase its strengths and weaknesses.
Present the evaluation from various angles, applying both approving and critical thinking.
This is your final chance to convince the reader of your viewpoint. The conclusion should summarize the essay and present the overall evaluation and final assessment. When composing an evaluation essay's conclusion, keep the following points in mind:
Restate your main points and arguments from the essay body.
Present evidence to support your thesis.
Conclude your argument convincingly, ultimately persuading the reader of your assessment.
3. Review, Edit, and Proofread
The final steps after writing the essay are editing and proofreading. Carefully reading your essay will help identify and correct any unintentional errors. If necessary, review your draft multiple times to ensure no mistakes are present.
Structure of an Evaluation Essay
An evaluation essay, like any good piece of writing, follows a basic structure: an introduction, body, and conclusion. But to make your evaluation essay standout, it's crucial to distinctly outline every segment and explain the process that led you to your final verdict. Here's how to do it:
Start strong. Your introduction needs to captivate your readers and compel them to read further. To accomplish this, begin with a clear declaration of purpose. Provide a brief background of the work being evaluated to showcase your expertise on the topic.
Next, rephrase the essay prompt, stating the purpose of your piece. For example, "This essay will critically assess X, utilizing Y standards, and analyzing its pros and cons." This presents your comprehension of the task at hand.
Wrap up your introduction with a thesis statement that clearly outlines the topics to be discussed in the body. This way, you set the stage for the essay's content and direction, sparking curiosity for the main body of the work.
Body of the Essay
Dive deep, but not without preparation. Before delving into the assessment, offer an unbiased overview of the topic being evaluated. This reaffirms your understanding and familiarity with the subject.
Each paragraph of the body should focus on one evaluation criterion, presenting either support or criticism for the point. This structured approach ensures clarity while presenting evidence to substantiate each point. For instance, discussing the benefits of a product, you can outline each advantage and back it up with supporting evidence like customer reviews or scientific studies.
Ensure a smooth flow of thoughts by linking paragraphs with transitional phrases like "in addition," "moreover," and "furthermore." Each paragraph should have a clear topic sentence, explanation, and supporting evidence or examples for easy understanding.
Your conclusion is where you make your final, compelling argument. It should focus on summarizing the points made according to your evaluation criteria. This isn't the place for new information but rather a concise summary of your work.
To conclude effectively, revisit your thesis and check whether it holds up or falls short based on your analysis. This completes the narrative arc and provides a solid stance on the topic. A thoughtful conclusion should consider the potential impact and outcomes of your evaluation, illustrating that your findings are based on the available data and recognizing the potential need for further exploration.
Evaluation Essay Examples
Now that we've covered the structure, let's take a look at some examples. Remember, an evaluation essay is just one type of essay that can be generated using tools like Jenni.ai. This AI-powered software can produce high-quality essays on any topic at impressive speeds. Here are some ideas to kickstart your assessment essay writing journey.
Evaluation Essay: Online Teaching vs. On-campus Teaching
In the face of technological evolution, education has seen a shift in teaching styles, with online learning platforms providing an alternative to traditional on-campus teaching. This essay will evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these two teaching styles, delving into various factors that contribute to their strengths and weaknesses.
The landscape of education has transformed significantly with the advent of online learning. This essay will scrutinize and juxtapose the effectiveness of online teaching against traditional on-campus teaching. The evaluation will take into account numerous factors that contribute to the success of each teaching style, focusing on their individual benefits and drawbacks.
On-campus teaching, the time-tested method of education, has proven its effectiveness repeatedly. The physical classroom setting provides students direct access to their teachers, promoting immediate feedback and real-time interaction. Moreover, the hands-on learning, group discussions, and collaborative projects intrinsic to on-campus teaching cultivate crucial soft skills like communication and teamwork.
A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research reveals that students attending on-campus classes show higher academic performance and are more likely to complete their degrees compared to those in online classes (Bettinger & Loeb, 2017). However, on-campus teaching isn't without its challenges. It offers limited flexibility in scheduling and requires physical attendance, which can be inconvenient for students residing far from campus or those with mobility constraints.
Online teaching, propelled by technological advancements and digital learning platforms, offers a compelling alternative. The most significant benefit of online teaching is its scheduling flexibility. Students can access classes and course materials from anywhere, at any time, providing a superior balance for work, family, and other commitments.
Online teaching democratizes education by enabling access for students in remote areas or with mobility challenges. The use of innovative teaching methods like interactive multimedia and gamification enhances engagement and enjoyment in learning.
Despite its numerous advantages, online teaching presents its own set of challenges. A major drawback is the lack of direct interaction with teachers and peers, potentially leading to delayed feedback and feelings of isolation. Furthermore, online classes demand a higher degree of self-motivation and discipline, which may be challenging for some students.
Both online teaching and on-campus teaching present their unique benefits and drawbacks. While on-campus teaching fosters direct interaction and immediate feedback, online teaching provides unmatched flexibility and accessibility. The choice between the two often depends on factors such as the course content, learning objectives, and student preferences.
A study by the University of Massachusetts reports that the academic performance of students in online classes is on par with those attending on-campus classes (Allen & Seaman, 2017). Furthermore, online classes are more cost-effective, eliminating the need for physical classrooms and related resources.
In conclusion, while both teaching styles have their merits, the effectiveness of each is heavily dependent on the subject matter, learning objectives, and the individual needs and preferences of students.
Citations: Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. Bettinger, E., & Loeb, S. (2017). Promises and pitfalls of online education. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2017, 347-384.
Evaluation essay: Analyze how the roles of females and males changed in recent romantic movies
Romantic movies have long been a popular genre, offering a glimpse into the complex and varied world of relationships. Over the years, the portrayal of gender roles in romantic movies has evolved significantly. This essay aims to evaluate and analyze how the roles of females and males have changed in recent romantic movies.
Historical Context of Gender Roles in Romantic Movies:
Gender roles have played a significant role in shaping the portrayal of romantic relationships in movies. In the past, traditional gender roles were often reinforced, with women playing the role of the damsel in distress, and men playing the role of the protector and provider.
However, over the years, the feminist movement and other social changes have led to a more nuanced portrayal of gender roles in romantic movies. Women are no longer just passive objects of desire, and men are not just dominant figures. Instead, both genders are portrayed as complex and multifaceted individuals with their desires, needs, and struggles.
Analysis of Recent Romantic Movies:
In recent years, romantic movies have become more diverse and inclusive, featuring a wider range of gender identities, sexual orientations, and cultural backgrounds. As a result, the portrayal of gender roles in these movies has also become more nuanced and complex.
One significant trend in recent romantic movies is the portrayal of female characters as strong, independent, and empowered. Female characters are no longer just passive objects of desire, waiting for the male lead to sweep them off their feet. Instead, they are shown to be capable of taking charge of their own lives, pursuing their goals, and making their own decisions.
For example, in the movie "Crazy Rich Asians," the female lead, Rachel, is portrayed as a strong and independent woman who stands up for herself and refuses to be intimidated by the wealthy and powerful people around her. Similarly, in the movie "The Shape of Water," the female lead, Elisa, is portrayed as a determined and resourceful woman who takes action to rescue the creature she has fallen in love with.
Another trend in recent romantic movies is the portrayal of male characters as vulnerable and emotionally expressive. Male characters are no longer just stoic and unemotional but are shown to have their insecurities, fears, and vulnerabilities.
For example, in the movie "Call Me By Your Name," the male lead, Elio, is shown to be sensitive and emotional, struggling with his feelings for another man. Similarly, in the movie "Moonlight," the male lead, Chiron, is shown to be vulnerable and emotionally expressive, struggling with his identity and his relationships with those around him.
However, while there have been significant changes in the portrayal of gender roles in recent romantic movies, there are still some aspects that remain problematic. For example, female characters are still often portrayed as objects of desire, with their value determined by their physical appearance and sexual appeal. Male characters are still often portrayed as dominant and aggressive, with their masculinity tied to their ability to assert control over others.
In conclusion, the portrayal of gender roles in recent romantic movies has evolved significantly, with female characters being portrayed as strong, independent, and empowered, and male characters being portrayed as vulnerable and emotionally expressive. These changes reflect the shifting social norms and values of our society and offer a more nuanced and complex portrayal of romantic relationships.
However, there are still some problematic aspects of the portrayal of gender roles in romantic movies, such as the objectification of female characters and the perpetuation of toxic masculinity. Filmmakers and audiences need to continue to push for greater diversity, inclusivity, and nuance in the portrayal of gender roles in romantic movies so that everyone can see themselves reflected in these stories.
"Crazy Rich Asians" Directed by Jon M. Chu, performances by Constance Wu, Henry Golding, and Michelle
The step-by-step guide and examples provided should have equipped you with the skills necessary to write a successful evaluation essay. However, crafting the perfect essay isn't a simple task; it demands practice, patience, and experience.
Incorporate Jenni.ai into your academic journey to revolutionize your writing experience. This advanced AI writing tool is designed to assist with a range of academic writing projects. With Jenni.ai, you can confidently tackle essays on any topic, easing your writing tasks considerably. Don't hesitate to register with Jenni.ai today ! Discover a world of writing opportunities and take your essay writing skills to new heights!
Try Jenni for free today
Create your first piece of content with Jenni today and never look back
How to Write a Critical Evaluation Essay
1) to present information effectively, and
2) to analyze the information critically.
If you have been assigned to write a critical evaluation essay, it is better to plan your work according to your personal skills, abilities and knowledge.
There are a few necessary steps involved in the writing process. The tips we offer below should guide you through critical evaluation writing process, but do not think that this is all you need. To know how to write a critical evaluation essay is a matter of experience.
Critical evaluation writing – 10 vital steps
1. define your topic.
If you have been already given a topic, you’d better start clarifying it to yourself first. What terms, conceptions, and meanings can be found in the topic? The topic can vary depending on the field of study. If you need further elucidation, talk to your instructor. He/she will give you some clues as long as it is allowed.
2. Do your own research
You have to gather some useful information on the topic. Since the topics of the critical evaluation essay are usually controversial, you can gather all information available from different points of view; for example, articles in newspapers, TV shows, personal interviews or even videos. Write down your personal thoughts during the process of research; some people are inspired during this process and are able to plan the draft within minutes.
3. Present your views on the topic
Be impartial; show both positive and negative sides of all conceptions you expose in the critical evaluation paper. It is better to mention the names of the adherents of the given theories and tell a little bit about their views.
4. Use reliable references in your critical evaluation essay
The critical evaluation essay will be of value only if it contains a good deal of references to reliable sources. Your essay needs to be formatted according to a given academic standard, which requires special formatting of the list of references ( MLA , APA , Harvard style).
5. Expose your own view on the subject
Here you should keep the balance between impartiality and personal view. If you are “completely” impartial, the paper you are working on will turn out to be a simple report. On the other hand, if you put stress only on your personal view, then the element of critical evaluation will be dismissed significantly, thereby leading to emotional (and not rational) defense of the given thesis, instead of mature evaluation of facts.
6. Show some other perspectives on the topic
New facts will probably change an attitude towards the process/phenomenon in question. Always leave some room for doubt and criticism. People are fallible, so absolute knowledge is unachievable.
7. Be analytical
Find the causes or the factors related to the given process or phenomenon and try to explain their function. Factors can be economic, social, psychological, cultural, political, etc.
8. Refine your critical evaluation essay structure
Try to be concise and clear, without unnecessary information or analyses. The transitions between various parts of the paper need to be plain and logical.
9. Use appropriate terminology
Be careful with the language you are employing while writing a critical evaluation essay. A lot of essays are being written without any respect for language, even in aesthetic sense (i.e., such essays resemble rather a post on Facebook than an essay written by an educated person).
10. Revise your essay
Give it first to a colleague or friend. Afterwards, listen to their advice and improve the essay in a formal and substantial sense. Make it look “more logical” and clearer. Also check the internal logic and coherence of the paper; it should stay the same after the revision has been made.
A critical evaluation essay is not that different from any other type of analytical essays, but it is focused on worthiness and value of a given theory, and is also able to explain a certain process, phenomenon or event.
A critical evaluation essay is focused on worthiness and value of a given theory, and is also able to explain a certain process, phenomenon or event. Tweet This
Do you need help with writing a critical evaluation essay?
Our guarantees, customer feedback.
© 2023 SolidEssay. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Data Researchers Network
- Step By Step Guide to Writing a Critical Evaluation Assignment
- By myaproadm
There are numerous types of academic writing, all of which necessitate extensive reading and research. An academic writing assignment known as a vital analysis essay is a difficult one. However, if you take the proper approach, you may find the creative process to be simple. Writing a vital analysis essay can be intimidating, especially if you don’t know where to begin or what structure you should use to do it. It will also provide you with a list of relevant topic examples for your vital analysis essay, as well as several helpful writing tips. For professional help at an affordable rate then simply choose cheap assignments help by My Assignments Pro.
Now, coming back to the topic of guiding how to write a critical evaluation assignment.
What is the purpose of a vital essay?
Critique and analysis of a topic or argument are typically required in the vital analysis essay. It shows how a student comprehends a particular subject. Books, paintings, and even movies can all be used as subjects for a literary essay.
Ultimately, vital analysis essays aim to educate the reader on a particular topic by laying out the truth about it from multiple opposing perspectives. The writer provides a supporting piece of evidence for the author’s thesis. In addition, they express their thoughts on the matter. Vital reading, vital thinking, and vital writing skills are summarised in this article.
We now have all the information we need to begin writing a vital analysis essay, so let’s get started.
A Vital Review’s Structure
Short (one page) and long (four pages) vital reviews tend to follow the same structure. Make sure to read your assignment instructions carefully for any formatting or structural requirements. Headings can be helpful for the reader in longer reviews, but they are usually optional.
One paragraph for a journal article review, and two or three paragraphs for a more comprehensive book review, is the typical length of an introduction. The introduction should include a few sentences that identify the author(s), the title, and the subject of the text. Make clear what you’re trying to accomplish with your writing by outlining the main point or argument. To wrap up the introduction, state your opinion about the content. Whether it’s a positive or a negative review, it’s common for this to be mixed.
Provide an overview of the main points with a few examples. It’s also a good idea to briefly describe how the text is structured and explain the author’s goals. Only a third of the vital review should be devoted to the summary.
When writing a vital review, it is essential to consider both the strengths and weaknesses of a piece. Make sure your discussion is based on a specific set of facts. The best reviews include evidence from other sources to back up your findings (remember to reference).
Your critique can be organised in any way you like. To get you started, here are some examples:
• The most significant to the least significant conclusions you draw from the text.
• If your critique is more positive than negative, begin with the negative points and end with the positive ones.
• The more negative your critique is, the more vital it is, to begin with, the positive points and end with the negative.
• If each criterion you use has both strengths and weaknesses, you need to make a final decision about your judgement. It’s possible to have both positive and negative thoughts about a particular point in the text. It is possible to begin by stating the positive aspects of the idea, then concede and explain how it is restricted. Your overall assessment is likely to be more harmful than positive based on this example.
• In long reviews, you can include both positive and negative points for each criterion you choose. A paragraph should separate positive and negative aspects in short vital studies (one page or less), where your comments will be more condensed.
• Critique sections can also include suggestions for improving the text in terms of ideas, research methodology, and theories or frameworks used.
Conclusion and Bibliography
For the most part, it’s a highly brief paragraph.
• Sum up your overall impression of the piece.
• Recommendations should be brief.
• If necessary, you may want to provide some additional context or justification for your opinion. As a result, it can make your critique sound more reasonable and fairer.
It is essential to include a list of references if other sources were used in your review.
Composing a vital review’s summary and analysis
Academic Writing, and vital review, in particular, necessitates the ability to summarise and paraphrase. To summarise a piece of writing is to distil it down to its most essential points and ideas. For a vital review, the length of your summary should only be about one-quarter to one-third of the total length of your vital evaluation.
This is the best way to sum up:
1.Scan the content. The introduction, conclusion, title, and headings are all excellent places to look for hints. It’s up to you to figure out what these tell you about the article.
2.As you read, locate and highlight the main points of each paragraph.
3. Reread the text and make separate notes on the main points. 3. At this point, examples and evidence are not necessary. Critiques often use them selectively.
There are many ways of paraphrasing. For those who prefer not to quote directly, paraphrasing provides a convenient way to incorporate your summary notes.
This is the most accurate way to express it.
1. Go over your notes from the summary.
2. Then, rewrite them in your own words and complete sentences in your own words.
3. ‘The author describes…’, ‘Smith argues that…’ are examples of reporting verbs and phrases that can be used.
4. Use quotation marks if you include phrases from the text that are unique or specialised.
Here are the final remarks
Your vital review for your assignment can begin by following these steps. Why not hire a professional and Cheap Assignments Help like My Assignments Pro, who can assist you in completing the critical evaluation assignment to the best of your abilities.
Also Read: Want To Get Top Notch Quality of Assignments?
Leave A Comment Cancel Comment
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Something went wrong. Wait a moment and try again.
The purpose in writing my critical evaluation essay is to do any analysis of a writer’s point of view. In addition, it is to do an evaluation of the author’s message. That is, what is the thesis or key idea the author was trying to get across. I will explore the writer’s arguments that were offered to prove the focal idea and a summary of the author’s solutions for action. It is my hope, with the critical evaluation, that l, along with the readers of my essay, will discover whether the author provided appropriate evidential support and the effectiveness of it. I also pop to provide some new insight and understanding to a topic that is so important to our history. This assignment allowed me to research a topic that is so important to our history. I was greatly intrigued that a group of atomic scientists who were responsible for creating such a meaner of destruction were pleading to halt the use of the atomic bomb against Japan. Not only through the course of my critical evaluation did I learn more about the events that led up to the bombing of Japan, I developed an understanding of the struggles between science, politics, and moral obligation and consequences. Moreover, to believe that if this plea could have been written in a different way, it could have affected the course of history. The difficulties I encountered during this writing assignment were ensuring I evaluated it in a logical manner, free from emotion due to the impact it had on our history. I attempted throughout the process, to perform research of the topic and make myself more knowledgeable of the events that led up to the petition and what took place after. I also had to ensure that while doing a critical evaluation off topic does not mean to be negative.
But rather, it meaner being objective and well- informed. I enjoyed this assignment because it allowed me to revisit a topic in history that had such a huge impact. Although, I was aware of the author and who he was, I was not aware of the importance of this petition and how it could have changed the course of history. This assignment allowed me to evaluate an important part of history, pose and challenge questions about the topic, and see the strengths and weaknesses of a particular point of view. The article I chose is Leo Galliard’s “Petition to the President”. As I stated previously, I chose this essay because of its huge impact on history, the struggle teen moral obligation and politics, and how the history course of events could have been altered had this article been written differently. Furthermore, with this article, it was easy for me to see the use of ethos versus pathos and the implications of the author’s writing style. Michael Martinez Professor Shields ENGLE 102 Effectiveness in Writing 24 May 2013 In 1945, when it became public that the Truman administration planned on using atomic bombs against Japan, a group of scientists, many who had worked on the project, decided to protest. Led by Leo Sailor, a petition was written to the president or his fellow scientists to consider. It asked the President “to rule that the United States shall not, in the present phase of the war, resort to the use of atomic bombs” (Sailor, par. 1). Galliard’s arguments expressed in the petition lacked the strength and persuasion needed to convince the President that the use of the atomic bomb against Japan was unjustifiable due to the lack of facts presented, the numerous fallacies found within the writing, and the failure to express the weight that their arguments held in the decision. In Leo Galliard’s petition to the President, the author repeatedly utilizes the appeal f pathos, expressing the ideas in a way that invokes emotion and feelings from the audience, particularly the president. Galliard’s states: Atomic power will provide the nations with new meaner of destruction. The atomic bombs at our disposal represent only the first step in this direction and there is almost no limit to the destructive power which will become available in the course of this development. Thus a nation which sets the precedent of using these newly liberated forces of nature for purposes of destruction may have to bear the responsibility of peeing the door to an era of devastation on an unimaginable scale (Sailor, par. 5). Here, Sailor was trying to describe to the President that the results of using the atomic bomb would not only affect Japan, but ultimately the United States. Not only would the United States have to bear responsibility of having unleashed this atomic power, she would feel the effects of it when it would be used, inevitably, against other countries in the future. The author’s overuse of pathos made his appeal less convincing and failed to convince President Truman that the use of atomic bombs against Japan was unwarranted. If Sailor had appealed to the President with the use of ethos, it would have made a more successful petition and proven his credibility as an expert. The lack of facts presented and the failure to express the weight that their arguments held weakened their petition. For example, as creators of the atomic bomb, they were aware of the specific catastrophic effects, including radiation poisoning. This is information that only the scientists knew and excluding it created a huge defect in their petition. A petition based on the scientist’s logic and expertise would have proven far more effective. Excluding critical information that only the scientists knew should have been used as the main incentive to persuade the President. Not addressing the fact that it was them who created the atomic bomb and they knew of its enormous destruction capabilities, was a key point that should have been addressed. The petitioner’s recurring use of pathos and pleas of emotion and moral obligation diverted the logical truths of their arguments. A factual representation of the have ultimately changed the course of history. Leo Sailor and his fellow co-signers did not prevent the bombings of Hiroshima ND Nagasaki, thus, proving that the arguments of the scientists failed to hold the strength needed to prevent the world’s first nuclear catastrophe. The choice of words and main points could have been more powerful. A more dramatic impact might have changed the way history played out. If the scientists would have gone about the bombings in complete opposition rather than attempting to dictate policy, they might have been successful. Works Cited Sailor, Leo and Cosigners. “A Petition to the President of the United States. ” Authenticator. Com. 2011. Web. 11 May 2012.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
- Our Guarantees
- Money Back Guarantee
- Revision Policy
- Refund Policy
- Terms and Conditions
- Personal Statement Writing
- Book Review Writing
- Case Study Writing
- Coursework Writing
- Custom Essays
- English 102 Essays
- Dissertation Writing
- Thesis Writing Service
- Writing a Perfect Essay Outline
- Quality Essays
- MLA Formatted Papers
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Nutrition Essay Sample
- History Essays and Dissertation
- Write your Nursing paper like a pro
- Term Paper Writing
Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code SUCCESS