vhdl signal assignments

VHDL Logical Operators and Signal Assignments for Combinational Logic

In this post, we discuss the VHDL logical operators, when-else statements , with-select statements and instantiation . These basic techniques allow us to model simple digital circuits.

In a previous post in this series, we looked at the way we use the VHDL entity, architecture and library keywords. These are important concepts which provide structure to our code and allow us to define the inputs and outputs of a component.

However, we can't do anything more than define inputs and outputs using this technique. In order to model digital circuits in VHDL, we need to take a closer look at the syntax of the language.

There are two main classes of digital circuit we can model in VHDL – combinational and sequential .

Combinational logic is the simplest of the two, consisting primarily of basic logic gates , such as ANDs, ORs and NOTs. When the circuit input changes, the output changes almost immediately (there is a small delay as signals propagate through the circuit).

Sequential circuits use a clock and require storage elements such as flip flops . As a result, changes in the output are synchronised to the circuit clock and are not immediate. We talk more specifically about modelling combinational logic in this post, whilst sequential logic is discussed in the next post.

Combinational Logic

The simplest elements to model in VHDL are the basic logic gates – AND, OR, NOR, NAND, NOT and XOR.

Each of these type of gates has a corresponding operator which implements their functionality. Collectively, these are known as logical operators in VHDL.

To demonstrate this concept, let us consider a simple two input AND gate such as that shown below.

The VHDL code shown below uses one of the logical operators to implement this basic circuit.

Although this code is simple, there are a couple of important concepts to consider. The first of these is the VHDL assignment operator (<=) which must be used for all signals. This is roughly equivalent to the = operator in most other programming languages.

In addition to signals, we can also define variables which we use inside of processes. In this case, we would have to use a different assignment operator (:=).

It is not important to understand variables in any detail to model combinational logic but we talk about them in the post on the VHDL process block .

The type of signal used is another important consideration. We talked about the most basic and common VHDL data types in a previous post.

As they represent some quantity or number, types such as real, time or integer are known as scalar types. We can't use the VHDL logical operators with these types and we most commonly use them with std_logic or std_logic_vectors.

Despite these considerations, this code example demonstrates how simple it is to model basic logic gates.

We can change the functionality of this circuit by replacing the AND operator with one of the other VHDL logical operators.

As an example, the VHDL code below models a three input XOR gate.

The NOT operator is slightly different to the other VHDL logical operators as it only has one input. The code snippet below shows the basic syntax for a NOT gate.

• Mixing VHDL Logical Operators

Combinational logic circuits almost always feature more than one type of gate. As a result of this, VHDL allows us to mix logical operators in order to create models of more complex circuits.

To demonstrate this concept, let’s consider a circuit featuring an AND gate and an OR gate. The circuit diagram below shows this circuit.

The code below shows the implementation of this circuit using VHDL.

This code should be easy to understand as it makes use of the logical operators we have already talked about. However, it is important to use brackets when modelling circuits with multiple logic gates, as shown in the above example. Not only does this ensure that the design works as intended, it also makes the intention of the code easier to understand.

• Reduction Functions

We can also use the logical operators on vector types in order to reduce them to a single bit. This is a useful feature as we can determine when all the bits in a vector are either 1 or 0.

We commonly do this for counters where we may want to know when the count reaches its maximum or minimum value.

The logical reduction functions were only introduced in VHDL-2008. Therefore, we can not use the logical operators to reduce vector types to a single bit when working with earlier standards.

The code snippet below shows the most common use cases for the VHDL reduction functions.

Mulitplexors in VHDL

In addition to logic gates, we often use multiplexors (mux for short) in combinational digital circuits. In VHDL, there are two different concurrent statements which we can use to model a mux.

The VHDL with select statement, also commonly referred to as selected signal assignment, is one of these constructs.

The other method we can use to concurrently model a mux is the VHDL when else statement.

In addition to this, we can also use a case statement to model a mux in VHDL . However, we talk about this in more detail in a later post as this method also requires us to have an understanding of the VHDL process block .

Let's look at the VHDL concurrent statements we can use to model a mux in more detail.

VHDL With Select Statement

When we use the with select statement in a VHDL design, we can assign different values to a signal based on the value of some other signal in our design.

The with select statement is probably the most intuitive way of modelling a mux in VHDL.

The code snippet below shows the basic syntax for the with select statement in VHDL.

When we use the VHDL with select statement, the <mux_out> field is assigned data based on the value of the <address> field.

When the <address> field is equal to <address1> then the <mux_out> signal is assigned to <a>, for example.

We use the the others clause at the end of the statement to capture instance when the address is a value other than those explicitly listed.

We can exclude the others clause if we explicitly list all of the possible input combinations.

• With Select Mux Example

Let’s consider a simple four to one multiplexer to give a practical example of the with select statement. The output Q is set to one of the four inputs (A,B, C or D) depending on the value of the addr input signal.

The circuit diagram below shows this circuit.

This circuit is simple to implement using the VHDL with select statement, as shown in the code snippet below.

VHDL When Else Statements

We use the when statement in VHDL to assign different values to a signal based on boolean expressions .

In this case, we actually write a different expression for each of the values which could be assigned to a signal. When one of these conditions evaluates as true, the signal is assigned the value associated with this condition.

The code snippet below shows the basic syntax for the VHDL when else statement.

When we use the when else statement in VHDL, the boolean expression is written after the when keyword. If this condition evaluates as true, then the <mux_out> field is assigned to the value stated before the relevant when keyword.

For example, if the <address> field in the above example is equal to <address1> then the value of <a> is assigned to <mux_out>.

When this condition evaluates as false, the next condition in the sequence is evaluated.

We use the else keyword to separate the different conditions and assignments in our code.

The final else statement captures the instances when the address is a value other than those explicitly listed. We only use this if we haven't explicitly listed all possible combinations of the <address> field.

• When Else Mux Example

Let’s consider the simple four to one multiplexer again in order to give a practical example of the when else statement in VHDL. The output Q is set to one of the four inputs (A,B, C or D) based on the value of the addr signal. This is exactly the same as the previous example we used for the with select statement.

The VHDL code shown below implements this circuit using the when else statement.

• Comparison of Mux Modelling Techniques in VHDL

When we write VHDL code, the with select and when else statements perform the same function. In addition, we will get the same synthesis results from both statements in almost all cases.

In a purely technical sense, there is no major advantage to using one over the other. The choice of which one to use is often a purely stylistic choice.

When we use the with select statement, we can only use a single signal to determine which data will get assigned.

This is in contrast to the when else statements which can also include logical descriptors.

This means we can often write more succinct VHDL code by using the when else statement. This is especially true when we need to use a logic circuit to drive the address bits.

Let's consider the circuit shown below as an example.

To model this using a using a with select statement in VHDL, we would need to write code which specifically models the AND gate.

We must then include the output of this code in the with select statement which models the multiplexer.

The code snippet below shows this implementation.

Although this code would function as needed, using a when else statement would give us more succinct code. Whilst this will have no impact on the way the device works, it is good practice to write clear code. This help to make the design more maintainable for anyone who has to modify it in the future.

The VHDL code snippet below shows the same circuit implemented with a when else statement.

Instantiating Components in VHDL

Up until this point, we have shown how we can use the VHDL language to describe the behavior of circuits.

However, we can also connect a number of previously defined VHDL entity architecture pairs in order to build a more complex circuit.

This is similar to connecting electronic components in a physical circuit.

There are two methods we can use for this in VHDL – component instantiation and direct entity instantiation .

• VHDL Component Instantiation

When using component instantiation in VHDL, we must define a component before it is used.

We can either do this before the main code, in the same way we would declare a signal, or in a separate package.

VHDL packages are similar to headers or libraries in other programming languages and we discuss these in a later post.

When writing VHDL, we declare a component using the syntax shown below. The component name and the ports must match the names in the original entity.

After declaring our component, we can instantiate it within an architecture using the syntax shown below. The <instance_name> must be unique for every instantiation within an architecture.

In VHDL, we use a port map to connect the ports of our component to signals in our architecture.

The signals which we use in our VHDL port map, such as <signal_name1> in the example above, must be declared before they can be used.

As VHDL is a strongly typed language, the signals we use in the port map must also match the type of the port they connect to.

When we write VHDL code, we may also wish to leave some ports unconnected.

For example, we may have a component which models the behaviour of a JK flip flop . However, we only need to use the inverted output in our design meaning. Therefore, we do not want to connect the non-inverted output to a signal in our architecture.

We can use the open keyword to indicate that we don't make a connection to one of the ports.

However, we can only use the open VHDL keyword for outputs.

If we attempt to leave inputs to our components open, our VHDL compiler will raise an error.

• VHDL Direct Entity Instantiation

The second instantiation technique is known as direct entity instantiation.

Using this method we can directly connect the entity in a new design without declaring a component first.

The code snippet below shows how we use direct entity instantiation in VHDL.

As with the component instantiation technique, <instance_name> must be unique for each instantiation in an architecture.

There are two extra requirements for this type of instantiation. We must explicitly state the name of both the library and the architecture which we want to use. This is shown in the example above by the <library_name> and <architecture_name> labels.

Once the component is instantiated within a VHDL architecture, we use a port map to connect signals to the ports. We use the VHDL port map in the same way for both direct entity and component instantiation.

Which types can not be used with the VHDL logical operators?

Scalar types such as integer and real.

Write the code for a 4 input NAND gate

We can use two different types of statement to model multiplexors in VHDL, what are they?

The with select statement and the when else statement

Write the code for an 8 input multiplexor using both types of statement

Write the code to instantiate a two input AND component using both direct entity and component instantiation. Assume that the AND gate is compiled in the work library and the architecture is named rtl.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Table of Contents

Sign up free for exclusive content.

Don't Miss Out

We are about to launch exclusive video content. Sign up to hear about it first.

• Product Manual
• Knowledge Base
• Release Notes
• Tech Articles
• Screencasts

Signal Assignments in VHDL: with/select, when/else and case

Sometimes, there is more than one way to do something in VHDL. OK, most of the time , you can do things in many ways in VHDL. Let’s look at the situation where you want to assign different values to a signal, based on the value of another signal.

With / Select

The most specific way to do this is with as selected signal assignment. Based on several possible values of a , you assign a value to b . No redundancy in the code here. The official name for this VHDL with/select assignment is the selected signal assignment .

When / Else Assignment

The construct of a conditional signal assignment is a little more general. For each option, you have to give a condition. This means that you could write any boolean expression as a condition, which give you more freedom than equality checking. While this construct would give you more freedom, there is a bit more redundancy too. We had to write the equality check ( a = ) on every line. If you use a signal with a long name, this will make your code bulkier. Also, the separator that’s used in the selected signal assignment was a comma. In the conditional signal assignment, you need the else keyword. More code for the same functionality. Official name for this VHDL when/else assignment is the conditional signal assignment

Combinational Process with Case Statement

The most generally usable construct is a process. Inside this process, you can write a case statement, or a cascade of if statements. There is even more redundancy here. You the skeleton code for a process (begin, end) and the sensitivity list. That’s not a big effort, but while I was drafting this, I had put b in the sensitivity list instead of a . Easy to make a small misstake. You also need to specify what happens in the other cases. Of course, you could do the same thing with a bunch of IF-statements, either consecutive or nested, but a case statement looks so much nicer.

While this last code snippet is the largest and perhaps most error-prone, it is probably also the most common. It uses two familiar and often-used constructs: the process and the case statements.

Hard to remember

The problem with the selected and conditional signal assignments is that there is no logic in their syntax. The meaning is almost identical, but the syntax is just different enough to throw you off. I know many engineers who permanenty have a copy of the Doulos Golden Reference Guide to VHDL lying on their desks. Which is good for Doulos, because their name gets mentioned all the time. But most people just memorize one way of getting the job done and stick with it.

• VHDL Pragmas (blog post)
• Records in VHDL: Initialization and Constraining unconstrained fields (blog post)
• Finite State Machine (FSM) encoding in VHDL: binary, one-hot, and others (blog post)
• "Use" and "Library" in VHDL (blog post)
• The scope of VHDL use clauses and VHDL library clauses (blog post)

• Network Sites:
• Technical Articles
• Market Insights

• Or sign in with
• iHeartRadio

Concurrent Conditional and Selected Signal Assignment in VHDL

Join our engineering community sign-in with:.

This article will review the concurrent signal assignment statements in VHDL.

This article will first review the concept of concurrency in hardware description languages. Then, it will discuss two concurrent signal assignment statements in VHDL: the selected signal assignment and the conditional signal assignment. After giving some examples, we will briefly compare these two types of signal assignment statements.

Please see my article introducing the concept of VHDL if you're not familiar with it.

Concurrent vs. Sequential Statements

To understand the difference between the concurrent statements and the sequential ones, let’s consider a simple combinational circuit as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. A combinational circuit.

If we consider the operation of the three logic gates of this figure, we observe that each gate processes its current input(s) in an independent manner from other gates. These physical components are operating simultaneously. The moment they are powered, they will “concurrently” fulfill their functionality. Note that while, in practice, the AND gate has a delay to produce a valid output, this does not mean that the OR gate will stop its functionality and wait until the output of the AND gate is produced. The OR gate will function all the time; however, its output will not be valid until its inputs have settled.

Now, let’s examine the VHDL description of Figure 1. This is shown below:

The main part that we are here interested in is the definition of the three gates:

Each of these lines describes a physical component in Figure 1. For example, the second line, which describes the OR gate, takes sig1 and c as inputs and produces the OR of these two values. We saw that the physical components of Figure 1 operate concurrently. Hence, it is reasonable to expect that the VHDL description of these gates should be evaluated in a concurrent manner. In other words, the above three lines of the code are executed at the same time and there is no significance to the order of these statements. As a result, we can rewrite the architecture section of the above code as below:

Since these statements are evaluated at the same time, we call them concurrent statements. This type of code is quite different from what we have learned in basic computer programming where the lines of code are executed one after the other. For example, consider the following MATLAB code:

This code produces out1=1 and out2=1 . However, if we change the order of the statements to the following, the program will stop working because we are trying to use sig1 before it is generated.

While the VHDL code describing Figure 1 was executed concurrently, the above MATLAB code is evaluated sequentially (i.e., one line after the other). VHDL supports both the concurrent statements and the sequential ones. It's clear that the concurrent VHDL statements will allow us to easily describe a circuit such as the one in Figure 1 above. In a future article, we'll see that the sequential VHDL statements allow us to have a safer description of sequential circuits. Furthermore, using the sequential VHDL, we can easily describe a digital circuit in a behavioral manner. This capability can significantly facilitate digital hardware design.

The following figure illustrates the difference between concurrent and sequential statements.

Figure 2. The difference between concurrent and sequential statements. Image courtesy of VHDL Made Easy .

Now let's take a look at two concurrent signal assignment statements in VHDL: “the selected signal assignment statement” and “the conditional signal assignment statement”.

Selected Signal Assignment or the “With/Select” Statement

Consider an n -to-one multiplexer as shown in Figure 3. This block should choose one out of its n inputs and transfer the value of this input to the output terminal, i.e., output_signal .

Figure 3. A multiplexer selects one of its n inputs based on the value of the control_expression.

The selected signal assignment allows us to implement the functionality of a multiplexer. For example, the VHDL code describing the multiplexer of Figure 3 will be

Here, the value of the control_expression will be compared with the n possible options, i.e., option_1 , option_2 , …, option_n . When a match is found, the value corresponding to that particular option will be assigned to the output signal, i.e., output_signal . For example, if control_expression is the same as option_2 , then value_2 will be assigned to the output_signal .

Note that the options of a “with/select” assignment must be mutually exclusive, i.e., one option cannot be used more than once. Moreover, all the possible values of the control_expression must be included in the set of the options. The following example clarifies these points.

Example 1 : Use the "with/select" statement to describe a one-bit 4-to-1 multiplexer. Assume that the inputs to be selected are a , b , c , and d . And, a two-bit signal, sel , is used to choose the desired input and assign it to out1 .

The code for this multiplexer is given below:

Note that since the std_logic data type can take values other than “0” and “1” , the last line of the “with/select” statement needs to use the keyword “ others ” to take all the possible values of sel into account.

The following figure shows the simulation of this code using the Xilinx ISE simulator. (In case you’re not familiar with ISE, see this tutorial .) As shown in this figure, from 0 nanosecond (ns) until 300 ns the select input, sel , is 00, and, hence, out1 follows the input a . Similarly, you can verify the intended operation for the rest of the simulation interval.

Figure 4. The ISE simulation for the multiplexer of Example 1.

Example 2 : Use the “with/select” statement to describe a 4-to-2 priority encoder with the truth table shown below.

The following VHDL code can be used to describe the above truth table:

The ISE simulation is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5. The ISE simulation for the priority encoder of Example 2.

Conditional signal assignment or the “when/else” statement.

The “when/else” statement is another way to describe the concurrent signal assignments similar to those in Examples 1 and 2. Since the syntax of this type of signal assignment is quite descriptive, let’s first see the VHDL code of a one-bit 4-to-1 multiplexer using the “when/else” statement and then discuss some details.

Example 3 : Use the when/else statement to describe a one-bit 4-to-1 multiplexer. Assume that the inputs to be selected are a , b , c , and d . And, a two-bit signal, sel , is used to choose the desired input and assign it to out1 .

The code will be

In this case, the expressions after “when” are evaluated successively until a true expression is found. The assignment corresponding to this true expression will be performed. If none of these expressions are true, the last assignment will be executed. In general, the syntax of the “when/else” statement will be:

We should emphasize that the expressions after the “when” clauses are evaluated successively. As a result, the expressions evaluated earlier has a higher priority compared to the next ones. Considering this, we can obtain the conceptual diagram of this assignment as shown in Figure 6. This figure illustrates a conditional signal assignment with three “when” clauses.

Figure 6. The conceptual implementation of a “when/else” statement with three “when” clauses.

Let’s review the main features of the selected signal assignment and the conditional signal assignment.

“With/Select” vs. “When/Else” Assignment

As mentioned above, the options of a “with/select” assignment must be mutually exclusive, i.e., one option cannot be used more than once. Moreover, all the possible values of the control_expression must be included in the set of options. While the “with/select” assignment has a common controlling expression, a “when/else” assignment can operate on expressions with different arguments. For example, consider the following lines of code:

In this case, the expressions are evaluating two different signals, i.e., reset1 and clk .

For the “when/else” assignment, we may or may not include all the possible values of the expressions to be evaluated. For example, the multiplexer of Example 3 covers all the possible values of sel ; however, the above code does not. The above code implies that out1 should retain its previous value when none of the expressions are true. This causes the inference of a latch in the synthesized circuit.

Another important difference between the “with/select” and “when/else” assignment can be seen by comparing the conceptual implementation of these two statements. The priority network of Figure 6 involves a cascade of several logic gates. However, the “with/select” assignment avoids this chain structure and has a balanced structure. As a result, in theory, the “with/select” statement may have better performance in terms of the delay and area (see RTL Hardware Design Using VHDL: Coding for Efficiency, Portability, and Scalability , Xilinx HDL Coding Hints , and Guide to HDL Coding Styles for Synthesis ).

In practice, we generally don’t see this difference because many synthesis software packages, such as the Xilinx XST, try not to infer a priority encoded logic. Though we can use the PRIORITY_EXTRACT constraint of XST to force priority encoder inference, Xilinx strongly suggests that we use this constraint on a signal-by-signal basis; otherwise, the constraint may guide us towards sub-optimal results. For more details see page 79 of the XST user guide .

• Concurrent statements are executed at the same time and there is no significance to the order of these statements. This type of code is quite different from what we have learned in basic computer programming where the lines of code are executed one after the other.
• The selected signal assignment or the "with/select" assignment allows us to implement the functionality of a multiplexer.
• The options of a “with/select” assignment must be mutually exclusive, i.e., one option cannot be used more than once. Moreover, all the possible values of the control_expression must be included in the set of the options.
• For the "when/else" statement, the expressions after the “when” clauses are evaluated successively. As a result, the expressions evaluated earlier has a higher priority compared to the next ones.
• One important difference between the “with/select” and “when/else” assignment can be seen by comparing the conceptual implementation of these two statements. The "when/else" statement has a priority network; however, the “with/select” assignment avoids this chain structure and has a balanced structure.

To see a complete list of my articles, please visit  this page .

  Featured image used courtesy of Parallella .

Related Content

• Thermocouple Signal Conditioners and Signal Conditioning Near the Cold Junction
• Reducing Distortion in Tape Recordings with Hysteresis in SPICE
• Test & Measurement in Quantum Computing
• Open RAN – Network Performance in the Lab and in the Field
• Integer and Its Subtypes in VHDL
• Looking for Good Waves: The Importance of Signal Integrity in High-Speed PCB Design

Learn More About:

• programmable logic

Great content. The link to the ISE guide requires password. Can we get that posted again? Thanks!

You May Also Like

Understanding EMI Debugging with Oscilloscopes

In Partnership with Rohde & Schwarz

Can Silicon Photonics Solve the Bandwidth Bottleneck in AI Data Centers?

by Daniel Bogdanoff

Microchip’s New 32-bit MCUs Include Built-In Hardware Security Module

by Aaron Carman

RISC-V Summit Europe News—Processor IP, Verification Tools, and More

Building a Handheld Retro Gaming Console With Local Wireless Connectivity

by Kristijan Nelkovski

Welcome Back

Don't have an AAC account? Create one now .

Forgot your password? Click here .

A signal assignment statement modifies the target signal

Description:

A Signal assignment statement can appear inside a process (sequential statement) or directly in an architecture (concurrent statement). The target signal can be either a name (simple, selected, indexed, or slice) or an aggregate .

A signal assignment with no delay (or zero delay) will cause an event after delta delay, which means that the event happens only when all of the currently active processes have finished executing (i.e. after one simulation cycle).

The default delay mode ( inertial ) means that pulses shorter than the delay (or the reject period if specified) are ignored. Transport means that the assignment acts as a pure delay line.

VHDL'93 defines the keyword unaffected which indicates a choice where the signal is not given a new assignment. This is roughly equivalent to the use of the null statement within case (see Examples).

• Delays are usually ignored by synthesis tool.

Aggregate , Concurrent statement , Sequential statement , Signal , Variable assignment

Chapter 3 - Data Flow Descriptions

Section 6 - signal assignments.

Designing Circuits with VHDL

1. introduction, 2. combinational circuits, signal assignments in vhdl.

library IEEE; use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL; use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_ARITH.ALL; use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_UNSIGNED.ALL; entity fullAdder is     port(  A,B: in  std_logic;  -- input bits for this stage            Ci:   in  std_logic; -- carry into this stage            S:    out std_logic; -- sum bit            Co:   out std_logic  -- carry out of this stage     ); end fullAdder; architecture a1 of fullAdder is begin     S <= A xor B xor Ci;     Co <= (A and B) or ((A xor B) and Ci); end a1;

Processes and Conditional Statements

if a = '0' then     x <= a;     y <= b; elsif a = b then     x <= '0';   y <= '1'; else     x <= not b; y <= not b; end if;

Every signal that is assigned a value inside a process must be defined for all possible conditions.

Case Statements

Structural vhdl, 3. sequential circuits.

busy   is high when the circuit is in the middle of performing an operation;             while busy is high, the insert and delete inputs are ignored; the             outputs are not required to have the correct values when busy is high empty     is high when there are no pairs stored in the priority queue; delete             operations are ignored in this case full      is high when there is no room for any additional pairs to be stored;             insert operations are ignored in this case

• For adjacent pairs in the bottom row, the pair to the left has a key that is less than or equal to that of the pair on the right.
• For pairs that are in the same column, the key of the pair in the bottom row is less than or equal to that of the pair in the top row.
• In both rows, the empty blocks (those with dp =0) are to the right and either both rows have the same number of empty blocks or the top row has one more than the bottom row.

entity priQueue is     Port (clk, reset : in std_logic;           insert, delete : in std_logic;           key, value : in std_logic_vector(wordSize-1 downto 0);           smallValue : out std_logic_vector(wordSize-1 downto 0);           busy, empty, full : out std_logic     );    end priQueue; architecture a1 of priQueue is constant rowSize: integer := 4; -- local constant declaration type pqElement is record     dp: std_logic;     key: std_logic_vector(wordSize-1 downto 0);     value: std_logic_vector(wordSize-1 downto 0); end record pqElement; type rowTyp is array(0 to rowSize-1) of pqElement; signal top, bot: rowTyp; type state_type is (ready, inserting, deleting); signal state: state_type; begin     process(clk) begin         if rising_edge(clk) then             if reset = '1' then                 for i in 0 to rowSize-1 loop                     top(i).dp <= '0'; bot(i).dp <= '0';                 end loop;                 state <= ready;             elsif state = ready and insert = '1' then                 if top(rowSize-1).dp /= '1' then                     for i in 1 to rowSize-1 loop                         top(i) <= top(i-1);                     end loop;                     top(0) <= ('1',key,value);                     state <= inserting;                 end if;             elsif state = ready and delete = '1' then                 if bot(0).dp /= '0' then                     for i in 0 to rowSize-2 loop                         bot(i) <= bot(i+1);                     end loop;                     bot(rowSize-1).dp <= '0';                     state <= deleting;                 end if;             elsif state = inserting or state = deleting then                 for i in 0 to rowSize-1 loop                     if top(i).dp = '1' and                         (top(i).key < bot(i).key                          or bot(i).dp = '0') then                         bot(i) <= top(i); top(i) <= bot(i);                     end if;                end loop;                 state <= ready;             end if;         end if;     end process;     smallValue <= bot(0).value when bot(0).dp = '1' else                   (others => '0');     empty <= not bot(0).dp;     full <= top(rowSize-1).dp;     busy <= '1' when state /= ready else '0'; end a1;

4. Functions and Procedures

package commonConstants is     constant lgWordSize: integer := 4;        constant wordSize: integer := 2**lgWordSize; end package commonConstants; library IEEE; use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL; use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_ARITH.ALL; use IEEE.STD_LOGIC_UNSIGNED.ALL; use work.commonConstants.all; entity firstOne is     Port (a: in std_logic_vector(0 to wordSize-1);           x: out std_logic_vector (lgWordSize downto 0)      ); end firstOne; architecture a1 of firstOne is procedure encode(x: in std_logic_vector(0 to wordSize-1);                 indx: out std_logic_vector(lgWordSize-1 downto 0);                 errFlag: out std_logic) is -- Unary to binary encoder. -- Input x is assumed to have at most a single 1 bit. -- Indx is equal to the index of the bit that is set. -- If no bits are set, errFlag bit is made high. -- This is conceptually simple. -- --        indx(0) is OR of x(1),x(3),x(5), ... --        indx(1) is OR of x(2),x(3), x(6),x(7), x(10),x(11), ... --        indx(2) is OR of x(4),x(5),x(6),x(7), x(12),x(13),x(14(,x(15),... -- -- but it's tricky to code so it works for different word sizes. type vec is array(0 to lgWordSize-1) of std_logic_vector(0 to (wordSize/2)-1); variable fOne: vec; variable anyOne: std_logic_vector(0 to wordSize-1); begin     -- fOne(0)(j) is OR of first j bits in x1,x3,x5,...     -- fOne(1)(j) is OR of first j bits in x2,x3, x6,x7, x10,x11,...     -- fOne(2)(j) is OR of first j bits in x4,x5,x6,x7, x12,x13,x14,x15,...     for i in 0 to lgWordSize-1 loop         for j in 0 to (wordSize/(2**(i+1)))-1 loop                        for h in 0 to (2**i)-1 loop                 if j = 0 and h = 0 then                     fOne(i)(0) := x(2**i);                 else                     fOne(i)((2**i)*j+h) := fOne(i)((2**i)*j+h-1) or                                            x(((2**i)*(2*j+1))+h);                 end if;             end loop;         end loop;         indx(i) := fOne(i)((wordSize/2)-1);     end loop;     anyOne(0) := x(0);     for i in 1 to wordSize-1 loop         anyOne(i) := anyOne(i-1) or x(i);     end loop;     errFlag := not anyOne(wordSize-1); end procedure encode; function firstOne(x: std_logic_vector(0 to wordSize-1))                         return std_logic_vector is -- Returns the index of the first 1 in bit string x. -- If there are no 1's in x, the value returned has a -- 1 in the high order bit. variable allZero: std_logic_vector(0 to wordSize-1); variable fOne: std_logic_vector(0 to wordSize-1); variable rslt: std_logic_vector(lgWordSize downto 0); begin     allZero(0) := not x(0);     fOne(0) := x(0);     for i in 1 to wordSize-1 loop         allZero(i) := (not x(i)) and allZero(i-1);         fOne(i) := x(i) and allZero(i-1);     end loop;     encode(fOne,rslt(lgWordSize-1 downto 0),rslt(lgWordSize));     return rslt; end function firstOne; begin     x <= firstOne(a); end a1;

5. Closing Remarks

Chapter 4 - Behavioral Descriptions

Section 3 - signals and processes.

Introduction to Digital Systems: Modeling, Synthesis, and Simulation Using VHDL by

Get full access to Introduction to Digital Systems: Modeling, Synthesis, and Simulation Using VHDL and 60K+ other titles, with a free 10-day trial of O'Reilly.

There are also live events, courses curated by job role, and more.

4.9 VHDL SIGNAL AND GENERATE STATEMENTS

4.9.1 signal statement.

Signal is a VHDL keyword. It declares a signal of specified data type. A signal declaration is used to represent internal signals within an architecture declaration.

Figure 4.20 Logic Circuit with Internal Signals

Unlike entity ports, internal signals do not have a direction. Signal assignment statements execute only when the associated signals (appearing on the right-hand side of the assignment statement) change values. In VHDL, the order of concurrent statements in VHDL code does not affect the order in which the statements are executed. Signal assignments are concurrent and could execute in parallel fashion. Consider the logic circuit in Figure 4.20 where the internal signals are identified. Notice, that from the point of view of an entity declaration, the signals Sig 1 , Sig 2 , and Sig 3 are internal signals. They are neither input ports nor output ports, and therefore do not have a direction.

The VHDL program in Figure 4.21 implements the logic circuit in Figure 4.20 . The entity declaration is similar to that in the VHDL program of Figure 4.6 . The architecture declaration has been modified to include the internal signals. The logic function of the circuit is described in an indirect way using the internal signals. Both VHDL implementations ( Figures 4.6 and 4.21 ) have the same logic function and should yield the same ...

Get Introduction to Digital Systems: Modeling, Synthesis, and Simulation Using VHDL now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.

Don’t leave empty-handed

Get Mark Richards’s Software Architecture Patterns ebook to better understand how to design components—and how they should interact.

It’s yours, free.

Check it out now on O’Reilly

Dive in for free with a 10-day trial of the O’Reilly learning platform—then explore all the other resources our members count on to build skills and solve problems every day.

Variables vs. Signals in VHDL

Variables and Signals in VHDL appears to be very similar. They can both be used to hold any type of data assigned to them. The most obvious difference is that variables use the := assignment symbol whereas signals use the <= assignment symbol. However the differences are more significant than this and must be clearly understood to know when to use which one. If you need a refresher, try this page about VHDL variables .

Signals vs. Variables:

• Variables can only be used inside processes, signals can be used inside or outside processes.
• Any variable that is created in one process cannot be used in another process, signals can be used in multiple processes though they can only be assigned in a single process .
• Variables need to be defined after the keyword process but before the keyword begin . Signals are defined in the architecture before the begin statement.
• Variables are assigned using the := assignment symbol. Signals are assigned using the <= assignment symbol.
• Variables that are assigned immediately take the value of the assignment. Signals depend on if it’s combinational or sequential code to know when the signal takes the value of the assignment.

The most important thing to understand (and the largest source of confusion) is that variables immediately take the value of their assignment, whereas signals depend on if the signal is used in combinational or sequential code . In combinational code, signals immediately take the value of their assignment. In sequential code, signals are used to create flip-flops, which inherently do not immediately take the value of their assignment. They take one clock cycle. In general, I would recommend that beginners avoid using variables. They can cause a lot of confusion and often are hard to synthesize by the tools.

The example below demonstrates how signals behave differently than variables. Notice that r_Count and v_Count appear to be the same, but they actually behave very differently.

Variables can be a bit tricky to display in simulation. If you are using Modelsim, read more about how to see your variables in Modelsim’s waveform window . Look carefully at the waveform above. Do you see how o_var_done pulses every 5th clock cycle, but o_sig_done pulses every 6th clock cycle? Using signals and variables to store data generates very different behavior . Make sure you clearly understand what you code will be generating and make sure that you simulate your code to check that behaves like you want!

Learn Verilog

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Stack Overflow for Teams Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers
• Advertising & Talent Reach devs & technologists worldwide about your product, service or employer brand
• OverflowAI GenAI features for Teams
• OverflowAPI Train & fine-tune LLMs
• Labs The future of collective knowledge sharing
• About the company Visit the blog

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Get early access and see previews of new features.

When do signals get assigned in VHDL?

Considering this code:

Is the second line going to respect that a changed in the other process or are all signals only at the end of architecture assigned?

• related stackoverflow.com/questions/5060635/… –  Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com Commented Jun 20, 2016 at 0:53

2 Answers 2

Careful with your terminology. When you say a changed in the other "process", that has a specific meaning in VHDL (process is a keyword in VHDL), and your code does not have any processes.

Synthesizers will treat your code as:

Simulators will typically assign a in a first pass, then assign b on a second pass one 'delta' later. A delta is an infinitesimal time delay that takes place at the same simulation time as the initial assignment.

Note this is a gross generalization of what really happens...if you want full details, read up on the documentation provided with your tool chain.

• 1 We learned that those lines above are called implicit processes , is there another name for them? –  Georg Schölly Commented Oct 11, 2011 at 7:40
• 2 @GeorgSchölly You are correct. Concurrent statements get elaborated as processes. Hence, your signal assignments could be designated as processes. –  Philippe Commented Oct 11, 2011 at 11:28
• 2 @Charles behavior is not tool dependent, but it is well defined by the VHDL standard. Here is a blog post that explains about delta cycles: sigasi.com/content/vhdls-crown-jewel –  Philippe Commented Oct 11, 2011 at 11:30

It sounds like you are thinking of signal behaviour within a single process when you say this. In that context, the signals are not updated until the end of the process, so the b update will use the "old" value of a

However, signal assignments not inside a process statement are executed continuously, there is nothing to "trigger" an architecture to "run". Or alternatively, they are all individual separate implied processes (as you have commented), with a sensitivity list implied by everything on the "right-hand-side".

In your particular case, the b assignment will use the new value of a , and the assignment will happen one delta-cycle after the a assignment.

For a readable description of how simulation time works in VHDL, see Jan Decaluwe's page here:

http://www.sigasi.com/content/vhdls-crown-jewel

And also this thread might be instructive:

https://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.vhdl/browse_thread/thread/e47295730b0c3de4/d5bd4532349aadf0?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=vhdl+concurrent+assignment#d5bd4532349aadf0

Your Answer

Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Stack Overflow. Learn more

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest.

Required, but never shown

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged vhdl or ask your own question .

• Featured on Meta
• We spent a sprint addressing your requests — here’s how it went
• Upcoming initiatives on Stack Overflow and across the Stack Exchange network...
• What makes a homepage useful for logged-in users

Hot Network Questions

• Why do jet aircraft need chocks when they have parking brakes?
• Fantasy book about a woman without magic who is summoned to royal court when her sister dies
• Where are quantised states in QFT?
• Go the Distance
• Is a "single" cpu safer than multiple cores?
• ArXiv submission on hold for 11 days. Should I inquire via moderation support or wait longer?
• Equivalence of first/second choice with naive probability - I don't buy it
• Identify the story about an author whose work-in-progress is completed by a computer
• Why is this transformer placed on rails?
• .Net 8 XUnit: Should my tests use real data or how to mock MySql with CQRS?
• Are there other proposed translations of "aelfheres" in Beowulf than a name?
• Error concerning projectile motion in respected textbook?
• Are the North Star and the moon ever visible in the night sky at the same time?
• Is the variance of the mean of a set of possibly dependent random variables less than the average of their respective variances?
• Using grout that had hardened in the bag
• Alternatives to iterrow loops in python pandas dataframes
• Can a MicroSD card help speed up my Mini PC?
• Is this a Hadamard matrix?
• Is infinity a number?
• Are any Population III stars red dwarfs?
• Judging a model through the TP, TN, FP, and FN values
• Big zeros in block diagonal matrix
• Quantum: why linear combination of vectors (superposition) is described as "both at the same time"?
• Translate Pandas groupby plus resample to Polars in Python

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Why do we assign our outputs to signals first in VHDL?

I saw in many VHDL codes that data/control outputs are first assigned to signals and then to output ports, and not instantly to the output ports.

I'll give an example:

My question is, why do we not assign some_data instantly to the data_out port? Why does it "have to go through" the signal data_out_sig ? Does this have anything to do with synthesis? Is it common practice?

4 Answers 4

I will tell you a scenario. Suppose you are creating an entity with

2 input ports : A,B 2 output ports : C,D

Suppose the output C is generated from A and B using some logic. And Suppose D is found to be directly related with C. For example:

D = compliment of C

So it is compelling to write in the code: D = not C directly, instead of using a logic expression with and A and B. However VHDL semantics don't allow you to read the output port C and hence you cannot implement such an expression. So what you can do is turn that port into a buffer port. Some people also make use in/out port for this purpose. But that makes thing complex. So a simple solution is to use some local internal signal C_int, and "use" it like the output port inside your code. So that you can implement the logic for C into this internal signal, read it and manipulate with it. Finally assigning this internal signal to the output port, outside all the process blocks, completes the requirement. An example illustration of what is happening inside the circuit:

It's because you couldn't read from ports of type OUT in VHDL.

If the value driving an OUT port was to be read within the design, a signal had to used to hold it, then that signal assigned to the OUT port.

The capability to do so was added in VHDL-2008. However, a huge amount of designs were created before 2008 and before take-up of VHDL-2008 became available in software tools. These designs would therefore use the signal-drives-OUT method.

As an aside, it depends upon your circumstances as an engineer but the option to use VHDL-2008 may well not be available to you. Some companies will require design revisions to be synthesised or simulated by a specific version of software (Quartus, Xilinx ISE, ModelSim etc.) with no changes to the design project settings, so you cannot use VHDL-2008. I have worked in a great many companies that do this, defence companies for example. Moving to a newer version of software introduces an unnecessary risk of unexpected changes that can discredit all the testing and experience gained with that firmware so far, with the time and expense that go with that. So there is a lot of value in writing 'middle of the road' VHDL that will be accepted by the widest range of software tools that you can, rather than using syntax specific to VHDL-2008 or VHDL-2002. The downsides of this are few or none - I'm not aware of anything that you can't do in the earlier versions that vast majority of designs require. As I said, it depends upon your circumstances and is something to consider. For me, I would definitely use signal-drives-OUT. Being completely portable between software tools and versions is valuable to me and one of my priorities.

If the signal from an output port also is read back you have to use the 'buffer' port type.

That by itself would not be a problem but if that 'output' port goes up a hierarchical chain of modules you have to change the output of each model to 'buffer'.

To avoid the hassle it is easiest to use a local variable and in one place assign that to the output.

I prefer to use that technique only for output ports that are also read back but I can image somebody preferring to use it all the time.

• 1 \$\begingroup\$ You can read back from OUT ports in VHDL-2008. So, this is either obsolete practice or a concession to obsolete tools. \$\endgroup\$ –  user16324 Commented Dec 29, 2017 at 19:25

Notice that data_out is defined as an output. That means it can only be written to. However, you cannot read from it.

So you can directly go

data_out <= some_data;

That works fine. But suppose some_data needed to be continuously modified.

For my purposes of these examples, I will assume the data types are integers and not std_logic like in your original post.

I cannot do

data_out <= data_out + 1

because this would require a read prior to adding the one. Since you cannot read from data_out, this would not work.

data_out <= some_data + 1

and this would work, but in doing so, I can no longer manipulate the result in the future because it is now stored in data_out and can no longer be read from.

If I want to manipulate the result in the future, then I have to go

data_out_sig <= some_data + 1; --can continue to reading and modify the result in the future data_out <= data_out_sig;

So you can assign data instantly to the output if you don't need to ever manipulate what is stored in data_out. For example, a conditional branch could decide that the output needs to be a '1' or '0'. You could write this directly to the output without an intermediary.

data_out <= 1;

Your Answer

Sign up or log in, post as a guest.

Required, but never shown

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged vhdl or ask your own question .

• Featured on Meta
• Upcoming initiatives on Stack Overflow and across the Stack Exchange network...
• We spent a sprint addressing your requests — here’s how it went

Hot Network Questions

• Go the Distance
• How can I prove that '+' is same as max?
• Do provisional utility patent applications also contain claims?
• Interesting structure: --- "If you ever go to sell this place, let me know."
• Breaking down a command to install Ros2
• iMac 21" i3 very slow even on clean install of OS
• Is it possible with modern-day technology to expand an already built bunker further below without the risk of collapsing the entire bunker?
• French Election 2024 - seat share based on first round only
• 80's/90's anime about a mecha made out of bones
• Why is this transformer placed on rails?
• Fantasy book about a woman without magic who is summoned to royal court when her sister dies
• How are GameManagers created in Unity?
• Real-life problems involving solving triangles
• Why bother with planetary battlefields?
• Error concerning projectile motion in respected textbook?
• Is prescreening not detrimental for paid surveys?
• Can trills have 3 notes instead of two?
• An adjective for something peaceful but sad?
• When, if ever, is bribery legal?
• Usage of わりと by itself?
• How to turn a sum into an integral?
• Identify the story about an author whose work-in-progress is completed by a computer
• Of "ils" and "elles", which pronoun is, grammatically speaking, used to refer to a group with an overwhelming female majority?
• How can I sort all levels except the innermost level?