research paper for strategic planning

A strategic management process: the role of decision-making style and organisational performance

Journal of Work-Applied Management

ISSN : 2205-2062

Article publication date: 16 February 2023

Issue publication date: 24 April 2023

The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework for integrating strategic thinking factors, organisational performance and the decision-making process.

Design/methodology/approach

The methodology involves a synthesis of literature and proposes a framework that explores the relationship between strategic thinking enabling factors, organisational performance and the moderating effect of decision-making styles.

The framework includes strategic thinking enabling factors (systems perspective, focused intent, intelligent opportunism, thinking in time and hypothesis-driven analysis), organisational performance and the moderating effect of decision-making styles (intuitive and rational).

Research limitations/implications

This research results in a conceptual model only; it remains to be tested in actual practice. The expanded conceptual framework can serve as a basis for future empirical research and provide insights to practitioners into how to strengthen policy development in a strategic planning process.

Originality/value

A paradigm shift in the literature proves that strategic management and decision-making styles are vital in determining organisational performance. This paper highlights the importance of decision-making styles and develops a framework for strategic management by analysing the existing strategic management literature.

• Strategic management
• Intuitive decision-making
• Rational decision-making
• Strategic thinking process
• Organisational performance

Sinnaiah, T. , Adam, S. and Mahadi, B. (2023), "A strategic management process: the role of decision-making style and organisational performance", Journal of Work-Applied Management , Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2022-0074

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Tamilarasu Sinnaiah, Sabrinah Adam and Batiah Mahadi

Published in Journal of Work-Applied Management . Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

1. Introduction

Managers are appointed to achieve the organisation's objectives and goals. As these objectives gradually increase with competition, managers must become strategic thinkers with excellent decision-making skills. The strategy towards the organisational outcome highlighted in this section has been widely debated among academic scholars and practitioners. Organisational strategies are essential in sustaining an organisation's competitive advantage to face a complex and uncertain future.

Effective strategic management frameworks enable managers to focus on the complex issues that must be prioritised to hasten decision-making processes ( Dlamini et al. , 2020 ). Whilst enabling managers important to make the decisions needed to direct the organisational effort towards overcoming specific issues ( Wang et al. , 2021 ). The organisation's effectiveness in addressing critical issues with solutions that best fit the current environmental factors will ensure the vitality and image of the organisation. Strategic management is pertinent to manage the organisation in a continuous, systematic manner.

The first segment of strategic management is the effective action programs chosen to reach these goals and objectives.

The second segment is the resource allocation pattern that relates the organisation to its environment.

Moreover, strategic management is defined as translating the thinking process into an action plan that benefits the organisation to sustain its competitive advantages. Strategy also can be categorised as strategic thinking and strategic planning. Strategy is also the commitment of the top-level management to attaining outcomes aligned with the organisation's strategic objectives. Strategy can be realised when there is consistent outcomes or patterns over the years. Therefore, strategy is planning for the future or determining patterns based on consistent outcomes. Organisations must develop plans and also evolve patterns derived from previous organisational outcomes. These phases can be explained as intended strategy and realised strategy.

The effectiveness of the strategies employed can indicate the organisation's performance in achieving its objectives and goals. Organisations need to measure the outcome of the strategies employed by having measurable objectives that will enhance the employees' commitment towards achieving the goals. Conversely, organisational learning and financial measures such as organisational profitability can also benchmark organisational performance. The responsiveness of organisational performance has a direct relationship and is influenced by management efforts to emphasise leadership within the organisational structure. This is done by observing the support and strategies utilised by managers to achieve the objectives and goals. This paper aims to enhance an understanding of strategic management processes involving decision-making styles towards organisational performance. First, this paper highlights strategic management's operational and theoretical approach towards organisational performance. Moreover, this study enhances the result of previous literature on strategic enablers by explaining the effort involving decision-making to strengthen the organisational structure, particularly the decision-making styles (intuitive and rational), that moderates the relationship between the strategic thinking process and organisational performances ( Ritter, 2014 ).

Academic scholars and practitioners have highlighted the importance of strategic management in measuring organisational performance in terms of innovation, entrepreneurship, technology, knowledge, economics, healthcare and organisational performance ( Adam et al ., 2018 , 2020 ; Alosani et al. , 2020 ). Conversely, there is a knowledge gap on the effective judgement practices of strategic management enablers and organisational performance during decision-making ( Abuhjeeleh et al ., 2018 ; Acciarini et al. , 2021 ; Elrehail et al ., 2020 ; Nguyen, 2020 ). This paper analyses the relationship between strategic management and organisational performance and suggests a framework to elucidate the relationship variables such as moderators, rational and intuitive decision-making styles.

2. Literature review

Strategic management is applying strategic decisions towards the organisational vision to achieve strategic competitiveness and sustain competitive advantages ( Alosani et al. , 2020 ; Rodrigues and Franco, 2019 ). Strategic management is a cognitive impairment of structuring the internal capabilities to fulfil external demands and involves plans, patterns, positions, perspectives and plots ( Mintzberg et al ., 2020 ). Strategic management is the managerial discourse involving a framework of the decision-making process, which highlights how the strategy process is formulated in organisations, acknowledging the cognitive management structure of the organisations. Additionally, the organisation's members need to respond effectually to the decisions made by the management and cooperate to ensure that the organisational vision is reached, given that this will affect the organisational adaptability, legitimacy and performance ( Johnsen, 2015 ). Organisations must be aware of the uncertain environments that can influence their welfare.

Consequently, the strategic management process can be reflected in two directions: strategic planning and strategic thinking. Strategic planning emphasises formulating strategies or disciplined efforts to produce strategic decisions to achieve the organisation's objectives ( Bryson, 2018 ). Strategic planning also can be reflected as a system that enhances the decision-making process among the members of an organisation. The strategic management process needs to be fulfilling for the organisation to sustain its competitive advantages. Moreover, strategic thinking is creative, disruptive, future-focused and experimental and often contradicts traditional notions of strategic planning ( Liedtka, 2000 ). Strategic planning is the principal element of the strategic management process involving resource management, implementation, control and evaluation of strategies ( Poister et al ., 2010 ). Strategic planning focuses on formalising existing strategies and employing creativity to enhance perspectives ( Mintzberg et al ., 2020 ). The uncertainties of environments and conflicting perspectives can be evaluated and addressed using strategic thinking as a part of the organisational decision-making process ( Chin et al ., 2018 ). Studies by Goldman et al . (2015) indicated that organisational members are not actively involved during the strategic decision-making process, leading to the decline in the organisation's performance.

The importance of the strategic decision-making process towards organisational performance was emphasised by Steptoe‐Warren et al. (2011) . The research suggested that evaluating, identifying and validating the process will enhance the strategic thinking process to positively impact performance ( Norzailan et al ., 2016 ). Moreover, strategic thinking plays a vital role in analysing the external factors influencing the process. If the organisational members take it lightly, it will lead to perception deficiencies ( Kızıloglu and Serinkan, 2015 ). Additionally, the study highlighted that strategic planning occurs after strategic thinking ( Alatailat et al ., 2019 ; Bonn, 2001 ; Mintzberg, 1994 ). Consequently, this study will focus on strategic thinking as the fundamental phase in the strategic management process.

A conceptual framework that highlights the management principles among the business process in delivering effective solutions for problems is shown in Figure 1 .

3. Strategic management

Strategic management is defined as a framework for achieving success, and it is pivotal for organisations to achieve their objectives and continuously perform better ( Elliott et al ., 2020 ). Additionally, strategic management is a continuous process of looking for a better action plan to ensure the organisation's competitiveness.

3.1 Strategic thinking

The most challenging issue an organisation faces is awareness of the strategic vision and missions, available resources and identifying opportunities for growth within the organisation ( Bryson, 2018 ). Therefore, strategic thinking is a vital element in the chain of processes, which must be carried out effectively and systematically ( Sahay, 2019 ). Nevertheless, organisations need to be aware that strategic thinking can fail miserly if the decision-makers do not realise the strategic enablers or the factors responsible for the effective strategic thinking process. Strategic enablers influence the thoughts and decision process of the organisational members ( Goldman et al ., 2015 ). Therefore, strategic enablers will lead the organisation's members towards idea growth and personal development, while strategic thinkers expedite the organisational performances ( Alatailat et al ., 2019 ).

Individuals involved in the organisational structure utilise their experiences and thought processes in managing conflicts to enhance strategic thinking ( Alaarj et al ., 2016 ). Strategy managers or thinkers recognise the relationship between business responsibilities and departments and organisations and their business stakeholders ( Cabral et al. , 2019 ). This relationship is known as “system thinking”, where an organisation explores the structure reflected in the action and environment that causes the incident. Additionally, the direction or the organisational destiny is a type of strategic intent utilised to help achieve the business objectives. This occurs when all the employees can concentrate on their purpose until it is achievable.

Strategic intent is pertinent in increasing competitive advantages and improving organisational performance ( Chen et al ., 2015 ). Intelligent firms must be considered before becoming competitive to ensure the organisation can create intelligent opportunities to lead the business emerging strategies towards their vision ( Alaarj et al ., 2016 ). Conversely, the organisation should integrate previous events with the current situation to achieve and align with the organisation's objectives. This is vital for organisations to connect to the past and present environment to envision the firms and prepare for any internal or external challenges in their business ( Abubakar et al ., 2019 ). A hypothesis-driven analysis is the core element in the strategic thinking process to gather relevant information regarding the business. Therefore, the challenges faced must be transformed into a hypothesis-driven analysis to understand better the measures needed to be taken by the stakeholders to improve the organisational performances.

3.2 Decision-making style

The role of managers within an organisation must be elucidated to help enhance the decision-making process to create competitive advantages for the organisation ( Dionisio, 2017 ). Moreover, Porter (1990) emphasised the differences between competitive strategy and competitors. Decision-making styles also play a vital role in formalising the strategic decision procedure and can be defined as a habitual or formal response pattern taken by managers when there is an incident ( Kulcsár et al ., 2020 ). According to Acciarini et al. (2021) , decision-making styles are directly related to cognitive styles involved in the strategic thinking process. Decision-making style, which can be both at individual and team levels, can be classified into intuition and rationality ( Dayan and Di Benedetto, 2011 ; Dayan and Elbanna, 2011 ; Giermindl et al ., 2022 ; Luan et al ., 2019 ; Sukhov et al ., 2021 ). Therefore, the author highlighted that cognitive styles could be divided into two different categories: “feeling as information evaluators”, where managers actively gather information intuitively, and “thinking as information evaluators”, where managers systematically collect information ( Behling et al ., 1980 ). Alternatively, decision-making styles can be considered intuitive and rational information gathering and evaluating styles ( Calabretta et al ., 2017 ).

The intuitive decision-making style can be defined as the episodes of uncertainty patterns of action imposed by managers or the decision-makers based on the current situation. In addition, intuitive decision-makers must be aware of current issues and relate the relationship between cognitive schemes with holistic thinking to resolve problems ( Calabretta et al ., 2017 ). It is also believed that the intuitive decision-making process can be influenced by a sudden awareness of information ( Zhu et al ., 2017 ). Decision-makers can determine solutions without fully understanding or realising the extent of information available. Studies agree that the intuitive decision-making process can occur when unsorted information is restructured into an organised pattern of action that transforms into a conscious solution ( Zander et al ., 2016 ). Furthermore, the intuition organisations performance is enhanced when decision-makers utilise the intuition decision-making style when there is no access or relevant analytical data to support them in making strategic decisions that align with the organisation's objectives ( Temprano-García et al ., 2018 ). Conversely, intuition decision-making also contributes positively to the organisations performance when the issues are resolved quickly despite limited resources or knowledge on the current issues.

Studies by Sauter (1999) emphasised that intuition decision-making or illumination is a sudden awareness of information where the decision-makers are unaware of fundamental facts or information. The author also highlighted several ways to establish the intuitive decision-making process. First, detection is an intuition where decision-makers think of several different situations rather than focusing on the current issue ( Kolbe et al. , 2020 ). Working on current strategic issues will enable managers to comprehend related information to help solve the issue by connecting facts or elements that previously did not relate to each other ( Temprano-García et al ., 2018 ). Another form of intuition is evaluation, where the solution appears as an available option creating a sense of certainty or vague feelings towards the analytical data ( Hodgetts et al ., 2017 ).

Conversely, the intuition decision-making process can also be hypothesised as an explicit and implicit decision-making style ( Tabesh and Vera, 2020 ), where explicit decision utilises feelings or emotion and implicit decisions refer to the experience of the relevant situation ( Bhat  et al ., 2021 ; Remmers et al ., 2016 ). Moreover, intuitive decision-making styles also utilise the subconscious processing of verbalised and nonverbalised facts or information ( Tabesh and Vera, 2020 ). A recent study suggests that intuitive decision-making aided managers in enhancing the strategic decision towards the organisation's performance ( Francioni and Clark, 2020 ).

Rational decision-making involves several solutions that will be analysed based on the issues and the relevance of this information towards the current problem before implementing the final decision ( Temprano-García et al ., 2018 ). The structured information consisting of conscious thinking must be evaluated critically ( Acciarini et al. , 2021 ). In addition, the rational decision-making process will enhance the effectiveness of the decision by structuring the decision criteria by highlighting and evaluating the alternatives individually ( Fitzgerald et al ., 2017 ). The decision-makers or the managers who utilise rational decision-making styles are more likely to be vigilant and organised about available information during decision-making ( Zhu et al ., 2021 ).

3.3 Organisational performance

For five decades, organisational performance has been widely researched by academic scholars and business practitioners ( Adam et al ., 2018 ). Organisational performance has been analysed in terms of normative and descriptive explanations in strategic planning research for continuous improvement in managing organisational performance ( Buddika et al ., 2016 ). Organisational performance can be explained by describing how things happen without judging good or bad. Alternatively, the organisational performance also can be elucidated by an evaluation in terms of performance against a benchmarked alternative or standard or by a descriptive statement explaining how the situation occurs without judgement ( Camilleri, 2021 ). Even though most research is done on the continuous improvements of organisational performance, practitioners still have many arguments and discussions on the terminology and conceptual bases to determine organisational performance ( Sarraf and Nejad, 2020 ).

Organisational performance can be reflected based on the results of the organisation's common objectives, given that the methods implemented are coherently used. Consequently, the performance processes' flow or the input resources can be critically analysed ( Tsai et al ., 2020 ). The effectiveness of organisational performance is influenced by the process implemented and can be measured by the achievements. Furthermore, organisational performance is defined as analysing the series of improvements to achieve organisational objectives. Generally, various factors can be associated with organisational performance, such as organisational structures, conflict, cross-cultural and social influences ( Sinnaiah et al. , 2023 ).

Performance measurement is a systematic series to identify the effectiveness and efficiency of people's behaviour to perform to their utmost abilities. Adam et al . (2018) described performance measurement as a unit, department or business process. Therefore, it is conceptualised that there is a structural relationship between organisational performance and performance measurement. Moreover, performance measurement requires substantive and relevant restructuring of input resources and processes to be aligned with the current system to increase productivity level or performance. Failure to analyse the performance measures will weaken the organisational strength and drain the organisation's efforts ( Alosani et al. , 2020 ). Thus, strategic thinking can be a highly effective performance measure for organisations.

4. Propositions

4.1 strategic thinking process and performance.

Strategic thinking is a structured assessment of analysing and synthesising information, intensively assessing the current situation and initiating new ideas or best available options to achieve strategic objectives ( Dhir and Dhir, 2020 ). An organisation's success depends on strategic thinking as it will enhance a decision-maker's skills, abilities and knowledge and help sustain competitiveness in uncertain environments ( Dhir et al ., 2021 ). Consequently, the process of strategic thinking is crucial for any organisation to successfully achieve and survive in the market for a more extended period. Decision-makers need to be effective and cognisant of the business opportunities that arise from innovating new ideas to enhance the strategic portfolio of organisations ( Bryson et al ., 2018 ).

Strategic thinking process will positively influence organisational performance.

4.2 Rational decision-making style, strategic thinking process and performance

In evaluating an organisation's performance and the uncertainties of the environment that influences the complexities in achieving positive growth for the organisation successfully, managers must have decision-making skills that utilise strategic thinking processes. Moreover, managers must be responsible for making fast and effective solutions by analysing, evaluating and prioritising available information to overcome strategic issues and obtain positive results ( Acciarini et al. , 2021 ). According to Calabretta et al . (2017) , there is a positive correlation between the strategic thinking process and decision-making style. Decision-making styles have the same structure as strategic thinking, which involves different levels, such as organisation or individuals.

Rational decision-making will moderate the relationship between the strategic thinking process and organisational performance.

4.3 Intuitive decision-making style, strategic thinking process and performance

Several studies highlight the roles of the strategic thinking process among managers within the boundaries of our cognitive capacities ( Kaufmann et al ., 2017 ) and postulate that mental flexibility can influence it ( Barlach and Plonski, 2021 ). Studies also emphasise that managers or decision-makers often utilise intuition during challenging situations, which is expected compared to the rational way of analysing the issues ( Kaufmann et al ., 2017 ). This intuition process can be a two-fold construct consisting of experience-based and emotionally affected situations. Additionally, this can involve a complex process of information affected by new cues towards previous experiences stored in their memory and transform it into subconscious action in the decision-making process ( Stanczyk et al ., 2015 ). Based on the study done by Simon (1976) , academic scholars and practitioners emphasised that managers are highly keen on inner feelings or gut feelings involving strategic decisions when faced with competitive issues ( Al-Jaifi and Al-Rassas, 2019 ; Bozhinov et al ., 2021 ; Palaniappan, 2017 ). The decision-making process utilising intuition uses available information, which might not have been available in the past, to quicken the process of decision-making. It is also important to realise that decision-making depends on the issues faced by the organisations, and not all issues require a rational decision-making style. For specific issues, managers might only need relevant information, deliberation and formal procedures to derive effective solutions for the organisation compared to instances where the managers are not bounded by any set of procedures or rules to solve the issue.

Therefore, strategic thinking is a process of synthesis, and based on intuitive decision-making style, where the outcome is an integrated perspective of the enterprise, managers can utilise intuition decision-making style to arrive at a solution with complete freedom and flexibility towards the organisational performance. The decision-makers attempt to be involved in the decision-making process while being aware of the current issues and having a sense of relationship among the cognitive schemas with the approach of holistic thinking to determine the solution to the problem ( Khemka and Hickson, 2021 ). It is clear that the intuitive decision-making process would include the issues faced by the organisation in analysing the issues and synthesis ( Zhu et al ., 2017 ) although all the processes occur under the sense of relationship or perception. It is also believed that the intuitive decision-making process could be influenced by the decision-makers upon the sudden awareness of information ( Peng et al ., 2020 ), whereby the decision-makers could propose a solution without the understanding or realisation of why the facts are present.

Intuitive decision-making will moderate the relationship between the strategic thinking process and organisational performance.

5. Discussion and conclusion

This paper reviews strategic management involving the strategic thinking process, organisational performance and decision-making styles with extant empirical work transforming into propositions, with the ultimate goal being to integrate the strategic management process into a systematised and approachable process that needs a fast response. Strategic management plays a vital role in aligning the standard repertoire of an organisation's strategic thinking. Moreover, managers must realise that strategic thinking has a unique process that depends on the situation. The thinking process should be aligned with the specific scenarios to ensure the best solution can be implemented. To sustain competitive advantage, managers should be effectively involved in the strategic thinking process to positively impact their organisations ( Bryson et al ., 2018 ).

The importance of strategic thinking enablers (systems perspective, focused intent, intelligent opportunism, thinking in time and hypothesis-driven analysis) was emphasised in the strategic thinking process and organisational performance. The systems perspective exposes the importance of organisations understanding the relationship between functions and departments internally and externally. Furthermore, organisations need to consider the functional, business and organisation strategies towards a highly competitive environment ( Buddika et al ., 2016 ). Consequently, these systems perspectives will help organisations manage interactions effectively across all departments to enhance productivity. Focus on intent will guide the organisations towards achieving strategic objectives and resisting eccentricity ( Bromiley and Rau, 2015 ). Focus intent will positively aid organisations to be more competitive in the long run as the managers realise the sense of discovery in managing strategic objectives. Therefore, it will improve the performance and consciously push the organisation towards innovation by eliminating limitations and becoming high achievers. Conversely, intelligent opportunism will enhance the strategic objectives by creating new opportunities to be more competitive although the strategies do not align with the current vision of the organisation. This is where intelligent opportunism will play an essential role at the managerial level of the organisation to effectively communicate and measure organisational performances ( Camilleri, 2021 ).

Emerging strategies will boost the organisation's motivation and productivity and should be carefully evaluated from time to time as the future of the organisations might be projected based on the past performance. Therefore, the importance of swift thinking permits the strategic managers to purposefully analyse the mission and vision of the organisation over time. The right action at the right time will help the organisations sustain competitively and save the organisations from self-destruction by limiting the positive changes made to help improve the organisation's performance ( Adam et al ., 2018 ).

Maintaining the balance between thinking creation and cognitive processing ( Calabretta et al ., 2017 ) and enhancing organisational performance (education, financial, creative, innovation, e-commerce and quality) is a challenge faced when creating effective management strategies ( Adam et al ., 2018 ; Al-Jaifi and Al-Rassas, 2019 ; Alharbi et al ., 2019 ; Arvis et al ., 2018 ). In addition, based on previous theoretical perspectives, most of the research scenarios will be based on the governance mechanisms of management and the policy development impacts on organisational performance ( Abubakar et al ., 2019 ). Therefore, based on extensive empirical and conceptual research, strategic thinking processes positively contribute to measuring organisational performance. Based on previous research, this study infers that cognitive development plays an effective role in the segregation of control between strategic thinking, which serves as a barrier to becoming more competitive and innovative in the long run ( Adam et al ., 2018 ). In addition, this happens among employees and directly impacts the quality of the organisational harmonies, such as mutual respect, trust and welfare of the employees. A cognitive processing environment is the use of intuition and rationality in decision-making with equal importance. The managers utilise intuition decision-making styles to resolve unrelated information received. During the strategic thinking process, the managers will receive unsorted information without processed knowledge which will be later organised into sorted knowledge using intuition styles ( Zander et al ., 2016 ). However, the rational decision-making style focuses more on the analytical procedure to conclude an issue the organisation faces. This helps the managers build confidence in the solution by eliminating uncertainty during decision-making ( Zhu et al ., 2021 ). Moreover, managers will only accept solutions with clear and less ambiguous information (rational) compared to managers utilising a more subconscious style (intuition) when formulating solutions. Consequently, there will be conflict in the decision-making process within the organisations.

According to Boamah et al. (2022) , the effectiveness of decision-making styles can differ according to the situation and the dependents. Alternatively, both decision-making styles were highlighted as an alternative way of generating a problem–solution approach within organisations ( Kolbe et al. , 2020 ; Stanczyk et al ., 2015 ). This study argues that both decision-making styles have equal importance in resolving problem–solution approaches and can be a harmonious process to achieve an effective performance measure. This argument is supported by Acciarini et al. (2021) , Tabesh and Vera (2020) . Therefore, this study concludes that both decision-making styles (rational and intuition) positively impact the strategic thinking process and organisational performance. Based on the framework in Figure 1 , the proposed framework highlights the missing sections of cognitive processing among businesses when delivering effective solutions for a complex problem. Organisations have only emphasised human capital and treated it as a scarce resource that will determine the organisation's performance. This study proposed that future strategic management researchers should explore the thinking process literature's core principles to investigate policy development further. Future research should transform these academic initiatives into empirical research by implementing this proposed model.

Conceptual framework

Competing interests: The authors reported no competing interests.

Abubakar , A.M. , Elrehail , H. , Alatailat , M.A. and Elçi , A. ( 2019 ), “ Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance ”, Journal of Innovation and Knowledge , Vol.  4 No.  2 , pp.  104 - 114 , available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003

Abuhjeeleh , M. , Elrehail , H. and Harazneh , I. ( 2018 ), “ The experiential image of North Cyprus destination as perceived by German tourists ”, Journal for Global Business Advancement , Vol.  11 No.  5 , pp.  630 - 649 .

Adam , A. , Lindahl , G. and Leiringer , R. ( 2020 ), “ The dynamic capabilities of public construction clients in the healthcare sector ”, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business , Vol.  13 No.  1 , pp. 153 - 171 .

Adam , S. , Mahadi , B. and Rahman , A.P.A. ( 2018 ), “ The effect of enterpreneurial orientation towards organizational performance of E-business in Malaysia ”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practices , Vol.  1 No.  2 , pp. 12 - 21 .

Acciarini , C. , Brunetta , F. and Boccardelli , P. ( 2021 ), “ Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review ”, Management Decision , Vol.  59 No.  3 , pp. 638 - 652 .

Al-Jaifi , H.A. and Al-Rassas , A.H. ( 2019 ), “ The financing decision puzzle of technology-based firms: evidence from Malaysia ”, International Journal of Business and Globalisation , Vol.  22 No.  2 , pp.  225 - 239 .

Alaarj , S. , Abidin-Mohamed , Z. and Bustamam , U.S.B.A. ( 2016 ), “ Mediating role of trust on the effects of knowledge management capabilities on organizational performance ”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , Vol.  235 , pp.  729 - 738 .

Alatailat , M. , Elrehail , H. and Emeagwali , O.L. ( 2019 ), “ High performance work practices, organizational performance and strategic thinking ”, International Journal of Organizational Analysis , Vol.  27 No.  3 , pp. 370 - 395 .

Alharbi , M. , Dowling , P.J. and Bhatti , M.I. ( 2019 ), “ Strategic planning practices in the telecommunications industry: evidence from Saudi Arabia ”, Review of International Business and Strategy , Vol.  29 No.  4 , pp. 269 - 285 .

Alosani , M.S. , Yusoff , R. and Al-Dhaafri , H. ( 2020 ), “ The effect of innovation and strategic planning on enhancing organizational performance of Dubai Police ”, Innovation and Management Review , Vol.  17 No.  1 , pp. 2 - 24 .

Arvis , J.-F. , Ojala , L. , Wiederer , C. , Shepherd , B. , Raj , A. , Dairabayeva , K. and Kiiski , T. ( 2018 ), Connecting to Compete 2018: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy , World Bank , Washington, DC .

Bamel , N. , Dhir , S. and Sushil , S. ( 2019 ), “ Inter-partner dynamics and joint venture competitiveness: a fuzzy TISM approach ”, Benchmarking: An International Journal , Vol.  26 No.  1 , pp. 97 - 116 .

Barlach , L. and Plonski , G.A. ( 2021 ), “ The Einstellung effect, mental rigidity and decision-making in startup accelerators ”, Innovation and Management Review , Vol.  18 No.  3 , pp. 276 - 291 .

Behling , O. , Gifford , W.E. and Tolliver , J.M. ( 1980 ), “ Effects of grouping information on decision making under risk ”, Decision Sciences , Vol.  11 No.  2 , pp.  272 - 283 .

Bellé , N. , Cantarelli , P. and Belardinelli , P. ( 2018 ), “ Prospect theory goes public: experimental evidence on cognitive biases in public policy and management decisions ”, Public Administration Review , Vol.  78 No.  6 , pp.  828 - 840 .

Bhat , A. , Mahajan , V. and Wolfe , N. ( 2021 ), “ Implicit bias in stroke care: a recurring old problem in the rising incidence of young stroke ”, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience , Vol.  85 , pp.  27 - 35 .

Boamah , F.A. , Zhang , J. , Wen , D. , Sherani , M. , Hayat , A. and Horbanenko , O. ( 2022 ), “ Enablers of knowledge management: practical research-based in the construction industry ”, International Journal of Innovation Science , Vol.  14 No.  1 , pp. 121 - 137 .

Bonn , I. ( 2001 ), “ Developing strategic thinking as a core competency ”, Management Decision , Vol.  39 No.  1 , pp. 63 - 71 .

Bozhinov , V. , Joecks , J. and Scharfenkamp , K. ( 2021 ), “ Gender spillovers from supervisory boards to management boards ”, Managerial and Decision Economics , Vol.  42 No.  5 , pp.  1317 - 1331 .

Bromiley , P. and Rau , D. ( 2015 ), “ Operations management and the resource based view: another view ”, Journal of Operations Management , Vol.  41 No.  1 , pp. 95 - 106 .

Bruine de Bruin , W. , Parker , A.M. and Fischhoff , B. ( 2020 ), “ Decision-making competence: more than intelligence? ”, Current Directions in Psychological Science , Vol.  29 No.  2 , pp.  186 - 192 .

Bryson , J.M. ( 2018 ), Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement , John Wiley & Sons , Hoboken, NJ .

Bryson , J.M. , Edwards , L.H. and Van Slyke , D.M. ( 2018 ), “ Getting strategic about strategic planning research ”, Public Management Review , Routledge , Vol.  20 , pp.  317 - 339 .

Buddika , S.I. , Palitha , J.N. and Peter , G.N. ( 2016 ), “ Operationalising performance measurement dimensions for the Australasian nonprofit healthcare sector ”, The TQM Journal , Emerald Group Publishing , Vol.  28 , pp.  954 - 973 .

Cabral , S. , Mahoney , J.T. , McGahan , A.M. and Potoski , M. ( 2019 ), “ Value creation and value appropriation in public and nonprofit organizations ”, Strategic Management Journal , Vol.  40 No.  4 , pp. 465 - 475 .

Calabretta , G. , Gemser , G. and Wijnberg , N.M. ( 2017 ), “ The interplay between intuition and rationality in strategic decision making: a paradox perspective ”, Organization Studies , Vol.  38 Nos 3-4 , pp.  365 - 401 .

Camilleri , M.A. ( 2021 ), “ Using the balanced scorecard as a performance management tool in higher education ”, Management in Education , Vol.  35 No.  1 , pp. 10 - 21 .

Chen , Y.-M. , Liu , H.-H. , Ni , Y.-T. and Wu , M.-F. ( 2015 ), “ A rational normative model of international expansion: strategic intent perspective, market positions, and founder CEOs/family-successor CEOs ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol.  68 No.  7 , pp.  1539 - 1543 , available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.048

Chin , T. , Rowley , C. , Redding , G. and Wang , S. ( 2018 ), “ Chinese strategic thinking on competitive conflict: insights from Yin-Yang harmony cognition ”, International Journal of Conflict Management , Vol.  29 No.  5 , pp. 683 - 704 .

Dayan , M. and Di Benedetto , C.A. ( 2011 ), “ Team intuition as a continuum construct and new product creativity: the role of environmental turbulence, team experience, and stress ”, Research Policy , Vol.  40 No.  2 , pp.  276 - 286 .

Dayan , M. and Elbanna , S. ( 2011 ), “ Antecedents of team intuition and its impact on the success of new product development projects ”, Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol.  28 s1 , pp.  159 - 174 .

Deslatte , A. ( 2020 ), “ Positivity and negativity dominance in citizen assessments of intergovernmental sustainability performance ”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory , Vol.  30 No.  4 , pp.  563 - 578 .

Dhir , S. and Dhir , S. ( 2020 ), “ Modeling of strategic thinking enablers: a modified total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) and MICMAC approach ”, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management , Vol.  11 No.  1 , pp.  175 - 188 .

Dhir , S. and Dutta , T. ( 2020 ), “ Linking supervisor-support, person-job fit and person-organization fit to company value ”, Journal of Indian Business Research , Vol.  12 No.  4 , pp. 549 - 561 .

Dhir , S. , Rajan , R. , Ongsakul , V. , Owusu , R.A. and Ahmed , Z.U. ( 2021 ), “ Critical success factors determining performance of cross-border acquisition: evidence from the African telecom market ”, Thunderbird International Business Review , Vol.  63 No.  1 , pp.  43 - 61 .

Dionisio , M.A. ( 2017 ), “ Strategic thinking: the role in successful management ”, Journal of Management Research , Vol.  9 No.  4 , pp.  44 - 57 .

Dlamini , N. , Mazenda , A. , Masiya , T. and Nhede , N.T. ( 2020 ), “ Challenges to strategic planning in public institutions: a study of the Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services, South Africa ”, International Journal of Public Leadership , Vol.  16 No.  1 , pp. 109 - 124 .

Elliott , G. , Day , M. and Lichtenstein , S. ( 2020 ), “ Strategic planning activity, middle manager divergent thinking, external stakeholder salience, and organizational performance: a study of English and Welsh police forces ”, Public Management Review , Taylor & Francis , Vol.  22 , pp.  1581 - 1602 .

Elrehail , H. , Harazneh , I. , Abuhjeeleh , M. , Alzghoul , A. , Alnajdawi , S. and Ibrahim , H.M.H. ( 2020 ), “ Employee satisfaction, human resource management practices and competitive advantage ”, European Journal of Management and Business Economics , Vol.  29 No.  2 , pp.  125 - 149 , doi: 10.1108/EJMBE-01-2019-0001 .

Fitzgerald , D.R. , Mohammed , S. and Kremer , G.O. ( 2017 ), “ Differences in the way we decide: the effect of decision style diversity on process conflict in design teams ”, Personality and Individual Differences , Vol.  104 , pp.  339 - 344 .

Francioni , B. and Clark , K.D. ( 2020 ), “ The mediating role of speed in the global sourcing decision process ”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , Vol.  26 No.  2 , 100609 .

George , B. ( 2021 ), “ Successful strategic plan implementation in public organizations: connecting people, process, and plan (3Ps) ”, Public Administration Review , Vol.  81 No.  4 , pp. 793 - 798 .

Giermindl , L.M. , Strich , F. , Christ , O. , Leicht-Deobald , U. and Redzepi , A. ( 2022 ), “ The dark sides of people analytics: reviewing the perils for organisations and employees ”, European Journal of Information Systems , Vol.  31 No.  3 , pp.  410 - 435 .

Goldman , E.F. , Scott , A.R. and Follman , J.M. ( 2015 ), “ Organizational practices to develop strategic thinking ”, Journal of Strategy and Management , Vol.  8 No.  2 , pp. 155 - 175 .

Hamidullah , M.F. , Riccucci , N.M. and Lee , I.P. ( 2021 ), “ Citizens' perceptions of closing the gender pay gap: an experimental study ”, Public Management Review , Vol.  23 No.  7 , pp.  1032 - 1055 .

Hodgetts , H.M. , Vachon , F. , Chamberland , C. and Tremblay , S. ( 2017 ), “ See No evil: cognitive challenges of security surveillance and monitoring ”, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition , Vol.  6 No.  3 , pp.  230 - 243 , available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.05.001

Hodgkinson , G.P. and Sadler-Smith , E. ( 2018 ), “ The dynamics of intuition and analysis in managerial and organizational decision making ”, Academy of Management Perspectives , Vol.  32 No.  4 , pp.  473 - 492 .

Johnsen , Å. ( 2015 ), “ Strategic management thinking and practice in the public sector: a strategic planning for all seasons? ”, Financial Accountability and Management , Vol.  31 No.  3 , pp.  243 - 268 .

Kaufmann , L. , Wagner , C.M. and Carter , C.R. ( 2017 ), “ Individual modes and patterns of rational and intuitive decision-making by purchasing managers ”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , Vol.  23 No.  2 , pp.  82 - 93 .

Khemka , I. and Hickson , L. ( 2021 ), “ Strategy-based interventions for effective interpersonal decision making ”, Decision Making by Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities , Springer , pp.  519 - 540 .

Kızıloglu , M. and Serinkan , C. ( 2015 ), “ Perception of strategical management in textile sector ”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences , Vol.  207 , pp.  306 - 314 .

Kolbe , L.M. , Bossink , B. and de Man , A.-P. ( 2020 ), “ Contingent use of rational, intuitive and political decision-making in R&D ”, Management Decision , Vol.  58 No.  6 , pp. 997 - 1020 .

Kulcsár , V. , Dobrean , A. and Gati , I. ( 2020 ), “ Challenges and difficulties in career decision making: their causes, and their effects on the process and the decision ”, Journal of Vocational Behavior , Vol.  116 , 103346 , available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103346

Liedtka , J. ( 2000 ), “ Strategic planning as a contributor to strategic change: a generative model ”, European Management Journal , Elsevier , Vol.  18 , pp.  195 - 206 .

Luan , S. , Reb , J. and Gigerenzer , G. ( 2019 ), “ Ecological rationality: fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty ”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol.  62 No.  6 , pp.  1735 - 1759 .

Mintzberg , H. ( 1994 ), “ The fall and rise of strategic planning ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol.  72 No.  1 , pp. 107 - 114 .

Mintzberg , H. , Ahlstrand , B. and Lampel , J.B. ( 2020 ), Strategy Safari , Pearson , London .

Nagtegaal , R. , Tummers , L. , Noordegraaf , M. and Bekkers , V. ( 2020 ), “ Designing to debias: measuring and reducing public managers' anchoring bias ”, Public Administration Review , Vol.  80 No.  4 , pp.  565 - 576 .

Nguyen , T.-M. ( 2020 ), “ Do extrinsic motivation and organisational culture additively strengthen intrinsic motivation in online knowledge sharing? ”, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems , Vol.  50 No.  1 , pp.  75 - 93 , doi: 10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2019-0019 .

Norzailan , Z. , Yusof , S.M. and Othman , R. ( 2016 ), “ Developing strategic leadership competencies ”, Journal of Advanced Management Science , Vol.  4 No.  1 , pp. 66 - 71 .

Palaniappan , G. ( 2017 ), “ Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to board characteristics of corporate governance in Indian manufacturing industry: an empirical study ”, European Journal of Management and Business Economics , Vol.  26 No.  1 , pp. 67 - 85 .

Parker , A.M. , Bruine de Bruin , W. , Fischhoff , B. and Weller , J. ( 2018 ), “ Robustness of decision-making competence: evidence from two measures and an 11-year longitudinal study ”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , Vol.  31 No.  3 , pp.  380 - 391 .

Peng , J. , Ren , L. , Yang , N. , Zhao , L. , Fang , P. and Shao , Y. ( 2020 ), “ The network structure of decision-making competence in Chinese adults ”, Frontiers in Psychology , Vol.  11 , p. 2411 .

Poister , T.H. , Pitts , D.W. and Hamilton Edwards , L. ( 2010 ), “ Strategic management research in the public sector: a review, synthesis, and future directions ”, The American Review of Public Administration , SAGE Publications Sage CA , Los Angeles, CA , Vol.  40 , pp.  522 - 545 .

Porter , M.E. ( 1990 ), “ The competitive advantage of nations ”, Harvard Business Review , Cambridge, Massachusetts , Vol.  68 , pp.  73 - 93 .

Remmers , C. , Topolinski , S. and Koole , S.L. ( 2016 ), “ Why being mindful may have more benefits than you realize: mindfulness improves both explicit and implicit mood regulation ”, Mindfulness , Vol.  7 No.  4 , pp.  829 - 837 .

Ritter , S.M. ( 2014 ), “ Creativity—the unconscious foundations of the incubation period ”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , Vol.  8 No.  1 , pp. 1 - 10 .

Rodrigues and Franco ( 2019 ), “ The corporate sustainability strategy in organisations: a systematic review and future directions ”, Sustainability , Vol.  11 No.  22 , p. 6214 .

Sahay , A. ( 2019 ), “ Strategic thinking: my encounter ”, IBA Journal of Management and Leadership , Vol.  10 No.  2 , pp.  7 - 14 .

Sarraf , F. and Nejad , S.H. ( 2020 ), “ Improving performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard with grey relational analysis and data envelopment analysis approaches: case study in water and wastewater companies ”, Evaluation and Program Planning , Vol.  79 , 101762 .

Sauter , V.L. ( 1999 ), “ Intuitive decision-making ”, Communications of the ACM , Vol.  42 No.  6 , pp. 109 - 115 .

Simon , H.A. ( 1976 ), “ From substantive to procedural rationality ”, 25 Years of Economic Theory , Springer , Boston, MA , pp. 65 - 86 .

Sinnaiah , T. , Adam , S. and Mahadi , B. ( 2023 ), “ Conflict resolution styles and organisational performance: the mediating role of cultural factor ”, IJARBSS , Vol.  13 No.  1 , pp. 1027 - 1037 .

Stanczyk , A. , Foerstl , K. , Busse , C. and Blome , C. ( 2015 ), “ Global sourcing decision-making processes: politics, intuition, and procedural rationality ”, Journal of Business Logistics , Vol.  36 No.  2 , pp.  160 - 181 .

Steptoe‐Warren , G. , Howat , D. and Hume , I. ( 2011 ), “ Strategic thinking and decision making: literature review ”, Journal of Strategy and Management , Vol.  4 No.  3 , pp. 238 - 250 .

Sukhov , A. , Sihvonen , A. , Netz , J. , Magnusson , P. and Olsson , L.E. ( 2021 ), “ How experts screen ideas: the complex interplay of intuition, analysis and sensemaking ”, Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol.  38 No.  2 , pp.  248 - 270 .

Supramaniam , S. and Singaravelloo , K. ( 2020 ), “ Emotional intelligence, job satisfaction and organisational performance in the Malaysian public administration ”, Institutions and Economies , Vol.  12 No.  1 , pp. 77 - 98 .

Tabesh , P. and Vera , D.M. ( 2020 ), “ Top managers' improvisational decision-making in crisis: a paradox perspective ”, Management Decision , Vol.  58 No.  10 , pp.  2235 - 2256 , doi: 10.1108/MD-08-2020-1060 .

Temprano-García , V. , Rodríguez-Escudero , A.I. and Rodríguez-Pinto , J. ( 2018 ), “ Brand deletion: how the decision-making approach affects deletion success ”, BRQ Business Research Quarterly , Vol.  21 No.  2 , pp.  69 - 83 .

Tsai , F.M. , Bui , T.-D. , Tseng , M.-L. , Wu , K.-J. and Chiu , A.S. ( 2020 ), “ A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach ”, Journal of Cleaner Production , Vol.  251 , 119740 .

Wang , T. , Wu , J. , Gu , J. and Hu , L. ( 2021 ), “ Impact of open innovation on organizational performance in different conflict management styles: based on resource dependence theory ”, International Journal of Conflict Management , Vol.  32 No.  2 , pp. 199 - 222 .

Zander , T. , Horr , N.K. , Bolte , A. and Volz , K.G. ( 2016 ), “ Intuitive decision making as a gradual process: investigating semantic intuition-based and priming-based decisions with fMRI ”, Brain and Behavior , Vol.  6 No.  1 , e00420 .

Zhu , Y. , Ritter , S.M. , Müller , B.C. and Dijksterhuis , A. ( 2017 ), “ Creativity: intuitive processing outperforms deliberative processing in creative idea selection ”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , Vol.  73 , pp.  180 - 188 .

Zhu , X.S. , Wolfson , M.A. , Dalal , D.K. and Mathieu , J.E. ( 2021 ), “ Team decision making: the dynamic effects of team decision style composition and performance via decision strategy ”, Journal of Management , Vol.  47 No.  5 , pp.  1281 - 1304 .

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the administration of Azman Hashim International Business School, Block T08, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, for providing the facilities and the PhD Scholar room during this research.

Corresponding author

Related articles, we’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

• Harvard Business School →
• Faculty & Research →

Publications

• Global Research Centers
• Case Development
• Initiatives & Projects
• Research Services
• Seminars & Conferences
• Publications →

Show Results For

• All HBS Web  (115,813)
• Faculty Publications  (58,279)

StrategicPlanning →

No results found in faculty publications.

• Were any results found in one of the other content buckets on the left?
• Try removing some search filters.
• Use different search filters.

• Open access
• Published: 27 November 2021

Strategic management accounting and performance implications: a literature review and research agenda

• Jafar Ojra 1 ,
• Abdullah Promise Opute   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-1856 2 , 3 &
• Mohammad Mobarak Alsolmi 4  

Future Business Journal volume  7 , Article number:  64 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

37k Accesses

9 Citations

Metrics details

The important role that management accounting plays in driving organisational performance has been reiterated in the literature. In line with that importance, the call for more effort to enhance knowledge on strategic management accounting has increased over the years. Responding to that call, this study utilised a qualitative approach that involved a systematic review to synthesise existing literature towards understanding the strategic management accounting foundation, contingency factors, and organisational performance impact. Based on the evidence in reviewed literature, we flag key directions for advancing this theoretical premise towards providing further insights that would enable practitioners strategically align their strategic management accounting practices for optimal organisational performance. The limitations of this study have been acknowledged.

Introduction

Successful managerial decisions enable organisational profitability and accounting aids effective managerial decisions [ 75 ]. Aimed at optimising the decision-enabling substance of accounting, management was criticised in 1980s as being too focused on internal operational issues that offer little to management from the point of strategy formulation and sustaining competitive advantage (CIMA Report Footnote 1 ). Recognising the importance for a broader impact of accounting on managerial decision-making, Simmonds [ 82 , p. 26] introduced and defined strategic management accounting (SMA) as “the provision and analysis of management accounting data about a business and its competitors, for use in developing and monitoring business strategy” .

Subsequently there has been increasing efforts that stress the importance for organisations to embrace strategic management accounting theory towards boosting strategic decision-making and organisational performance (e.g. [ 4 , 8 , 9 , 17 , 23 , 53 , 58 , 86 , 90 , 48 ], amongst others). As rightly noted by Turner et al. [ 86 ], organisations that aim to enhance their competitiveness and performance, must not only develop but also “implement internal policies and procedures such as strategic management accounting that are consistent with their business strategies and account for changing competitive demands” (p. 33). Doing that will enable the strategic management accounting tool to be effectively used to drive corporate success. This is the underlying argument in this study.

The task of profitably satisfying customers is becoming more challenging [ 61 , 65 , 67 ]. Meeting that challenge requires that organisations recognise the importance for effective decision-making. Accountants play a significant role in enabling effective decision-making in organisations (e.g. [ 21 , 23 , 27 ]). Accounting information enables the organisation determine the going concern [ 6 , 36 ]. Accounting provides the management with relevant information for ensuring and sustaining growth and profitability. The strategic management accounting foundation emphasises that in order to fully fulfil its management decision-making enabling function, accounting practices must not only focus on the internal but also on the external components relating to the organisation's operations. In other words, accounting should embrace a much broader and market-oriented approach and focus on costing (e.g. [ 8 , 17 , 58 , 78 ]); planning, control and performance measurement (e.g. [ 17 , 58 ]), strategic decision-making (e.g. [ 8 , 58 ]), customer accounting (e.g. [ 58 , 86 ]) and competitor accounting (e.g. [ 17 , 58 , 86 ]).

Given the importance of strategic management accounting to effective management decision-making and corporate success, there remains a growing interest in understanding the topic. Little wonder therefore that the advocacy for more research towards a better understanding of what strategic management accounting practices organisations adopt and what motivates their preference for one technique over the other (e.g. [ 4 , 53 , 58 , 86 , 90 ]) remains current. While embracing strategic management accounting is a critical path for enabling effective managerial decision-making and boosting organisational performance (e.g. [ 3 , 9 , 58 ]), the enablement outcome of strategic management accounting practice would hinge on the effectiveness of the organisation in tailoring its strategic management accounting practices to its strategy and environment [ 9 , 11 , 58 ].

Following that contingency logic, this research is a response to the aforementioned call and the aim in this study is to contribute to strategic management accounting discourse by critically analysing the body of knowledge towards enhancing the understanding of how knowledge has evolved in this theoretical domain and also to contribute to knowledge by flagging directions for further knowledge development. To achieve the aim of this study, the theoretical focus in this study is premised along three questions:

What strategic management accounting techniques can organisations use towards driving organisational performance?

What factors would influence strategic management accounting techniques usage and performance association? and

What future research gaps exist based on the explored literature?

Literature review

This study follows the theoretical foundation that strategic management accounting would aid effective management decision-making, and ultimately boost organisational performance. In line with the aim of this study, relevant literature is reviewed to explain the theoretical premise of this study. The literature review is organised along three core themes in strategic management accounting discourse, namely, strategic management accounting techniques, contingency factors of strategic management accounting usage, and the impact of strategic management accounting on organisational performance.

Strategic management accounting: definition and techniques

Management accounting is noted to involve the “generation, communication, and use of financial and non-financial information for managerial decision-making and control activities” ([ 28 ] p. 3). One major criticism of accounting in the 1980s relates to the fact that accountants have hardly taken a proactive role in the strategic management process [ 7 , 8 ]. According to Nixon and Burns [ 55 , p. 229], although strategic management has been variously defined, there is “broad consensus that the key activities are (1) development of a grand strategy, purpose or sense of direction, (2) formulation of strategic goals and plans to achieve them, (3) implementation of plans, and (4) monitoring, evaluation and corrective action”. The role of management accounting is to enable effective decision-making, and it involves typically information gathering and analysis, identifying options, implementation, monitoring and evaluation [ 16 ]. Thus, the focus in strategic management accounting, rephrased also as accounting for strategic positioning [ 73 , 74 ], is to embrace a broader approach that incorporates a strategic management focus into its dynamics towards effectively enabling management decision-making and organisational performance [ 8 , 80 ]).

Since the first attempt by Simmonds [ 82 , p. 26] who defined strategic management accounting as “the provision and analysis of management accounting data about a business and its competitors, for use in developing and monitoring business strategy” , there have been numerous attempts to enhance that definition and identify core techniques of strategic management accounting. For example, CIMA [ 16 ] describes strategic management accounting as a management accounting form that emphasises focusing on information relating to external factor of the entity and also on non-financial information as well as information that is generated internally. In a much earlier contribution, Bromwich [ 7 , p. 28] offers a description of strategic management accounting as involving “the provision and analysis of financial information on the organisation’s product markets and competitors’ costs and cost structures and the monitoring of the organisation’s strategies and those of its competitors in the market over a number of periods” (Cited in [ 56 , p. 14]).

In their 2008 study, Cadez and Guilding asked the question “what is strategic management accounting?” (p. 838). In that same study, they conclude, based on evidence from reviewed literature, that there are two perspectives of strategic management accounting. While one perspective focuses on strategically oriented accounting techniques, the other focuses on the actual involvement of accountants in the strategic decision-making process. Following the former perspective (e.g. [ 8 , 9 , 17 , 58 ]), existing literature distils sixteen (16) strategic management accounting techniques that are categorised under five SMA themes (e.g. [ 9 , 11 , 58 ]):

Strategic costing;

Strategic planning, control and performance measurement;

Strategic decision-making;

Competitor accounting; and

Customer accounting.

Strategic costing

According to literature (e.g. [ 8 , 11 , 23 ]), strategic and marketing information-based cost data can be leveraged by organisations to ensure effective strategies for achieving sustainable competitive advantage. Thus, organisations must recognise the importance of integrating cost strategies and undertake multiple strategic cost analyses. Literature distils five key costing techniques: attribute costing (e.g. Roslender and Hart 2003), life-cycle costing (e.g. [ 8 , 17 ]), quality costing (e.g. [ 17 ]), target costing (e.g. [ 8 , 17 ]) and value chain costing (e.g. [ 8 ]).

Strategic planning, control and performance measurement

Literature has also underlined the need for organisations to give due attention to planning, control and performance measurement features of the strategic management accounting, as doing that is important in the pro-active market orientation approach for competing effectively in the marketplace (e.g. [ 8 , 58 ], Chenhall 2005). Core components under the strategic planning, control and performance measurement tool includes benchmarking (e.g. [ 8 , 17 ]) and integrated performance management (Balanced Scorecard) (e.g. [ 8 , 17 ]).

Strategic decision-making

As a strategic management accounting tool, strategic decision-making is a critical tool for supporting strategic choice [ 11 ]. Core strategic decision-making options include strategic costing (e.g. [ 58 ]), strategic pricing (e.g. [ 11 , 58 ]) and brand valuation (e.g. [ 11 , 58 ]).

The importance of addressing strategic costing as a key strategic decision-making element has been emphasised in the literature (e.g. [ 58 , 78 , 79 ]). In this discourse, it is underlined that effectively driving competitive advantage requires cost analysis that explicitly considers strategic issues. In line with that viewpoint, Cadez and Guilding [ 8 ] note that strategic costing involves “the use of cost data based on strategic and marketing information to develop and identify superior strategies that will produce a sustainable competitive advantage” (p. 27).

In the literature too, strategic pricing is underlined as another core element the strategic decision-making typology of strategic management accounting (e.g. [ 8 , 58 ], Simmonds 1982). According to scholars, understanding market competition level, which as noted by Guilding et al. [ 29 , p. 120] entails the appraisal of the following factors: “competitor price reaction, price elasticity; projected market growth; and economies of scale and experience”, is important (e.g. [ 8 , 11 , 58 ]).

Within the strategic management accounting literature, brand valuation is the third element of the strategic decision-making technique. The brand valuation component “involves combining projected brand earnings (an accounting-orientated measure) with a multiple derived from the brand’s strength on strategic factors such as the nature of the brand’s market, its position in that market and its level of marketing support” [ 29 , p. 118]. In the view of Cescon et al. [ 11 ], brand valuation enables organisations to understand market reputation trends over time and potential implications for marketing executives and strategic accounting. Cescon et al. [ 11 ] contend that organisations would achieve a variable brand valuation that would provide a potential measure of marketing achievement when perceived quality and branded products are considered, while Guilding et al. [ 29 ] remind that achievable impact of brand valuation would hinge, amongst others, on the valuation method used.

Competitor accounting

According to Porter [ 72 ], strategy involves developing appropriate tools that enable a firm to analyse and determine its position in a competitive market. Thus, a firm selects suitable strategies that enables it compete more effectively over its rivals. To effectively do that, a firm needs to collect competitor accounting information. The importance of giving due attention to competitor accounting has been underlined in the literature (e.g. [ 11 , 17 , 58 ]). Three forms of competitor accounting tools are described in the literature, namely, competitor cost assessment (e.g. [ 11 , 17 , 58 ]), competitor position monitoring (e.g. [ 11 , 58 ]) and competitor performance appraisal (e.g. [ 11 , 17 , 58 ]).

Customer accounting

The fifth cluster of strategic management accounting techniques described in the literature relates to customer accounting (e.g. [ 49 , 58 ]). Customer accounting concerns practices aimed at appraising profit, sales or costs related to customers or customer segments [ 58 ]. Core customer accounting techniques include customer profitability analysis (e.g. [ 30 , 58 ]), lifetime customer profitability analysis (e.g. [ 58 ]) and valuation of customers as assets (e.g. [ 30 , 58 ]).

The contingency factors of strategic management accounting

According to management accounting discourse, when organisations carefully embrace appropriate strategic management accounting practices, they would ensure successful managerial decisions that would ultimately lead to optimising organisational performance (e.g. [ 48 , 53 , 56 , 58 ]). Thus, the extent of improved performance that an organisation would achieve would depend on its careful utilisation of appropriate strategic management techniques. As noted by Roslender and Hart (2003), p. 4 and further supported by subsequent literature (e.g. [ 34 , 58 ]), “the adoption of strategically oriented management accounting techniques and accountants’ participation in strategic management processes”, is a core research premise. In line with the carefulness notion mentioned above, the contingency perspective has been widely utilised in the effort to understand strategic management accounting practices and performance impact (e.g. [ 8 , 12 , 30 , 34 , 58 ]). The underlying foundation in the contingency perspective is based on the notion “that an organisation maximises its efficiency by matching between structure and environment” [ 22 , p. 49]. According to Otley [ 68 ]:

The contingency approach to management is based on the premise that there is no universally appropriate accounting system that applies equally to all organisations in all circumstances. Rather, it is suggested that particular features of an appropriate accounting system will depend on the specific circumstances in which an organisation finds itself. Thus, a contingency theory must identify specific aspects of an accounting system which are associated with certain defined circumstances and demonstrate an appropriate matching (p. 413).

Thus, the central foundation in the contingency perspective is that no one single accounting system is universally fit for all organisation in all circumstances (e.g. [ 41 ]). No one accounting control system can be seen as “best” for all situations; rather, the appropriateness of any control system would depend on the organisation's ability to adapt effectively to the environment surrounding its operations [ 41 , 58 , 86 ].

From reviewed literature, numerous researchers have flagged key contingency factors that should be considered in relation to strategic management accounting practice. Four factors were identified as critical contingency factors in the strategic management accounting systems design in Cadez and Guilding's [ 8 ] study, namely: business strategy, strategy formulation pattern, market orientation and firm size. On their part, Islam and Hu [ 41 ] identify core organisational effectiveness factors to include technology, environmental volatility, organisational structure, information system and size of the organisation.

Analysed together, the conceptualisation in the aforementioned studies [ 8 , 41 ] reflect perspectives that have been recognised in the 1980s. For example, Merchant [ 50 ] describe contingency factors to include firm size, product diversity, extent of decentralisation and budgetary information use. In their study of accounting information systems, Gordon and Narayanan [ 26 ] classify three core contingency factors to include perceived environmental uncertainty, information characteristics and organisational structure. Based on a study that examined the extent to which accountants were involved in the strategic management process, CIMA Footnote 2 reports three key contingency factors: “organisational influences, accountant led influences and practicalities” (p. 12). Exploring strategic management accounting practices in the Palestinian context, Ojra [ 58 ] conceptualised a comprehensive contingency perspective that considered (1) organisational structure (involving formalisation and decentralisation), (2) organisational size, (3) technology and (4) organisational strategy. In more recent literature, Pavlatos [ 70 ] suggests seven factors that affect strategic management accounting usage in the hospitality industry (hotels) in Greece, namely, “perceived environmental uncertainty, structure, quality of information systems, organisational life cycle stage, historical performance, strategy and size” (p. 756).

The contingency framing in this study draws from the theoretical guideline which suggests that both the internal and external environments of organisations should be considered in the effort to advance strategic management accounting literature (e.g. [ 58 , 70 ]). The conceptual framing in this study includes two external (perceived environmental uncertainty—competitive intensity, and market turbulence) and three internal (organisational structure—formalisation, and decentralisation, and organisational strategy) factors.

Perceived environmental uncertainty and strategic management accounting usage

From the perceptual lens, the environment could be viewed as certain or uncertain only to the extent that decision makers perceive it to be (e.g. [ 1 , 11 ]). Perceived environmental uncertainty is described as the absence of information relating to organisations, activities and happenings in the environment [ 20 ]. According to Cescon et al. [ 11 ], organisations must give due attention to their operational environment because engaging with environmental uncertainty factors would enable them identify key change drivers.

Prior literature has documented that perceived uncertainty significantly influences the extent to which firms would embrace strategic management accounting practices (e.g. [ 49 , 58 , 70 ]). According to that foundation, how firms respond from the point of strategic management accounting practices that they would endorse would depend on the nature of environmental uncertainties that surround their operational activities.

Studying the hotel property setting, Pavlatos [ 70 ] documents a positive correlation between the degree of environmental uncertainty and the use of strategic management accounting tools. In other words, the higher the perceived environmental uncertainty, the higher the need for use of strategic management accounting tools. Intensified use of strategic management accounting tools is essential because that will enable the hotels to manage the uncertainties, and be more effective in managerial decision-making, and ultimately improves organisational performance [ 70 ]. The notion of a significant influence of environmental uncertainty on strategic management accounting practices is supported by prior literature (e.g. [ 15 ]). According to them, managers who operate in highly uncertain environments would require information that is timely, current and frequent. Other scholars have also argued that environmental uncertainty would be associated with more pro-active and externally focused accounting systems (e.g. [ 32 , 38 ]).

In their study of Italian manufacturing companies, Cescon et al. [ 11 ] found a positive association of perceived environmental uncertainty and strategic pricing usage as a feature of the strategic decision-making SMA technique. In other words, the more the perceived environmental uncertainty, the higher the usage of the strategic pricing feature of the strategic decision-making SMA component.

In the perceived environmental uncertainty literature, two core dimensions have been distilled, namely competitive intensity and market turbulence (e.g. [ 30 , 58 ]). Market turbulence—a subset of environmental turbulence [ 47 ], is defined by Calantone et al. [ 10 ] as characterised by continuous changes in customers’ preference/demands, in price/cost structures and in the composition of competitors. In settings where there is high market turbulence, organizations would need to modify their products and approaches to the market more frequently [ 44 ]. On the other hand, the notion of competitive intensity relates to the logic that organisations compete for numerous resources, such as raw materials, selling and distribution channels, as well as quality, variety and price of products [ 26 , 46 ]. Achieving organisation-environment alignment in highly competitive environments requires that organisations have the capacity to effectively detect environmental signals and timely communicate environmental information (e.g. [ 88 ]).

Exploring Australian hospitality industry, McManus [ 49 ] examined the association of competition intensity and perceived environmental uncertainty on customer accounting techniques usage. The study suggests that competition intensity positively associates with customer accounting practices but also found that higher perceived environmental uncertainty would not lead to greater usage of customer accounting techniques in the explored hotels. In a much similar conceptualisation, Cescon et al. [ 11 ] examined the association of environmental uncertainty and competitive forces on strategic management accounting techniques usage in large Italian manufacturing firms. Empirically, that study found that external factors (environmental uncertainty and competitive forces) positively associate with SMA usage (strategic pricing, balanced scorecard, risk analysis, target costing, life-cycle costing). Based on the two-dimensional conceptualisation, Ojra [ 58 ] examined the relationship between perceived environmental uncertainty and SMA usage in Palestinian firms. Ojra [ 58 ] hypothesised a positive correlation of perceived environmental uncertainty (conceptualised to include competition intensity and market turbulence) but found no support. To the contrary, Ojra [ 58 ] documents a potential for negative influence of perceived environmental uncertainty on strategic management accounting techniques usage, however only significant for the market turbulence dimension. In other words, Ojra [ 58 ] suggests that market turbulence associates negatively with strategic management accounting techniques usage in medium Palestine firms.

Organisational structure (formalisation) and strategic management accounting usage

Across the various streams of management, formalisation has been mentioned as a key contingency factor in understanding the operational dynamics of organisations (e.g. [ 58 , 63 , 64 ]). With regard to strategic management accounting discourse, this notion has been numerously supported (e.g. [ 26 , 58 , 85 ]).

Studying the influence of formalisation in the functional relationship between the accounting and marketing departments, Opute et al. [ 64 ] suggest a positive association. In other words, they argue that the more formalised the processes in the firm, the higher the achieved integration between both functional areas. However, Opute et al. [ 64 ] note that whether this positive association is achieved would depend on the integration component (information sharing, unified effort and involvement) considered.

In the strategic management accounting domain, there is mixed evidence of the association of organisational structure on strategic management accounting usage. For example, Ojra [ 58 ] hypothesised that less formalised organisational structure would lead to higher use of strategic management accounting techniques in Palestinian firms but found no support for that hypothesis. In that study, no support was found for the notion that less formalised structures would lead to higher use of strategic management accounting techniques, both for total SMA as well as for all the dimensions of SMA. Thus, that study concludes that formalisation has no significant influence on strategic management accounting techniques usage in Palestinian firms. That conclusion supports the findings in Gordon and Narayanan [ 26 ], but contrast the view in Tuan Mat’s [ 85 ] exploration of management accounting practices.

Organisational structure (decentralisation) and strategic management accounting usage

Similar to formalisation, management scholars have noted decentralisation as a core organisational structure factor that should be given due attention in the drive to enhance the understanding of contingency theory (e.g. [ 58 , 62 , 63 ]). Organisational structure has been noted to influence the strategic management accounting practices of a firm (e.g. [ 58 , 70 ]). Within that foundation, decentralisation (or its opposite) has been flagged as a major factor. A contention that has been underlined numerously in the discourse is that strategic management accounting usage would be higher in organisations that embrace decentralised structure. Following that foundation, Pavlatos [ 70 ] hypothesised that SMA usage is higher in decentralised hotels than in centralised hotels in Greece. The results support the hypothesis: there is higher need for strategic management accounting practices in decentralised firms, as lower-level managers require more information to aid decision-making.

The above conclusion supports as well as contrasts prior literature, namely Chenhall [ 14 ] and Verbeeten [ 87 ], respectively. According to Chenhall [ 14 , p. 525], “strategic management accounting has characteristics related to aspects of horizontal organisation as they aim to connect strategy to the value chain and link activities across the organisation…”. Chenhall [ 14 ] adds that a typical approach in horizontal organisation is identifying customer-oriented strategic priorities and then exploiting process efficiency, continuous improvements, flattened structures and team empowerment, to initiate change, a conclusion that suggests that higher use of strategic management accounting practices would seem ideal in such decentralised organisational structure. The reason for that outcome is that in decentralised structure, lower-level managers can adapt their MACS as necessary to meet requirements [ 52 ], a logic that finds support in McManus [ 49 ] who found that customer accounting usage is higher in Australian hotels that are decentralised than those that are centralised. In contrast to that logic, Verbeeten [ 87 ] found decentralisation to associate negatively with major changes in the decision-influencing components of MACS.

Insight about the less developed context, namely about Palestinian firms lend support to, as well as contrast past literature. According to Ojra [ 58 ], decentralisation has a tendency to associate negatively with strategic management accounting usage. Therefore, although statistically insignificant, the results indicate that explored Palestinian firms that endorse decentralised decision-making process would seemingly have lesser need for strategic management accounting practices. On the evidence that decentralisation may have a negative influence on strategic management accounting usage, Ojra [ 58 ] supports Verbeeten [ 87 ] but contrasts Pavlatos [ 70 ].

Organisational strategy and strategic management accounting usage

An internal organisational factor that has been considered important in the understanding of contingency perspective of management accounting relates to organisational strategy (e.g. [ 8 , 17 , 58 ]). Hambrick [ 33 ] defined strategy as:

A pattern of important decisions that guides the organisation in its relationship with its environment; affects the internal structure and processes of the organisation; and centrally affects the organisation’s performance (p.567).

In the strategic management accounting discourse, organisational strategy has been mentioned as one of the key factors that would condition strategic management accounting practices of a firm (e.g. [ 9 , 58 , 70 , 86 ]). For example, Turner et al. [ 86 ] note that in hotel property setting, strategic management accounting use would hinge on the market orientation business strategy of the firm. Given the notion that strategic management accounting would aid management decision-making and lead ultimately to improved organisational performance, there is some legitimacy in expecting that organisations that align their strategic management accounting practices to the strategic orientation of the firm would achieve a higher organisational performance.

Following Miles and Snow’s [ 51 ] strategy typology (prospector, defender, analyser, and reactor), efforts to understand the association of strategy to strategic management accounting tools usage have also tried to understand how the various strategy typologies play out in this association. For example, Cadez and Guilding [ 9 ] considered the prospector, defender and analyser typologies in the Slovenian context, while Ojra [ 58 ] considered the prospector and defender typologies in the Palestinian contexts.

Cadez and Guilding [ 9 ] report that companies that endorse the analyser strategy, which is a deliberate strategy formulation approach, are not highly market oriented, but tend to show high usage of SMA techniques, except for competitor accounting technique. Further, they report that prospector strategy-oriented companies also pursue a deliberate strategy formulation approach, but are highly market oriented, and SMA techniques usage is fairly high (for competitor accounting) and averagely high (for strategic costing). For very high prospector-oriented companies, they are highly market oriented, have a strong strategy drive and a very high SMA techniques usage. For the defender strategy-type companies, they suggest that such companies are not only average in their market orientation, but also in their usage of SMA techniques.

In the study of Palestinian companies, Ojra [ 58 ] offers insights that resonate relatively with the findings in Cadez and Guilding [ 9 ]. Ojra [ 58 ] suggests that prospector companies have a higher usage of SMA techniques than defender-type companies. So, SMA technique usage is positively associated to prospector strategy (see also [ 8 ]. Elaborating the findings, Ojra [ 58 ] reports that prospector-type companies focused more on four SMA techniques (mean values reported), namely SMAU-Planning, Control and Performance Measurement (4.601), SMAU-Strategic Decision Making (4.712), SMAU-Competitor Accounting (4.689) and SMAU-Customer Accounting (4.734), statistical results that are significantly higher than the results for 'defender'-type companies. Cinquini and Tenucci [ 17 ] lend support to Ojra [ 58 ]: 'defender'-type companies give more attention to the Costing dimension of SMA.

Without emphasising the strategy typologies, Pavlakos (2015) comments that organisational strategy affects SMA usage in the Greek hotel industry.

Strategic management accounting and organisational performance

A central tenet in the strategic management accounting foundation is that management accounting would significantly aid organisations to achieve sustained competitiveness [ 7 , 82 ]. Implicitly, these scholars argue that in order to stay competitive in the marketplace, organisations should not only focus on cost-volume-profit issues, but rather embrace a broad externally focused management accounting approach that is strategically driven and provides financial information that enables management to effectively formulate and monitor the organisation's strategy. Thus, management accounting should also focus on competitor information as that will enable management effectively organise the firm's strategic structure.

Over the years, there is growing recognition of the importance of strategic management accounting to organisations, leading therefore to increasing research attention. One area that has received attention in the strategic management accounting discourse relates to the organisational performance enhancement notion (e.g. [ 23 , 56 , 58 , 77 , 86 ]).

Insights from Malaysia also add to the discourse on the impact of strategic management accounting usage on organisational performance. In their study of Malaysian electrical and electronic firms, Noordin et al. [ 56 ] examined the extent of usage of strategic management accounting and influence on the performance of the participating firms. The study found that in explored Malaysian companies, the extent of strategic management accounting usage was significantly related to organisation’s performance. That conclusion supports Cadez and Guilding [ 8 ] who contend that there is a positive association between strategic management accounting usage and organisational performance.

In a performance perspective that considers the ISO 9000 Quality Management System (QMS) aspect, Sedevich-Fons [ 77 ] examined the connection between strategic management accounting and quality management systems performance. The findings show that strategic management accounting and quality management are complementary and their effective implementation would enhance overall performance. Sedevich-Fons [ 77 ] notes further that when both are used in conjunction that would spread SMA techniques and enable full exploitation of Quality Management Systems.

Insights from the less developed economy context also associate organisational performance to the implementation of strategic management accounting practices (e.g. [ 3 , 57 , 58 ]). In a conceptual approach that aimed to address one major gap in previous literature, Ojra [ 58 ] examined both the financial and non-financial dimensions of organisational performance. According to Ojra [ 58 ], strategic management accounting usage does not impact the financial dimension of organisational performance but exerts significant positive impact on non-financial performance. That finding resonates with Perera et al. [ 71 ] conclusion that various forms of management accounting associate positively with the use of non-financial measures.

On their part, Oboh and Ajibolade [ 57 ], in their investigation of the association between strategic management accounting practices and strategic decision-making in Nigerian banks, found that explored Nigerian banks “practice SMA not as a concept, but as a principle of operation, and that SMA contributes significantly to strategic decision-making in the area of competitive advantage and increased market share” (p.119).

Alabdullah [ 3 ] offers evidence that adds support to the insights in the aforementioned studies [ 57 , 58 ]. In a study that explored the Jordanian service sector, Alabdullah [ 3 ] found that strategic management accounting enables performance in the service sector in Jordan. If strategic management accounting is effectively implemented, that will enable optimal strategic decision-making and ultimately improve organisational performance.

Research methodology

Research design.

Qualitative research method [ 18 , 76 ] is used in this study to achieve the objectives of this research. Following the methodological approach, as well as responding to the research call, in a past study on the contingency perspective of strategic management accounting [ 41 ], a study which was literature review-based, literature review-based qualitative research approach was deemed fit in this study.

A systematic review approach (e.g. [ 5 , 39 , 81 ]) is used in this research on the topic of strategic management accounting. Using the systematic review approach in this study is appropriate because it enables a systematic and transparent approach in identifying, selecting, and evaluating relevant published literature on a specific topic or question [ 42 , 83 ]. Furthermore, systematic review approach was deemed appropriate for this study as it has been documented to aid core research gaps identification and steering future research (e.g. [ 40 , 59 , 66 ]).

Alves et al. [ 5 ] forward a two-stage guideline for systematic review of literature: planning the review and conducting the review and analysis. As they noted, researchers should describe how the systematic approach was planned (in the former) and also describe the phases of the review and selection of literature (in the latter). In this research, effort was made to combine the best evidence: careful planning was used to determine literatures for inclusion or exclusion (e.g. [ 5 , 65 , 67 ]). The planning was focused at identifying relevant publications in various academic journals on the topic of strategic management accounting. First, the theoretical themes to be considered in the conceptual premise of this study were confirmed and academic resource for tracking relevant publications determined [ 5 , 66 , 83 ].

In the preliminary stage of the literature review, electronic search was carried out to identify relevant literature relating to strategic management accounting. Three steps were taken in the systematic review: we searched the literature, analysed and synthesised the literature, and wrote the review. Several databases were scanned using key search terms to capture relevant literature [ 81 ]. Core search terms were used, such as strategic management accounting, historical aspects of strategic management accounting, contingencies of strategic management accounting practices, strategic management accounting and organisational strategy, strategic management accounting and organisational performance, amongst others. Relevant publications were also found using data extraction tools such as Google Scholar, Emerald Insight and Research Gate.

Using the aforementioned methodological approach, a collection of relevant articles published in academic journals was identified. Identifying the relevant literature in this study followed methodological guideline [ 69 ]: criteria of language, relevance and type of research to identify relevant studies were embraced, and articles that contained non-English contents and also articles that did not fit closely to the thematic premise of this study were excluded. It is important to emphasise here that this study recognises that not all publications relating to the topic of strategic management accounting may have been considered in this research. However, for the scope of this piece of research, the body of literature covered in this study was deemed adequate for the conceptual framing.

Table 1 shows a sample of selected literature covered in this piece of research, pinpointing clearly the focus, context of the studies and findings from the studies.

The analysis

The interpretive approach of analysis was followed in processing the qualitative data to achieve reliable meaning in this study (e.g. [ 59 , 65 , 67 , 84 ]). Following that precedence, an iterative approach that involved reading reviewed literature back and forth, was used in this study. Using that approach, a synthesis of literature was undertaken to capture the core threads, debates and themes in the literature (e.g. [ 65 , 67 ]). Guided also by that methodological approach, relevant directions for future research have been flagged towards enhancing the knowledge about strategic management accounting and performance association.

Subjectivity is a major concern in qualitative researches (e.g. [ 18 , 76 ]). To address that concern, steps taken in this research to validate the articles incorporated into this research include rigor of conduct and strength of evidence by cross-referencing, as well as undertaking a duplicate check (e.g. [ 76 , 81 ]).

The findings

Prompted by the central threads that emerged from the analysis of the selected literature, the findings from this study are organised along three core themes: strategic management accounting techniques, contingencies of strategic management accounting techniques usage and the organisational performance implications of strategic management accounting usage.

The importance of management accounting, and in particular the strategic management accounting element as a tool for enabling top management to make effective decisions that enable organisation compete effectively in the marketplace, is gaining increasing mention in management discourse. In that discourse, five core categorisations of SMA techniques: strategic costing; strategic planning, control and performance measurement; strategic decision-making; competitor accounting; and customer accounting. While literature distils numerous forms of strategic management accounting techniques that organisations may embrace towards enabling effective management decision-making and organisational performance, evidence was found in reviewed literature that in some organisations, practitioners do not believe that strategic management accounting as a separate concept is a notion they subscribe to (e.g. CIMA Footnote 3 ; [ 48 , 55 ]). For example, CIMA Footnote 4 documents that participants unanimously do not subscribe to the notion, a conclusion which lends support to prior literature [ 48 , 55 ] that notes that strategic management accounting as a term, did not exist in the lexicon of accounting practitioners.

Grounded on the substance that effective use of the SMA techniques would improve organisational performance, immense research effort has focused on how organisations can effectively align the SMA usage towards achieving desired performance improvement. Premised in that theoretical domain, this study examined existing literature on the contingency factors of competitive intensity, market turbulence, formalisation, decentralisation and organisational strategy and SMA usage. Cumulative evidence obtained from the review of literature reinforces the need for organisations to pay particular attention to their operational environment in their use of SMA techniques. Reinforcing the fit principle, the cummulative evidence underlines that optimising the benefits of the strategic management accounting techniques in enabling effective customer orientation and boosting organisational performance is dependent on the organisation's ability to effectively align strategic management accounting practices to its operational environment. In other words, what works for an organisation would depend on the organisational dynamics, internal, as well as external. For example, formalisation may work for some but not for some, as decentralisation could work for some but not for some. Similarly, the utility of SMA techniques would hinge on the competitive intensity and market turbulence features of an organisation. Thus, aligning SMA practices to the internal and external features of an organisation is essential to enable them adapt effectively to their circumstances, make rational decisions and optimise their performance. So, alignment is critical because there is no one-size fits all approach for achieving customer orientation and organisational performance goals.

The third focal point of this study relates to the association of SMA techniques usage to organisational performance. Reviewed literature shows that organisations are achieving higher performance through the use of SMA techniques. In other words, effective use of SMA techniques would improve organisational performance. The plausibility in that performance outcome lies in the fact that organisations are able to utilise appropriate SMA measures to ensure effective, customer, competitor, strategic decision-making, costing, and planning and control orientation in their operational activities. Further on the performance point, literature also suggests that management control systems (MCS)–performance relationship is mediated by business strategy (e.g. [ 2 ]). Also, that study documents that the impacts (both indirect and total) of MCS on performance are stronger for family businesses than non-family businesses.

Conclusions

Conclusions and implications.

One of the major challenges that organisations are facing in today's dynamic marketplace is to steer their organisations in a way that they can stay competitive. In the contemporary world, where globalisation and technological evolution have expanded the options that customers have (e.g. [ 31 , 61 , 65 , 67 ]), organisations must strive hard to win the loyalty of customers. For organisations wishing to achieve that, strategic management accounting practices offer a strategic pathway. Organisations must embrace strategic management accounting practices that would enable them understand the market, their competitors, and the customers and leverage the intelligence from that knowledge to organise their operations towards profitably satisfying the customer. To effectively do that, organisations must avoid the mistake of focusing only on the internal issues; rather, their effort must be tailored towards embracing strategic management accounting practices that would enable them to be fully informed of the market trends, customer dynamics and competitor trends. Thus, organisations must ensure that good costing, planning, control and performance measurement; strategic decision-making, customer accounting and competitor accounting measures are embraced to enable them compete effectively.

Furthermore, in that drive to compete effectively in the market and profitably satisfy customers, organisations would not only need to embrace appropriate strategic management accounting techniques but also do that bearing in mind the environments that surround the operational activities. In other words, organisations must give due attention to the contingencies of their operational setting. Organisations must ensure a good blend of critical factors that would enable their optimal operation. Due attention must be given to organisational structure (centralisation or decentralisation of decision-making process), external environment (dynamism and turbulence), technological development, strategic approach, size of the organisation, amongst others. Doing that is critical for corporate success because there is no one size fits all approach—the outcome achieved would depend significantly on the dynamics surrounding the operational activities of the firm.

Thirty-three months on after Covid 19 was documented, Footnote 5 the pandemic is still ever present and has remained a daunting global challenge. Competing effectively in the dynamic marketplace is a major challenge for organisations, and with the Corona pandemic exerting unprecedent effects on organisations globally, most organisations are facing a more daunting challenge to survive (e.g. [ 65 , 67 ]). Organisations must strive to strategically orientate their management accounting practices to enable them find ways to effectively navigate the daunting challenges they face in this Corona era.

Implications of this study

The implications of this study are organised along managerial and theoretical implications.

Managerial Implications —Managers are reminded that optimal use of strategic management accounting techniques would boost organisational performance. Achieving high levels of organisational performance would however hinge on an organisation's ability to effectively align its SMA techniques usage to its internal and external dynamics. In other words, managers must bear in mind that there is no one-size fits all approach; therefore, they should endorse SMA techniques usage that fits their operational dynamics.

Theoretical Implications —In line with the central objective of this paper to sensitise the need for enhancing the understanding of the contingency perspective of strategic management accounting, the theoretical implications of this study are tailored towards specifying core gaps in the reviewed literature.

Overall, evidence from reviewed literature underlines the criticality of SMA techniques usage to organisational performance. Thus, if organisations strategically align SMA techniques usage to their operational setting, this would positively impact organisational performance. Within the goal of enhancing the literature on how to optimise the performance impact, much gaps still exist from the point off illuminating how differences in marketing and national culture differentiate SMA acceptance, usage, contingencies and performance impact.

Finally, on the point of performance, reviewed literature documents an obvious gap in the literature from the point of illuminating SMA techniques usage impact along the performance dimensions. As noted by Ojra [ 58 ], for some societies (especially ones that are Islamic cultured), non-financial performance is of central importance. Theoretical development from the point of SMA techniques usage, contingencies and non-financial performance impact is scanty.

Limitations of the study

Based on systematic review approach, this study aimed to drive further knowledge development on the contingency perspective of strategic management accounting, drawing on the evidence from reviewed literature to understand the core debates in the literature and pinpoint directions for future research. Two core limitations of this research relate to the conceptual framework and volume of literature reviewed.

The conceptual framing of this study embraced only three themes in the SMA discourse, namely perceived environmental uncertainty, organisational structure and organisational strategy. Elaborated, the contingency premise considered in this study relates to perceived environmental uncertainty (competitive intensity, and market turbulence), organisational structure (formalisation and decentralisation), and organisational strategy. This study recognises that there are other contingencies of strategic management accounting practices that have not been included in the conceptual framing of this study.

To capture the central debates in the SMA discourse, extant literature was reviewed. It is however important to acknowledge that this study may have ignored some literature relevant to the conceptual premise of this study. Finally, although efforts were made by the researchers to ensure validity in this research by adopting an analytical approach that involved thorough reading of literature to ensure valid meaning in the interpretation, it must be reminded that subjectivity is a concern in every qualitative research.

Future research directions

In explaining the theoretical implications of this study, core gaps in the literature were underlined (Section “ Implications of this study ”), while the limitations of this study were acknowledged in Section “ Limitations of the study ”. Building on these, this Section “ Future research directions ” extends the contribution of this study by specifying core directions for further knowledge development on the contingency perspective of strategic management accounting.

No doubt, this study has limitations, amongst which are the conceptual framework and the literature review scope. In their study, Naranjo-Gil et al. [ 54 , p. 688] note that “future research is needed to examine other factors to add a more comprehensive view of management accounting”. Given the conceptual limitation of this study, this study reinforces the research call by Naranjo-Gil et al. [ 54 ]. Future research could expand the work done in this research and knowledge development by incorporating contingency factors that have not been considered in the conceptual framing of this study. More research is required in that regard, both from the point of a systematic literature review approach, as well as from the point of empirical investigations that seek to illuminate the contextual (industrial sectors and geographical settings) differentiators to the contingency impacts on the use of strategic management accounting techniques.

Furthermore, more research effort is required from the point of gaining deeper understanding of the various strategic management accounting techniques. Marketing dynamics (e.g. [ 62 ]) and national culture [ 35 , 60 ] differ from one setting to another, therefore exploring the nature of strategic management accounting techniques that organisations endorse and why are core premises for research.

As flagged in the findings, there is a growing support of the notion that accounting practitioners do not subscribe to the use of the term strategic management accounting (e.g. CIMA Footnote 6 ; [ 48 , 55 ]). Further research could help to shed more light not only on why practitioners may not subscribe to the use of the term strategic management accounting, but also on the understanding of how practitioners would prefer to describe the management accounting practices that they embrace, and also why the specific practices are prioritised.

Furthermore, on the point of the content of strategic management accounting, researchers have also noted that not much effort is given to highlighting clearly the accounting information that organisations should give much attention to towards boosting organisational performance (e.g. [ 53 , 89 ]). Future research should aim to fill this gap. Doing that is critical to fully optimising the performance benefits of strategic management accounting [ 56 ].

Reviewed literature has documented that the extent to which strategic management accounting practices would aid management decision-making and organisational performance would depend on the contingency dynamics of the organisation (e.g. [ 11 , 58 ]). Understanding the contingency premise of strategic management accounting utility in driving effective management decision-making and organisational performance is a critical research premise, and future research should aim to shed more light on that. No one size fits all approach that works for all organisations in all contexts. Therefore, future research should seek to enhance the 'fit' foundation of strategic management accounting relevance and performance outcome. In that regard, future research should seek to illuminate further how perceived environmental uncertainty, decentralisation, formalisation, strategy and other contingency factors not considered in this study, would influence strategic management accounting techniques usage and organisational performance impact. In the particular case of perceived environmental uncertainty, more research is not only required from the point of understanding the influence of the construct, but also clarifying the competitive intensity and market turbulence associations.

An insight that emerged from the reviewed literature relates to the fact that majority of efforts to improve strategic management accounting discourse have considered mainly financial aspects of organisational performance (e.g. [ 58 , 86 ]). Focusing only on financial performance is inadequate as the customer perspective of performance is neglected [ 45 , 58 ]. The importance of focusing on customer performance has been re-echoed in further literature: organisational-level customer satisfaction associates positively to financial performance (e.g. [ 24 , 86 ]), and customer performance enables business strategy and an organisation's ability to deliver value to its shareholders as well as customers [ 25 ]. Supporting prior research (e.g. [ 49 , 58 , 86 ]), this study underlines the need for more studies that illuminate non-financial performance aspects and strategic management accounting association.

Finally, the Corona pandemic, which remains a global crisis, has exerted unprecedent global economic damage. Organisations are facing daunting challenges as a result of the Corona pandemic and are still seeking ways to successfully navigate these challenges. Future research should illuminate what strategic management accounting practices organisations are endorsing in the effort to effectively navigate the Corona-crisis-induced challenges.

Availability of data and materials

This study is based on the review of literature.

Management Accounting in support of the strategic management process. https://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/Thought_leadership_docs/Management%20and%20financial%20accounting/Academic-Research-Report-Strategic-Management-Process.pdf .

January 9—WHO Announces Mysterious Coronavirus-Related Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Abbreviations

• Strategic management accounting

Strategic management accounting usage

Chartered Institute of Management Accountants

Management accounting and control system

Management control systems

Quality management system

Achrol R, Stern L (1988) Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. J Mark Res 25:36–50

Google Scholar  

Acquaah M (2013) Management control systems, business strategy and performance: A comparative analysis of family and non-family businesses in a transition economy in sub-Saharan Africa. J Fam Bus Strat 4:13–146

Alabdullah TTY (2019) Management accounting and service companies’ performance: research in emerging economies. Austral Account Bus Finance J 13(4):100–118

Alamri AM (2019) Association between strategic management accounting facets and organizational performance. Balt J Manag 14(2):212–234

Alves H, Fernandes C, Raposo M (2016) Social media marketing: A literature review and implications. Psychol Mark 33(12):1029–1038

Atkinson AA, Kaplan RS, Matsumura EM, Young SM (2011) Management accounting information for decision making and strategy execution, 6th edn. Times Prentice Hall, Hoboken

Bromwich M (1990) The case for strategic management accounting: the role of accounting information for strategy in competitive markets. Account Organ Soc 15(1/2):27–46

Cadez S, Guilding C (2008) An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. Account Organ Soc 33:836–873

Cadez S, Guilding C (2012) Strategy, strategic management accounting and performance: a configurational analysis. Ind Manag Data Syst 112(3):484–501

Calantone R, Garcia R, Dröge C (2003) The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. J Prod Innov Manag 20:90–103

Cescon F, Costantini A, Grassetti L (2019) Strategic choices and strategic management accounting in large manufacturing firms. J Manag Governance 23:605–635

Chenhall R (2003) Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Account Organ Soc 28:127–168

Chenhall R (2007) Theorising contingencies in management control systems research. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research. Elsevier, New York, pp 163–205

Chenhall R (2008) Accounting for the horizontal organization. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1207–1233

Chenhall RH, Morris D (1986) The impact of structure, environment and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Account Rev 61:16–35

CIMA (2005) Official terminology. CIMA Publishing, London

Cinquini L, Tennuci A (2010) Strategic management accounting and business strategy: a loose coupling? J Account Organ Change 33:228–259

Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Cuganesan S, Dunford R, Palmer I (2012) Strategic management accounting and strategy practices within a public sector agency. Manag Account Res 23:245–260

Daft RL, Sormunen J, Parks D (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics and company performance: an empirical study. Strateg Manag J 9(2):123–139

Dai J, Vasarhelyi MA (2017) Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. J Inf Syst 31(3):5–21

Dik R (2011) Arab management accounting systems under the influence of their culture. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation submitted at Dortmund University of Technology, Germany

El Deeb MS (2012) Towards a strategic management accounting: framework for cost management in Egyptian healthcare industry. Egyptian Accounting Review, Cairo University, Faculty of Commerce, Issue No. 2-year 2.

Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgesson FV III, Krishnan MS (2006) Customer satisfaction and stock prices: high returns, low risk. J Mark 70:3–14

Franco-Santos M, Lucianetti L, Bourne M (2012) Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research. Manag Account Res 23(2):79–119

Gordon LA, Narayanan VK (1984) Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: an empirical investigation. Account Organ Soc 9(2):33–47

Granlund M (2011) Extending AIS research to management accounting and control issues: a research note. Int J Account Inf Syst 12(1):3–19

Groot T, Selto F (2013) Advanced management accounting. Pearson, Harlow

Guilding C, Cravens KS, Tayles M (2000) An international comparison of strategic management accounting practices. Manag Account Res 11(1):113–135

Guilding C, McManus L (2002) The incidence, perceived merit and antecedents of customer accounting: an exploratory note. Account Organ Soc 27(1/2):45–59

Guesalaga R, Gabrielsson M, Rogers B, Ryals L, Cuevas JM (2018) Which resources and capabilities underpin strategic key account management. Ind Mark Manag 75:160–172

Haldma T, Lääts K (2002) Contingencies influencing the management accounting practices of Estonian manufacturing companies. Manag Acc Res 13(4):379–400

Hambrick D (1980) Operating the concept of business-level strategy in research. Acad Manag Rev 5:567–576

Henri J-F, Boiral O, Roy M-J (2016) Strategic cost management and performance: the case of environmental costs. Br Account Rev 48:269–282

Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

Holm M, Ax C (2019) The interactive effect of competition intensity and customer service competition on customer accounting sophistication—Evidence of positive and negative associations. Manag Account Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2019.07.001

Article   Google Scholar  

Hoque Z (2004) A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: Impact on organisational performance. Int Bus Rev 13:485–502

Hwang EJ (2005) Strategic management and financial performance in South Korean apparel retail stores, an unpublished Ph.D. Thesis submitted at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, US.

Ibidunni AS, Ufua DE, Opute AP (2021) Linking disruptive innovation to sustainable entrepreneurship within the context of small and medium firms: a focus on Nigeria. Afr J Sci Technol Innov Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1975355

Irene BN, Opute AP, Ibidunni AS (2020) Competency-based entrepreneurship education: analysis of the disruptive innovation theory in African HEIs. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Publishers

Islam J, Hu H (2012) A review of literature on contingency theory in managerial accounting. Afr J Bus Manag 6(15):5159–5164

John KSt, McNeal KS (2017) The strength of evidence pyramid: one approach for characterizing the strength of evidence of geoscience education research (GER) community claims. J Geosci Educ 65(4):363–372

Jusoh R (2010) The influence of perceived environmental uncertainty, firm size, and strategy on multiple performance measure usage. Afr J Bus Manage 4(10):1972–1984

Kandemir D, Yaprak A, Cavusgil ST (2006) Alliance orientation: conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. J Acad Mark Sci 34(3):324–340

Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001) Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part I. Account Horiz 15(1):87–104

Khandwalla P (1977) The design of organizations. Harcourt Brace Jovanovoich, New York

Kohli AJ, Jaworski BJ (1990) Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J Mark 10:1–8

Langfield-Smith K (2008) Strategic management accounting: how far have we come in 25 years? Acc Audit Acc J 21:204–228

McManus L (2012) Customer accounting and marketing performance measures in the hotel industry: evidence from Australia. Int J Hosp Manag 33:140–152

Merchant KA (1985) Control in business organizations, Ballinger Publishing Company, New York

Miles RE, Snow CC (1978) Organizational strategy, structure and process. McGraw-Hill, New York

Moers F (2006) Performance measure properties and delegation. Account Rev 81(4):897–924

Mohammed BAH, Maelah R, Amir AM (2019) Strategic management accounting information and performance of private hospitals in Malaysia. Int J Econ Manag Account 27(2):473–502

Naranjo-Gil D, Maas V, Hartmann F (2009) How CFO’s determine management accounting innovation: an examination of direct and indirect effects. Eur Account Rev 18(4):667–695

Nixon B, Burns J (2012) The paradox of strategic management accounting. Manag Account Res 23:229–244

Noordin R, Zainuddin Y, Fuad, Mail R, Sariman NK (2015) Performance outcomes of strategic management accounting information usage in Malaysia: Insights from electrical and electronics companies. Procedia Econ Finance 31:13–25

Oboh CS, Ajibolade SO (2017) Strategic management accounting and decision making: a survey of the Nigerian banks. Future Business Journal 3:119–137

Ojra J (2014) Strategic management accounting practices in Palestinian companies: Application of contingency theory perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation submitted at University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Ojra J, Opute AP, Sabti A (2020) Influence of culture on the effectiveness of internal audit: a literature review. Int Rev Bus Res Pap 16(2):46–65

Opute AP (2012) Maximizing effectiveness in team sports: The personal audit tool. Team Perform Manag 18(1 & 2):78–101

Opute AP (2017) Exploring personality, identity and self-concept among young customers. In: Young consumer behaviour. Routledge (Taylor and Francis) Publications, New York

Opute AP, Madichie N (2017) Accounting-marketing integration Dimensions and antecedents: insights from a Frontier Market. J Bus Ind Mark 32(8):1144–1158

Opute AP, Madichie N (2014) Integration of functional areas of business: a research Agenda. Afr J Bus Econ Res 9(1):29–54

Opute AP, Dedoussis E, Tzokas N (2013) Building blocks of Accounting-Marketing integration in UK financial services organizations. J Mark Oper Manag Res 1(4):323–336

Opute AP, Irene BN, Iwu CG (2020) Tourism service and digital technologies: a value creation perspective. Afr J Hosp Tour Leisure 9(2):1–18

Opute AP, Kalu KI, Adeola O, Iwu CG (2021) Steering sustainable economic growth: entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. J Entrep Innov Emerg Econ 7(2):216–245

Opute AP, Iwu CG, Adeola O, Mugobo V, Okeke-Uzodike OE, Fagbola S, Jaiyeoba O (2020) The covid-19-pandemic and implications for businesses: innovative retail marketing viewpoint. Retail Mark Rev 16:1-18

Otley DT (1980) The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. Account Organ Soc 10:413–428

Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, London

Pavlatos O (2015) An empirical investigation of strategic management accounting in hotels. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 27(5):756–767

Perera S, Harrison G, Poole M (1997) Customer-focused manufacturing strategy and the use of operations-based non-financial performance measures: a research note. Acc Organ Soc 22(6):557–572

Porter ME (1985) The competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York

Roslender R (1995) Accounting for strategic positioning: responding to the crisis in management accounting. Br J Manag 6:45–57

Roslender R (1996) Relevance lost and found: critical perspectives on the promise of management accounting. Crit Perspect Account 7:533–561

Roslender R, Hart S (2002) Integrating management accounting and marketing in the pursuit of competitive advantage: the case for strategic management accounting. Crit Perspect Account 14(2):77–255

Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2012) Research methods for business students. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow

Sedevich-Fons L (2018) Linking strategic management accounting and quality management systems. Bus Process Manag J. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-02-2018-0038

Shank JK, Govindarajan V (1992) Strategic cost management: tailoring controls to strategies. J Cost Manag Fall:14–24

Shank JK, Govindarajan V (1993) Strategic cost management: the new tool for competitive advantage. Free Press, New York

Sidhu BK, Roberts JH (2008) The marketing/accounting interface: lessons and limitations. J Market Manag 24(7–8):669–686

Silverman D (ed) (2016) Qualitative research, 4th edn. Sage, Los Angeles, CA

Simmonds K (1981) Strategic management accounting. Manag Account 59(4):26–29

Snyder H (2019) Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 104:333–339

Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analysing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27(2):237–246

Tuan Mat T (2010) Management accounting and organizational change: impact of alignment of management accounting system, structure and strategy on performance. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/149

Turner MJ, Way SA, Hodari D, Witteman W (2017) Hotel property performance: the role of management accounting. Int J Hosp Manag 63:33–43

Verbeeten FHM (2010) Effects of business strategy, structure and technical innovativeness on change in management accounting and control systems at the business unit level: an empirical study. Int J Manag 27:123–143

Yasai-Ardekani M, Haug R (1997) Contextual determinants of strategic planning processes. J Manage Stud 34:729–767

Zakaria M (2015) Strategic management accounting information usage and the performance of SMEs in Malaysia. Int J Sci Commerce Human 3(1):99–113

Zamecnik R, Rajnoha R (2015) Strategic business performance management on the base of controlling and managerial information support. Procedia Econ Finance 26:769–776

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

No external funding was obtained.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, UK

GPROM Academic and Management Solutions, Paderborn, Germany

Abdullah Promise Opute

University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Lampeter, UK

Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia

Mohammad Mobarak Alsolmi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

OJ—the lead author—has made substantial contributions in the design of this study, in the design of the methodological approach and analysis of data, as well as in writing up the conclusions for this study. OA—the corresponding author—has made substantial contributions in the design of this study, the review of literature, the methodological approach and analysis of data, as well as in writing up the conclusions for this study. AM has contributed substantially to the design of this study, review of literature, methodological approach, as well as in writing up the conclusions for this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah Promise Opute .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

There are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Ojra, J., Opute, A.P. & Alsolmi, M.M. Strategic management accounting and performance implications: a literature review and research agenda. Futur Bus J 7 , 64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00109-1

Download citation

Received : 25 May 2021

Accepted : 30 October 2021

Published : 27 November 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00109-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Competition intensity
• Market turbulence
• Formalisation
• Decentralisation
• Organisational strategy
• Organisational performance

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Strategic planning

• Strategy formulation

Why Does Your "New" Strategy Look Just Like Your Old One?

• Graham Kenny
• August 18, 2022

The Key to Being on Time

• Peter Bregman
• May 31, 2012

The Strategic Side Gig

• Orlan Boston
• From the May–June 2020 Issue

The Error at the Heart of Corporate Leadership

• Joseph L. Bower
• Lynn S. Paine
• From the May–June 2017 Issue

How One Family Business Found Its Sweet Spot

• George Stalk, Jr.
• April 05, 2013

Knowing When to Reinvent

• Mark Bertolini
• David Duncan
• David S Duncan
• Andrew Waldeck
• From the December 2015 Issue

If Brands Are Built over Years, Why Are They Managed over Quarters?

• Leonard M. Lodish
• Carl F. Mela
• From the July–August 2007 Issue

Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy (HBR OnPoint Enhanced Edition)

• Michael E. Porter
• Mark R. Kramer
• December 01, 2002

The Three-Box Approach to Business Model Reinvention: Putting the Idea into Practice

• Katherine Bell
• September 19, 2011

Every CEO Should Write an Annual Memo to the Board

• Anthony K. Tjan
• November 12, 2009

Fast Heat: How Korea Won the Microwave War

• Ira C. Magaziner
• Mark Patinkin
• From the January–February 1989 Issue

What Strategists Can Learn from Architecture

• Andrew Campbell
• Mark Lancelott
• November 13, 2013

Coupling Strategy to Operating Plans

• John M. Hobbs
• Donald F. Heany
• From the May 1977 Issue

Link Manufacturing Process and Product Life Cycles

• Robert H. Hayes
• Steven C. Wheelwright
• From the January 1979 Issue

Finding Your Strategy in the New Landscape

• Pankaj Ghemawat
• From the March 2010 Issue

In Uncertain Times, the Best Strategy Is Adaptability

• Michael Mankins
• August 24, 2022

Understanding China

• Rana Mitter
• Elsbeth Johnson
• J. Stewart Black
• Allen J. Morrison
• Zak Dychtwald
• Adi Ignatius
• From the May–June 2021 Issue

Forward-Thinking Cultures

• Mansour Javidan

Stop Selling. Start Collaborating.

• Christoph Senn
• From the May–June 2022 Issue

How the Growth Outliers Do It

• Rita Gunther McGrath
• From the January–February 2012 Issue

Clean Energy for the Future

• Richard H.K. Vietor
• Howaida Kamel
• September 07, 2019

Merck Latin America (D): Mexico

• Michael Beer
• James Weber
• March 12, 2001

The Management Buyout of Dell, Inc.

• Guhan Subramanian
• October 09, 2016

SK's Double Bottom Line: Challenges and Way Forward

• William P. Barnett
• Yong Suk Jang
• Mooweon Rhee
• Tae-won Chey
• September 27, 2019

Du Pont's Titanium Dioxide Business (B)

• November 30, 1989

Becton Dickinson: Designing the New Strategic, Operational, and Financial Planning Process

• Robert Simons
• Antonio Davila
• Afroze Mohammed
• July 12, 1996

Deloitte & Touche (A): A Hole in the Pipeline

• Rosabeth Moss Kanter
• Jane Roessner
• September 28, 1999

Cradle (B): Resurgence and Organizational Change

• Anne Cohn Donnelly
• Brenda Ellington-Booth
• Nadeem Ghani
• January 01, 2004

Du Pont's Titanium Dioxide Business (C)

Volkswagen of america: managing it priorities.

• Robert D. Austin
• Warren Ritchie
• Greggory Garrett
• October 05, 2005

Zenith Radio Corp. (A)

• October 01, 1973

Casa Pedro Domecq

• Neil E. Thornberry
• U. Srinivasa Rangan
• David Wylie
• June 15, 1999

PepsiCo, Performance with Purpose, Achieving the Right Global Balance

• Rakesh Khurana
• Eric Baldwin
• October 24, 2011

Student Success at Georgia State University (A)

• Michael W. Toffel
• Robin Mendelson
• Julia Kelley
• September 15, 2020

Salt Lake Organizing Committee: 2002 Olympics

• H. Kent Bowen
• Courtney Purrington
• Bryce C. Lapierre
• March 24, 2004

Overstock.com and Worldstock

• James A. Phills
• March 07, 2008

Walt Disney Co. (B): Sustaining Growth

• David J. Collis
• Elizabeth Johnson
• March 27, 1994

Saudi Arabia: Vision 2030

• Haviland Sheldahl-Thomason
• January 10, 2018

Mueller-Lehmkuhl GmbH

• Robin Cooper
• Dagmar Bottenbruch
• March 31, 1990

Internationalization at Cementos Argos

• Esteban R. Brenes
• Luciano Ciravegna
• Ezequiel Reficco
• November 26, 2020

What You Can Learn from Professional Project Managers

• February 01, 2001

Torvald Klaveness Group: From Old Traditions to Future Innovations, Teaching Note

• John L. Ward
• Colleen Lief
• July 30, 2004

HBR Magazine Issue Pathway July/August 2023

• Harvard Business Publishing
• June 15, 2023

Popular Topics

Partner center.

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Document Library sub navigation

• All Documents
• National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES)
• Obtaining Documents
• Search Documents
• Document Library

Leading the World in Discovery and Innovation, STEM Talent Development and the Delivery of Benefits from Research - NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2022 - 2026

For more information about file formats used on the NSF site, please see the Plug-ins and Viewers page.

RESEARCH PAPER: Untether AI – Where Performance Intersects With Efficiency

AI is the most disruptive and transformational technology trend we have witnessed. And its unique requirements impact virtually every element of the technology stack – from silicon to compute platforms to software.

While most of the focus has been on the training aspect of AI – the shaping and modeling of datasets – inference, or what to do with trained data, is where the value of this workload is realized. The platforms that perform inference will be broadly deployed because inference happens everywhere and requires real-time responsiveness.

You can download the paper by clicking on the logo below:

Table Of Contents

• Situation Analysis
• Breaking Down AI – Training Is Temporary, Inference Lasts Forever
• The Unique Requirements Of Inference
• Purpose Built Should Be Purpose Designed
• Untether AI Delivers Inference Designed For Performance, Openness, And Efficiency
• Figure 1: Inference For Sentiment Analysis

Companies Cited

• Untether AI

Matt Kimball

• Matt Kimball https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/author/matt-kimball/ Google Introduces Axion, Its First Arm-Based, Homegrown CPU
• Matt Kimball https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/author/matt-kimball/ Oracle Launches Globally Distributed Autonomous Database
• Matt Kimball https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/author/matt-kimball/ Oracle Cloud Has Achieved Momentum Through Differentiation
• Matt Kimball https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/author/matt-kimball/ The AI Craze Is Highlighting The Cooling Crunch

Patrick Moorhead

• Patrick Moorhead https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/author/phfmphfmgmail-com/ Moor Insights & Strategy Weekly Update Ending April 26, 2024
• Patrick Moorhead https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/author/phfmphfmgmail-com/ Apple’s DoJ Lawsuit Was Inevitable And Will Change The Company Forever
• Patrick Moorhead https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/author/phfmphfmgmail-com/ Google Introduces Axion, Its First Arm-Based, Homegrown CPU
• Patrick Moorhead https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/author/phfmphfmgmail-com/ Apollo Wearable Review: Better Sleep Is Possible

Recent Posts

RESEARCH PAPER: AMD Pensando – Silicon that Supercharges the Modern Datacenter

RESEARCH PAPER: AI PC: What You Need To Know About The Future of Computing and AI

RESEARCH PAPER: Private Cellular Networks: Unlocking Value in Warehousing and Logistics

RESEARCH PAPER: Fortinet: Optimizing Business Outcomes Through Network & Security Convergence

RESEARCH PAPER: Infoblox: Unlocking The Power Of Domain Name System For Security

RESEARCH PAPER: Intel’s AI Strategy, Offerings, And Differentiation

Become an mi&s insider.

Stay up to date with tech insights and research from leading industry experts.

We work with leaders in every category

#1 ARInsights Ranking

Important Links

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Cookie Settings

Disclosures

Sustainability

Join the Conversation on Social

© 2024 Moor Insights & Strategy. All Rights Reserved.

By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies and similar tracking technologies described in our privacy policy .

Resource Library

The AAEP develops numerous resources to assist veterinarians and the broader equine industry with issues affecting the horse and connection to those with common goals.

Search & Filter

Resource Type

Audience Type

Snake Bite Vaccination Guidelines

Tetanus Vaccination Guidelines

Tetanus toxoid is a core equine vaccine and should be included in equine immunization programs for every horse annually.

Venezuelan Equine Encephalomyelitis Vaccination Guidelines

Equine Viral Arteritis (EVA) Vaccination Guidelines

Equine Influenza Vaccination Guidelines

West Nile Virus Vaccination Guidelines

• Next »

Join Us Today!

Our community of horse doctors connects you to more than 9,000 veterinarians and veterinary students who make a difference every day in horse health, just like you!

Solving your most complex planning challenges

Explore Industry Research

What do Gartner, Forrester, and IDC have in common? They all named Anaplan a planning leader.  

Your success is the heart of our success

Hear from our customers at Anaplan Connect 2024

Join us for a day of connected inspiration from your industry-leading peers who have found the answer in agile, connected enterprise planning.​

Transform how you see, plan and lead your business

Get started today.

Explore on-demand demos to discover how our modeling and planning capabilities are designed to meet the specific and unique needs of your business.

Transform how you see, plan, and lead your business

We’d love to find out how we can help you

Events, training, and content for your planning journey

Visit our blog and newsroom

Your hub for Anaplan updates, insights, perspectives, and innovations.

Powerful partnerships to drive your digital transformation and deliver game-changing strategies. 

Solutions for your business, your industry, from the world’s leading alliances.

ANALYST REPORT

The 2024 gartner® magic quadrant™ for supply chain planning solutions.

Anaplan recognized for the fourth year in a row, based on Completeness of Vision and Ability to Execute

Today's supply chain planning faces many challenges – complexities of globalization, disruptions from natural disasters, volatile demand patterns, limited visibility, inventory management dilemmas, and the integration of emerging technologies. Additionally, sustainability concerns, ethical considerations, and regulatory compliance requirements add layers of complexity. Maintaining strong supplier relationships and navigating geopolitical risks further compound these challenges. 

According to Gartner, “Supply chain planning technology is needed to facilitate responsive, agile and flexible planning that supports a company’s strategic goals.”

Read your complimentary copy of the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Supply Chain Planning Solutions today. Discover why we believe, the Anaplan Connected Planning platform can support your supply chain planning functions. Anaplan can help you shape your customer experience and demand, bring the right people and data together, and respond to change in your supply network sooner.

Gartner, Magic Quadrant for Supply Chain Planning Solutions, Pia Orup Lund, Tim Payne, Joe Graham, Caleb Thomson, Jan Snoeckx, 23 April 2024

GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally, and MAGIC QUADRANT is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates and are used herein with permission. All rights reserved.

Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

Read the Report

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

2024 National Strategy for Suicide Prevention

Suicide is an urgent and growing public health crisis. More than 49,000 people in the United States died by suicide in 2022. That’s one death every 11 minutes.

National Strategy for Suicide Prevention

The 2024 National Strategy for Suicide Prevention is a bold new 10-year, comprehensive, whole-of-society approach to suicide prevention that provides concrete recommendations for addressing gaps in the suicide prevention field. This coordinated and comprehensive approach to suicide prevention at the national, state, tribal, local, and territorial levels relies upon critical partnerships across the public and private sectors. People with lived experience are critical to the success of this work. 

 The National Strategy seeks to prevent suicide risk in the first place; identify and support people with increased risk through treatment and crisis intervention; prevent reattempts; promote long-term recovery; and support survivors of suicide loss. 

Four strategic directions guide the National Strategy:

Strategic Direction 1: Community-Based Suicide Prevention

Goal 1: Establish effective, broad-based, collaborative, and sustainable suicide prevention partnerships.

Goal 2: Support upstream comprehensive community-based suicide prevention.

Goal 3: Reduce access to lethal means among people at risk of suicide.

Goal 4: Conduct postvention and support people with suicide-centered lived experience.

Goal 5: Integrate suicide prevention into the culture of the workplace and into other community settings.

Goal 6: Build and sustain suicide prevention infrastructure at the state, tribal, local, and territorial levels.

Goal 7: Implement research-informed suicide prevention communication activities in diverse populations using best practices from communication science.

Strategic Direction 2: Treatment and Crisis Services

Goal 8: Implement effective suicide prevention services as a core component of health care.

Goal 9: Improve the quality and accessibility of crisis care services across all communities.

Strategic Direction 3: Surveillance, Quality Improvement, and Research

Goal 10: Improve the quality, timeliness, scope, usefulness, and accessibility of data needed for suicide-related surveillance, research, evaluation, and quality improvement.

Goal 11: Promote and support research on suicide prevention.

Strategic Direction 4: Health Equity in Suicide Prevention

Goal 12: Embed health equity into all comprehensive suicide prevention activities.

Goal 13: Implement comprehensive suicide prevention strategies for populations disproportionately affected by suicide, with a focus on historically marginalized communities, persons with suicide-centered lived experience, and youth.

Goal 14: Create an equitable and diverse suicide prevention workforce that is equipped and supported to address the needs of the communities they serve.

Goal 15: Improve and expand effective suicide prevention programs for populations disproportionately impacted by suicide across the life span through improved data, research, and evaluation.

Federal Action Plan

The Federal Action Plan identifies more than 200 actions across the federal government to be taken over the next three years in support of those goals. These actions include:

• Evaluating promising community-based suicide prevention strategies
• Identifying ways to address substance use/overdose and suicide risk together in the clinical setting
• Funding a mobile crisis locator for use by 988 crisis centers
• Increasing support for survivors of suicide loss and others whose lives have been impacted by suicide

These actions will be monitored and evaluated regularly to determine progress and success, and to further identify barriers to suicide prevention.

Get Involved

Join the conversation. Everyone has a role to play in preventing the tragedy of suicide. Find social media material, templates, and other resources to support and participate in the shared effort.

Read the press release

* This content is undergoing Section 508 remediation. For immediate assistance, contact [email protected] .

Asking the better questions that unlock new answers to the working world's most complex issues.

Trending topics

AI insights

EY podcasts

EY webcasts

Operations leaders

Technology leaders

Marketing and growth leaders

Cybersecurity and privacy leaders

Risk leaders

EY Center for Board Matters

EY helps clients create long-term value for all stakeholders. Enabled by data and technology, our services and solutions provide trust through assurance and help clients transform, grow and operate.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Strategy, transaction and transformation consulting

Technology transformation

Tax function operations

Climate change and sustainability services

EY Ecosystems

Supply chain and operations

EY Partner Ecosystem

Explore Services

We bring together extraordinary people, like you, to build a better working world.

Experienced professionals

MBA and advanced-degree students

Student and entry level programs

Contract workers

EY-Parthenon careers

Discover how EY insights and services are helping to reframe the future of your industry.

Case studies

Energy and resources

How data analytics can strengthen supply chain performance

13-Jul-2023 Ben Williams

How Takeda harnessed the power of the metaverse for positive human impact

26-Jun-2023 Edwina Fitzmaurice

Banking and Capital Markets

How cutting back infused higher quality in transaction monitoring

11-Jul-2023 Ron V. Giammarco

At EY, our purpose is building a better working world. The insights and services we provide help to create long-term value for clients, people and society, and to build trust in the capital markets.

EY is now carbon negative

19-Sep-2022 Carmine Di Sibio

Our commitment to audit quality

13-Nov-2023 Julie A. Boland

No results have been found

Recent Searches

BEPS 2.0: as policies evolve, engagement is key

It remains to be seen whether the US will align its tax law with the OECD/G20’s global BEPS 2.0 rules. MNEs will feel the impact in 2024. Learn more.

How GenAI strategy can transform innovation

Companies considering or investing in a transformative GenAI strategy should tie generative artificial intelligence use cases to revenue, cost and expense. Learn more

Top five private equity trends for 2024

Read about the five key trends private equity firms will emphasize in 2024 as they create value

Select your location

close expand_more

EY Survey: AI adoption among financial services leaders universal, amid mixed signals of readiness

Press contact

Multidisciplinary professional services organization

• Send e-mail to EY Americas

One in five are not confident that their organizations are well-positioned to take advantage of the potential benefits AI might bring

Ernst & Young LLP (EY US) today released its 2023 Financial Services GenAI Survey. Nearly all (99%) of the financial services leaders surveyed reported that their organizations were deploying artificial intelligence (AI) in some manner, and all respondents said they are either already using, or planning to use, generative AI (GenAI) specifically within their organization.

Amid these universal adoption plans, just over one in five respondents said they are nervous or skeptical about the potential impact of GenAI on their organization. That same percentage also does not feel confident that their organizations are well-positioned to take advantage of the potential benefits AI might bring. Insurance is ranked highest in the nervous or skeptical category (24%), while banking and capital markets leaders had the lowest levels of skepticism (17%), followed by wealth and asset management (21%).

“While there’s a whole world of possibilities and efficiencies AI can create for financial services in areas ranging from data analysis to customer service optimization, blind optimism and hype around the technology can ultimately have a counterproductive impact on a business,” says  David Kadio-Morokro , EY Americas Financial Services Innovation Leader. “We like to take an ‘innovation intelligence’ approach to putting artificial intelligence to work — planning, education and an agile test and learn strategy for implementation are imperative for those looking to make the most of AI’s potential benefits.”

AI Outlook: Optimism Now and in the Future

The majority of respondents felt positive about AI, with more than half (55%) saying they felt supportive and optimistic about using AI in their organization. The long-term sentiment is even more optimistic, with 77% of executives viewing GenAI as an overall benefit to the financial services industry in the next 5-10 years. Leaders see a particular opportunity in customer and client experience, with 87% stating that they believe AI can bring improvements to this space.

AI Implementation: It’s Time to Get Back to Basics

Taking advantage of, and deploying, GenAI is not without its hurdles. When asked about the challenges financial organizations will face in taking advantage of GenAI, leaders ranked the following as top barriers:

• 40% said lack of proper data infrastructure and 35% lack technology infrastructure
• 36% said lack of clear commitment from leadership
• 33% said unclear governance and ethical framework

“Generative AI holds the potential to revolutionize a broad array of business functions,” says  Sameer Gupta , EY Americas Financial Services Organization Advanced Analytics Leader. “With each new wave of AI and analytic innovation, it becomes increasingly clear how important it is to have a tech stack with a solid foundation. Our role is to support financial services organizations in making sure their legacy data and technologies are unimpeachable before adding AI applications on top of existing systems.”

If organizations truly want to take advantage of AI’s benefits, a major factor in their success will be a better understanding of, and improvements in, their data infrastructure. The survey reflects this, with leaders citing the following as the top three ways AI will benefit the financial services industry:

• 46% said risk reduction from data processing
• 38% said creation of new offerings and hyper-personalized marketing
• 37% said improving data management process and accuracy

Winning the (AI) Talent Battle

“Focusing on the human role of AI implementation is just as important as technology infrastructure,” says EY Americas Financial Services Accounts Managing Partner  Michael Fox . “Our data showed that 44% of leaders cited access to skilled resources as a barrier to AI implementation, but there’s only so many already skilled professionals in existence. Part of the solution is deploying upskilling programs today that can equip your current workforce with the skills they need to help leaders and their business thrive in an increasingly AI-centric world.”

Implementing AI in financial services will undoubtedly change the way sector leaders learn, serve customers, process data and manage risk. Organizations that act now with investments in training, talent and infrastructure development while putting proper governance and controls in place will reap the benefits that AI offers their industry, continue driving the business case for investment and will likely find themselves to be a step ahead of their peers.

To find out more about EY and GenAI in Financial Services, including the recently announced unifying platform that the EY organization has created to help organizations confidently adopt AI, please visit  EY.ai .

EY exists to build a better working world, helping create long-term value for clients, people and society and build trust in the capital markets.

Enabled by data and technology, diverse EY teams in over 150 countries provide trust through assurance and help clients grow, transform and operate.

Working across assurance, consulting, law, strategy, tax and transactions, EY teams ask better questions to find new answers for the complex issues facing our world today.

EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. Information about how EY collects and uses personal data and a description of the rights individuals have under data protection legislation are available via ey.com/privacy. EY member firms do not practice law where prohibited by local laws. For more information about our organization, please visit  ey.com .

Ernst & Young LLP is a client-serving member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited operating in the US.

Methodology

Wakefield Research conducted this survey between August 15–28, 2023, among 300 Executive Directors, Managing Directors or higher at financial organizations with $2b+ in revenue. Financial organizations are defined as across the banking and capital markets, insurance, and wealth and asset management industries, with 100 responses collected from each sector.

• Connect with us
• Our locations
• Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
• Legal and privacy
• Accessibility
• Open Facebook profile
• Open X profile
• Open LinkedIn profile
• Open Youtube profile

EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.